Richard B. Winston 1 and Joseph D. Ayotte 2 1 U.S. Geological Survey, MS 431 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston VA, 20192, United States of America,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ground Water Mounding & P Evaluations
Advertisements

Sustainable water supply in Swedish coastal areas – possibilities and challenges Bosse Olofsson Royal Institute of Technology, KTH NGL Annual Meeting at.
FE Review for Environmental Engineering Problems, problems, problems Presented by L.R. Chevalier, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Shakib Ahmed Earth and Environmental Sciences Boston College δD AND δ 18 O FRACTIONATION IN GROUNDWATER IN THE VICINITY OF AN ARSENIC CONTAMINATED LANDFILL.
Byram Township NJDEP Matching Grant Groundwater Assessment John Robinson, PG, CPG Hydrogeologist GeoEnvironmental Research.
Groundwater Flow Model of the Southern Willamette Valley Groundwater Management Area Jeremy Craner and Roy Haggerty Department of Geosciences.
CAN EQUIVALENT CONTINUUM MODELS SIMULATE FLOW AND POLLUTANT TRANSPORT IN FRACTURED LIMESTONE AQUIFER? EGU 2011 HS C. Masciopinto (1)
Distribution of Nitrate in Ground Water Under Three Unsewered Subdivisions Erin P. Eid Mike Trojan Jim Stockinger Jennifer Maloney Minnesota Pollution.
Identifying Sensitive Aquifers in Ohio Chris Kenah, Michael. W. Slattery, Linda. D. Slattery, and Michael Eggert Ohio EPA, Division of Drinking and Ground.
Effects of Boundary Condition on Shape of Flow Nets
The Caveat: Hydrology Complex Site specific Difficult to accurately quantify More questions than answers.
Factors that Influence the Occurrence of Nitrate in the Upper Willamette Valley Basic Groundwater Hydrology Understanding Nitrate and its Distribution.
(Z&B) Steps in Transport Modeling Calibration step (calibrate flow model & transport model) Adjust parameter values.
Water Quality Investigation of Agua Caliente Spring Martha Conklin & Roger Bales University of Arizona Background on Agua Caliente Science questions &
Vasey’s Paradise Groundwater discharges from the wall of Marble Canyon to form a series of natural springs. (Grand Canyon)
Watershed Hydrology, a Hawaiian Prospective; Groundwater Ali Fares, PhD Evaluation of Natural Resource Management, NREM 600 UHM-CTAHR-NREM.
GLY 521- Hydrogeology Modflow Packages. Block Center Flow (BCF) Package The BCF package is the central package for all solutions Specify the way each.
1 Pumping Test Analyses in an Aquifer with Fresh Water/Salt Water Interface SWIM 2008 Liliana Cecan, Gregory Nelson, Charles McLane, and Maura Metheny.
BIOPLUME II Introduction to Solution Methods and Model Mechanics.
Surface Water & Groundwater Interactions Middle Reach of Russian River
Potentiometric Surface Map - September 2007 Sources of Nitrate and Estimated Groundwater Travel Times to Springs of the Santa Fe River Basin, AMEC.
Uses of Modeling A model is designed to represent reality in such a way that the modeler can do one of several things: –Quickly estimate certain aspects.
Formation and Treatment
Determination of Ellenburger Aquifer Sustainability
Uncertainty Analysis and Model “Validation” or Confidence Building.
Characterization of the Mammoth Cave aquifer Dr Steve Worthington Worthington Groundwater.
Using Ground-Water Model Predictions and the ppr and opr Statistics to Guide Data Collection.
Management Application: Volume of Water in Storage (An Ogallala Example with Applicability to All Aquifers in Texas) Judy A. Reeves, Ph.D. Hydrogeologist,
Almost Everywhere: Naturally Occurring Arsenic in Wisconsin’s Aquifers Madeline Gotkowitz Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ground-Water Monitoring in the Lake Michigan Basin Lake Michigan Monitoring Coordinating Council.
Grid design/boundary conditions and parameter selection USGS publication (on course website): Guidelines for Evaluating Ground-Water Flow Models Scientific.
Darcy’s Law and Flow CIVE Darcy allows an estimate of: the velocity or flow rate moving within the aquifer the average time of travel from the head.
1 Factors Controlling Riffle-Scale Hyporheic Exchange Flows and Their Seasonal Changes in a Gaining Stream: A Three- Dimensional Groundwater Flow Model.
Uniondale, NY At least two UST releases MTBE mass release estimated 7,000 lb Upper Glacial; Magothy Threatened PWS deeper in Magothy IRM design In-situ.
Groundwater aquifer / aquitard water table groundwater flow
TCE and 1,2-DCE Biotransformation Inside a Biologically Active Zone Anthony W. Holder, Philip B. Bedient, and Joseph B. Hughes Environmental Science and.
The aquifer lies on top of the bedrock, and in the eastern three quarters of the area, it is deeply buried below younger fine-grained sediment. The Mahomet.
Trends in Shallow Ground-Water Quality of the Delmarva Peninsula Results from regional and local studies Linda M. Debrewer Judith M. Denver U.S. Department.
Winds Yin (2000) JAM Annual mean winds. Annual Cycle in Wind Yin (2000) JAM Annual cycle amplitude.
Central Texas Trinity Aquifer – Science and Management Marshall Jennings and Richard Earl Texas State University – San Marcos Presented at Texas Groundwater.
Darcy’s Law Philip B. Bedient Civil and Environmental Engineering Rice University.
Final Project I. Calibration Drawdown Prediction Particle Tracking
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluating uncertainty in areas contributing recharge to wells for water-quality network design.
Modeling of the Potential for Vertically Downward Saltwater Migration from a Dredge Pond Peter F. Andersen 1, Lisa M. Grogin 1, and Ronald L. Bartel 2.
Elise A. Striz, Hydrologist USEPA ORD National Risk Management Research Laboratory Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Div. Ada, OK US EPA Optimal.
HONR 297 Environmental Models
Chapter 3: Solving Equations 3.7 Percent of Change.
Argentina,
Some Observations from Using a Colloidal Borescope in Basalt Aquifers Gerry Winter.
A Saltwater Upconing Model to Evaluate Wellfield Feasibility Gregory W. Council Christopher J. Richards June 2008 Salt Water Intrusion Meeting (SWIM) Naples,
Water In what ways have you used water today? How much water is used to make a 1KG burger?
Flow to Wells - 1 Groundwater Hydraulics Daene C. McKinney.
Objective: conceptual model definition and steady state simulation of groundwater flow.
Home Water Supply Basic Facts a Homeowner Needs to Know
Groundwater Modeling Assignment #2. Parts A and B.
Groundwater Vulnerability To Contamination
Groundwater Learning objectives
Aquifers and Groundwater flow
Uses of Modeling A model is designed to represent reality in such a way that the modeler can do one of several things: Quickly estimate certain aspects.
Groundwater 08CO, p. 205.
Single vertical fractures
Review Question Consider an unconfined aquifer overlying impermeable bedrock with the following properties Porosity 27% Specific retention 12% Thickness.
Transport Modeling in Groundwater
Ch. 12: Fire! Part 2.
Gas Field Development Class Example
Conversion to Transient Particle Tracking
Chapter 5 Sources and Sinks
Transport Modeling in Groundwater
Characterization of the Mammoth Cave aquifer
Lærke Thorling and Klaus Hinsby
Presentation transcript:

Richard B. Winston 1 and Joseph D. Ayotte 2 1 U.S. Geological Survey, MS Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston VA, 20192, United States of America, 2 U.S. Geological Survey, 331 Commerce Way, Pembroke, NH 03301, United States of America

Fractured Bedrock aquifer Glacial aquifer >90 percent of all new wells drilled into the bedrock aquifer. Glacial aquifer: acidic pH, oxic 3% of wells with arsenic > 10 ug/L Fractured bedrock aquifer: alkaline pH, anoxic 20% of wells with arsenic > 10 ug/L (Ayotte et al., 2003, ES&T) Low As High As

 Identify what factors pose the greatest risks for arsenic contamination.

 Use sensitivity analysis on a series of hypothetical models to identify features that increase flow of bedrock-water into the well.  The differences in chemistry between bedrock and till were ignored. However, the acidic, oxic conditions in the till favor arsenic removal.

 Dimensions = 500x1000 ft.

Without WellWith Well

 Determine the fraction of flow into the well for each particle.  The MODFLOW Cell by Cell flow file records the amount of flow through each face of every active cell.  Calculate the fraction of flow associate with particles that have passed through bedrock.  Pathline files record the cell containing each particle at each point along the path

Model feature that was variedPercent of flow from bedrock Base case0.58 Seasonal recharge0.60 No recharge0.59 High recharge0.48 Well orientation0.58 Increased slope and recharge0.47 Decreased slope and recharge0.92 Vertical position of well shallower0.25 Vertical position of well deeper1.13 Increased bedrock hydraulic conductivity8.63 Well moved 300 ft. downslope5.97 Well moved 100 ft. upslope0.18 Well 300 ft. downslope and shallower2.73 Both aquifers isotropic6.68 Till aquifer isotropic0.24 Bedrock aquifer isotropic7.89 Length of well0.48

 Bedrock aquifer (assumed arsenic concentration = 50 μ g/L)  Till aquifer (assumed arsenic concentration = 0 μ g/L)  8.63% flow from Bedrock aquifer → Maximum possible concentration of arsenic in shallow well water ( μ g/L) = 4.32

Greatest risk factors  Natural upward flow from bedrock  High bedrock vertical hydraulic conductivity Even in the worst case simulated, the arsenic concentration is acceptable

Dimensions1000 * 500 ft. (300 x 150 m) Till Hydraulic Conductivity 2x10 -6 m/s Bedrock Hydraulic Conductivity m/s Recharge Rate0.002 ft./day (7x10 -9 m/s) Till Thickness30 ft. (9 m) Bedrock Thickness450 ft. (135 m) Cell size2 – 10 ft. (0.6 – 3.0 m) Slope0.1 Pumping Rate200 gal/day (0.75 m 3 /day)