Fatigue: Its Measurement & Applications Suresh Gulati October 9, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chap.8 Mechanical Behavior of Composite
Advertisements

2E4: SOLIDS & STRUCTURES Lecture 9
Introduction Ultimate Limit States Lead to collapse Serviceability Limit States Disrupt use of Structures but do not cause collapse Recall:
EFFECT OF DESIGN FACTORS ON THERMAL FATIGUE CRACKING OF DIE CASTING DIES John F. Wallace David Schwam Sebastian Birceanu Case Western Reserve University.
Hardened Concrete Properties u Strength u compressive strength psi u tensile strength psi u flexural strength u compression >> tension.
Cracking, Deflections and Ductility Code Provisions and Recent Research October 2006 Serviceability and Ductility The Other Limit States.
An Experimental Study and Fatigue Damage Model for Fretting Fatigue
High Temperature Composites Rutgers University Federal Aviation Administration Advanced Materials Flammability Atlantic City, NJ October 24, 2001.
Distribution of Microcracks in Rocks Uniform As in igneous rocks where microcrack density is not related to local structures but rather to a pervasive.
SILICATES FOR GROUND CONSOLIDATION Silicate based grouts usually contain three main components: Sodium silicate Hardener or reagent Water.
Model: 3D Piston. Diesel Engine Piston Studies the deformation and distribution of stresses in a suggested design at steady-state conditions Applied piston.
Japan-US Workshop held at San Diego on April 6-7, 2002 How can we keep structural integrity of the first wall having micro cracks? R. Kurihara JAERI-Naka.
Design of an Aerospace Component
7. Fatigue Fracture Fracture surface of a bicycle spoke made of 7075-T6 aluminum alloy 25 × magnification 100 × magnification.
CHAPTER 9: MECHANICAL FAILURE
Lecture #19 Failure & Fracture
Fatigue Failure Through Bending David Burnette ME 498.
Chapter 5 – Design for Different Types of Loading
EBB 220/3 PRINCIPLE OF VISCO-ELASTICITY
Lab 6B -Fracture Toughness and Fracture Toughness-limited Design Big bang for the buck!
Thermal Strains and Element of the Theory of Plasticity
Uncertainties in Thermal Barrier Coating Life Prediction by Karl A. Mentz A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Lecture on CE 4014 Design of Concrete Structures
Critical Plane Approach in Stage I and Stage II of Fatigue Under Multiaxial Loading A. KAROLCZUK E. MACHA Opole University of Technology, Department of.
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
Applications and Processing of Ceramics
Predicting the Reliability of Ceramics Under Transient Loads and Temperatures With CARES/Life Noel N. Nemeth Osama M. Jadaan Tamas Palfi Eric H. Baker.
High strength materials are being increasingly used in designing critical components to save weight or meet difficult service conditions. Unfortunately.
Fatigue life estimation from bi-modal and tri-modal PSDs Frank Sherratt.
Fatigue Fatigue is the lowering of strength or the failure of a material due to repetitive stress, which may be above or below the yield strength. Many.
Design of Concrete Structure I Dr. Ali Tayeh First Semester 2009 Dr. Ali Tayeh First Semester 2009.
Design Stress & Fatigue
FATIGUE Fatigue of Materials (Cambridge Solid State Science Series) S. Suresh Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
Week 4 Fracture, Toughness, Fatigue, and Creep
Introduction Ceramic materials can easily exhibit complex behavior that is both inherently time- dependent and hereditary in the sense that current behavior.
FATIGUE Fatigue of Materials (Cambridge Solid State Science Series) S. Suresh Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998) MATERIALS SCIENCE &ENGINEERING.
Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila Lecture No. (4&5)
Jiangyu Li, University of Washington Yielding and Failure Criteria Plasticity Fracture Fatigue Jiangyu Li University of Washington Mechanics of Materials.
The tungsten/F82H sample was impinged at 6 different locations with 6 different laser fluence energies to determine the critical energy that would result.
Yield point and yield stress or strength,  y Offset method finds this yield stress by assuming a 0.2 % strain (.002).002 Big yielding region, large elongation.
DER Program Weibull Strength Parameter Requirements for Si 3 N 4 Turbine Rotor Reliability Steve Duffy & Eric Baker Connecticut Reserve Technologies, LLC.
Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering West Virginia University Statistics of Brittle Fracture.
Exam 2 Grade Distribution. Stress-strain behavior (Room T): Ideal vs Real Materials TS
M.Nuzaihan DMT 243 – Chapter 5 Fundamental Design For Reliability What is Design for Reliability, Microsystems Failure & Failure Mechanisms, Fundamental.
Opti 523 Wenrui Cai. Tensile stress will occur just outside the contact area and will form cracks into subsurface of the glass. If damage does occur,
Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran A Probabilistic Approach To Modeling Fatigue.
Fatigue 7-1. Fatigue of Metals Metals often fail at much lower stress at cyclic loading compared to static loading. Crack nucleates at region of stress.
Week 4 Fracture, Toughness, Fatigue, and Creep
7. Ceramic Matrix Composites Ceramic matrials strenth, stiffness temperature chemical inertness low density sensitive flaw thermal shock Ceramic matrix.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy SNS mercury target fatigue life prediction with Fe-Safe/Verity High Power Targetry Workshop.
Date of download: 6/2/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Slow Crack Growth of a Pyroceram Glass Ceramic Under Static Fatigue Loading—Commonality.
ISSUES TO ADDRESS... How do flaws in a material initiate failure? How is fracture resistance quantified; how do different material classes compare? How.
TS Cool Down Studies TSu Unit Coils (24-25) N. Dhanaraj and E. Voirin Tuesday, 10 March 2015 Reference: Docdb No:
Hardened Concrete Properties
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
MIT Amorphous Materials 8: Mechanical Properties
Dynamic Property Models
Comparing Rolling to Journal
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Introduction We select materials for many components and applications by matching the properties of the material to the service condition required of the.
Hardened Concrete Properties
Temperature and Rate The rates of most chemical reactions increase with temperature. How is this temperature dependence reflected in the rate expression?
Transforming to Linearity
( BDA 3033 ) CHAPTER 6 Theories of Elastic Failures
( BDA 3033 ) CHAPTER 6 Theories of Elastic Failures
Mechanical Properties: 2
Mechanical Properties: 1
FATIGUE FATIGUE Dr. Mohammed Abdulrazzaq
Lab8: Fatigue Testing Machine
The effect of steel platens of testing machine in uniaxial loading
Presentation transcript:

Fatigue: Its Measurement & Applications Suresh Gulati October 9, 2006

Definition Materials, when stressed above threshold level, experience flaw growth and become weak, i.e. less durable. This phenomenon is called FATIGUE.

Types of Stress Constant Stress (static fatigue) Constant Stress Rate (dynamic fatigue) Cyclic Stress (cyclic/dynamic fatigue)

Fatigue Mechanism Summary SiO 2 + H 2 O + Stress Si (OH) 4 Hence, stress becomes the catalyst, i.e. no stress, no fatigue ! Strong oxide bonds become weak hydroxyl bonds !!

Necessary Elements for Fatigue 1.Stress 2.Flaw 3.Water Vapor 4.Time

Role of Water Vapor Small molecule (< 3 A o ) Easily fits the cavity of 6-member SiO 2 tetrahedra Need only few molecules of H 2 O Hence fatigue can occur at low RH Higher the humidity, higher the fatigue No fatigue in vacuum

Role of Stress Stress is the catalyst Higher the stress, higher the fatigue

Role of Temperature Vibrational energy of H 2 O molecule vs. T Chemical reaction of SiO 2 with H 2 O vs. T Vibrational energy of glass forming oxides,SiO 2, Na 2 O, CaO, B 2 O 3, etc. vs. T Fatigue vs. Coeff. Thermal Expansion Fatigue at subzero temperature

Role of Stress Duration (SiO 2 + H 2 O + stress) reaction requires time Short duration of time means less fatigue Long duration of stress means more fatigue

Measurement of Strength 4-point Bend Test (uniaxial) Tensile Test(uniaxial) Ring-on-Ring Test (biaxial) ASTM Standard Test Duration Test Environment

St. Venant Flexure M/I = E/R =  /y MOR =  f = 1.5 P (L – l ) / (b t 2 ) P = load at failure L = support span l = load span b = width of specimen t = thickness of specimen

Strength Distribution Gaussian Weibull P f = 1 – exp [ - (  /  o ) m ] P f : failure probability at stress   o : stress at P f = 0.63 m : slope of (lnlnP f vs. ln  )

Weibull Distribution Unimodal (single value of m, i.e. uniform flaw) Multimodal (multiple values of m, i.e. multiple families of flaw) Physical meaning of m: approx.(mean  f / std.dev) Fatigue is difficult to measure for multiple families of flaw

Measurement of Dynamic Fatigue d  /dt (MPa/s) N   (MPa) mt (s)

Weibull Distribution Plot Weibullized Eagle SG dynamic fatigue at each rate, fastest rate (#1) has the strongest distribution.

Computation of Fatigue Constant Let   = median strength at (d  /dt) 1 Let    = median strength at (d  /dt) 2 Then  1 /  2 = [ (d  /dt) 1 / (d  /dt) 2 ] 1/(n + 1)

ln  vs. ln (d  dt) Plot 1 n+1

Dynamic Fatigue Constants for Silicate Glasses (ambient environment) Glass CodeCompositionAvg. n Value CTE (25-300C) 9061CTV Panel SLS Pyrex Color Filter LCD SAS FS ULE450.3

Plot of n vs. CTE

Physical Meaning of n n Value Strength loss due to 10X lower (d  / dt) % % % % % %

Measurement of Static fatigue Apply static (constant) stress  to 4-point bend specimen and measure time t f till it fails Plot ln  vs. t f Estimate n value from  1 n t f1 =  2 n t f2 n = [ (ln t f2 – ln t f1 ) / (ln  1 – ln  2 ) ]

Plot of ln  vs. ln t f ** * *** * *** *** ln (time) ln(stress) * * ** 1/n 1

Comparison of Static vs. Dynamic n Values Dynamic n > Static n Code 9061 glass: n d = 22, n s = 14 CO diesel filter: n d = 30, n s = 15

Allowance for Fatigue Damage ( LD Diesel Filter ) Recall  n t f = constant New Filter:  1 =  o, t f = t o = 1 sec. AT Filter for LDD application: n = 70, Life = 200,000 Km Regen. Freq’y: 300 Km  max Duration: 75 sec. each regen. Find fatigue factor & usable strength

LD Diesel Filter (cont’d) Total regens = 200,000 Km / 300 KM = 667 Total stress duration = 667 x 75 s = 50,000 s. Useable strength =  2 as shown below  2 n x 50,000 =  1 n x 1  2 =  1 [ 1 / 50,000 ] 1/n = 0.86  1 = 0.86  o Fatigue Factor = 0.86

Allowance for Fatigue Damage ( HD Diesel Filter ) CO Filter for HDD application n =30, Life = 700,000 Km Regen. Freq’y = 400 Km  max Duration = 100 s Total Regens = 1750 Total Stress Duration = 175,000 s  2 = [ 1/175,000 ] 1/30 = 0.67  o Fatigue Factor = 0.67

Allowance for Stressed Area ( HD Diesel Filter ) Assume 9” diameter x 12” long filter Assume m = 15 Area Factor = [ A spec / A filter ] 1/m A spec = 0.75” x 1” = 0.75 in 2 A filter = 3.14 x D x L = 113 in 2 Area Factor = 0.72

Allowance for Acceptable P f ( HD Diesel Filter ) Failure Probability Factor = ( P f ) 1/m, m = 15 FPF = 0.54for P f = (0.01 % fail) FPF = 0.46 for P f = (0.001% fail)

Final Useable Strength of CO Filter for HD Diesel Filter Useable Strength =  o x FF x AF x FPF = 0.26  o for P f = 0.01% = 0.22  o for P f =0.001%

Threshold Stress (fatigue free stress) At certain value of stress, known as threshold stress, the critical flaw does not propagate Materials can sustain threshold stress without becoming weak, hence we may call that “happy stress”

Static Fatigue Test for Estimating Threshold Stress Use 4-point bend test at 400C Measure MOR of 15 specimens Assume n =n dyn and estimate allowable stress (  eas ) for 9 x 12 filter at P f = 0.001% Apply static stress =  eas on 15 specimens =  eas + 50 psi on 15 specimens =  eas + 75 psi on 15 specimens Hold above static stresses for 100 hours at 400C Record any premature failures Remove stress Measure MOR of surviving specimens for each set Compare MOR distributions before and after static stress Expect max. loss of strength at highest static stress and none at  eas

Static Fatigue Fixture with Multiple Specimens

Static Fatigue Fixture in 400C Oven

Comparison of Strength Distributions after Static Load Test CO-E1(axial) Static Load then Residual MOR at 400 o C

Strength Data for CO 200/12 Baseline:353 psi(  s = 0 ) MOR res :296 psi (  s = 150 psi ) MOR res :243 psi(  s = 175 psi ) MOR res :187 psi (  s = 200 psi )

Crack Growth during Static Loading a r / a i = [ MOR i / MOR res ] 2 a r / a i = 150 psi = 175 psi = 200 psi Estimated n value: ~15

Static vs. Dynamic n Values Static value is lower than dynamic value due to longer time for stress corrosion reaction in humid environment Which n value should be used? This will depend on stress/time history for a given application

Applications of Fatigue Effect Color TV Panel Space Shuttle Windows Fiber Optics Catalytic Converters Diesel Filters LCD Panel

Acknowledgements John Helfinstine Janto Widjaja