Using the PARCC Rubrics to Analyze Student Writing College Career Ready Conference 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
Advertisements

New Approach to Designing Performance Level Descriptors: PARCC ELA/Literacy Summative Assessment.
Performance Tasks for English Language Arts
Madison School District Governing Board Meeting March 19, 2013.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
EXTENDED ESSAY, CONTINUED Assessment Criteria and Subject Areas.
A Look at the Future of Assessments - ELA Ron Bauman · January 29, 2014.
Writing B. Finco. A little light reading! B. Finco.
Writing Rubrics for the PARCC Assessment
TUSD Scoring Extended Writing Using the PARCC Rubric as Framework September 2014.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Science Research Simulation Task Science High School Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching and Learning.
Writing Rubrics for the PARCC Assessment
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
 Sticky Note Chart paper  Markers, Glitter markers, highlighters  Ream of Paper  Video (Individual) Handout 1- The Standards (Class Sets) Handout 2-
Instructional Implications for PARCC Assessment in the Science and Social Studies Classroom Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers PARCC 1.
PARCC ELA Evidence Tables September 25, Today’s Outcomes Identify how Evidence-Centered Design informs the PARCC Summative Assessment. Identify.
Secondary PARCC Tests Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Foreign language and English as a Second Language: Getting to the Common Core of Communication. Are we there yet? Marisol Marcin
SMARTER BALANCED QUESTION TYPES OVERVIEW TEXT TXT EXT Assess a broad range of content. Scoring is objective, fast, and inexpensive to score. Difficult.
PERFORMANCE TASKS. INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE Students create products or perform tasks to show their mastery of a particular skill Students select a response.
Educator’s Guide Using Instructables With Your Students.
Welcome to Implementing the Common Core State Standards
Unit 1 Learning Objectives Experience a science lesson that integrates CA CCSS speaking/listening, writing and reading with science content Identify Literacy.
Anne Zeman, Ed.D., Director, Curriculum/Professional Learning Don Azevada, Program Specialist, History/Social Science Ray Pietersen, Program Specialist,
1 Summer 2012 Educator Effectiveness Academies English Language Arts Transitioning to the CCSS by Making Strategic and Informed Choices in the Classroom.
How do we evaluate the quality of existing and newly created text-based lessons and units of study???? Please refer to the Tri-State Review Rubric for.
Overview Dr. Karen Russo 1 As of October 1, 2014.
Aligning Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessments
A transitional approach. REPORT CARDS PHONE CALLS TO PARENTS S PARENT-TEACHER CONFERENCES STUDENT-TEACHER CONFERENCES EVALUATED STUDENT WORK STANDARDIZED.
CTE Literacy Support Session 3 Using Templates for Scaffolding Student Writing Feedback and evaluation of student writing.
Maryland Assessment Group Conference Wednesday, October 22, 2014.
Presented by: Devonna Abner Kelly Philbeck. Step 1: Determine needs Step 2: Create specific learning goals based on pre- assessment Step 3: Create and.
10/11/2015MSDE1 PARCC Assessment Update PARCC Assessment Update Day 3, Session 4.
Session 2: Informational Text Audience: 6-12 ELA Teachers.
Understanding PARCC and Disciplinary Literacy November
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/ Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
Common Core. What is Common Core? Common Core is a set of standards (what is taught) that has been adopted by 46 states in math and language arts and.
ELA Educator Effectiveness Academy.Summer 2011.© Maryland State Department of Education Educator Effectiveness Academy English Language Arts & Literacy.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Let’s explore the Common Core and take a walk in the PARCC! Presented by: Principal Gary C. Breen Math Teacher Julie Balkenhol Reading Specialist Janet.
Examining the Modules: Instructional Practices related to Finding and Using Evidence LT 2a. I can describe the impact of content-rich curriculum on students’
English Language Arts/Literacy Louisiana Textbook Adoption Publisher’s Orientation March 1, 2012.
Work Sample Seminar1 Developing a Pretest & Posttest for the Literacy Work Sample Portland State University.
FACILITATOR SARA OVERBY COORDINATING TEACHER FOR SECONDARY LITERACY Performance Tasks: An Integrated.
© 2015 The College Board The Redesigned SAT/PSAT Key Changes.
Putting the Pieces Together
College Career Ready Conference Today we will:  Unpack the PARCC Narrative and Analytical writing rubrics while comparing them to the standards.
College and Career Ready Conference  Participants will be able to:  Review the design of the PARCC assessments.  Analyze the Literary Analysis.
EXAMINING THE MODULES: Instructional practices related to finding and using evidence LT 2a. I can describe the impact of content-rich curriculum on students’
GCSE English Language 8700 GCSE English Literature 8702 A two year course focused on the development of skills in reading, writing and speaking and listening.
Rhode Island Department of Education Diane Girard & Colleen O’Brien.
Thomas Suarez TED Talk. Mathematics Performance Task Planting Tulips 1.Classroom Activity 2.Student Task 3.Task Specifications 4.Scoring Rubric Smarter.
Implementing the Common Core State Standards Monday, January 23rd - 4pm EST Deconstructing the Common Core Standards: Analyzing for Content, Level of Cognition.
College Career Ready Conference Participants will  Review components of the Grade 3 and the Grades 4 and 5 Condensed Scoring Rubric for Prose Constructed.
Writing CCSS: English Language Arts. Objectives  Become familiar with format and content of Common Core writing standards  Review writing samples for.
Understanding the PARCC Prepared for Hillcrest School February 11, 2015.
Cracking the Code to the Performance Based Assessment (PBA) PARCC.
Writing – CCSS Style AACRC – October 29, Prior Knowledge 1.I don’t know anything about the ELA CCSS 2.I have some familiarity with the ELA CCSS.
+ PARCC Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Happy Wednesday! Please take a highlighter from the table. Please get out your bias test from yesterday. You will need a clean sheet of paper. You should.
GENERATION Z THE 8 SECOND GENERATION. THIS GROUP OF JUNIORS HAVE NEVER TAKEN THE TAKS TEST TOOK EOC ENGLISH I ENGLISH II ALGEBRA 1 BIOLOGY 1 WILL TAKE.
California Common Core Standards Session 2 of 5: English Language Arts SOAR WITH THE COMMON CORE.
Instructional Implications for PARCC Assessment in the Science and Social Studies Classroom Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
“Unpacking” our modules-building modules that meet LDC criteria
GED Writing: Extended Response
Testing Schedule.
Presentation transcript:

Using the PARCC Rubrics to Analyze Student Writing College Career Ready Conference 2015

 Identify the rubric that will be used to evaluate each type of writing students produce on the PARCC Performance-Based Assessment  Analyze the dimensions of each rubric and determine how they will be applied at each grade level  Apply the rubrics to student writing samples  Uncover ways in which teachers can use these rubrics in the classroom to promote student achievement

 Then, find a photo on your mobile device, share it with your group, and briefly explain the anecdote behind it.  Please introduce yourself to your table group and share a few “vital statistics” (name, position, school/county, familiarity with PARCC rubrics).

The writing rubrics for the PARCC assessment were created to score on-demand “summative, final prose constructed response items. Research… suggests that it would be unwise and counterproductive to expect students to use these rubrics as ‘checklists’ to produce writing.” (PARCC) Remember:PARCC  These rubrics are holistic.  These rubrics are not grade specific.

Students will write three responses as part of the ELA/Literacy Performance-Based Assessment (PBA):  Literary Analysis Task  Research Simulation Task  Narrative Task

The Literary Analysis Task and the Research Simulation Task will be a combination of:  Informative Writing  Argumentative Writing Students may write one of each, or two informative pieces. It is unlikely that they will write two argumentative pieces.

At the Middle School level, there are two rubrics:  Grades 6-11 Research Simulation Task (RST) and Literary Analysis Task (LAT)  Grades 6-11 Narrative Task (NT) Access rubrics electronically at

Let’s take a closer look at the RST and LAT Rubric…

 Reading: Comprehension of Key Ideas and Details  Writing: Written Expression  Writing: Knowledge of Language and Conventions

What are the key ideas for receiving a Score Point 4?

Remember, these rubrics are not grade specific. Consider the grade-specific standards. What criteria within the Score Point 4 will vary based on grade level?

Grade 6: Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. Grade 7: Cite several pieces of textual evidence to support analysis... Grade 8: Cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports analysis...

Where do we find the grade-specific expectations for textual analysis? See Reading grade-level standards 2-9 for specific expectations.

What are the keys for receiving a Score Point 4?

Remember, these rubrics are not grade specific. Consider the grade- specific standards.  In your table groups, determine the criteria within the Score Point 4 that will vary based on grade level.  In what standards can you find the grade- specific expectations? The student response  addresses the prompt and provides effective and comprehensive development of the claim or topic that is consistently appropriate to the task by using clear and convincing reasoning supported by relevant textual evidence;  demonstrates purposeful coherence, clarity, and cohesion, making it easy to follow the writer’s progression of ideas;  establishes and maintains an effective style, attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline. Score Point 4 W1, W2 R1 W1, W2 L3 L1, L2

Note that Score Points range from 0-3 for this dimension instead of 0-4. What are the keys for receiving a Score Point 3? Note: There will be errors in student writing. The key is whether or not these errors impact meaning.

Remember, these rubrics are not grade specific. Consider the grade-specific standards.  What criteria within the Score Point 3 will vary based on grade level?  In what standards can you find the grade-specific expectations? L1, L2, L3

Students will receive a score for each dimension, such as 4, 4, 3.

What are the implications of a holistic rubric that spans grades 6-11?

Your group has 4 examples of student writing in response to a single task. Independently (15 minutes)  Read the texts and the task.  Use the PARCC rubric to evaluate student responses (whole-number scores only for each of the three dimensions). Note your rationale. As a Group (10 minutes)  Share the scores you gave each response. Discuss and COME TO A CONSENSUS for each dimension.

As a group, discuss successes and challenges you faced while applying the PARCC rubric to the student writing samples.

Take a close look at the Narrative Task Rubric. Identify ways in which it is the same and different from the RST/LAT Rubric.

 Narrative Writing will not receive a separate score for Reading Comprehension.  “The narrative criteria for Written Expression was separated so that both teachers and scorers can easily apply the correct criteria.” (PARCC ELA/Literacy Rubrics: Updated and Refined)PARCC ELA/Literacy Rubrics: Updated and Refined  The Language and Conventions construct is identical to that on the RST & LAT Rubric.

RST/LAT The student response  addresses the prompt and provides effective and comprehensive development of the claim or topic that is consistently appropriate to the task by using clear and convincing reasoning supported by relevant textual evidence; NT The student response  is effectively developed with narrative elements and is consistently appropriate to the task;

As a group, discuss how teachers might use the PARCC ELA/Literacy rubrics in the classroom.

 Use to score final written essays  Use to pull together student models of excellence  Use to guide discussion with student(s) about how to better meet criteria  Use in conjunction with PARCC’s released sample tasks to understand rigor of expected student work  Use language from one dimension of rubric to exemplify criteria for mastery of a skill  Use language from rubrics to create classroom rubrics or other formative assessment tools that are aligned with the standards

Three Things You Learned… Two Things You Will Put into Action/Practice… One Thing You Will Explore Further…

Common Core Website PARCC Website (Link to Rubrics: MSDE Website (Username: MSDEguest; Password: MSDEguest) Achieve the Core (Link to Writing Samples: From Comprehension to Conventions (Session Resources) ASCD Article Using Rubrics to Promote Thinking and Learning