Review Group 221: Security provision timing options and other supporting info.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Executive Pension Plan
Advertisements

UK Gas Entry Regime – Review of existing Interruptible Arrangements & Potential Reforms for this Winter.
Energy Balancing Credit Proposal MOD 315 Energy Balancing Credit Proposal MOD 315 To Enhance Section X of the UNC Transportation Principal Document to.
Carl Johnson Financial Literacy Jenks High School Preparing for a Savings or Investment Program.
Bid Bonds 23 January What is a Bid Bond? Stepping stone to full performance bond (or letters of credit). Value is based on cost of running the.
Nabil dmaidi1 Miller Act H Enacted in 1935 H Federal Contracts over $25,000 H Contractor shall provide Bonds H Performance Bonds in the amount to protect.
Orion Karl Daley August – 2009
The Options Institute Chicago Board Options Exchange 1 Proactively Manage Risk and Generate Income with Options Presentation for FPA of Philadelphia May.
1 Chapter 15 Options 2 Learning Objectives & Agenda  Understand what are call and put options.  Understand what are options contracts and how they.
Mortgageguidelines.net Mortgage Guide. mortgageguidelines.net What is a mortgage? A mortgage refers to a loan that you take out to finance a property.
Lora Carney Section 8 Support Programming Liaison Ext. 1229
Long Term Entry Capacity & User Commitment Transmission Workstream 7 th August 2008.
May 3, We Are All In!  We are stepping out in faith  There is a plan to obtain needed funding  There will be no “part way”  The final timeframe.
Insurance provisions under JCT 1998 and JCT Standard Building Contract 2005 Brian Lewis – QBE CAR.
1 Chapter 5 Adjustable Rate Mortgages. 2 Overview Adjustable Rate Mortgages and Lender Considerations Interest Rate Risk of Constant Payment Mortgages.
The economic regulation of gas processing services Key issues and initial thoughts Ofgem presentation 18 June 2007.
Innovation in Life Insurance! Life & Accident Assurance Co. Life & Accident Assurance Co. Vernon U. Lawrence Vernon U. Lawrence.
A Reliance Capital company Strictly For Internal Communication Only Reliance Super InvestAssure Plan June 3 rd, 2008 Get More Than You Can Ask For!
3 rd 9 Weeks Benchmark Review Career Preparedness.
The Treatment of “Spare / Sterilised” Capacity – follow up Draft for discussion purposes only.
Renovation Financing Presented By: Kim Renock, CMB, CRO.
Long Term Entry Capacity & User Commitment Review Group th September 2008.
GRI NW Investment Workshop Chris Logue, European Policy Manager, 4 th June 2010 The Hague.
Cotton / Rice Risk Management & Marketing Strategies Carl Anderson Texas A&M University.
Transfer & Trades Special Transmission Workstream
Momentum Protected Index Plan (Momentum PIP) - 100% Option
Review Group 0221 Session 4: 28 th October Introduction  Agenda item 4.1 Focus Session: “Who/What capacity holders should be captured by these.
Auctions recommendations GTE+ Capacity Product Coordination (CPC) Workshop on 26 November 2008 Matthew Hatch National Grid.
Mod 116B Steve Rose - on behalf of RWE Trading. 2 Background Mod 116 B was raised after discussion with a number of shippers about aspects Mod 116 which.
The Work Programme Aims of the Workshop: To provide a general overview of the Work Programme, what it sets out to achieve and who will be responsible for.
Modification Proposal 0246: Quarterly NTS Entry Capacity User Commitment Chris Shanley.
Classification: Statoil Internal Status: Draft Mod 156/156a Questions regarding the proposals…
Review Group Modification Proposal Introduction of Enduring NTS Exit Capacity Arrangements.
MIG TF Voting Items Market Participant Notification Period (Transmission outage) – =1 Year Interconnection Date for Protocol Considerations – First Interconnection.
Introduction The following chapter will review: –Overview –Model assumptions –The Cost Proposal & Evaluation –Payments methodology –Financial Incentives/Disincentives.
Review Group 221 Session 3: 13 October Introduction  During this presentation we will seek views on the following questions.  What should the.
Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.
BIG pension plan change coming Effective January 1, 2014.
Review Group 221: Option 3 – security provided after allocation.
Review of Entry Capacity and the Appropriate Allocation of Financial Risk Review Group th Sept 2008.
Savings. Pay yourself first Next, pay your expenses leftover money is called discretionary income.
Entry Capacity Substitution Workshop 3 11 th June 2008 Substitution Example.
Retail Market Subcommittee Visibility into OGRR219.
Entry Capacity Trading Transmission Work Stream, 5 April 2007.
Chapter 5 The Banking System. Slide 2 What Is the Purpose of Savings? A savings account is a demand deposit account for the accumulation of money. It.
Review Group 221: 23 January Analysis of the impacts of the proposal on Users.
Entry Capacity Substitution Workshop 4 9 th July 2008 Entry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement: Discussion Paper.
Facilitating Release of Non-obligated Entry Capacity Draft – for discussion purposes only 22 November 2007.
DRSEC Update Transmission Workstream 06 November 2008.
Completing Jobs Early ENGINUITY TUTORIAL Copyright Virtual Management Simulations.
Mod Entry Capacity Transfers Transmission Work Stream, 5 April 2007.
Calculating CRR Auction Portfolio Exposure:
Exit Capacity User Commitment – Transmission Workstream update
ENHANCED FAMILY INCOME PROTECTION PLAN
Retirement Plans and Mutual Funds
Removal of a Users ability to allow Quarterly NTS Entry Capacity to lapse Chris Shanley.
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
Capacity Methodology Statements: Impact of Mod 452
Transmission Workgroup June 7th 2012
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
Development of Entry Capacity Substitution
Transmission Workstream – 6th July 2005
System calls….. C-program->POSIX call
IECR Incremental Step Size
Review Group 221: Review of Questions from Session 2
Review Group Action November 2008.
Entry Capacity Transfers - Constrained Period
Interconnector trading in SEM 7th June 2007
and Forecasting Resources
Aim of presentation CBSC was tasked to propose to the Council via IRCC to provide information on the minimum resources needed to support a sustainable.
Presentation transcript:

Review Group 221: Security provision timing options and other supporting info

2 Security Provision Timing Options

3 Option 1 - Security put in place pre auction Option 1 - Security put in place pre auction.  Security based on estimate of the Allocated Capacity Value (ACV)  Security required 1 month prior to the QSEC auction bid window starting but Users can top up security prior to the allocation process starting.. ProsCons Ensures Users do not participate in the auction without security/commitment being in place Requires User to estimate security required, which could lead to errors if bidding strategy is changed/flawed. Ensures security is in place for all capacity holdings protecting community from the full impact of a User default. Above could lead to Users providing head room/more security than required, increasing operating costs Limited impact on current auction process and no need to re-run auction Possible barrier to entry due to project sanctioning issues Provides flexibility – Users are able to top up security

4 Option 2 - Security provided prior to allocation process starting  Option 2 - security provided prior to allocation process starting.  Existing 60 day allocation window would be extended to [75 days] to allow the User to provide their security within 15 days of the auction bids being processed/prior to the allocation process commencing.  All new capacity bids will be removed if insufficient security is in place prior to the allocation process commencing. ProsCons Allows User to provide security to match his allocated capacity holding, reducing operating costs Requires extension of allocation window. Ensures security is in place for all capacity holdings protecting community from the full impact of a User default. Potential minor impact on the timing of other capacity auctions/processes. No need to re-run auction

5 Option 4 - Hybrid of option 1 & 2. Hybrid Option 1 & 2 - Security (minimum %) or bid bond (fixed deposit for all) put in place pre auction but Users allowed to top up prior to allocation  Security/bid bond required 1 month prior to the QSEC auction bid window starting but Users can provide their overall security within 15 days of the auction bids being processed/prior to the allocation process commencing. ProsCons Ensures Users do not participate in the auction without some security/commitment being in place. May requires User to still estimate security required (if amount depends on a % of security). Ensures security is in place for all capacity holdings, protecting community from the full impact of a User default. Requires extension of allocation window. Provides flexibility – Users are able to top up security to exact amount required.

6 Option 3 – security provided after allocation Option 3 Security is provided within one month of the allocation process taking place.  User provides their security within [30] days of the allocation process finishing. ProsCons This option has the benefit of the User knowing exactly what security is required. User may fail to provide the security and the auction may need to be re-run.. Allows for sufficient time for the security to be put in place. Re-running an auction would affect other QSEC auction participants, incur costs, impact on investment lead times and may impact on the timing of other capacity auctions/processes.

7 Option 5 - Hybrid of options 1 & 3 Option 5 - Hybrid of option 1 & 3 - Security (minimum %) or bid bond (fixed deposit for all) put in place pre auction but Users allowed to top up prior to allocation  Some security/bid bond required 1 month prior to the QSEC auction bid window starting but Users can provide their security within 30 days of the allocation process finishing ProsCons Ensures Users do not participate in the auction without some security/commitment being in place. May require User to still estimate security required. Security in place is lower and will not protect community from the impact of a User default. User may fail to provide all the security and the auction may need to be re-run. Provides flexibility – Users are able to top up security to exact amount required. Re-running an auction would affect other QSEC auction participants, incur costs, impact on investment lead times and may impact on the timing of other capacity auctions/processes. However amount obtained may be sufficient to cover the costs of re-running the auction.

8 Security Required Note: overall amount of security is lower than previously reported due to changes to UPR and progress of projects affected

9 Bid bond level Security to be provided (range)Number of Users Over £1m20 £0.5m to £1m4 £0.2m to £0.5m6 £0.1m to £0.2m4 £0.05m to £0.1m3 £0 to £0.054 £011 Large User level? Small User level?