Critical Conditions Review Jeff Borski │ Water Quality Assessment Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Applying Conditional Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen Season Flow Applied to classified and unclassified streams found in Appendix A and D of the Water Quality.
Advertisements

Laurie Eng Water Quality Standards Group Jill Csekitz Surface Water Quality Monitoring Team Guidance Advisory Workgroup Meeting June 16, 2011.
Buffers and Special Water Quality Protections
Whole Effluent Toxicity NPDES Program
The Barton Springs Part of the Edwards Aquifer: Basic physical and hydrologic characteristics pertinent to permitted discharges Raymond Slade, Jr, Certified.
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing Water Quality Standards Workgroup Meeting June 26, 2007.
Low Flow Calculations In NPDES permits the permitted industry or municipality must meet certain requirements with regards to the toxicity of their effluent.
Jennie Henthorn Henthorn Environmental Services LLC.
1 Mixing Zones, Reasonable Potential Analysis, and Permit Limits A Quick Overview Steve Schnurbusch Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
Presentation Texas Water: What You Should Know November 6, 2010.
©Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C. Presented by: LAUREN KALISEK (512) Congress Avenue Suite 1900 Austin, Texas.
The Entergy facility is a boiling water reactor with a rated core thermal power level of 1912 MW, providing a gross electrical output of 620 MW. The facility.
Water Quality Standards and MS4 Storm Water Permitting.
James Beckley. Virginia and DEQ Virginia has > 52,255 miles of rivers and streams 116,364 acres of significant lakes and reservoirs 2,684 square miles.
Critical Conditions Review
An Introduction To The Use Of Modeling of Surface Waters For TPDES Permits Mark A. Rudolph, P.E. WQ Modeler, TCEQ WQ Division.
Design Flow Analysis Project Phase One:Low-Flow Analysis Case Study This analysis was done by EPA summer intern Graham Jonaitis in 2002.
Paonia/Collbran Low Flow Presentation Water Quality Work Group Meeting June 9, 2004.
Water Cycle - Running Water
WQBELs Karen Holligan May 6, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
Implementation of Antidegradation Policies for Indiana Waters.
Georgia Tech What is Dilution?? Ocean Plan (2001) p. 15: INITIAL DILUTION is the process which results in the rapid and irreversible turbulent mixing of.
Lower Saluda River Instream Flow Study TWC Study Team Workshop December 11, 2007.
Surface Water Standards Triennial Review and Implementation Connie Brower Nikki Remington-Julie Grzyb-Sandra Moore NC Division of Water Quality.
Implementation Procedures (IPs) Brittany Lee Standards Implementation Team
Paul Novak, Ohio EPA. Committee Meetings/Agenda  March call of full committee  April meeting with IDEM, OEPA, ORSANCO on streamlined variance.
What is a Drainage Basin? Drainage basin Drainage basin  A drainage system which consists of a surface stream or a body of surface water together with.
Report of the NPDES Subcommittee. Conference Call Meetings July 8 and August 19 Mercury Discharges – Utility Request to Address Permit Requirements for.
Toward the development of northern water standards presentation to the MVLWB December 5, 2007 Kathleen Racher Water Resources Division.
Stream flow estimation. Why try to estimate it? Gauges don’t exist on every stream Important for water quality modeling Permitting discharge sites Biological.
Streamflow Information in Texas David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin USGS Workshop, Fort Worth,
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Nutrient Management in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, U.S. Geological Survey.
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
An Introduction To Modeling of Surface Waters For TPDES Permits Mark A. Rudolph, P.E. TCEQ Water Quality Division.
1 Towns and reservoirs for aluminum dilution factor studies Settling velocity reservoir 2.
Mass Balance Assessment of 2014 Synoptic Survey Results: Dave Dilks Spokane River Regional Toxics Task Force 2014 Workshop January 13,
Potential Changes to Sections and 307.9: Standards Applicability and Attainment Gregg Easley TCEQ Water Quality Standards Team September 6, 2007.
Water Quality Standards History – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION OF OKLAHOMA 17th Annual Meeting October 1-3, 2008 Derek Smithee.
Changes to § Application of Standards and §307.9-Determination of Standards Attainment Gregg Easley Water Quality Standards Team Texas Commission.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Report of the NPDES Subcommittee
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Storm Water Permit Program Authority to regulate storm water discharges derives from 40 CFR Illinois EPA is delegated authority to administer this.
Review of Mixing Zone Studies Ben Cope EPA Region 10.
30 TAC Chapter 307 Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Workgroup meeting March 7, 2007.
WATERWAYS AND BRIDGES IN TEXAS “Final” Presentation by: Brandon Klenzendorf CE 394K Dr. Maidment.
River basin monitoring 3.2. River basin Monitoring Tamara Avellan Peter Kelderman UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education Online Module Water.
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
WQBELs Karen Holligan September 23, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
Revisions to: The Procedures to Implement the Surface Water Quality Standards Mrs. Brittany M. Lee Standards Implementation Team Phone:
Integrated Watershed Management
Water Quality-Based Effluent Limits
Module 17: MIXING ZONES A limited area or volume of water where initial dilution of a discharge takes place and where numeric water quality criteria.
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
Critical Conditions Review
Clark Fork River Metals TMDL Development
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Clean Water Act (CWA) Purpose
TOWARDS THE GOAL OF SETTING NUTRIENT CRITERIA FOR THE DELAWARE ESTUARY
Low Flow Calculations In NPDES permits the permitted industry or municipality must meet certain requirements with regards to the toxicity of their effluent.
Drafting group Mixing Zones
2018 Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Revision
` Permitting Workshop Water Quality Control Division cdphe.state.co.us/wq Pueblo, Colorado May 18, 2005.
Water Quality-Based Effluent Limits
Water Quality-Based Effluent Limits
Peter Schaefer Standards Implementation Team
Stream Crossing Replacement Policy
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Presentation transcript:

Critical Conditions Review Jeff Borski │ Water Quality Assessment Team

Where We Fit in the Permitting Process ApplicationsStandards Critical Conditions DO ModelingBiomonitoring Permit Writers

What Do We Do? Critical Conditions Reviews —Determine mixing zones —Calculate critical conditions (7Q2, effluent percentages) Outfall Mapping (GIS and Paper Maps) Coastal Zone Determinations 3-mile Requests Pretreatment Reports

Which Applications Do We Review? All industrial wastewater permits All municipal permits with biomonitoring Municipal permits with design flows of ≥1.0 MGD

What are Critical Mixing Conditions? In flowing waters, the river or stream’s low-flow metric (7Q2) is the critical condition for receiving-water flow In non-flowing waters, the width of the water body is the critical condition for receiving-water dilution

EPA Guidance on Critical Conditions “States may, at their discretion, include in their State standards, policies generally affecting their application and implementation, such as mixing zones, low flows and variances. Such policies are subject to EPA review and approval.” (40 CFR §131.13) Our guidance is outlined in the TSWQS

TEXTOX Menu Determination Assess menu numbers for each type of water body within 3 miles of the discharge point Assess menu numbers for downstream receiving waters with higher human health criteria than the initial receiving waters — Human health screenings as needed for downstream water bodies

Menu #Immediate Receiving WaterWater Body Within 3 Miles 1 Intermittent water body──── 2 Intermittent water bodyPerennial ditch, stream, or river 3 ──── 4 Lake or lake-like water body──── 5 Wide tidal water body or narrow tidal with no upstream flow data ──── 6 Narrow tidal water body with upstream flow data ──── 7 Intermittent stream w/perennial pools──── 8 Intermittent water bodyLake or lake-like water body 9 Intermittent water bodyNarrow tidal water body w/ upstream flow 10 Intermittent water body Wide tidal water body or narrow tidal with no upstream flow data

What is a Regulatory Mixing Zone? “The area contiguous to a permitted discharge where mixing with receiving waters takes place and where specified criteria, as listed in §307.8(b)(1) of this title, can be exceeded.” – TSWQS

Types of Mixing Zones Zone of Initial Dilution (ZID) – Acute aquatic life criteria applies at the edge of the ZID Mixing Zone (MZ) – Chronic aquatic life protection applies at the edge of the MZ Human Health Mixing Zone – Chronic human health protection at the edge of the HHMZ

ZID Aquatic Life Mixing Zone (MZ) Human Health Mixing Zone (HH) 400 ft. 200 ft. 50 ft. Point of Discharge

60 ft.20 ft. ZID 300 ft.100 ft. Mixing Zone & Human Health MZ Point of Discharge Direction of Flow

Zone of Initial Dilution The small area immediately adjacent to the point of discharge (PoD) Numerical acute aquatic life criteria do not apply inside it, but narrative criteria do apply – No lethality to aquatic organisms – Discharge may not impede migration of aquatic organisms

Mixing Zone MZs may not preclude passage of aquatic life to the extent that aquatic life use is significantly affected Acute aquatic life criteria apply within the MZ Chronic aquatic life criteria apply at the edge of the MZ

Human Health Mixing Zone Lakes – up to a 200-foot radius from the point of discharge Estuaries – up to a 400-foot radius Rivers – 100 feet upstream and 300 feet downstream Chronic aquatic life criteria apply within the HHMZ Human health criteria apply at the edge of the HHMZ

Undefined Mixing Zones Receiving waters that do not have defined mixing zones – Intermittent streams – Intermittent streams with perennial pools (ZID and MZ is not defined, but the human health mixing zone is defined) – Wetlands, marshes, and tidal mudflats

Diffuser Reviews For outfalls with diffusers, the DO modelers determine mixing-zone dimensions and effluent percentages It’s possible to get effluent percentages that are lower than default levels because of increased mixing efficiency Mixing zone shape may also differ from gravity-driven outfalls – Round, square, or irregular shape based on diffuser characteristics

What is the 7Q2? The lowest average discharge (Q) over a period of 7 days with a recurrence interval of 2 years Used to calculate effluent limits for aquatic life protection Another way to think about the 7Q2 – There is a 50% chance in any given year that the in-stream flow will be less than the 7Q2 – For comparison, there is a 10% chance in any given year than the in-stream flow will be less than the 7Q10

How Do We Calculate the 7Q2? Rank score of the moving 7-day average Q for each year Calculator for Low Flows (CaLF) – Excel-based app created by UT researchers – Calculates values using 30 years of continuous USGS gaging data (ideally) In areas with limited flow data, the 10 th percentile of available flow data will be analyzed Default value for perennial streams: 0.10 cfs (TSWQS)

How Do We Calculate the 7Q2? Special guidelines for springflow-dominated segments (30 TAC §307.8(a)(2)) – For such segments with listed species, take the 0.1 th percentile of the lognormal distribution of flow data – For such segments without listed species, take the 5 th percentile of the flow data – Listed in Appendix D of TSWQS

What is the Harmonic Mean? The reciprocal of the average of the reciprocals Yields a truer average for rates, e.g. streamflows Typically much lower than the arithmetic mean because it is less influenced by large outliers Used to establish human health limits in flowing water bodies Default value – 0.20 cfs

The Challenge of Critical Conditions There are 3,700 named streams in Texas Countless other unnamed tributaries & ditches 191,000 named stream miles …Yet there are only about 800 USGS usuable gages in Texas

Determining the 7Q2 and Harmonic Mean USGS gage upstream of the point of discharge USGS gage downstream of the point of discharge Upstream dischargers SWQM station (10 th percentile) Drainage area ratio Receiving Water Assessment (RWA) Waste Load Evaluation (WLE) Other sources of info (e.g. applicant model)

Point of Discharge Å USGS Gage M M M Intervening Dischargers Direction of flow

Determining the 7Q2 and Harmonic Mean Calculate critical conditions for USGS gage Calculate critical conditions for each intervening discharger using the 2 years of self-reporting data – 7Q2 – minimum 2-year flow – HM – Harmonic mean of 2-year discharge Gage + Intervening Dischargers = Critical Conditions for PoD

Critical Conditions for non-flowing water bodies

Point of Discharge 1010 ft.

ZID 30% Mixing Zone 8% Human Health Mixing Zone 4% 400 ft. 200 ft. 50 ft. Point of Discharge

Critical Conditions Contact Info Jeff Borski x5599 Nancy Vignali x1303