GWADW - La Biodola 20061/20 Underground reduction of Gravity Gradient Noise. Giancarlo Cella INFN sez. Pisa/Virgo GWADW – La Biodola 2006.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Beyond The Standard Quantum Limit B. W. Barr Institute for Gravitational Research University of Glasgow.

Advertisements

Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.

The Asymptotic Ray Theory

One Arm Cavity M0 L1 L2 TM M0 L1 L2 TRIPLE QUAD 16m R = 20m, T=1% R = ∞, T=1%  Optimally coupled cavity (no mode matched light reflected back)  Finesse.

Takanori Sekiguchi Italy-Japan Workshop (19 April, 2013) Inverted Pendulum Control for KAGRA Seismic Attenuation System 1 D2, Institute for Cosmic Ray.

April 27th, 2006 Paola Puppo – INFN Roma ILIAS Cryogenic payloads and cooling systems (towards a third generation interferometer) part II: the Vibration.

Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site Identification Jo van den Brand

Head Waves, Diving Waves and Interface Waves at the Seafloor Ralph Stephen, WHOI ASA Fall Meeting, Minneapolis October 19, 2005 Ralph Stephen, WHOI ASA.

Lecture-15 1 Lecture #15- Seismic Wave Overview. Lecture-15 2 Seismograms F Seismograms are records of Earth’s motion as a function of time.

Excitation of Oscillations in the Sun and Stars Bob Stein - MSU Dali Georgobiani - MSU Regner Trampedach - MSU Martin Asplund - ANU Hans-Gunther Ludwig.

Gravity Wave Detectors Riccardo DeSalvo - LIGO Gravity waves GW detectors Strain measurement, sensitivity Newtonian Noise How do we throw away your signal.

Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.

Recent Developments toward Sub-Quantum-Noise-Limited Gravitational-wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005 LIGO-G R.

Waves and Sound Ch

GWADW, May 2012, Hawaii D. Friedrich ICRR, The University of Tokyo K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata, T. Mori, S. Kawamura QRPN Experiment with Suspended 20mg Mirrors.

GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,

FE model implementation of seismically driven GG noise in subterranean gravitational wave detectors David Rabeling, Eric Hennes, and Jo van den Brand

1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.

A Rotary Subwoofer as an Infrasonic Source

Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.

Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…

LIGO-G Z Gravity gradient studies Firenze, Pisa, Roma and Urbino Francesco Fidecaro, Pisa.

Ambient ground motion and gravity gradient noise Jo van den Brand, Nikhef, Amsterdam on behalf of the design study team Einstein Telescope site selection.

1 DUSEL and Gravitational Waves Vuk Mandic University of Minnesota 03/17/08.

31 May 2006Federico Paoletti Elba GWADW 1 Available traps (short sensors’ list) l Fast monitoring (50Hz < f sample < 20kHz)  vertical high frequency accelerometers.

New Low-Frequency GW Detector with Superconducting Instrumentation

SUSPENSIONS Pisa S.Braccini C.Bradaschia R.Cavalieri G.Cella V.Dattilo A.Di Virgilio F.Fidecaro F.Frasconi A.Gennai G.Gennaro A.Giazotto L.Holloway F.Paoletti.

Types of Traveling Waves

1 Thermal noise and high order Laguerre-Gauss modes J-Y. Vinet, B. Mours, E. Tournefier GWADW meeting, Isola d’Elba May 27 th – Jun 2 nd, 2006.

1 The Virgo noise budget Romain Gouaty For the Virgo collaboration GWADW 2006, Isola d’Elba.

Infrasounds and Background Free Oscillations Naoki Kobayashi [1] T. Kusumi and N. Suda [2] [1] Tokyo Tech [2] Hiroshima Univ.

Parametric Instabilities In Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Detectors Li Ju Chunnong Zhao Jerome Degallaix Slavomir Gras David Blair.

Seismic Noise Coherence Measurements in Deep Salt Mines

State College May 2004 LIGO- Mining for IMBH Gravitational Waves Fabrizio Barone Enrico Campagna Yanbei Chen Giancarlo Cella Riccardo DeSalvo Seiji Kawamura.

Thermoelastic dissipation in inhomogeneous media: loss measurements and thermal noise in coated test masses Sheila Rowan, Marty Fejer and LSC Coating collaboration.

The status of VIRGO Edwige Tournefier (LAPP-Annecy ) for the VIRGO Collaboration HEP2005, 21st- 27th July 2005 The VIRGO experiment and detection of.

The VIRGO Suspensions Control System Alberto Gennai The VIRGO Collaboration.

The control of the Virgo Superattenuator: present and future Giovanni Losurdo - INFN Firenze/Urbino on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.

Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

Surface Acoustics Wave Sensors. Outline Introduction Piezoelectricity effect Fabrication of acoustic waves devices Wave propagation modes Bulk Wave sensor.

LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.

Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.

1 DC readout for Virgo+? E. Tournefier WG1 meeting, Hannover January 23 rd,2007 DC vs AC readout: technical noises Output mode cleaner for DC readout.

The Mechanical Simulation Engine library An Introduction and a Tutorial G. Cella.

1 Frequency Noise in Virgo by Matt Evans. 2 The Actors  Noise Sources  Input Mode Cleaner length noise  Sensing noise on IMC lock  Frequency Servo.

G. Cella I.N.F.N. Sezione di Pisa.  The mass density fluctuates..... ..... and the gravitational field will do the same Direct gravitational coupling.

Plans on table-top experiments towards Newtonian noise subtraction Frank Brückner, D. Brown, L. Carbone, P. Fulda, A. Freise University of Birmingham GEO-ISC.

NOTA: Per modificare l'immagine su questa diapositiva, selezionarla ed eliminarla. Fare quindi clic sull'icona delle Immagini nel segnaposto per inserire.

A revised formulation of the COSMO surface-to-atmosphere transfer scheme Matthias Raschendorfer COSMO Offenbach 2009 Matthias Raschendorfer.

Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan July 14th th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves.

Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO 1MGR13- ET.

Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland GW Astronomy, Korea August, 2016

Type-A SAS Local Control Simulation (Current Status)

Activities in the Homestake mine

Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005

Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects

GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves

Superattenuator for LF and HF interferometers

Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities

Local gravity gradient noise

MECHANICAL WAVES AND SOUND

Free oscillation modes Spheroidal mode (analogous to the P, SV and Rayleigh waves). Motions are parallel to the radial direction. Sensitive to gravity,

Gravity gradient studies

Newtonian Noise Mitigation by Using Superconducting Gravity Gradiometers Ho Jung Paik Department of Physics University of Maryland ICGAC-XIII, Seoul.

Introduction to Space Weather

Elastic Moduli Young’s Modulus Poisson Ratio Bulk Modulus

Thermal noise and high order Laguerre-Gauss modes J-Y. Vinet, B

Some ideas on advanced Virgo Twins A. Giazotto-INFN Pisa

Radiation pressure induced dynamics in a suspended Fabry-Perot cavity

Measurement of radiation pressure induced dynamics

Presentation transcript:

GWADW - La Biodola 20061/20 Underground reduction of Gravity Gradient Noise. Giancarlo Cella INFN sez. Pisa/Virgo GWADW – La Biodola 2006

GWADW - La Biodola 20062/20 Introduction In future advanced interferometers Newtonian (Gravity Gradient) Noise will be one of the fundamental limitations for the sensitivity in the low frequency region. Can it be estimated? What are the most important sources? Can it be reduced? What we gain going underground?

GWADW - La Biodola 20063/20 Outline Motivations Seismic GGN Atmospheric GGN Going underground Underground GGN estimates GGN reduction inside a cavity Other (but related) options Monitoring and subtraction Reference masses Conclusions

GWADW - La Biodola 20064/20 What is Gravity Gradient Noise Mass density fluctuations couple directly to the test masses: Example: Elastic material

GWADW - La Biodola 20065/20 Seismic GGN Estimate uses transfer function between seism and GGN

GWADW - La Biodola 20066/20 Atmospheric GGN Other Effect of acoustic waves (Saulson) Negligible Airborne objects, sonic booms, advection, … (Creighton) Turbolent generation of acoustic waves (Lighthill process). (C. Cafaro, G. C.) Negligible Well developed turbulence Method: extimation of the structure functions using simple scaling relations. Rayleigh Bernard Scenarios (G.C., E. Cuoco, P. Tomassini) Different possibilities accordingly with the intensity of thermal gradient. Nucleation phase (slow) Ascension phase Thermal bubbles

GWADW - La Biodola 20067/20 Atmospheric GGN

GWADW - La Biodola 20068/20 What we can expect by going underground

GWADW - La Biodola 20069/20 Going underground: seismic GGN reduction A simple fact: surface waves die off exponentially with the depth Surface waves are probably the most important excitations for GGN Surface movement dominate the bulk compression effect Most efficient mechanism to transport energy from “far” sources Significative coupling with “local” sources (human activity) GGN is a “long range” effect: what is its depth dependence? h/l “Smearing effect”

GWADW - La Biodola /20 GGN vs. depth Surface/Bulk 100 Hz 50 Hz 10 Hz 5 Hz 100 Hz50 Hz 10 Hz 5 Hz All this is pretty good, but Volume waves contributions will not share this fast decay Surface fluctuations in the depth? depth (m) Relative reduction of GGN with depth: Bulk Surface Total

GWADW - La Biodola /20 A rough model for an underground cavity Test mass Spherical cavity in a homogeneous elastic medium: Elasticity eq. Free boundaries Mode Classification accordingly with rotation symmetry: Spherical cavity in a homogeneous elastic medium: Elasticity eq. Free boundaries Mode Classification accordingly with rotation symmetry: ToroidalSpheroidal longitudinal For each ,l,m: 2 spheroidal modes (mixed transverse & longitudinal) 1 toroidal mode (transverse only) Incoming wave scattered to an outgoing one For each ,l,m: 2 spheroidal modes (mixed transverse & longitudinal) 1 toroidal mode (transverse only) Incoming wave scattered to an outgoing one What is the contribution of each mode to GGN? Spheroidal transverse

GWADW - La Biodola /20 A rough model for an underground cavity Volume fluctuation Surface fluctuation Test mass Bulk contribution to GGN: Surface contribution to GGN: Only “dipole” contribution to bulk GGN (cavity displacements) Both transverse & longitudinal contributions to surface GGN Toroidal modes: transverse, no surface motion, no Newtonian

GWADW - La Biodola /20 Amplitude/Amplitude(r=1) 5 Hz 10 Hz 20 Hz 40 Hz R dependence of GGN inside the cavity Surface longitudinal and transverse contributions Amplitude/Amplitude(r=1) Normalization: fixed incoming flux from infinity of elastic energy Statistical sum over modes Assumed absence of correlations between modes (weak dependence) Bulk longitudinal and transverse contributions Method: Surface contributions always dominant in the relevant frequency range

GWADW - La Biodola /20 R dependence: final result Amplitude/Amplitude (R=1) 5 Hz 10 Hz 20 Hz 40 Hz Bulk + Surface Longitudinal + Transverse Good reduction with a reasonable cavity’s size.

GWADW - La Biodola /20 Transfer function There is a relation between GGN in the cavity and seismic motion measured on the surface? Motion normal to the surface (as an example) Symmetries are not constraining enough…… Seismic motion get contributions from all GGN is controlled by modes only In other words: measuring the dipole mode is a difficult issue, without additional informations about the importance of each. In principle: measure the correlations

GWADW - La Biodola /20 Other (related) options

GWADW - La Biodola /20 GGN subtraction Example: a set of 10 accelerometers with random initial position.... …and after the optimization Test of subtraction: 3 environmental channels (acoustic) from dark fringe data Noise PSD (log arbitrary units) Frequency (Hz)

GWADW - La Biodola /20 Subtraction in the cavity? We can apply the subtraction method to seismic measurements inside the cavity. Subtracted signal Subtraction efficiency The method can be applied We can’t anticipate its efficiency Performances and number of sensors will depend on the number of relevant modes

GWADW - La Biodola /20 PD L Virgo mirror d δxδx δyδy L/2 1/2 Finesse F Measuring horizontal GGN Preliminary idea: 1.Measure the GGN using as a reference “quiet” masses. 2.Subtract Features: 1.Decoupled from vertical GGN 2.L large compared with 3.L small compared with interferometer arms Problems: 1.“Quiet” masses must be dominated by GGN 2.“Quiet masses coupled to vertical seism (more refined schemes can cure this problem)

GWADW - La Biodola /20 Conclusions: The underground option seems promising Seismic surface waves contributions to GGN exponentially damped Atmospheric contributions should be damped also exponentially A cavity can be used to further reduce GGN Localized seismic waves on the gallery Small masses involved Monitorable Acoustic (pressure waves) resonances Could be reduced Monitorable Volume seismic waves Problems: Measurements in realistic scenarios are mandatory! Thank you for your attention!