Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt DNA wg IETF71.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IETF Calsify.
Advertisements

PPSP WG IETF-80, Prague, March 28, 2011 Chairs: Yunfei Zhang Cullen Jennings Jabber:
STRAW IETF#91, Honolulu, USA. Victor Pascual Christer Holmberg.
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) BoF IETF 91 Monday Afternoon Session II, Coral 1.
L2VPN WG “NVO3” Meeting IETF 82 Taipei, Taiwan. Agenda Administrivia Framing Today’s Discussions (5 minutes) Cloud Networking: Framework and VPN Applicability.
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
PPSP Working Group IETF-89 London, UK 16:10-18:40, Tuesday, Webex: participation.html.
CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: Tools start page:
DRINKS Interim („77.5“) Reston, VA Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF.
IETF 90: NetExt WG Meeting. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet- Draft.
Multiple Interfaces (MIF) WG IETF 78, Maastricht, Netherlands Margaret Wasserman Hui Deng
Dime WG Status Update IETF#81, THURSDAY, July 28, Afternoon Session I.
DIME WG IETF 84 DIME WG Agenda & Status Tuesday, July 31 st, 2012 Jouni Korhonen, Lionel Morand.
SIPCLF Working Group Spencer Dawkins Theo Zourzouvillys IETF 76 – November 2009 Hiroshima, Japan.
IETF #82 DRINKS WG Meeting Taipei, Taiwan Fri, Nov 18 th
EAP Method Update (EMU) IETF-79 Chairs Joe Salowey Alan DeKok.
1 NOTE WELL Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
IETF #81 DRINKS WG Meeting Québec City, QC, Canada Tue, July 26 th, 2011.
GROW IETF 78 Maastricht, Netherlands. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft.
IETF 86 PIM wg meeting. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC.
IETF 79 - Beijing, China1 Martini Working Group IETF 79 Beijing Chairs: Bernard Spencer
Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) WG Interim Meeting, Monday, January 7,
IPPM WG IETF 79. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and.
Tictoc working group Thursday, 28 July – 1720 EDT (1920 – 2120 UTC) Karen O’Donoghue and Yaakov Stein, co-chairs.
Technical Plenary Agenda IETF 81 Quebec City, Quebec July 25, 2011 Presentations: Jabber room:
SIPREC WG, IETF# , GMT+2 John Elwell (WG co-chair) Brian Rosen (WG co-chair)
CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: Data tracker:
Web Authorization Protocol (oauth) Hannes Tschofenig.
IETF #86 - NETCONF WG session 1 NETCONF WG IETF 86 - Orlando, FL, USA MONDAY, March 11, Bert Wijnen Mehmet Ersue.
Transport Service (TAPS) Aaron Falk
IETF DRINKS Interim Meeting (#82.5) Virtual Interim Meeting Wed, Feb 1 st p-6p UTC/9a-1p Eastern.
CLUE WG IETF-83 Mary Barnes (WG co-chair) Paul Kyzivat (WG co-chair)
P2PSIP WG IETF 87 P2PSIP WG Agenda & Status Thursday, August 1 st, 2013 Brian Rosen, Carlos J. Bernardos.
OAuth WG Blaine Cook, Hannes Tschofenig. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft.
Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environment (ACE) WG Chairs: Kepeng Li, Hannes
IETF 89, LONDON, UK LISP Working Group. 2 Agenda and slides:  lisp.html Audio Stream 
MPTCP – MULTIPATH TCP WG meeting #5 Nov 8 th & 10 th 2010 Beijing, ietf-79 Yoshifumi Nishida Philip Eardley.
IETF – NVO3 WG Virtual Interim Meeting Chairs: Secretary: Sam Aldrin Benson Schliesser Matthew Bocci.
DNSEXT at IETF-83 Paris 2012/3/27 at 17:10 – 18:10 Ólafur Guðmundsson Andrew Sullivan.
DMM WG IETF 84 DMM WG Agenda & Status Tuesday, July 31 st, 2012 Jouni Korhonen, Julien Laganier.
LMAP WG IETF 92, Dallas, TX Dan Romascanu Jason Weil.
Transport Layer Security (TLS) IETF-84 Chairs: Eric Rescorla Joe Salowey.
Interface to the Routing System (IRS) BOF IETF 85, Atlanta November 2012.
IPR WG IETF 62 Minneapolis. IPR WG: Administrivia Blue sheets Scribes Use the microphones Note Well.
IETF #81 - NETCONF WG session 1 NETCONF WG IETF 81, Quebec City, Canada MONDAY, July 25, Bert Wijnen Mehmet Ersue.
RADEXT WG Virtual Interim Agenda Monday, October 11, :00 AM – 10:00 AM PDT Please join the Jabber room:
Transport Layer Security (TLS) IETF 73 Thursday, November Chairs: Eric Rescorla Joe Salowey.
IETF #73 - NETMOD WG session1 NETMOD WG IETF 73, Minneapolis, MN, USA November 20, David Harrington David Partain.
Transport Layer Security (TLS) IETF-78 Chairs Joe Salowey Eric Rescorla
HIP WG Gonzalo Camarillo David Ward IETF 80, Prague, Czech Republic THURSDAY, March 31, 2011, Barcelona/Berlin.
OPSREA Open Meeting Area Directors: Dan Romascanu and Ron Bonica Monday, March 28, 2011 Morning Session, 10:30 – 11:30, Room Barcelona/Berlin Discussion.
Agenda Behcet Sarikaya Dirk von Hugo November 2012 FMC BOF IETF
IETF #82 - NETCONF WG session 1 NETCONF WG IETF 82, Taipei, Taiwan TUESDAY, November 15, Afternoon Session III Bert Wijnen Mehmet Ersue.
NETWORK-BASED MOBILITY EXTENSIONS WG (NETEXT) July 28 th, 2011 IETF81 1.
Agenda Stig Venaas Behcet Sarikaya November 2011 Multimob WG IETF
Alternatives to Content Classification for Operator Resource Deployment (ACCORD) BOF Chairs: Gonzalo Camarillo & Pete Resnick.
TSVAREA IETF84 - Vancouver. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft.
OPSAWG chairs: Scott Bradner Christopher Liljenstolpe.
Agenda Wednesday, July 29, :00 – 15:00 Congresshall B Please join the Jabber room: LEDBAT WG IETF 75.
STIR Secure Telephone Identity Revisited
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
Kathleen Moriarty, Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning (TEEP) BoF IETF-100 November 2017 Chairs: Nancy Cam-Winget,
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
Thursday, 20th of July 2017.
Agenda IETF 82 Taipei November 14, 2011
SIPREC WG, Interim virtual meeting , GMT
TEAS CCAMP MPLS PCE Working Groups
SIPBRANDY Chair Slides
Multiple Interfaces (MIF) WG
Scott Bradner & Martin Thomson
Presentation transcript:

Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt DNA wg IETF71

Top right corner for field-mark, customer or partner logotypes. See Best practice for example. Slide title 40 pt Slide subtitle 24 pt Text 24 pt Bullets level pt © Ericsson AB 2008DNA Chair Slides Note Well  Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution". Such statements include oral statements in IETF sessions, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to:  -the IETF plenary session,  -any IETF working group or portion thereof,  -the IESG or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG,  -the IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the IAB,  -any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list itself,  any working group or design team list, or any other list  functioning under IETF auspices,  -the RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function  All IETF Contributions are subject to the rules of RFC 3978 (updated by RFC 4748) and RFC 3979(updated by RFC 4879).  Statements made outside of an IETF session, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to an IETF activity, group or function, are not IETF Contributions in the context of this notice.  Please consult RFC 3978 (and RFC 4748) for details.  A participant in any IETF activity is deemed to accept all IETF rules of process, as documented in Best Current Practices RFCs and IESG Statements.  A participant in any IETF activity acknowledges that written, audio and video records of meetings may be made and may be available to the public.

Top right corner for field-mark, customer or partner logotypes. See Best practice for example. Slide title 40 pt Slide subtitle 24 pt Text 24 pt Bullets level pt © Ericsson AB 2008DNA Chair Slides Agenda  15:10 Agenda bashing - 2 minutes  15:12 Document status and scribes - 3 minutes  15:15 Simple DNA protocol presentation - 15 minutes  15:30 Simple DNA protocol discussion - 20 minutes –Call for adoption and measuring consensus (Jari Arkko)  15:50 Tentative options - 5 minutes  15:55 Way forward with complete DNA solution - 5 minutes

Top right corner for field-mark, customer or partner logotypes. See Best practice for example. Slide title 40 pt Slide subtitle 24 pt Text 24 pt Bullets level pt © Ericsson AB 2008DNA Chair Slides WG document status  draft-ietf-dna-protocol –In v07 –Pending reclassification to Experimental –Will be discussed in wg  draft-ietf-dna-tentative –Expired –Used for Optimistic DAD (RFC4429) –Will be revved  draft-ietf-dna-frd –Expired –Will be revved once the protocol goal is achieved

Top right corner for field-mark, customer or partner logotypes. See Best practice for example. Slide title 40 pt Slide subtitle 24 pt Text 24 pt Bullets level pt © Ericsson AB 2008DNA Chair Slides Adoption call  Should we adopt draft-krishnan-dna-simple-03 as WG document? –Yes. (It is a good starting point for a deployable solution) –No. (Kill it, the fundamental approach is wrong) –Not ready. (The fundamental approach is OK but a much better procedure exists for doing the same thing)

Top right corner for field-mark, customer or partner logotypes. See Best practice for example. Slide title 40 pt Slide subtitle 24 pt Text 24 pt Bullets level pt © Ericsson AB 2008DNA Chair Slides Consensus call  Should we reclassify draft-ietf-dna-protocol-07 to Experimental? –Yes. –No.  Should we continue working on the tentative options in the dna wg –Yes. –No, punt them off to 6man

Top right corner for field-mark, customer or partner logotypes. See Best practice for example. Slide title 40 pt Slide subtitle 24 pt Text 24 pt Bullets level pt © Ericsson AB 2008DNA Chair Slides Reviews  Thanks to –Bernard Aboba, –Thomas Narten, –Jari Arkko, –Jin Hyeock Choi, and –Julien Laganier for their reviews.  We need more eyes on the document. –If you volunteer, I promise you some nice cookies next meeting

Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt Thanks for attending Questions? Comments?