Materials  Wiki 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reaching Consensus.
Advertisements

10 Things to Expect Regarding Your Child’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) Meeting.
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
Decision Making Process It is essential that teams have a clearly defined process for making decisions before and during the course of their work. It should.
Effective Partnership in Special Education Advocating in Harmony
Copyright c 2006 Oxford University Press 1 Chapter 7 Solving Problems and Making Decisions Problem solving is the communication that analyzes the problem.
HANCOCK CENTRAL SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM SEPTEMBER 14, 2012.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1 March 2013.
1 Interdisciplinary Collaboration for Elder Care.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Teamwork and Consensus Leadership. 1.____________ ____________  asks questions, looks for new ideas, willing to research, open to new ideas 2._____________.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing Educators for Rater Agreement and Sustainability: Planning for Professional Learning.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Legislative Update Michaela Miller TPEP Program Manager OSPI TPEP RIG Update March 15th, 2012 Jim Koval TPEP Program.
June 2002USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service1 Critical Meeting Elements: Preparation to Minimize Conflict.
AWCPA PLC Facilitator’s Training AWCPA Leadership Team.
Materials  Wiki 
LEADERSHIP AND FOLLOWERSHIP. DISCUSSION CONTENTS  Leadership and Followership as a subject, and a relationship  Definitions and awareness  Basic Types.
SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL TRAINING  A group intended to represent the broad school community and those persons closest to the students who will.
Effective Teaming RTI Training 9/23/07. Objectives Each district team will define how it will work together to lead the implementation of RTI. Each district.
PREPARING FOR AND RUNNING MEETINGS 8.1.  Establish meeting schedule for entire year at first meeting.  Same time on the same day each month?  Sett.
Why Teams?. Teams Outperform individuals acting alone or in groups Outperform individuals acting alone or in groups Often necessary to lead deep and lasting.
Teamwork and Consensus Leadership. 1.Information Seeker  asks questions, looks for new ideas, willing to research, open to new ideas 2.Tension Reliever.
Team Communication and Difficult Conversations Chapter 3.
Unitarian Universalist Church of Fort Myers UUCFM Leadership Development Program Session 1 November 6, 2014.
Collaboration Grants Design 101 Salem November 21 st, 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Ambassador Design Team meeting #4 February 25, 2015.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
The Process  Greeting  Introductions  Agenda Review  Ground Rules  Decision Making Rules  Sticking to the Agenda  Complete the IEP  Closure 
Session Materials  Wiki
Defending Childhood Protect Heal Thrive January 25-27, 2011 Sandra Spencer Executive Director National Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
Materials  Wiki 
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Washington State’s Professional Certification The Big Picture (reminder : ) Everett Public Schools Pre-Assessment Seminar
2015 SAA Board Survey. Raw Board Survey ResultsStrongly Agree AgreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree Don't Know Total Points Responses minus DKs Average Score.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
Intro Trade- show Panel Individual Invention Design Challenge Draft Synthesis Work Round Closing W hitewater S trategies, I nc. Coaching Performance.
Chapter 9* Managing Meetings. Chapter 10/Managing Meetings Hilgert & Leonard © Explain why meetings, committees, and being able to lead meetings.
Learning Teaching and Family Support Retreat April 24, :30 am – 3:00 pm Wiki site
CHAPTER TEN Multiple Parties and Teams McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Importance of Teams How to Create Effective Teams and Develop Team Norms.
Materials  Wiki 
13-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved CHAPTER THIRTEEN Multiple Parties and Teams.
Lecture 8 TQM 311 lecturer: Noura Al-Afeef Medical Record Department 1.
Professional Learning Communities AKA Purposeful Learning and Collaboration PLCs.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Making Teams Work: Who me? AMLE Conference 2015 Columbus, OH Presentation by: Dr. Michelle Williams, Ms. Leah Kahn, and Dr. Claudia Whitley.
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
CONSENSUS DECISION MAKING???. 9 COMMON DECISION-MAKINGPROCESSES ANNOUNCEMEN T UNANIMOUS VOTE BY GROUP LOTTERY, COIN FLIP, STRAWS COMPROMISE, GROUP AVERAGING,
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
The VCS PAC meets on the second Thursday of each month from 6:30 pm to 8:30 pm in Room 15. Childcare is provided Refreshments are provided.
CONSENSUS DECISION MAKING???
APS Strategic Plan Steering Committee
Educator Evaluation and TPEP in Washington State Changes to the law for Procedures for Evaluation are now addressed in: RCW 28A.405 WAC.
Evanston/Skokie School District 65
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Effective Meeting.
Presentation transcript:

Materials  Wiki 

Agenda 2 12:15-12:30 Reconnect 12:30-1:30 CEL 5D+ Panel Jennie Beltramini (Anacortes EA) Marci Shepard (Orting SD) Roni Rumsey (CEL Feedback Specialist and Eatonville SD) 1:30-1:40 Break 1:40-2:40 Danielson Panel Justin Fox-Bailey (Snohomish EA) John Hellwich (Sumner SD) Michelle Lewis (Danielson Feedback Specialist and PSESD) 2:40-3:20 Discussion 3:20-3:40 Next steps and closing

Agreements  Be present. Stay focused on meeting/task, avoid distractions ( ), attend meetings, if absent, accept work of group. Support decisions of the group.  Participate actively. Ask/answer questions, share connections, listen, do you homework and be prepared.  Invite and welcome contributions of every member. If conflict occurs, address respectfully. Assume best intentions.  Work together as a community toward our common goal of student growth and improvement.  Start (12:15) and end (3:30) on time. 3

TPEP Core Principles 1. The critical importance of teacher and leadership quality 2. The professional nature of teaching and leading a school 3. The complex relationship between the system for teacher and principal evaluation and district systems and negotiations 4. The belief in professional learning as an underpinning of the new evaluation system 5. The understanding that the career continuum must be addressed in the new evaluation system 6. The system must determine the balance of “inputs or acts” and “outputs or results” 4

Hopes Group 1  That our system will be meaningful.  That our system will be positive and support growth.  That our system leads to student growth. Group 2  Growth is positive  Professional learning  Student-focused Group 3  Positive collaboration  Quality  Professional growth 5

Concerns Group 1  That our system cannot become bureaucratic.  Short timelines, sufficient training.  Growth component is dependent on the makeup of students. Group 2  Narrow focus  missed opportunities Group 3  Student growth  Time/training  Overwhelmed by unknown and detail 6

Sufficient consensus means that: 1. All participants contribute. 1. Differences viewed as helpful rather than as a hindrance. 1. Anyone can paraphrase an issue. 1. Everyone has an opportunity to describe his/her feelings about an interest/issue. 1. Those who continue to disagree may indicate publicly that they are willing to go along for an experimental try for a prescribed period of time. 1. All share in the final decision.

Consensus does not mean: 1. A unanimous vote. 2. Everyone’s first choice. 3. That everyone agrees, rather that enough are in favor to get the decision carried out. 4. Avoiding conflict or overcoming resistance in the short run

Proposed Consensus Definition We have arrived at consensus when all points of view have been heard, and the will of the group is evident— even to those who oppose it. 9

Important: Silence is not agreement! 3.1.6

Ways to Indicate Sufficient Consensus  Thumb System - Up is yes, down is no and sideways is either an undecided or a sign that it meets the minimum requirement; however the team should continue the discussion and/or proceed with extreme caution in the event more than one person has voted sideways.  Fist to Five System - This is a system to indicate degrees of agreement or disagreement. A hand raised with all five fingers up indicates full agreement. A fist with no fingers raises indicates complete disagreement. Less than five fingers raised indicates various degrees of agreement. If the indication is mixed, continue the discussion

Proposed Consensus Definition We have arrived at consensus when all points of view have been heard, and the will of the group is evident— even to those who oppose it. 12

Agreements  Be present. Stay focused on meeting/task, avoid distractions ( ), attend meetings, if absent, accept work of group. Support decisions of the group.  Participate actively. Ask/answer questions, share connections, listen, do you homework and be prepared.  Invite and welcome contributions of every member. If conflict occurs, address respectfully. Assume best intentions.  Work together as a community toward our common goal of student growth and improvement.  Start (12:15) and end (3:30) on time. 13