L. Serio1.6.2007 COPING WITH TRANSIENTS L. SERIO CERN, Geneva (Switzerland)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cryogenic system in P4: Possible options S. Claudet & U. Wagner LHC Workshop, “Chamonix XlV” January 2005 (Mostly for RF & beam scrubbing)
Advertisements

1 Ann Van Lysebetten CO 2 cooling experience in the LHCb Vertex Locator Vertex 2007 Lake Placid 24/09/2007.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1.
Cryogenics at CERN (LHC)&Helium Inventory Brief review with emphasis given on cryogen management Americas Workshop on Linear Colliders 2014 Fermilab,
February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Roberto Than R&D ERL Cryogenics Roberto Than February 17-18, 2010 CRYOGENICS.
Current status Arkadiy Klebaner November 21, 2012
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
CASIPP Design of Cryogenic Distribution System for CFETR CS model coil Division of Cryogenic Engineering and Technical Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese.
SC - 04Feb'13Cryo Heaters Review Cryogenic Heaters Review Operation use and wishes S. Claudet - A. Suraci LHC Cryogenic Operation.
LHC Experimental Areas Forum - 03/07/ ATLAS Helium Cryogenics Nicolas Delruelle on behalf of the AT / ECR group.
Large-capacity Helium refrigeration : from state-of-the-art towards FCC reference solutions Francois Millet – March 2015.
Andrzej SIEMKO, CERN/AT-MTM Slide 1 14th “Chamonix Workshop”, January 2005 Beam loss induced quench levels A. Siemko and M. Calvi Machine Protection Issues.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
23 Jan 2007 LASA Cryogenics Global Group 1 ILC Cryomodule piping L. Tavian for the cryogenics global group.
FCC Study Kick-off Meeting Cryogenics Laurent Tavian CERN, Technology Department 14 February 2014 Thanks to Ph. Lebrun for fruitful discussions.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Fk. Bordry AB/PO Ability of the converter s to follow the reference function (static, dynamics) I1 I2 I3 Static part is covered by the static definition.
Cryomodule Helium Vessel Pressure -- a Few Additional Comments Tom Peterson 18 November 2007.
HC review - 12 May 2005Luigi SERIO - AT/ACR/OP1 SECTOR COOL DOWN AND CRYOGENIC COMMISSIONING L. Serio.
Introduction to LHC cryogenic system (layout, architecture) Preparation before cool-down (Purge, flushing) Transient operations to reach nominal operating.
Partikeldagarna, Göteborg 21 September 2007 LHC: Status and Plans Lyn Evans.
05 Novembre 2003Chamonix XIV Workshop, January How to deal with leaks in the QRL and magnet insulation vacuum Paul Cruikshank for AT/VAC Germana.
S. Claudet - 31st May 2007Power refrigeration for LHC Power refrigeration at 4.5K & 1.8K for the LHC S. Claudet, CERN AT-ACR.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Project X RD&D Plan Cryogenics Arkadiy Klebaner AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
a magnetic refrigeration stage
To TT10 Nitrogen or helium gas LN2 Storage vessel buffer storage vessel G1G2 Magnet cryostat VALVE BOX Schematic diagram of the cryogenic system.
C.KotnigFCC Design Meeting FCC Beam Screen cooling Claudio Kotnig.
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
Luigi Serio CRYOGENICS PERFORMANCE AND OPERATION L. Serio, on behalf of the LHC Cryogenics Operation and Cryogenics Performance Panel.
GLA2011 The cryogenic systems of the LHC experiments Johan Bremer on behalf of TE/CRG, ATLAS collaboration and CMS collaboration.
Heat loads and cryogenics L.Tavian, D. Delikaris CERN, Cryogenics Group, Technology Department Accelerators & Technology Sector Friday, October 15, 20101HE-LHC'10.
FCC Week 2015, Washington Cooling the FCC beam screens
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Cryogenics for LHC Test Benches Safety Aspects Overview of the Test Station Overview of the Operation.
MAGNET#1MAGNET#2MAGNET#3 SATELLITE VB#1 SATELLITE VB#2 SATELLITE VB#3 PRECOOLER#1PRECOOLER#2 DISTRIBUTION VALVE BOX DVB CP#1CP#3CP#2 BUFFER DEWAR LHe 5m.
Rossana Bonomi R. Bonomi TE-MSC-CMI SPL Seminar 2012.
Cryogenic refrigeration for the XFEL facility. Current status of the commissioning. Wilhelm Hanspeter Grenoble, June 4th, 2015.
A. Bertarelli – A. DallocchioWorkshop on Materials for Collimators and Beam absorbers, 4 th Sept 2007 LHC Collimators (Phase II): What is an ideal material.
Cryogenic scheme, pipes and valves dimensions U.Wagner CERN TE-CRG.
PIP-II Cryogenics Arkadiy Klebaner and Jay Theilacker PIP-II Collaboration Meeting 9 November 2015.
Project X Workshop - Cryogenics1 Project X CRYOGENICS Arkadiy Klebaner.
5-year operation experience with the 1.8 K refrigeration units of the LHC cryogenic system G. Ferlin, CERN Technology department Presented at CEC 2015.
Logo area HL LHC IT STRING M. Bajko CERN TE-TM and QXF Review.
R. van Weelderen Overview of the LHC cryogenic system.
ILC : Type IV Cryomodule Design Meeting Main cryogenic issues, L. Tavian, AT-ACR C ryostat issues, V.Parma, AT-CRI CERN, January 2006.
FCC Infrastructure & Operation Update on the cryogenics study Laurent Tavian CERN, TE-CRG 28 October 2015.
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik 1 ICEC 26- ICMC 2016 March 7-11, 2016, New Delhi, India Michael Nagel Cryogenic commissioning, cool down and first.
FCC Week 2016, Roma Cryogenics overview Laurent Tavian, CERN, ATS-DO On behalf of the FCC cryogenics study collaboration 14 April 2016.
SIS 100 Vacuum chamber Recooler String system Components
Final Design Cryogenic and mechanical configurations
Process Simulation for the LCLS-II Cryogenic Systems
Design of the thermosiphon Test Facilities 2nd Thermosiphon Workshop
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
M Chorowski, H Correia Rodrigues, D Delikaris, P Duda, C Haberstroh,
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Innovative He cycle Francois Millet.
FCC Week 2017, Berlin Towards a conceptual design for FCC cryogenics
CRYOGENICS – strategy, unavailability root causes and limitations
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
CEPC Cryogenic System Jianqin Zhang, Shaopeng Li
CRYOGENICS OPERATIONS 2008 Organized by CERN
Why are particle accelerators so inefficient?
How does a cryogenic system cope with e-cloud induced heat load
Operation experience of cryogenic system and cryomodules for the superconducting linear accelerator at IUAC, New Delhi. T S Datta ( On behalf of Cryogenics.
The superconducting solenoids for the Super Charm-Tau Factory detector
Schematic diagram of the cryogenic system
Cryogenic behavior of the magnet
Cryogenic management of the LHC Run 2 dynamic heat loads
Laurent Delprat CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
Presentation transcript:

L. Serio COPING WITH TRANSIENTS L. SERIO CERN, Geneva (Switzerland)

L. Serio Contents  Introduction Systems, principles and parameters  Cooldown Principles and key figures From simulations to sector cooldown  From steady state to nominal powering Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Working with circulating beams Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Fast current discharges and quench Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Conclusion

L. Serio Contents  Introduction Systems, principles and parameters  Cooldown Principles and key figures From simulations to sector cooldown  From steady state to nominal powering Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Working with circulating beams Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Fast current discharges and quench Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Conclusion

L. Serio LHC Parameters (p-p) impacting on Cryogenics Circumference26.7km Beam energy in collision7TeV Beam energy at injection0.45TeV Dipole field at 7 TeV8.33T Luminosity10 34 cm -2.s -1 Beam intensity0.56A Energy loss per turn6.7keV Critical energy of radiated photons44.1eV Synchrotron power per beam3.8kW Stored energy per beam350 MJ Operating temperature1.9K Cold mass36.8x10 6 kg Helium inventory130x10 3 kg

L. Serio LHC operation cycles

L. Serio Cryogenic system main functions  Cope with load variations and large dynamic range induced by the operation of the accelerator  Cool down and fill but also empty and warm-up the huge cold mass of the LHC in a maximum time of 15 days  Cope with the resistive transitions of the superconducting magnets minimising loss of cryogen and system perturbations  Limit the resistive transition propagation to the neighbouring magnets and recover in few hours  Cope with the resistive transition of a full sector  Allow for rapid cool-down and warm-up of limited lengths of cryo-magnet strings, e.g. for repairing or exchanging a defective diode

L. Serio Overview of the cryogenic system  5 cryogenic islands  8 x 4.5 K refrigerators ( K, 600 kW precooler and heater)  8 x 1.8 K refrigeration units ( K)  25 km of superconducting magnets in superfluid helium –several 1’000’s control loops: –1400 for current leads –320 for magnets temperature –600 for beam screen –several 1’000’s for refrigerators (distribution line) (interconnection box)

L. Serio Contents  Introduction Systems, principles and parameters  Cooldown Principles and key figures From simulations to sector cooldown  From steady state to nominal powering Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Working with circulating beams Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Fast current discharges and quench Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Conclusion

L. Serio Cooling towers Compressed air Vacuum mbar Cooling and ventilation 4800 m 3 /h of water Helium and nitrogen 130 t of He – 4.3 MCHF 10’000 t of LN2 – 1.6 MCHF Electric power about 32 MW; 24 GWh/month 1.2 MCHF/month LHC COOLDOWN CRYOGENICS Controls: Networks, fieldbuses, PLC, SCADA Mass to be cooled[t] 36’800 Max He flow[g/s]6160 Max cooling capacity K[kW]4800 Liquefaction rate[g/s]1000

L. Serio Arc cooling principles

L. Serio LHC COOLDOWN 300 to 4.5 K

L. Serio Final cooldown to 1.9 K

L. Serio LHC COOLDOWN 4.5 to 1.9 K

L. Serio Contents  Introduction Systems, principles and parameters  Cooldown Principles and key figures From simulations to sector cooldown  From steady state to nominal powering Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Working with circulating beams Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Fast current discharges and quench Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Conclusion

L. Serio Cell Cooling Principle (I)

L. Serio Cell Cooling Principle (II)  Pressurised LHeII: Content: 26 l/m Free cross-section: 60 cm2  Bayonet heat exchanger: Linear thermal conductance: 120 W/m.K Free inner diameter: 54 mm  Control principle: The JT valve controls the temperature difference between: - the maximum of cell temperature TT and - the saturated temperature Ts0 corresponding to Ps0. As a consequence: - the bayonet heat exchanger is partially dried, - the wetted length increase with the heat deposition.

L. Serio Temperature Excursion during Injection Sequence The magnet current ramp- up and de-ramp from 0 to 12 kA with a rate of 10 A/s (Eddy currents dissipate 480 J/m in the cold masses) Heat partially buffered by helium content Maximum temperature excursion: 50 mK

L. Serio Typical LHC ramp to nominal current (11860 A) Temperature stability :  5 mK

L. Serio Contents  Introduction Systems, principles and parameters  Cooldown Principles and key figures From simulations to sector cooldown  From steady state to nominal powering Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Working with circulating beams Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Fast current discharges and quench Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Conclusion

L. Serio Beam induced loads

L. Serio Beam Squeezing Transient  Beam squeezing Fast transient heat deposition (few minutes) Heat loads (secondaries due to inelastic collisions): W/m in Nominal conditions - Up to 4 W/m in Ultimate conditions - Proportional to the beam luminosity  Ratio up to 20 with respect to the static heat inleaks  Control principle Feed-forward control for ratio above 3 “Normal” control for ratio below 3

L. Serio Contents  Introduction Systems, principles and parameters  Cooldown Principles and key figures From simulations to sector cooldown  From steady state to nominal powering Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Working with circulating beams Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Fast current discharges and quench Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Conclusion

L. Serio Temperature Excursion during Fast Current Ramp-down Magnet current fast ramp- down from 12 to 0 kA with a rate of 80 A/s, for which Eddy currents dissipate 3000 J/m in the cold masses. Magnet temperature remains below T (helium stays in superfluid state) Recovery time: 2 hours

L. Serio  500 kJ.m -1 stored magnetic energy dissipated in the windings (see M. Chorowski spot)  Pressure rise contained by discharge every m by cold safety valves (see R. Couturier spot)  Discharged helium buffered into header D or discharged and recovered from header D into gas storage vessels Quench and helium recovery

L. Serio Recovery Time after Limited Resistive Transitions  A resistive transition warms up the magnets to 30 K  More than 14 cells or full sector  recovery up to 48 hours

L. Serio Contents  Introduction Systems, principles and parameters  Cooldown Principles and key figures From simulations to sector cooldown  From steady state to nominal powering Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Working with circulating beams Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Fast current discharges and quench Principles and key figures From simulations to full scale experiments  Conclusion

L. Serio Conclusions  The cooling principle of the LHC magnets and the cryogenic plants will: In steady-state operation, maintain the arc magnet temperature below 1.9 K with temperature stability within 10 mK In-between the different steady-state operation modes, give a temperature stability within 70 mK Not limit the cycle rate of injection After a fast current ramp-down, maintain the magnet temperature below T, but a recovery time of 2 hours is required Because of local random losses, give a maximum temperature excursion of 20 mK After a limited resistive transition, give a beam down time of 4 to 7 hours  Individual system, full scale prototype and final full sector tests have validated the basic design and operating principles as well as demonstrated a high level of availability achievable after the necessary commissioning time required by this complex but performing system