Brief Review up to Now 1 March 11, 2011, Geneva UNECE/WP29/ITS Informal Group 19th Meeting T. Onoda & K. Hiramatsu, Japan Transmitted by expert from JAPANInformal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Emergency Braking System / Lane Departure Warning System OICA POSITION 1 Informal document No. GRRF-S08-10 Special GRRF brainstorming session.
Advertisements

1 TP/EMD European State of the Art for AEBS systems Stuttgart, May 2008 Dr. Jürgen Trost AEBS/LDWS
Warning Timing for AEBS AEBS/LDWS Proposal of Warning Timing 1) Warning has two functions; to induce the driver to take an avoiding maneuver.
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2013 Overview of International Activities to Limit Distraction Document No. ITS (21st ITS,
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
Concept of Driver Assistance The ASV Project of Japan Geneva November 2003 Informal Document No. 20 (131 st WP.29, agenda item 2.4.)
OICA/CLEPA Homework Part I HMI, Driver in/out of the Loop Submitted by the experts of OICA/CLEPA Tokyo, June 2015 Informal Document ACSF
Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
Automatically Commanded Steering Function
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Information on mandatory fitting of advanced safety systems in Japan Engineering Policy Division.
REPORT TO GRPE 68 TH SESSION EVE IWG 1 Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG) Informal document No. GRPE (68 th GRPE, 9-10 January, 2014,
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
Submitted by the experts from Sweden and Japan Presentation in conjunction with GRRF Amendment proposals to UN R79 to introduce the requirements.
Review of ITS/IG Activity March 15, 2013 WP29/ITS Informal Group Takao Onoda Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan Document No.
Voluntary Standards Development of Advanced Safety Systems
3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from.
Summary of Activities up to Now March 16, th ITS Informal Group Meeting K. Hiramatsu and M. Sekine NTSEL: National Traffic Safety and Environmental.
1 Consideration of Issues Japan Presentation Informal document No. GRRF-S08-13 Special GRRF brainstorming session 9 December 2008 Agenda item 5.
Guidelines for Safety Critical Warnings Peter Burns IHRA-ITS Transmitted by the representative of Canada Informal Document No. ITS th ITS informal.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Damage Mitigation Braking System
ECE Regulation No.79 Informal Document No. GRRF (61 st GRRF, 5-9 February 2007 agenda item 5.) Proposal for Amendments Presented by the Expert from.
Human Factors Concerns for Design & Performance of Warnings J.L.Harbluk & P.C. Burns Ergonomics & Crash Avoidance, Transport Canada Human Factors Forum.
Progress report of GRSG informal group on Accident Emergency Call System (AECS) Transmitted by Chair of the AECS IWG Informal document GRSG
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - February 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT Japan.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Possible Example of Split of Regulation ~ Split of R79 and The New Regulation of Driving Assistance.
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
Lane Departure Warning Human Machine Interface GRRF informal group on AEBS/LDWS 1 February 2010 AEBS-LDWS
Vehicle Safety - (R)Evolution of Driving Assist Systems Jochen Schäfer Heiner Hunold Submitted by the experts from Informal document GRRF th GRRF,
1 Automotive industry Reducing Noise Emissions from Motor Vehicles: New EU Commission legislative proposal World Forum on Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) 156.
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
1 GRPE Informal Working Group on Heavy Duty Hybrids UNITED NATIONS Report to GRPE 65 Geneva, 17 January 2013 Informal document No. GRPE (65th GRPE,
1 ISO TC204/WG14 FVCMS Operation Performance, and Verification Requirements 9, December 2008 WG14 Expert Member of Japan Informal document No. GRRF-S08-08.
Development of Guidelines for Improvement of Vehicle Safety Regarding Infant-Carrying Vehicles Presentation material by Japan for 53rd session of GRSP.
Regulation 13-H Transitional Provisions Presentation in conjunction with ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRRF/2014/16 Prepared by the ad hoc group on Transitional Provisions.
IWVTA Informal Group WP th Session March 13, Transmitted by the representative of Japan Informal document WP (156 th WP.29, 13.
5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.
Conditional Automation (Level 3) Use-Case Description Submitted by the Experts of OICA as Input to the IWG ITS/AD November 3, 2015 Geneva Submitted by.
Cycle of Vehicle Safety Measures in Japan - Study process before & after rulemaking procedure Issue of safety regulations Enforcement (type approval &
Report to GRSG from ambassador to IWVTA Olivier Fontaine / Ignacio Lafuente Informal document GRSG (109th GRSG, 29 Sept.-2 October 2015, agenda.
CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.
1. Overview of the past and future work of WP29 ITS Round Table 18/2/2004 Geneva Kenji Wani Co-chairman of ITS informal Group, ECE/WP29 Ministry of Land,
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
Transmitted by the Experts of TRL (EC)
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Initial project results: Annex 6 – 20 Sept 2016
Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS)
JASIC Japan ______ 61st GRSP Session May 2017
Status Report to GRB #68 Task Force on Reverse Warning issues
Proposal for UN Regulation on AEBS for M1/N1
Informal document GRRF-86-36
Statement of Principles on the Design of High-Priority Warning Signals
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
NHTSA Research Overview: Automation, ADAS, and Human Factors
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Report on Automated Vehicle activities
WP.29 and GRVA activities on Automated Vehicles
Emergency Steering Function
Status of discussion about “Reversing Motion” in VRU-Proxi
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting
Sustainable Mobility & Automotive industry Unit
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI
Status of discussion after 8th meeting
Presentation transcript:

Brief Review up to Now 1 March 11, 2011, Geneva UNECE/WP29/ITS Informal Group 19th Meeting T. Onoda & K. Hiramatsu, Japan Transmitted by expert from JAPANInformal document No. ITS ( 19th ITS, 11March 2011, Agenda item 4)

Current activities: TOR : November 2004 –To develop common understanding of driver assistance systems Report of Two Years Activities : March 2007 –Appropriateness of "Driver in the Loop" under normal driving condition –Effectiveness of damage mitigation under pre-crash condition where collision is no longer avoidable Proposal of Warning Guidelines to WP29 : March

How ADAS assist driver in terms of HMI : 3 Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 recognitionjudgmentoperation recognition judgmentoperation recognitionjudgment operation recognitionjudgmentoperation Assistance by Advanced Technologies Behavioral Model of a Driver Conventional driving Information Warning Control

44 Report of two years activities : Information : –To keep monitoring the situation of self- commitment basis guidelines in each region for a time being Warning : –To develop high-priority warning guidelines in cooperation with IHRA-ITS WG Control : –To have following understanding as a base for future consideration

Control (continued) : –Systems should be designed in which driver is always held responsible for his/her driving. For this purpose followings are effective. Installation of auditory or visual announcement devices providing information on the system functioning –Control systems activated under normal driving condition should be designed based on “Driving in the loop”, where driver should be involved in driving in a way or other. For this purpose followings are effective. Announcement is made when the driving initiative is transferred from system to driver. Driver is kept involved in driving operation. For example, starting initiative should not be given to system. System allows switching on or off by driver System allows overriding by driver –As for Control systems to reduce collision speed activated under pre- crash condition where collision is no longer avoidable, there is no room for necessity of overriding and driver is not very likely to depend on system. 5

What are warning guidelines ? Purpose : to provide basic recommendations for the design of high-priority warnings on ADAS  Better understanding from drivers  Reduced confusion  More accurate and consistent expectations High-priority warning : to be delivered at critical situation where the driver is required to take immediate action or decision to avoid crash event 6

7 Warning guidelines 1.High-priority warning should be noticeable in the driving environment. 2.High-priority warning should be distinguishable from other messages in the vehicle. 3.High-priority warning should provide spatial cues to the hazard location. 4.High-priority warning should inform the driver of proximity of the hazard. 5.High-priority warning should elicit timely response or decisions. 6.Multiple warnings should be prioritized. 7.False/nuisance warnings rate should be low. 8.System status and degraded performance of high-priority warnings should be displayed.

8 Application of warning guidelines to AEBS and LDWS : ►High-priority warning should be noticeable in the driving environment , two modalities or more are generally recommended to make high-priority warnings more noticeable, however the warnings can be displayed using one modality if it can be ensured that the driver will notice the warning Proposal for draft Regulation on LDWS : 68th Session of GRRF, Sept/ Warning indication The lane departure warning referred to in paragraph shall be noticeable by the driver and be provided by: (a) at least two warning means out of optical, acoustic and haptic, or (b) one warning means out of haptic and acoustic, with spatial indication about the direction of unintended drift of the vehicle.

Wrap up : ITS Informal Group submitted Warning Guidelines in March, Final decision of WP29 will be made in next June, "Driver in the Loop" Principles were drafted by IHRA-ITS WG, dealing with advanced driver assistance systems. 9

Thank you for your attention 10