NRT & NRT+ Pilot Preliminary Results Gowri Shetty MS, MPH Gita Bewtra MPH.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation of the Illinois Tobacco Quitline Thomas W. ORourke, PhD, MPH 1, Diane O'Rourke, MA 1, Harold Wimmer, MS 2 and Lynda Preckwinkle, RRT 2 (1)University.
Advertisements

Colorado Tobacco QuitLine David Tinkelman, MD. Tobaccos Toll In Colorado 17.9% of the states adult population smoke cigarettes This is approximately 626,000.
MN Clinic Fax Referral Program. What is it? The MN Clinic Fax Referral Program allows you to easily refer any of your patients to appropriate tobacco.
Jim McCord, Project Director Tobacco Control Program SD DOH 615 E. 4 th St. Pierre, SD Phone: (605) Fax: (605)
Jean-François ETTER Evelyne LASZLO Jean-Pierre ZELLWEGER Charles PERROT Thomas PERNEGER University of Geneva, Switzerland Smoking reduction with NRT: a.
Drug Use and HIV Risk Behaviors among HIV-positive Latino MSM in a Large Urban Setting Jesus Felizzola, MD Mario De La Rosa, PhD Florida International.
Randi Lachter, MPH Manager of Policy Initiatives Webinar: Promoting Cessation Around the Federal Tobacco Tax Increase March 5, 2009 Promoting Quitlines.
Intervention and Promotion Makes a Difference Tobacco cessation intervention by healthcare providers improves quit rates. Brief counseling is all that.
Northwest Missouri State University Health Risk Assessment February 2009 RESULTS.
Implementing and Monitoring Proactive Referral program Rebecca “Bec” Ruiz-McGill; Bob Leischow; Susan Larsen; Corbie Ball May 2005 Arizona Smokers’ Helpline.
Vermont Department of Health Changing to the Minimum Data Set for Evaluation of Quit Line Services Presented By: Todd Hill, LiCSW, LADC Public Health Tobacco.
Public-Private Partnerships: Sustaining and Expanding Access to Quitlines Deb Osborne, MPH NAQC Public-Private Partnership Manager May 29, 2014.
The Role of Quitlines in Comprehensive Tobacco Cessation: Where are We Now; Where are We Going; and How do We Get There? Tamatha Thomas-Haase, MPA Manager,
1 The Impact of Smoking in Los Angeles County March 25, 2010 Jonathan Fielding, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A Director of Public Health and Health Officer L.A. County.
Results from the 2010 NAQC Annual Survey of Quitlines Prepared by: Westat, Jessie Saul, and the NAQC Annual Survey Workgroup July 11,
1 CTRI Webinar: Combination Medication Effectiveness June 9, 2010 Stevens S. Smith, Ph.D. Megan E. Piper, Ph.D. Center for Tobacco Research & Intervention.
The Ohio Partners for Smoke-Free Families 5A’s
Source: Massachusetts BRFSS Prepared by: Health Survey Program Using the BRFSS to Track Healthy People 2010 Objectives Highlights from the 2004 Massachusetts.
Tracey Strader, MSW, Executive Director Oklahoma Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust The Oklahoma Tobacco Helpline.
Highlights from the 2009 NAQC Annual Survey of Quitlines Prepared by: ERDU, Mignonne Guy, Jessie Saul, and the NAQC Annual Survey Workgroup July 22, 2010.
Arizona Department of Health Services - Tobacco Education and Prevention Program Proactive Referrals: Increasing Cessation Recruitment by Building Collaborations.
Economics of Tobacco Use and Help-Seeking Behavior Bishwa Adhikari, Ph.D., Economist Office on Smoking and Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Quit For Life® Program Presented by Helen Farid 1.
Tobacco Education and the Oregon Tobacco Quit Line An Introduction for General Audiences.
Linking Quitline Counseling & Medication Post Hospital Discharge via iPad App Post Hospital Discharge via iPad App Canadian Cancer Society Smokers’ Helpline.
Prepared by: ERDU May 5, 2009 Draft Results from the 2008 NAQC Annual Survey.
Perspectives on Impact Evaluation Cairo, Egypt March 29 – April 2, 2009 Presented by: Wayne M. Harding. Ed.M., Ph.D., Director of Projects, Social Science.
Giving a way free stuff to motivate smokers to call a Quitline North American Quitline Consortium Meeting May 2, 2005.
The Alabama Tobacco Quitline and July 22, 2010.
Tobacco Cessation Benefits Your HealthChoice Benefits with the Oklahoma Tobacco Helpline 2922.
Some thoughts about minimal dataset Róbert Urbán Smoking Cessation Center Budapest.
MINIMAL DATA SET FOR QUITLINES North American Quitline Consortium Annual Meeting May 2005 NORTH AMERICAN QUITLINE CONSORTIUM.
Gaining Quit Line Efficiencies Presented by Mary Kate Salley May 3, 2005 NAQC Annual Meeting.
Analysis of MDS Data Deborah J. Ossip-Klein, Ph.D. University of Rochester Medical Center 2005 NAQC Annual Membership Meeting Chicago.
Laws/Policies ABSTRACT Problem: A challenge for tobacco control practitioners is getting smokers to quit using cessation methods. To increase the proportion.
Increasing Access to Pharmacotherapy Jonathan P. Winickoff, MD, MPH Associate Professor in Pediatrics Harvard Medical School April 26, 2013.
Range of Quitline Practice in North America and Europe Sharon Cummins, Ph.D., Shu-Hong Zhu, Ph.D., Linda Bailey, JD, MHS, Regina Van der Meer, Ph.D., Sharon.
Realizing the Benefits of Health IT For CHCs November 8, 2005 Ralph Silber, MPH, CEO Community Health Center Network 1320 Harbor Bay Parkway, Suite 250.
“High School Students Take Anti-Tobacco Message Outside the Box”
New Plan Provisions- Medical Plan Changes. 2 Tobacco/Smoking Cessation Support “Clearing the Air” to a Tobacco-Free UC on January 2, 2014 Effective January.
1 Current Evidence-Based Cessation Treatments: Efficacy and Critical Ingredients Saul Shiffman.
Awareness of National Cancer Information Resources Linda Squiers, Ph.D. Lila Finney Rutten, Ph.D., MPH Audie Atienza, Ph.D. Mary Anne Bright, R.N., M.N.
Why Quitlines Work Shu-Hong Zhu, Ph.D Gary Tedeschi, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego NAQC Annual Membership Meeting, Chicago May 2-3, 2005, Chicago.
Ohio’s Fax Referral Initiatives Reach, Enrollment and Participant Characteristics Jeff Willett, PhD Director, NYS Tobacco Control Program March 4 th and.
Addressing Nicotine Dependence in Drug Treatment Kimber Paschall Richter, PhD, MPH Robert M. McCool, MS University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas.
Staff Training. MOQC/MCC Tobacco Cessation Patient Education Video: Why Cancer Patients Should Quit Tobacco.
Results from the 2009 NAQC Annual Survey of Quitlines Prepared by: ERDU, Mignonne Guy, Jessie Saul, and the NAQC Annual Survey Workgroup June 30, 2010.
Understanding Characteristics of Callers to Vermont’s Quit line after Expansion of NRT Presented by: Todd Hill, LiCSW, LADC Jason Roberts, MPH Vermont.
Factors associated with health care providers’ practice of smoking cessation interventions in public health facilities in Kiambu County, Kenya Dr Judy.
E of computer-tailored S moking C essation A dvice in P rimary car E ffectiveness Hazel Gilbert, Irwin Nazareth and Richard Morris Department of Primary.
Arizona Department of Health Services - Tobacco Education and Prevention Program Evaluating Cessation Among Clients Receiving Intensive Treatment at the.
Smoking Cessation Services in a Baltimore County Title X Family Planning Program CityMatCH Urban Maternal and Child Health Leadership Conference Albuquerque,
Implementing and Monitoring Pharmacotherapy Benefit Rebecca Ruiz-McGill, Bob Leischow, Dale Gehring and Corbie Ball Arizona Smokers’ Helpline a service.
Evaluating the Impact of the National Tobacco Quitline Network Paula A. Keller, MPH Linda A. Bailey, JD, MHS Shu-Hong Zhu, PhD Michael C. Fiore, MD, MPH.
Strategies for integrated, population-based recruitment into telephone-based smoking cessation counseling Linda C. Lockard Senior Project Coordinator Center.
Efficacy of Combination First Line Agents for Smoking Cessation Sneha Baxi, Pharm.D. Pharmacy Practice Resident University of Illinois at Chicago.
Partnering with the Michigan Tobacco Quitline Michigan Purchasers Health Alliance 17 September 2015.
MassHealth and Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program Examples of Collaboration Donna Warner, Director of Cessation Policy and Program Development, Massachusetts.
A Resource for Tobacco Dependence Treatment Michigan Tobacco Quitline Washtenaw County Public Health May 2016.
Clare Meernik, MPH 1 ; Anna McCullough, MSW, MSPH, CTTS 1 ; Leah Ranney, PhD 1 ; Barbara Walsh 2 ; Adam O. Goldstein, MD, MPH 1 Predictors of Quit for.
Barbara Silver, MA, CTTS, Carol Ripley-Moffitt, MDiv, CTTS, Jillian E. Harris, BASW, Mark Gwynne, MD, Adam Goldstein, MD, MPH Nicotine Dependence Program.
Full Circle: A Holistic Cessation Intervention Serving American Indians in Oklahoma Sally Carter, MSW, Oklahoma State Department of Health; Cynthia Tainpeah,
Assistant professor Family Medicine - Suez Canal University
Creating Community-Clinical Linkages to Treatment
QuitlineNC Funding.
Results from the 2013 NAQC Annual Survey of Quitlines
Florida International University
Mobile Apps/Resources
Presentation transcript:

NRT & NRT+ Pilot Preliminary Results Gowri Shetty MS, MPH Gita Bewtra MPH

Background Some sort of NRT benefit has been available to clients since In 2006, we offered a 50% discount on NRT and medications like Zyban An NRT workgroup was formed to address issues related to NRT and NRT+ coverage. Based on recommendations of the NRT workgroup, a pilot program was started in March 2008 where all clients received 12 week free NRT or NRT+ (including medications like Zyban, Welbutrin and Chantix) This pilot program was implemented for all clients enrolling in cessation services for the months of March and April 2008.

Background Funding –Pilot funded through Arizona tobacco tax, received by ADHS-BTEP –Estimated billing between March 1, 2008 thru April 30, 2008: ~$200K – 250K

Purpose of the Pilot Program To assess the impact of offering 12 week free NRT and NRT+ on Quitline service utilization and cessation outcomes Specifically we looked at: –How effective is offering free medication in motivating people to call the quit line? –Do free medications impact someone’s ability to quit for at least 7 days, 30 days or more? Does this vary by type of NRT/medication? –Do people value the behavioral support offered through the Quitline, and is there a difference if they do?

Pilot Program Description All clients enrolled in cessation services were offered 12 week free NRT/NRT+ NRT/NRT+ was mail ordered through BeBetter Networks Inc.

Methods Compared Quitline utilization for months before, during and after the pilot program All clients enrolled during the months of March and April 2008 were followed up at 4 months to assess their smoking status Criteria for follow-up –Complete the Client Intake Form (CIF) –Consent for follow up Up to 10 attempts were made to contact eligible callers

Demographics Age Gender Race/Ethnicity Insurance

Age Age RangeAll Callers N (%) Callers reached for follow up N (%) Mean <2444 (2.2%)18 (1.8%) 24 - <34268 (13.%)118 (11.5%) 34 - <44399 (19.8%)184 (17.9%) 44 - <54569 (28.2%)308 (30.0%) 54 - <64472 (23.4%)252 (24.5%) (12.8%)146 (14.2%) Missing5 (0.2%)1 (0.1%)

Gender All Callers N (%) Callers reached for follow up N (%) Male752 (37.3%)393 (38.3%) Female1224 (60.7%)619 ( 60.%) Missing39 (1.9%)15 (1.5%)

Race/Ethnicity All Callers N (%) Callers reached for follow up N (%) White1715 (85.1%)896 (87.2%) Latino194 (9.6%)74 (7.2%) African American57 (2.8%)30 (2.9%) American Indian/Alaskan Native 36 (1.8%)17 (1.7%) Asian10 (0.5%)6 (0.6%) Other129 (6.4%)51 (5.0%)

Insurance Insurance Coverage All Callers N (%) Callers reached for follow up N (%) Yes1173 (88.0%)900 (87.6%) AHCCCS443 (22.0%)210 (20.4%)

Results Call volume –2015 calls Clients reached at follow up –1027

Follow – up Clients Participants who enrolled in the free NRT program –854 (83.2%) How important was the offer of the free quit medication in your decision to quit tobacco? –Almost 80% said it was important

Follow – up Clients NRT/NRT+Number of Clients Chantix543 (52.9%) Bupropion6 (0.6%) Patch65 (6.3%) Gum16 (1.6%) Lozenge19 (1.9%) Did not use NRT378 (36.8%)

Quit Rate Calculation REACHED ONLY – Continuous quit Number of participants who have not used tobacco since last call Total number reached at call (1027) REACHED ONLY – 24 hour quit Number of participants who have not used tobacco in the past 24 hours Total number reached at call (1027)

Follow – up Clients NRT/NRT+ type Continuous Quit percentage Continuous Quit Rate 24 hour Quit percentage 24 Quit Rate Chantix (543) 44.6%23.6%10.3%5.5% Bupropion* (6) 66.7% Sample size too small 16.7% Sample size too small Patch (65) 38.5%2.4%16.9%1.1% Gum (16) 37.5% Sample size too small 18.8% Sample size too small Lozenge (19) 31.6% Sample size too small 15.8% Sample size too small Did Not Use NRT (378) 21.7%8.0%8.7%3.2%

Follow – up Clients NRT/NRT+ type Continuous Quit percentage Continuous Quit Rate 24 hour Quit Percentage 24 Hour Quit Rate Chantix (543) 44.6%23.6%10.3%5.5% All Other (106) 38.7%4.0%17.0%1.8% Did Not Use NRT (378) 21.7%8.0%8.7%3.2%

Follow – up Clients How important was the offer of quit coaching in your decision to quit tobacco? –Over 75% said it was important How helpful did you find the coaching in your efforts to quit tobacco? –Over 55% said it was helpful Overall, how satisfied were you with the service you received from the cessation quitline? –Over 67% said they were mostly or very satisfied

Next Steps Calculation of quit rates, based on new NAQC recommendations Recommendations for provision of NRT/NRT+ Compare pilot data to before and after data

Questions?