Civil Aviation Authority Slide 1 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES ROBIN ALLAN Deputy Legal Adviser.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peter Adams Health and Safety - Responsibilities and the Universitys Approach.
Advertisements

The New Safety Laws – Are you being Harassed? Jamie McPherson Partner MVM Legal.
Health and Safety Chapter 10.
The Law of Manslaughter Louise Christian Christian Fisher and Partners CCA Board Member.
What You’ll Learn How to define negligence (p. 88)
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
Torts and Legal Liability Craig A. Wallace, P.Eng
{ Chapter 10 TORTS: Negligence and Strict Liability.
Tort Law Part 2 Negligence and Liability. Negligence Most common tort Accidental or Unintentional Tort Failure to show a degree of care that a “reasonable”
RCN Joint Representatives Conference 2013 – Francis Inquiry and RCN Accredited Representatives Chris Cox Director of Legal Services Royal College of Nursing.
E Construction Surveying Liability of Surveyors.
The Legal Obligations of Safety Auditors Do safety auditors belong to any profession? What is a profession?
Negligence The Unintentional Tort (The most common civil action) Negligence.
Tort Law – Unintentional torts
PARTNERSHIPS, CORPORATIONS AND THE VARIANTS PROF. BRUCE MCCANN SPRING SEMESTER LECTURE 1 DUTY OF LOYALTY PP Business Organizations Lectures.
1 Professional negligence Joy Wingfield Short residential course Session 6 May 16 th 2006.
Professional Accountability Judicial system –Criminal justice system Criminal liability –Civil justice system Civil liability Professional self regulation.
Health and safety at work
Importance of Documentation Demonstratin g Due Diligence concept application defense.
ICAEW Health and Safety for Insolvency Practitioners - how to stay out of jail Simon Joyston-Bechal 24 October
Driving Services UK Limited. The Old Barn, Ledsham Village, Cheshire, CH66 ONE. Tel : Corporate Manslaughter & Health & Safety Considerations.
By Monika, Max, Vanja, Nicole KEY PRINCIPLES OF NEGLIGENCE.
Company Law — Lecture 22 Corporate liability under defective contracts
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Intentional Torts Section 4.1.
Topic 4 Involuntary manslaughter. Topic 4 Actus reus Involuntary manslaughter has the same actus reus as murder (unlawful killing) but a different mens.
Medico-legal aspects of “off-licence” prescribing in Obstetrics ENTER 2006 CONFERENCE Saj Shah Solicitor/Pharmacist 3 May 2006.
Presented by 1 © McGrigors LLP 2009 EMPLOYMENT LAW AND THE EXPAT Gary Freer, McGrigors LLP.
Beachcroft Wansbroughs What happens if we get it wrong? Barrie Hall Solicitor.
Torrington, Hall & Taylor, Human Resource Management 6e, © Pearson Education Limited 2005 Slide 22.1 Protection from Hazards Conflict between needs for.
Durham Public Schools Chemical Safety Program On-line Science Safety Workshop Janet Scott, Director of Science 6-12.
Level 2 Award in Employability Skills
Counselling and the Law Week 8 (part two). Session Objectives Explore the relationship between counselling and the law Explain what ‘duty of care’ means.
Field Trips – Legal liability Tom Baker Beachcroft LLP.
Legal Considerations Sports Med 2.
Part 2 – The Law of Torts Chapter 5 – Negligence and Unintentional Torts Prepared by Michael Bozzo, Mohawk College © 2015 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 5-1.
Concepts of Crime and Punishment. What is a crime? Essential constituents of a crime are: An act or omission forbidden or commanded by law. Violation.
INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER
The FPP Test What you (or your students) need to know Flight Training Division Presentation AIA Aviation Week Conference July 2011.
Tutorial Business Law Law of Tort. Question 1 The driver of a car driving at a fast speed hits a pedestrian who had just stepped down from the footpath.
CAA Design Delegation Seminar 2005 Legal Powers and Legal Issues for Design Delegates Sid Wellik, Solicitor, CAA.
DIRECT WORKS FORUM 10 June 2008 Andy Ballard. COMMON LAW MANSLAUGHTER Effectively – Death by gross negligence Test – (a) was a (common law) duty of care.
Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Jentz Miller.
ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING 1 Environmental Law. Environmental Permitting 2 Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2007 introduced a new.
OHS Seminar DO THE TIME – avoid the crime! Miles Crawley 8 June 2007.
 Criminal Law  Intentional act against the public at large  Arrest made  Punishment is handed out  Examples????
Involuntary Manslaughter
LEGAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES MLA EDUCATION DAY May 13, 2006.
Chapter 09 Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Negligence by Snježana Husinec. Negligence  failure to exercise the care toward others which a reasonable or prudent person would do in the circumstances,
TORT LAW. DUTY The legal obligation to perform …as dictated by condition of employment or statute.
Law in Action – Ch. 14. Tort = a civil wrong; damage to property or a personal injury caused by another person Unintentional Torts = injuries that are.
NEGLIGENCE “Carelessness” or “Not to give proper care”
Sources of Law Relevant to Health Service Management  Constitutions little relevant to management  Statutes many statues that affect malpractice  Administrative.
Elements of Crime. For an offender to be convicted of a criminal offence, at common law the prosecution usually must prove: –Actus reus –Mens rea –causation.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Intentional Torts Section 4.1.
Assessing Risk in Sport Legal and Regulatory factors.
1 Accountable Manager Responsibilities George Monteiro Principal Airworthiness Surveyor.
Health & Safety Management “and a few other things for your consideration”
Legal Aspects DEFINITIONS –Statutory law –Common (case) law –Public law and Private law –Criminal law and Civil law.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 20 Legal Liability.
Unit 3: Assessing Risk in Sport
Jamie McPherson Partner – MVM Legal
Chapter 6-1 Lesson Objectives
Professional Engineering Practice
SAVED BY THE BELL: INTERVENING IN STUDENT VIOLENCE
Assessing Risk in Sport
Explain the nature of liability insurance
Fire Service Course Delivery Legal Issues
Safety at Sea – Where the Law Kicks In
Chapter 6-1 Lesson Objectives
Presentation transcript:

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 1 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES ROBIN ALLAN Deputy Legal Adviser CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 2 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES There are four types of legal consequence to be considered  Employment  Criminal  Regulatory  Civil

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 3 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES EMPLOYMENT Taylor v Alidair “there are activities in which the degree of professional skill which must be required is so high, and the potential consequences of the smallest departure from that high standard are so serious, that one failure to perform in accordance with those standards is enough to justify dismissal”

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 4 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES CRIMINAL  UK aviation safety legislation (including EASA Regulations) is part of criminal law  Any breach is a criminal offence  CAA given responsibility by DfT to enforce  CAA has team of investigation officers to investigate and CAA will prosecute where appropriate  Police/CPS responsible for other and more serious offences eg manslaughter

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 5 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 CRIMINAL Manslaughter This would be a matter for the Police/CPS Gross negligence or recklessness Conduct was so bad in all the circumstances as to amount to a criminal act or omission. Recklesness means indifference to an obvious risk of injury, or actually to have foreseen the risk but to have determined nevertheless to run it THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 6 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 CRIMINAL Negligence and the ANO The most serious offence in the ANO – reckless or negligent endangering - also requires the prosecutor to prove recklesness or negligence. THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 7 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 CRIMINAL Negligence and the ANO A person is negligent if he fails to exercise such care, skill or foresight as a reasonable man (of that profession) in his situation would exercise  “it is so easy to be wise after the event and to condemn as negligence that which was only misadventure....”  “a mere error of judgement is not negligence.” THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 8 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES REGULATORY  CAA must be satisfied as to fitness and competence of licence/approval holders etc  May provisionally vary or suspend and/or propose to substantively vary suspend or revoke  Right of review of proposal  CAA cannot take away a licence to punish

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 9 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES CIVIL Civil liability largely depends on whether there has been negligence

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 10 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 Ingredients of negligence Four ingredients of a negligence claim are:  a person is negligent  loss or injury is suffered by some other person;  the negligent person owed a duty of care to the person who has suffered loss or injury; and  that loss or injury was reasonably foreseeable THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 11 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES BEING NEGLIGENT Negligence A person is negligent if he fails to exercise such care, skill or foresight as a reasonable man (of that profession) in his situation would exercise

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 12 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES BEING NEGLIGENT Duty of care A duty of care is owed to “persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the act or omissions which are called in question”. No negligence - no liability regardless of duty of care

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 13 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES BEING NEGLIGENT VICARIOUS LIABILITY Where an individual is negligent during the course of his employment, the employer is liable. Employer liable for acts of employee where he is doing something within the scope of employment possibly in an unauthorised manner or which is necessarily incidental to something which he is employed do to.

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 14 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES BEING NEGLIGENT VICARIOUS LIABILITY Employee entitled to be indemnified by employer. Nothing can prevent an individual being sued, but he will be entitled to look to his employer to deal with any such claim.

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 15 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES MINIMISING RISK Negligence is an important part of civil and criminal liability and indirectly of regulatory and employment liability So how can the risk of negligence arising be minimised?

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 16 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES MINIMISING RISK Almost always where negligence is proved it turns out that either –  no proper procedures have been developed at all or  there are perfectly adequate procedures but they have not been complied with

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 17 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES MINIMISING RISK The Organisation -  Develops appropriate procedures  Keeps up to date  Recruits, trains, manages and supports adequate staff  Monitors and enforces compliance The individual – Works within such a framework

Civil Aviation Authority Slide 18 Risk Taking & Rule Breaking October 2005 THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREAKING THE RULES ROBIN ALLAN Deputy Legal Adviser CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY