1 FVTX Detector Assembly Stephen Pate New Mexico State University (FVTX Assembly Management WBS 1.7) Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3 Oct Cost and Schedule Update Craig Ogilvie, Iowa State University Analysis of system risks Update schedule  Critical path.
Advertisements

Geoff Pile FAC Review - Undulator 12 November 2008 LCLS Undulator System Overview and Fabrication Geoff Pile.
David H. Dowell Injector RF Design November 3, LCLS Injector RF Gun: Design, Fabrication & Tuning Plans D. H. Dowell,
Stephen Milton Undulator System 20 April, 2006 LCLS Undulator System Update S. Milton, ANL FAC, April 20 th, 2006.
Integration and Test 14 October 2008 Martin Nordby.
Electrical Integration WBS Eric J. Mannel Columbia University Electronics Project Engineer VTX and FVTX.
The STAR HFT PXL system is designed to be inserted in situ. Is housed in 2 large frame aligned with rails inside Inner Detector Support. Inserted from.
March 20, 2001M. Garcia-Sciveres - US ATLAS DOE/NSF Review1 M. Garcia-Sciveres LBNL & Module Assembly & Module Assembly WBS Hybrids Hybrids WBS.
Electrical Integration WBS Eric J. Mannel Columbia University Electronics Project Engineer VTX and FVTX.
1. 2 Outline Contract Status  Q.A. plan  construction plan Preparations for construction  populating the construction space Microscope electronics.
+ STAR HFT Upgrade – Installation and Integration Rahul Sharma Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Jon S Kapustinsky 11/17/2010 Jon S Kapustinsky FVTX Commissioning Plan 1.71 Jon S Kapustinsky 1.
TGC Big wheel Sector assembly plan Tatsuo Kawamoto ATLAS workshop 2005.
David M. Lee Forward Vertex Detector Cost, Schedule, and Management Plan Participating Institutions Organizational plan Cost Basis R&D Costs.
ASPERA-3 Apr. 25, 00 Monthly Status Report ASPERA Monthly Status ReportMonthly 4_25/ Page 1 Monthly Status Report Report due 4/25/00 Schedule statused.
John LeRose March 12, A Program of three “projects” to assemble the Super BigBite Spectrometer for a series of experiments in Hall A There is a.
Robert Pak 1 DOE VTX Review June 2, 2009 Mechanical Integration & Safety Personnel: Walt Sondheim: Mechanical Project Engineer Don Lynch: PHENIX Chief.
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
Silicon Meeting July 10, 2003 Module and Stave Production Status James Fast Fermilab.
1 FVTX Detector Assembly Stephen Pate New Mexico State University (FVTX Assembly Management WBS 1.7) Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 17-Nov-2010.
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese U.S. ATLAS Review Revised Version November 29, 2000.
PMG, June 15, 2000 Slide 1 Schedule Started ! Done Late Done Done(today)
Ronald Lipton PMG June Layer 0 Status 48 modules, 96 SVX4 readout chips 6-fold symmetry 8 module types different in sensor and analog cable length.
M. Gilchriese Sectors, Rings, Frame Assembly and Installation July 18.
Technical Support Activities in PH-ADO-PO
CesrTA Experimental Plan M. Palmer for the CesrTA Collaboration November 17, 2008.
Takao Sakaguchi, BNL Run-11 PHENIX Run Coordinator PHENIX Run-11 Report Sakaguchi, RHIC retreat 1 RHIC retreat version.
David Lee, FVTX Review Nov Cost and Schedule WBS 1.0 David M. Lee Los Alamos National Lab Deputy Project Leader.
PMG, Aug 03, 2000 Slide 1 Schedule In preparation Done Started Done Started Half done.
Run 12: STAR Status and Schedule Update RHIC Coordination Meeting October 18, 2011 Bill Christie BNL Outline Status update Schedule update and issues Summary.
CMS Si Tracker Project - US CMS Meeting at Riverside – May 19, US CMS Tracker Outer Barrel (TOB) Silicon Project Tim Bolton (for Regina Demina)
FVTX Review, November 17th, FVTX Mechanical Status: WBS 1.6 Walter Sondheim - LANL Mechanical Project Engineer; VTX & FVTX.
1 US Cost & Schedule Summary W. R. Edwards US Project Manager CD-2/3a Review January 8, 2008 BNL.
RICH Installation and integration in CLAS12 October 13 th 2015 D. Orecchini, S. Tomassini 1 CLAS12 RICH- Mid Term Review.
FVTX Wedge Assembly WBS , , , , , David Winter Columbia University FVTX Wedge Manager.
Response to TAC8 and Annual Review Recommendations John Haines Head of Target Division April 2, 2014.
Robert Pak, FVTX Annual Review Nov Mechanical Integration WBS Robert Pak Brookhaven National Laboratory.
D. M. Lee, LANL 1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Cost and Schedule.
Walter Sondheim 6/2/20091 DOE – Review of VTX upgrade detector for PHENIX Mechanics: Walter Sondheim - LANL Mechanical Project Engineer.
Forward Vertex Detector Cost, Schedule, and Management Plan Participating Institutions Organizational plan Cost Basis R&D Costs Cost Schedule.
1 FVTX Monthly/Quarterly Report January 2009 Cost Summary Schedule Summary Current technical status of each WBS item.
D. M. Lee, LANL 1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Overview Technical Design Overview Design status.
Walter Sondheim 6/9/20081 DOE – Review of VTX upgrade detector for PHENIX Mechanics: Walter Sondheim - LANL.
FourStar Status SAC Meeting 13mar2010 Persson, Murphy, Birk, Monson, Kelson, Uomoto.
Columbia University IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK FVTX Electronics Oversight and Integration Eric J. Mannel Columbia University.
March 25, FVTX Monthly/Quarterly Report June, 2009 Technical Status, Cost & Schedule Melynda Brooks, LANL.
David M. Lee Forward Vertex Detector Cost, Schedule, and Management Plan Participating Institutions Organizational plan Cost Basis R&D Costs.
CMS Upgrade Workshop, FNAL, Oct 28-30, O.Prokofiev Update ME4/2 Chambers and Tooling A construction of new ME4/2 prototype at CERN Factory tooling,
Preparations to Install the HBD for Run 6 Craig Woody BNL PHENIX Weekly Meeting January 26, 2006.
TBL experimental program Status and Results  Introduction  Status  Experimental program for 2010 and beyond  Outlook ACE, Steffen Döbert.
3/7/20131 PHENIX WEEKLY PLANNING 3/7/2013 Don Lynch.
Columbia University IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK VTX Electronics Integration E.J. Mannel Columbia University DOE Review June 2-3, 2009.
Irfu.cea.fr ATLAS-NSW 4 TH MMM WORKSHOP SELECTION CRITERIA FOR THE DECISION ON THE MM CONSTRUCTION SCHEME of June 2013 Patrick PONSOT for the CEA-Saclay-Irfu.
SPHENIX MECHANICAL D. Lynch August 21, /15/2014sPHENIX Mechanical Design.
RLSR 16/4/2015 UK Financial Plan & Risks. Content Finances – FY 2014/15 – Cost to Completion Risks – Top level to completion – R9 working space – Summary.
SuperB Integration SuperB Experimental hall. Related topics of Slac D&D activities.
1 2/19/2009 PHENIX WEEKLY PLANNING 2/19/2009 Don Lynch.
Plans for the UT Installation LHCb infrastructure workshop February Burkhard Schmidt for the UT group.
1 FVTX Quarterly/Monthly Report July 2008 Melynda Brooks, Dave Lee.
MUSE NSF Review March 24, MUSE Project Management Ronald Ransome Rutgers The State University of New Jersey For the MUSE Collaboration.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months Vaia Papadimitriou Beamline Technical Board Meeting.
SPHENIX Mechanical Don Lynch & Rich Ruggiero April 10, 2014.
SuperB Experimental hall General considerations on the Babar experimental area Preliminary space requirements hall proposal. A floor plan. Specification.
Jim Fast Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
HFT Overview Flemming Videbæk BNL 3/14/12 F2F LBNL.
News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months
The SABRE Crystals Frank Calaprice.
X-ray Pump-Probe Instrument
HL-LHC upgrade at IPHC news
Polarized 3He target installation
Presentation transcript:

1 FVTX Detector Assembly Stephen Pate New Mexico State University (FVTX Assembly Management WBS 1.7) Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009

Stephen Pate, NMSU FVTX Review 10/12/ Talk Outline Scope Assembly Labs at BNL – status and outlook Support Structures and Assembly Fixtures Optical Metrology of Sensors on Wedges Assembly Schedule Summary

Stephen Pate, NMSU FVTX Review 10/12/ Scope Prepare assembly labs at BNL Receive wedges, ROCs, and support structures Build up half-disks and half-cages Metrology and Survey of sensors –Sensors located to 10 microns in x and y in each plane System testing including sensors and ROCs –Functioning and noise levels in all components Coordination of Installation in PHENIX

4 Assembly Labs Some minimum requirements for labs: o Just “clean” enough; sticky pad at door to minimize dust, proper handling procedures for wedges, dry box to store wedges o Basic electronic equipment o Four people should be able to work there o Sufficient room for surveying o Space for “mini-DAQ” and cooling system Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009

5 Assembly Labs Two rooms to be used in Physics Building: (1) Room ~ 250 sq ft; will be used largely for storage of items before and after assembly Can do survey of finished half-cages there Needs: Dry box for storage (2) Room 2-91 ~ 400 sq ft; active assembly and testing area Needs: Clean entry; dry box; air filter; electronics Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009

6 Assembly Labs Plan for Room Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009 Main task for this room is storage of “raw” materials (wedges, ROCs) and finished items (half-cages). Existing shelves Storage bins Two 35” high work benches Dry box Dry air bottles

7 Assembly Labs Plan for Room 2-91 Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009 Main task for this room is active assembly and testing of half-disks and half-cages. Three 33” high work benches (for assembly work) Existing cabinets Storage bins Floor sticky pad will go here Three 29” high work desks (for electronics testing) Dry box Dry air bottles

8 Assembly Labs Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009 Requests for clean-up and preparation of Room 2-91 Cleaning of all surfaces, including inside and outside of cabinets (janitorial) Cleaning and sealing the floor (janitorial) Filter box built over air inlet, with replaceable filter (Mike Lenz) Dry air system for dry-boxes (Rob Pisani) Grounding points for dry-boxes and anti-static mats (request to Sal) Experimental Safety Review (ESR) is needed before this room can be used.

Stephen Pate, NMSU FVTX Review 10/12/ Support Structures & Assembly Fixtures HYTEC is designing the Support Structures (WBS ) and the Assembly Fixtures (WBS 1.6.5); The support structures are far advanced in design; see Walt Sondheim’s talk for more details The assembly fixtures (i.e. items used in the assembly process, but not part of the final detector) are still in the conceptual phase; attention needed.

10 Assembly Procedure 1.Power-up tests of wedges delivered from SiDet, and of manufactured ROCs 2.Build up a half-disk as wedges become available; mechanical testing 3.Electronic testing of half-disk 4.Metrology of sensors on half-disk 5.Install half-disks into half-cages 6.Survey of half-disks in half-cages 7.Electronic testing of half-cage 8.Installation of half-cages into VTX enclosure 9.Installation of FVTX in PHENIX IR Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009

11 Support Structures & Assembly Fixtures Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009 Prototype design for a half-disk assembly and storage mount

12 Support Structures & Assembly Fixtures Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009 Need a support and dark enclosure for half-cages: Enclosure Idea – build a combination dry-box and dark- box for storing a half-cage while testing it; must take into account the size and shape of the big wheel Build four boxes of this type? The support should also be the transport fixture from 510 to 1008, and should be used to insert the half-cage into the VTX/FVTX enclosure.

13 Metrology and Survey Goal is to locate the sensors in a plane to within ~10 microns in x and y The strip-to-strip spacing within a wedge will be much better than that. So the issues reduces to the metrology of the sensors in a half-disk, the survey of the half-disks into a half-cage, and the survey of the half- cages in the IR. Optical metrology of individual half-disks can reach the ~5 micron level Normal surveying of disks in cages can get you to ~ microns Analysis of track data needed to reach ~10 microns A preliminary document has been written describing a procedure for this process – in development… Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009

14 Metrology and Survey Procedure: – There are 6 target marks on each wedge – Wedges are mounted on a half-disk; the half-disk fixtures will include survey targets – Target marks and survey targets will be located using a camera mounted on an optical CMM – Survey half-disks within a half-cage after assembly – Survey the half-disks into the IR during installation Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009

15 Metrology and Survey Each sensor has 6 alignment marks placed with high precision by sensor vendor; are visible to the un-aided eye. These marks will be optically located by a camera mounted on a CMM. Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009

16 Metrology and Survey Three Options: 1.Nikon optical scanner in the Physics building, which was previously used by STAR many years ago. Control system needs replacing, cost about $17k. 2.CMM in the BNL Main Shops; in constant use and carries hefty hourly price tag. 3.VTX has an appropriate machine but we have a big schedule overlap with them; shared use unlikely. Most likely we will replace the control system on the Nikon machine and use that one. Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009

17 Assembly Schedule Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009 Currently we’re considering a plan in which we install one or two half-cages into the PHENIX IR before Run 11 starts, in Fall The purpose would be to gain some advanced knowledge of operating the detector in the IR. Pursuit of this plan would need to be done in coordination with the VTX. This “early commissioning” plan would have a big influence on the order of tasks in the detector assembly at BNL. I have put together two task/workforce schedules; one that reflects the “baseline” plan (install 4 half-cages before Run 12) and one that reflects this “early commissioning” plan (install up to 2 half-cages before Run 11). Both plans are viable at this point in time. If we decide that having a half- cage in the IR for Run 11 is a priority, then we will need to focus our efforts on that; need to make that decision sometime in Spring 2010.

18 Assembly Schedule Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009 Contains explicit float of 3 months. Baseline plan

19 Assembly Schedule Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009 No explicit float, and bigger workforce integral. Early Commissioning Plan

Stephen Pate, NMSU FVTX Review 10/12/ Assembly Schedule Overview(s) Baseline Plan –Start building half-disks from wedges – May 2010 –Start placing half-disks in half-cages – August 2010 –Start testing half-cages – November 2010 –Start placing half-cages in VTX enclosure in IR – April 2011 –Start install and test 2 half-cages in IR – June 2011 [project complete!] –Start install and test remaining half-cages in IR – July 2011 Early Commissioning Plan –Start building half-disks from wedges – May 2010 –Start placing half-disks in half-cages – August 2010 –Start testing first 2 half-cages – October 2010 [first diversion from baseline plan] –Start placing first 2 half-cages in IR – November 2010 – followed by testing! –Resume building half-disks – January 2011 –Start building final 2 half-cages – April 2011 –Start testing final 2 half-cages – May 2011 –Start placing final 2 half-cages in IR – June 2011 [project complete!]

Stephen Pate, NMSU FVTX Review 10/12/ Summary Assembly labs at BNL are in a good shape with some work still remaining to be done to prepare them Support structure designs are advanced; assembly fixtures need attention Funds will likely be expended to repair CMM. Workforce needs and schedule have been anticipated; we have good schedule contingency at this point