Define the geographical scope of management Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 1 © Christina Lehmann 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WTO, Trade and Environment Division
Advertisements

Complex Site Governance Christopher Young. Levels of governance What UNESCO wants What the government should do Management at site level.
Systematic Conservation Planning, Land Use Planning and SEA in South Africa Sustainable development embodied in Constitution Secure ecologically sustainable.
Ecosystem-based adaptation helps to build the resilience of natural habitat and communities to climate change impacts and thereby reduce their vulnerability.
1A-1B.Team, Scope and Vision Conservation Coaches Network Workshop Presentation.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Implementation workshop
KEY ISSUES AND CONCERNS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN REDD+ AND FCPF Joan Carling, AIPP.
Determine conservation objects: (biodiversity-dependent) human wellbeing objects Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 3 © Christina Lehmann.
Determine conservation objects: biodiversity objects Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 2 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Analysis of systemic activity and the strategic relevance of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis.
Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 12 © Pierre Ibisch.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
Operational planning and implementation of measures Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 25 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Defining Responsible Forest Management FSC Forest Certification Standards Defining Responsible Forest Management Version:
Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 15 © Christina Lehmann 2015.
The concept of ecological networks and “green corridors”. Design and implementation. Current status and trends with focus on Europe. Transboundary cooperation.
Strategic Planning & the Duty to Co-operate Andrew Pritchard Director of Policy & Infrastructure.
Analysis of knowledge and manageability of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 16 © Pierre.
Monitoring of results, impacts and research Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 26 © CEEM 2014.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
Proposed Action Purpose and Need A proposal to authorize, recommend, or implement an action in response to the need identified in the Purpose and Need.
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
Building Capacity on Protected Areas Law & Governance Management Module 5.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
Planning schemes Statutory documents under s.20(2) of LUPAA –outline policies and objectives –regulate or prohibit use or development of land –reserve.
Revision and validation Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 16 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
1 Examples on Natura 2000 forest management on private areas Timo Soininen, M.Sc. Forestry Forestry Development Centre Tapio
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
The current state-of-play – protected areas Existing protected areas are not sufficiently comprehensive or adequate to achieve conservation targets. The.
Identification of existing strategies and “strategy mapping” Phase III Evaluation, prioritisation and strategy formulation Step 17 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Knowledge and non-knowledge management Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 27 © Pierre Ibisch 2013.
ESSnet(s) Big Data I + II Item 8 of the agenda Joint DIME-ITDG Plenary Luxembourg, 24 Feb 2015.
Climate Financing: Stakeholder Mapping. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F.
Climate policy mapping and analysis. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F +49.
Exercise: Pros and Cons of National Climate Funds.
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Cindy Damons 28 May 2008 The role of municipalities in managing and giving effect to.
Results webs, goal and objective setting and monitoring design Phase III Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation Step 24 © Pierre.
Analysis and filling of strategic gaps: the development of complementary strategies Phase III Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation.
Organise, revise and complete the systemic conceptual model Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 8 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Evaluation and revision of the underlying concept Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 29 © Pierre Ibisch 2013.
Analysis of climate finance policy instruments. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T
Spatial analysis and priority setting Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 9 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Analysis of private sector stakeholders. 2 Imprint Published by: Contact adelphi Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a Berlin / Germany T F.
© 2014 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Climate Change Response Framework projects Presentation to the Forest Community Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity in the Context of Climate Change Workshop.
The Canadian Geospatial Data Infrastructure Presented by Prashant Shukle Director General Canada Centre for Mapping and Earth Observation.
Define the initial management vision Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 4 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
2A.Develop a Formal Action Plan: Results Chains. Copyright and Use Terms Under this license, you are free to share this presentation and adapt it for.
2A.Develop a Formal Action Plan: Goals & Strategies © Foundations of Success December 2008.
NGO Initiatives in Advancing Civil Society Safeguards and Conservation GEF Civil Society Consultation Luis Pabon November, 2009.
Development Permit System. Development Permit System 2 Disclaimer  The information presented is provided as background information to facilitate understanding.
Assessment of the current status of the biodiversity objects Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 5 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Identifying contributing factors to threats
Assessment and prioritization of existing strategies
Stakeholder consultations
Objectives of WHO's collaboration with NGOs
Phase II Systemic Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Step 6
Visualisation of systemic relationships
Assess criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors
The Urban Forest Management Plan
Planning the Audit Engagement: key ingredients
CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional Authority
Module 0.1 Participants introduction / Preliminary stocktaking Trainer: [Name] Note to trainer:   During the NAP country-level training, the participants.
Module V.2 NAP as a living document Trainer: [Name]
Preparing Tables and Figures: Some Basics
Visualisation of systemic relationships I
Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation
Natura 2000 and Forests A new guidance document
Presentation transcript:

Define the geographical scope of management Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 1 © Christina Lehmann 2014

Credits and conditions of use 1. Define the geographical scope of management2 You are free to share this presentation and adapt it for your use under the following conditions: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). You may not use this work for commercial purposes. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you must remove the Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management logo, and you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar conditions to this one. © Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, 2014 The Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management strongly recommends that this presentation is given by experts familiar with the adaptive management process in general (especially as designed as the Conservation Measures Partnership’s Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation) as well as the MARISCO Method itself. This material was created under the leadership and responsibility of Prof. Dr. Pierre Ibisch and Dr. Peter Hobson, co- directors of the Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, which was jointly established by Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development and Writtle College. Compare: Ibisch, P.L. & P.R. Hobson (eds.) (2014): The MARISCO method: Adaptive MAnagement of vulnerability and RISk at COnservation sites. A guidebook for risk-robust, adaptive, and ecosystem-based conservation of biodiversity. Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde (ISBN ). 195 pp. – This Powerpoint Presentation was conceived by Jamie Call, Christina Lehmann and Pierre Ibisch. Authors of graphs and photographs are indicated on the corresponding slides. Supported by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH on behalf of the Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ).

1. Define the geographical scope of management3

Learning objectives Participants have the skills to guide through the process of defining a scope of management taking into account the wider context of a conservation site. They have the understanding and are able to explain the key term “scope” as well as the rationale for this step to identify a scope of management including features of biodiversity that need consideration and protection and taking into account issues related to human impacts occurring in the wider landscape. 1. Define the geographical scope of management4

? Outline What is the geographical scope of management? Why is it important to define the geographical scope? How do we define the geographical scope? Practical Tips 1. Define the geographical scope of management5

? What is the geographical scope of management? The area of a project or site, where deployment of resources is necessary to maintain, restore or develop ecosystem functionality An area large enough to include relevant features of ecosystems that need consideration and management 1. Define the geographical scope of management6 © Pierre Ibisch 2014

? Why is it important to define the geographical scope? To build an agreement upon common ground among all participants → everyone knows which (elements of ) ecosystems are to be included in the analysis of vulnerability and risk 1. Define the geographical scope of management7 Gives criteria regarding further administrative units to be approached in the course of research/ planning/ strategy implementation → encouragement to in- clude neighbouring units (potentially across borders) © Pierre Ibisch 2014

? How do we define the geographical scope? Metaphor of a medical doctor and his examination of the patient Which part of the body has to be examined? Is it only a specific part of the body that shows symptoms of illness or is there more behind that? Which parts of the body need to be treated in order to heal the patient? Does the source of sickness come from somewhere else? What about the patients environment? A more holistic and functional approach is to be chosen 1. Define the geographical scope of management8 © Microsoft

? How do we define the geographical scope? Maps are of major importance to visualise the study region and its surroundings In order to take all influences into account the following properties should be contained: – Habitat types – Land use cover – Land use cover change (e.g. deforestation) – Administrative boundaries – Land tenure – Topography – Hydrology (catchment areas!) – Infrastructure 1. Define the geographical scope of management9 © Christoph Nowicki 2013 © Google earth Satellite pictures are also helpful as they are real-life images containing surface features that do not necessarily appear on maps Time series showing changes might be useful

? How do we define the geographical scope? Where applicable, identify the legally defined conservation site Evaluate the appropriateness of the existing area with regards to understand the biodiversity needs that go beyond legally defined borders (e.g. forest blocks/ corridors, natural ecosystem borders) as well as relevant socioeconomic features or stakeholders Extend the area of analysis if held necessary Make sure that participants understand that scope will be revisited later on 1. Define the geographical scope of management10 © Pierre Ibisch 2014 © Christoph Nowicki 2013

? Practical Tips Size matters! The bigger the maps the easier to work on and with them In case of legally established conservation or planning sites (e.g. protected area, municipality) make sure that maps include a sufficiently large buffer around it (participants rarely decide to expand scope of analysis beyond regions depicted on maps) Encouraging the participants to expand the area across borders is sometimes necessary (where appropriate) Take scope-wise requirements of original project and the client’s expectations into account Provide maps on which can be drawn (working material!) 1. Define the geographical scope of management11