1 Exchange Network Performance Measures Exchange Network Users Conference Mary Greene, Chief Information Exchange Partnership Branch Office of Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE LUBRECHT REPORT: A MID-WAY ASSESSMENT OF THE 10 -YEAR WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP CHALLENGE Developed By: The Wilderness Advisory Group April 2010.
Advertisements

Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
1 Service Providers Capacity Assessment Framework Presentation to the Service Delivery Advisory Group August 28, 2008.
Bilateral Relations Programme level Bilateral Fund & Complimentary actions, reporting on them Andreas Aabel Bilateral officer EEA and Norway Grants Riga,
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
1 Geographic Support System Proposed Initiative – FY 2011 and Beyond Timothy Trainor U.S. Census Bureau 1.
Academic Advising Implementation Team PROGRESS REPORT April 29, 2009.
Campus Catering Don Green, C.P.M. Director, Contracts and Procurement
DEPAUL UNIVERSITY SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS AND PERFORMANCE METRICS Marge Hayes Ashton Hayes Group January 31, 2000.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
1 Customer and Market Focus in the Baldrige Criteria Examines how an organization determines requirements, expectations, and preferences of customers and.
ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Indicator 1.01 Understand marketing’s role and function in business to facilitate economic exchanges with customers.
Customer & Associate Engagement October 2008 NAW CEO Roundtable Dick Gochnauer United Stationers, Inc. President and Chief Executive Officer.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
1 How do Central Banks Write? An Evaluation of Inflation Reports by Inflation Targeting Central Banks Comment By Peter Andrews, Monetary Assessment and.
County Scorecard Update NACS Ronnie L. Taylor NGS State Advisor – Branch Chief Brett Howe NGS Headquarters Staff 7 March, 2008 Joe Whitsitt NGS Headquarters.
HR Business Impact Survey Introductory Slides can be adapted.
Creating Sustainable Organizations The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Sherry Martin HIV Quality of Care Advisory Committee September 13, 2012.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
EPA’s Work Related to P2 and the Great Lakes Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Round Table Summer Conference August 2005.
SIMCorBSIMCorB 1 Outreach Projects n SIMCorB Web site (8.3.1) n Strategic partnerships with other organizations (8.3.2) n Promote awareness of scientific.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Quarterly Meeting PMHP Collaborative PIP April 4, 2012 PMHP Analysis of Improvement.
Report on Performance Evaluation of the National Fish Habitat Board Cecilia Lewis, FWS Ryan Roberts, NFHP March 9, 2014.
Prepared by Opinion Dynamics Corporation May 2004.
OCTA Strategic Planning March 8, 2011 STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED MANAGEMENT.
American Evaluation Association 2008 Annual Meeting Denver, Colorado * November 5, 2008 Online Evaluation Resources: Knowledge Sharing for the Field Sue.
System Establishing Your Management Reporting System.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
2005 Performance Development System Survey Human Resources Staff Meeting March 20, 2006.
Sharing Session on Organizational Performance Jakarta, 3 September 2013.
STRATEGIC PLANNING Vandenberg Fire Department. Strategic Planning Is the set of actions and decisions made by management that lead to the development.
THE GREEN SUPPLIERS NETWORK- MICHIGAN Presented for: The Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Roundtable Winter Meeting March 8-9, 2005, McCormick.
Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.
HFTC Collaborative Council Strategic Plan Update.
Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.
© Prentice Hall, 2005Excellence in Business, Revised Edition Chapter Fundamentals of Marketing, Customers, and Strategic Marketing Planning.
The Balanced Scorecard
1 Office of Community Services Division of State Assistance COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT (CSBG) Technical Assistance Coordination Strategy Office of.
Presented to:Bellefontaine City Schools RECOGNIZING TEACHING EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
PROGRAM Perkins III Accountability and Continuous Improvement “Work in Progress” at Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Mary Jacquart Minnesota State.
The Kansas Cancer Partnership Evaluation – Fall 2009.
Presentation to Membership. A Recap of Our Process February 2009: Decision to renew strategic plan March 2009: Engagement of Berlin, Eaton.
Citizens are talking. Are we listening? Using customer data in your organization Presented by: Carlos Thomas Chief Deputy Tax Collector.
Educational Strategies Presented by: Christina Worrall Vice President, The Lewin Group, Inc PHDSC Annual Meeting March 18, 2004.
Creating an Interoperable Learning Health System for a Healthy Nation Jon White, M.D. Acting Deputy National Coordinator Office of the National Coordinator.
Community Planning: Monitoring & Evaluation Geddes Institute Research The Geddes Institute Emma Coles.
Measuring Development Impact: Beyond Satisfaction Deloitte Services LP Janelle HughesJohn DeVille Development LeaderTalent Analytics Manager.
Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Architecture Plus Meeting December 4, 2007 Kshemendra Paul (Acting) Chief Architect.
1 Future of the Exchange Network Whad’ya Node? Exchange Network Node Mentoring Workshop Presented by Molly O’Neill New Orleans, Louisiana February 28-March.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
MyFloridaMarketPlace Quality Improvement Plan. Page 2 MFMP Quality Improvement Plan  The MFMP team has developed a quality improvement plan that addresses.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – APRIL 12, Strategic Action Plan Evaluation Results.
ACF Office of Community Services (OCS) Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Survey of Grantees Satisfaction with OCS Survey of Eligible Entities Satisfaction.
©2012 THE ADVISORY BOARD COMPANY ADVISORY.COM Gaining Provider Feedback In February – March 2014, we administered a medical staff survey to employed &
Neeraj Kumar Negi Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office March 11 th 2015 Performance Measurement in GEF.
Delivering Results and Satisfaction: Strategic Planning for Information Professional Leaders and Managers SLA 2016 Annual Conference Donald Malcolm Smith,

Balanced Scorecard Designer
Public Health England – Our progress under the Sendai Framework
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Contents A GENERIC IT BALANCED SCORECARD
Wellingtone PMO Practitioner
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Strategy
Presentation transcript:

1 Exchange Network Performance Measures Exchange Network Users Conference Mary Greene, Chief Information Exchange Partnership Branch Office of Environmental Information April 19, 2006

2 Project Goals Evaluate Exchange Network performance Establish system for feedback Use measures to determine progress and strategic focus Prepare the Exchange Network for PART evaluation

3 Overview of Progress 30 performance measures were collaboratively developed through workgroup Measures are weighted and evaluated for ROI 10 performance measures will have metrics developed and baseline data collected Some measures may be deleted or added after baseline

4 Performance Measures Categories Customer Satisfaction and Market Share Knowing our customers well and creating value for them Business Process Improvement How we improve the business processes within programs and for their customers Operational Excellence Delivering exceptional levels of functionality, quality, and availability Governance and Strategy Transparent and fair governance process

5 Exchange Network Operational Excellence 12.3% Network Availability0.8% Response Time0.3% % of Successful Transactions1.6% Planned vs. Actual Ease of Use1.6% Ease of Bringing on New Users 3.1% Wait Time: user on hold0.3% % of Problems Resolved During First Call0.5% Customer Support Satisfaction 2.0% % of Repeat Problems by Category0.6% Customer Satisfaction with 1.5% Features & Services Business Process Improvement 53.7% Implementation Costs1.2% Business Process Costs4.8% Fewer Errors Discovered by Users1.5% Filling Perceived Data Gaps4.2% Survey on EN Data Being Easy to Use1.4% Standardization of Web Services6.6% Expansion & Enhancement of Web Services2.8% Information Quality8.8% Execution of EN Strategic Plan3.4% Environmental Decision Making Improvements 20.4% Making Improvements Customer Satisfaction and Market Share 24.1% Customer Satisfaction with14.1% Current Services Service Utilization Index 2.6% New Partners Using 7.4% Existing Services Governance and Exchange Network Strategy 9.9% Governance Satisfaction2.4% Requirement in PPGs, PPAs & Grants1.3% % of Data Exchanges using3.9% Exchange Network Governance Coordination0.8% Coordination with other data efforts0.3% Understanding of Grant Process0.3% Alignment of Grants with 0.9% Strategic Priorities Complete Set of Exchange Network Metrics and Weights Customers are delighted and usage base expands. We continually improve how we do our business. We have a transparent and fair governance process. The Exchange Network operates flawlessly.

6 Exchange Network Operational Excellence 6.6% Business Process Improvement 21.9% Fewer Errors Discovered 1.5% By Users Environmental Decision 20.4% Making Improvements Customer Satisfaction and Market Share 21.5% Customer Satisfaction with 14.1% Current Services New Partners Using 7.4% Existing Services Governance and Exchange Network Strategy 7.6% Governance Satisfaction 2.4% Requirement in PPGs, 1.3% PPAs and Grants % of Data Exchanges 3.9% Using Exchange Network Exchange Network Baseline Metrics and Weights Customers are delighted and usage base expands. We continually improve how we do our business. We have a transparent and fair governance process. The Exchange Network operates flawlessly. Ease of Bringing on New Users 3.1% Customer Support Satisfaction 2.0% Customer Satisfaction with 1.5% Features & Services

7 Your Role in Project Member of workgroup Provider of information on, for example:  Customer satisfaction with EN features and services  Customer opinion on ease of use  Satisfaction with governance  Satisfaction with Help Desk Facilitating improved environmental decision making Helping to tell the story of EN performance

8 Score Card A Score Card is similar to a report card  The Score Card will have an overall grade for the program  The Score Card will have four categories, each comprised of several metrics  Underling metrics based on statistical analysis and user comments

9 Performance Goals After the baseline, performance goals for the next evaluation period will be established Meeting performance goals will be a major indicator of program success Score Card results will influence how we manage the EN

10 Project Schedule MILESTONESDATESSTATUS Identify MeasuresDecember 2004 – February 2006 COMPLETE Develop Baseline MetricsJuly 2005 – March 2006 COMPLETE Develop Data Collection StrategiesMarch 2006 – May 2006 Underway Collect DataMay 2006 – September 2006 Pending Develop Baseline ReportAugust 2006 – September 2006 Pending Establish Targets and Implement Metrics Program FY 2007

11 Summary Significant progress on performance measurement development Baseline collection over the Summer 2006 Annual performance measures Score Card Aide in assessing  Overall performance  Telling the story  Facilitating improved decision making