Board of Education Meeting September 10, 2012. Special Education Quality Review - Monitor compliance related to programs and services provided to students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Early Childhood Outcomes… Who, What, Where and How
Advertisements

Special Education Continuum of Services Oswego City School District October 9, 2009.
Evaluation of Special Education Teachers
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MIGRANT HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEM CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEMS Training Plan * Outcomes Awareness.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
VESID UPDATES Patricia J. Geary 9/15/06.  Behavioral Interventions  IDEA Federal Regulations  State Assessments  State Performance Plan  Levels of.
Components of an IEP NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS.
Everything you need to know before the Annual Review March 16, 2011 The New State Mandated IEP.
Supporting Students with Disabilities in the Classroom Standards Based IEPs LASPDG Presented by Kathy Kilgore January 22, 2015.
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Special Education Annual Report for to the Board of Education Jamesville-DeWitt Central School District November 2, 2009.
CPSE/CSE Additional Parent Member Training Rochester City School District.
Improving Outcomes for Students with Disabilities Office of Exceptional Children Cathy Boshamer, Director John Payne, Team Lead November 7, 2013.
RtI in Early Childhood Lisa Kelly-Vance, UNO and Kristy Feden, Papillion- LaVista Schools.
PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.
Laura Matson, Ph.D. Director, Special Services Puget Sound Educational Service District Navigating the School Culture September 25, 2014.
Newark Central School District Special Education District Plan November 1, 2014-October 31, 2016 Submitted by: Jennifer Singer Director of Pupil Services.
Why/Purpose Instructional Support Services Program Review The purpose of the review is to create a well-articulated, high quality, financially sustainable.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Board Presentation November 26, P.L Education for All Handicapped Children Act IDEIA -- Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement.
Special Education Briefing April 10, 2015 HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HawaiiPublicSchools.org.
Department of Special Education and Pupil Personnel Services Michelle Davis, Director of Special Ed/PPS Patricia Griffin, Admin. Assistant for Special.
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
NWAESC Early Childhood Special Education Program “Making A Difference”
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner NYSED VESID Presentation to NYS Staff / Curriculum Development Network Targeted Activities to Improve Results for.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
 Indicator 1 – Graduation  Indicator 2 – Dropout Rates  Indicator 3 – Assessment  Indicator 4 – Suspension/Expulsion  Indicator 5 – School Age LRE.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
The Transition Process “ BRIDGING THE GAP” ECI Project TYKE to KATY ISD (Revised 12-12)
Special Education is not a place, it’s a service. Board Presentation November 28, 2011.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT Chapter One.
RTI stands for Response to Intervention. It is a four tiered process designed to meet the needs of struggling students. W HAT IS RTI??
New IEP Process and Product March/April/May/June 2008 Barrie Grossi, Lynne Ryan RI Department of Education RI Technical Assistance Project.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
District Annual Determinations IDEA Part B Sections 616(a) and (e) A State must consider the following four factors: 1.Performance on compliance.
KETTLE MORAINE (KM) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Ryan Meyer.
Understanding Special Education Services
Spring 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 SPP/APR Update.
New IEP Process and Product Preschool Special Education Conference Series #3 May 22, 2008 Barrie Grossi, Lynne Ryan RI Department of Education RI Technical.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
Annual Desk Audit (ADA) March 31, 2015 Webinar. Agenda  Purpose/Introduction of the ADA  Indicator Reviews  With Five-year trends  Navigating the.
 Is unique to Nebraska with its self- assessment process.  Is intended to be a component of your district’s School Improvement Process.  Is an ongoing.
Special Education Services Lynne Adams, Director of Special Education Shelby Thibodeau, Assistant Director of Special Education School Board Presentation,
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Spencer County Preschool Update 2013 – 2014 SCHOOL YEAR.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
Early Childhood Feasibility Study Presented by Early Childhood Feasibility Committee Members Eileen F. Swan, parent Amy Lupoli, parent Alisa Ruggiero,
SPECIAL EDUCATION OVERVIEW. OVERVIEW The Pikes Peak BOCES is the Administrative Unit (AU) for nine member districts. We serve over 600 students As the.
State Performance Plan ESC-2 Presentation For Superintendents September 19, 2007.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
And Amendments to the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education Effective December 8, 2010.
Special Education School District Profile Slinger School District Lynda McTrusty.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Appleton Area School District
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004
Milwaukee School District
Department of Exceptional Student Education
The ABCs of Student Support Services
Blackhawk School District
Presentation transcript:

Board of Education Meeting September 10, 2012

Special Education Quality Review - Monitor compliance related to programs and services provided to students with disabilities.

State Performance Plan Indicator / Target School-Age Enrollment 1,5181,4701,387 School-Age SWD Enrollment Classification Rate 11.4%12.2%13.1% Preschool Enrollment Total Cohort SWD *19 Total Cohort SWD * year Graduation Rate (44% or higher) *78.9% Total Cohort SWD *18 5-year Graduation Rate *77.8% ELA Performance Index (Make AYP) Math Performance Index (Make AYP) Long-term Suspension Rate (2.7% or lower) 0.6% 2.7% (4A) 5. LRE – 80% or more of day (More than 53.3%) 81.5%77.5%69.6% 6. Preschool Outcomes – Percent functioning within age expectations by the time they exited the program (55.4%; 55.3%; 63.2%) NA No (Social/Emotional) Yes (Knowledge & Skills) Yes (Behaviors) 7. Timely Evaluations (100%) NA90.9% (Preschool) 100% (School-age) NA 8. Early Childhood Transition (100%) NA 9. Secondary Transition (100%) 43.3%100%NA 10. Post-School Outcomes Within One Year – Baseline data collected NA 38% (Higher Ed.) 75% (Higher Ed./Employment) 88% (Postsecondary education or some employment)

Consultant teacher 20:1 ratio Resource Room 5:1 ratio Integrated Co-teaching Special Class 15:1 ratio  Related Services  Speech and Language Pathology  Audiology services  Psychological services  Physical therapy  Occupational Therapy  Counseling Services  Assistive technology services  Teacher of visually impaired

 Individualized Education Program (IEP) Development  IEP Implementation  Appropriate Instruction from Qualified Staff  Access to and Participation and Progress in the General Education Curriculum  Specially-designed Instruction  Instruction in Literacy  Behavioral Supports  Parental Involvement

 Review of school records  Classroom visitations and interviews  Observations of Committee on Special Education  Interviews of administration and faculty  Interview of parents and guardians  Case studies

 Response to Intervention (RtI)  Layered Curriculum that allows for differentiated instruction  Implementation of Just Words (Wilson Reading) MS/HS  SPED teachers participating in PD on goal development& progress monitoring  Leveled Literacy Intervention (Fountas & Pinnell) as a Tier II intervention at the elementary level  The development of effective practices for a student strength-based functional behavioral assessment (FBA) and BIP process. Positive practices

 Alignment of annual goals and progress monitoring  Progress monitoring of Behavior Intervention Plans

 Continued Professional development  Development of RtI (HS/MS)  Aligned FBA/BIP in the district

“I”m not afraid of storms, for I’m learning to sail my ship”. Aeschylus