Assessment Report & Review (Location) (Date). Assessment Report and Review Step 1 : Upon completing your research, your assessment team produces a comprehensive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
August 2014 Liver quest User Demo: Liver Quality Enhancement Service Tool (QuEST)
Advertisements

Falls Risk Assessment and Management Plan (FRAMP).
Training for OCAN Users Day 2
Building Disaster-Resilient Places STEP FIVE – Prepare, Review, and Approve the Plan.
THE KEEP PROCESS. ADMINISTRATION Use EDCS to assign evaluators to classroom teachers and leaders Send information from EDCS  KEEP.
Office of Student and School Success “Ensure equality of outcome for Washington State’s 1.1 million students” Our Mission… Andrew E. Kelly Assistant Superintendent.
Learning Outcome Management System This is a Windows application that interacts with a database to manage learning outcomes for College of Business courses.
TECHNICAL BID OPENING. Tender creator logs in 1. Dept user logs in with login id and password 2. Click Login.
New Zealand’s Second Universal Periodic Review: an opportunity for change.
ONLINE TECHNICAL REPORT SYSTEM Team Crash Course Ryan Ashe, Eileen Balci, James Kirk, Taylor Paschal.
ACCESS TO SKILLS ASC TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 1. WELCOME TO A UNIQUE LEARNING OPPORTUNITY... You have been invited by the Pharmacy Guild SA to participate.
Write On! Creating an Online Dissertation Writing Group.
Hollis Day, MD, MS Susan Meyer, PhD.  Four domains for effective practice outlined in the Interprofessional Education Collaborative’s “Core Competencies.
Planning and Conducting An Investigation Deon Woods Bell U.S. Federal Trade Commission Livingstone, Zambia September The Fifth Annual African.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” CYE 2014 Transition Update AHCCCS Contractor Update Meeting June.
Insert name of presentation on Master Slide The Public Health Wales Good Practice Scheme October 2010 Presenter: Malcolm Ward.
POSITIVE BEHAVIOUR FOR LEARNING - website and toolkit 27 April 2012.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
COMMUNITY AWARENESS / EMERGENCY RESPONSE BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLES AND TOOLS David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council May 31,
What is Alaska STEPP Alaska STEPP, which stands for Steps Toward Educational Progress and Partnership, is an online, school improvement planning tool based.
Monitoring Schedule David Chappell, or
Faculty Performance Evaluation Reports Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
The Team Science Toolkit is an interactive website that provides resources to help users support, engage in, and study.
 Overview  Online Report Process ◦ Report process for Grantees/Look-Alike Site Visits ◦ Report Process for Look-Alike Applicant Site Visits  Report.
Three State Data Warehouse 1 Cassie Archuleta Tom Moore May 6, 2014 Progress Update for 3SDW Development.
ATPMM – a Guide to TELSOM/ATRC Project Approval Process Workshop on ASEAN TELSOM Project Implementation & Funding Management Manual (ATPMM) Phnom Penh,
History-Higher Education 2004 Office of Campus Police and Security (OCPS) created excellent practices in the prevention of crime.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
The Access Initiative and the Partnership for Principle 10 World Resources Institute Nathalie Eddy.
GLOBAL FUND EVALUATION WORKSHOP Coalition on HIV and AIDS among girls and women in Swaziland Cape Town February 18-22, 2008.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
CSOC – Certification Structure Oversight Committee Application Guidance October 2015.
A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO STRATEGIC PLANNING Mitch Everton Saturday, November 23 4:15-5:30.
THE POSTMORTEM Chapter 10 Introduction to Team Software Process.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
Forming a National Research and Advisory Panel. The National TAI Coalition The Lead Organization –Convenes coalitions –Coordinates workshop –Communicates.
Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.
Educator Effectiveness Updates April Updates Closing up Looking forward to
Afdeling Institusionele Navorsisng en Beplanninig Division for Institutional Research and Planning FROM EVALUATION REPORTS TO ACTION – CLOSING THE LOOP.
SESSION 6 Content types Survey, Meeting, Talkback Consultation, Discussion Forum.
Kentucky Alternate Assessment Transition Attainment Record (TAR) Part II Click here to download the Administration Guide (Required for completion.
Faculty Performance Evaluation Reports Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
Instructions for using CAP eServices online DDR Reporting From your DDR Team 1.
Indistar® Tools for Coaching And Using Coach’s Critiques.
Insert name of presentation on Master Slide The Public Health Wales Good Practice Scheme October 2010 Presenter: Malcolm Ward.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Info-Tech Research Group, Inc. Is a global leader in providing IT research and advice. Info-Tech’s products and services combine.
Faculty Performance Evaluation Reports Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
TOPS TRAINING.
Design a 360 Degree Feedback Program
Applying for HEA Fellowship
2016 Year-End Performance Management
The NICE Citizens Council and the role of social value judgements
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Bradford VTS Web Pages for General Practice ONLINE RESOURCES
State Steering Team Meeting
IATI External Evaluation 2015
Regulated Health Professions Network Evaluation Framework
1915(c) WAIVER REDESIGN 2019 Brain Injury Summit
The session will commence at Please mute your microphone
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
[Team Name] (e.g. ESH) Team Lead.
Building Disaster-Resilient Places
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
Earned Value Management System Acceptance Working Group
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Report & Review (Location) (Date)

Assessment Report and Review Step 1 : Upon completing your research, your assessment team produces a comprehensive report of your findings and a shorter, summary report (a copy of which must be produced in English). Step 2 : Your report undergoes a thorough Review by your national advisory panel and then by a TAI Global Review. After each round, writers evaluate and incorporate comments from reviewers. Step 3 : Upon completion of the formal Review processes, your report and summary are added to the TAI Global Database and made available to the public. ** The TAI Toolkit allows the review process to occur online and your report findings to be published online. **

Assessment Report The Report allows your team to: Formally organize your research, and present the findings of your analysis Present evidence that supports your coalition’s advocacy agenda Find new ways to engage your government in dialogue about improving access issues

The Summary and Report may be uploaded into the system, allowing national and global reviewers to access documents online. Researchers and writers can download a detailed, comprehensive report outline to use as a guide.

National and Global Review The Review Process is a mandatory step to your TAI Assessment being officially recognized as a TAI product. The Review Process allows your coalition to: Engage your advisory panel to receive valuable feedback and input from your national advisory panel Receive feedback from members of the TAI Core Team and its global network and be certain of the methodological integrity of your assessment

Your Team Leader will give your National and Global Reviewers a special login to your assessment. This allows all reviewers to access your assessment and provide feedback and suggestions online.

Reviewers are prompted to consider specific elements of your national assessment report. After each reviewer has responded to the questions, they submit their responses. The responses are immediately available to your team for consideration and integration.

Assessment to Action Upon successful National and Global reviews: The TAI Core Team accepts your assessment as a TAI Product. You may now use the TAI logo on your report Your assessment and summary are added to the TAI Global Findings Database; once in this database, your assessment will be available to the public Your team is poised to use the assessment results to leverage for change on the ground