ID-cloud GAP analysis work overview Prepared for F2F May 16-17, 2012 Redmond, WA Gershon Janssen, secretary ID-Cloud TC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FCMAT Response & Preparation: Process Outline October 25, 2006.
Advertisements

Planning M&E to Tell Our ACSM Story. Objectives Discuss how ACSM activities can address barriers to help reach national TB control targets. Describe how.
P ROJECT S TATUS S UMMARY. Insert Date Presentation Title Goes Here Sample Project Status/Schedule Summaries In addition to managing a project plan in.
PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT
FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2013/2014 UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS
P ROJECT S TATUS S UMMARY. Insert Date Presentation Title Goes Here Sample Project Status/Schedule Summaries In addition to managing a project plan in.
Jan 28, 2009CFS-GBL meeting 1 PM report Jan 28, 2009: Reviews –AAP –PAC (May 9 and 10, 2009) Meetings –TILC09 FALC –Madrid, Jan 19, 2009.
OCIO/OCMIO Informatics Workforce Development Project Phase II CMIO Subgroup: Planning Discussion February 2012.
Solving Problems in Groups Ch. 9. Advantages of group problem solving Groups posses a greater collection of resources than individuals Groups increase.
Quality is about testing early and testing often Joe Apuzzo, Ngozi Nwana, Sweety Varghese Student/Faculty Research Day CSIS Pace University May 6th, 2005.
Project Plan The Development Plan The project plan is one of the first formal documents produced by the project team. It describes  How the project will.
TECH Project Design and Manufacturing Control Process for Formula SAE Analyze Phase Date: 11/19/2014 Team members: Chris Lawrence.
ESC/EN Engineering Process Compliance Procedures August 2002.
Oasis Identity in the Cloud (IDCloud) Towards standardizing Cloud Identity Anil Saldhana ( Red Hat), Co-Chair Gershon Janssen, Secretary
Business Acquisition Process Implementation & transition Closing Negotiation of the transaction Due Diligence Engagement TargetIdentification.
OE 3B Roles & Responsibilities New GSMP V15 26 th August 2009.
RUP Fundamentals - Instructor Notes
Chapter 2 The process Process, Methods, and Tools
Enterprise Product Implementation Process. Components of a Successful Implementation  A detailed Scope Document for customer review and signoff  Creation.
[Facility Name] [Presenter Name] [Date]. Objectives 2 After this session, you will be able to 1. describe Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and Plan-Do-Study-Act.
© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Defect Management and Prevention QMS Training.
IT 499 Bachelor Capstone Week 8. Adgenda Administrative Review UNIT Seven UNIT Eight Project UNIT Nine Preview Project Status Summary.
Gershon Janssen 11 th October 2011 London Privacy Management Reference Model International Cloud Symposium 2011.
Public Health Reporting Initiative: Stage 2 Draft Roadmap.
Transfer Payment and Financial Reporting Branch Ministry of Education Implementation of Tangible Capital Asset (TCA) Reporting TPFR Information Sessions.
EsMD Use Case 1: Introduction to Harmonization 1.
SacProNet An Overview of Project Management Techniques.
Executive Session Director’s CD-3b Review of the MicroBooNE Project January 18, 2012 Dean Hoffer.
Software Engineering Saeed Akhtar The University of Lahore Lecture 7 Originally shared for: mashhoood.webs.com.
2006 BYU Reaffirmation of NWCCU Accreditation Executive Accreditation Committee February 12, 2006.
Process Assessment Method
Detailed description of your H2020 project Description of the action (Annex 1) Estimated budget for the action (Annex 2) Ulrich Genschel European Commission.
Overview of the RBS Plan Review Process Leslie Ann Hay, Implementation Lead Megan Stout, CDSS Analyst.
Identity in the Cloud (ID-Cloud) Towards standardizing Cloud Identity
S&I Standards Organization Engagement & Communication Plan DRAFT Standards Support Team 1 September 2011.
Data Provenance Community Meeting November 6, 2014.
Introducing Project Management Update December 2011.
Standards and Interoperability Framework Primer of S&I Phases, Procedures, and Functions.
Fall 2015 ECEn 490 Lecture #8 1 Effective Presentations How to communicate effectively with your audience.
1 Software Engineering and Security DJPS April 12, 2005 Professor Richard Sinn CMPE 297: Software Security Technologies.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD)
Long-Term Congestion Rights (LTCR) Weekly Testing Call January 5, Project Pinnacle.
Requirement Engineering
1 of SM & VL – NFPCSP, 14 Nov. 07 NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: situation analysis NFPCSP Formulation of Phase II: Situation analysis Dhaka, Wednesday 14.
SITUATION ASSESSMENT FOR HIV PROGRAMMING DR. S.K CHATURVEDI DR. KANUPRIYA CHATURVEDI.
Developing the Marketing Plan Appendix 1. COPYRIGHT © 2002 by Thomson Learning, Inc. All rights reserved. Aids in Developing a Strong Marketing Plan…
SUMMARY ON THE SPL STUDY COLLABORATION R. Garoby – 12/12/2008 First SPL Collaboration Meeting December, CERN.
Overview PRINCE Hogeschool Rotterdam. 2 Project definition  A project is a temporary organization that is created for the purpose of delivering.
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 2 Diploma of Project Management.
A Quick Review of the Components THE DMAIC CYCLE.
1. Scope of Application 2. Use Case Actors Data Flows Touch Points Initial PI 3. PI - at Touch Points In Internal Out 4. PI - Operational Privacy Policies.
WP1.4 Index and Search George Kakaletris University of Athens.
Small Business Superannuation Clearing House - Transition to ATO
Oasis Identity in the Cloud (IDCloud) Towards standardizing Cloud Identity Anil Saldhana ( Red Hat), Co-Chair Gershon Janssen, Secretary.
Rebecca McQuaid Evaluation 101 …a focus on Programs Rebecca McQuaid
MANAGEMENT of INFORMATION SECURITY, Fifth Edition
Implementation Review Team Meeting
REWG activities in LILIIA MALON REWG Chair Prague
Data warehouse & associated reports
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT [SECOND]/[THIRD] QUARTERLY COLLABORATIVE WORKSHOP
Version 0.1Assessment Method Overview - 1 Process Assessment Method An objective model-independent method to assess the capability of an organization to.
PEM PAL IA COP AiP Working Group Guidance to Audit Engagement Planning
How to Successfully Implement an Agile Project

CLINICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM
TECHNICAL REPORT.
X-DIS/XBRL Phase 2 Kick-Off


Draft Charter Community of Practice for Direct Access Entities
Presentation transcript:

ID-cloud GAP analysis work overview Prepared for F2F May 16-17, 2012 Redmond, WA Gershon Janssen, secretary ID-Cloud TC

About the GAP analysis Identify gaps in current standards by: –Detailed analysis of each use case –See if all the needs are addressed with the current available standards So can the desired goal or outcome be achieved, based on the process flow considering its actors, systems and services involved? What is required to do this: –Go through each of the use cases and analyze how it can be implemented and what is required or find out where the standards fall short or what we perceive as missing. –To kick-start this: ask initial submitters / owners of the use cases about their first take at the gap analysis to –Need for expertise on the details

Considered Approaches Considered approached for the GAP analysis: –Full analysis per use case Select a use case and perform all that is necessary to identify the possible gaps –Step by step / phased drill-down into more detail First identify commonalities and reusable elements Drill-down in phases looking at all use cases per phase Pros of this approach: results after each phase; expected reuse of common elements; obvious / big gaps surface quickly; required in-depth knowledge level increases with each phase (we can start lightweight); show progress.

Agreed on GAP analysis process Approach: Step by step / phased drill-down –First pass: Identify relevant standards Goal / result: summary / list of relevant standards per use case Need to do: (1) brainstorm / discuss and (2) summarize and list –Second pass: Coarse GAP analysis Goal / result: identify big /obvious gaps Need to do: (1) brainstorm / discuss and (2) summarize and ‘come to conclusions’ –Third pass:

Mechanics of the GAP analysis process Brainstorm and discuss during meeting [all members] –Regular TC meetings Limited time for in-depth discussions Not frequent enough –Informal GAP analysis meetings Weekly meetings Go through the work all as a group (informal obligation) Use list for off-line discussion / input gathering Document all output in GAP analysis document and update frequently [editors]

Current status GAP analysis Phase 1 is finalized (20/feb/12) GAP analysis Phase 2 is in progress since (27/feb/12) –Brainstormed / discussed: 8 out of 29 –Summarized and ‘came to conclusions’ on ? out of 29 –‘Brainstorm / discuss’ versus ‘summarize/conclude’ is about 2/3 – 1/3 (effort) –We are at currently at 18% of Phase 2

Right pace and direction? Purpose of the TC (from charter): –Collect and harmonize definitions, terminologies, and vocabulary of Cloud Computing –Develop profiles of open standards for identity deployment, provisioning, management and achieving interoperability –Identify gaps in existing Identity Management standards –Suggest mitigations for identified risks and the threats and vulnerabilities Are we working at the right pace?

Appendix A: Meetings since Dec/12 DateComment 12/dec/2012regular TC meeting 26/dec/2012cancelled 09/jan/2012 cancelled 23/jan/2012regular TC meeting -> agreed to startwith weekly GAP meetings 06/feb/2012regular TC meeting 09/feb/2012 informal gap analysis meeting – first pass 13/feb/2012 informal gap analysis meeting – first pass 20/feb/2012regular TC meeting 27/feb/2012 informal gap analysis meeting – second pass 05/mar/2012regular TC meeting 19/mar/2012 ??? 02/apr/2012regular TC meeting -> agreed to continue again with informal gap meetings 06/apr/2012 informal gap analysis meeting – second pass 16/apr/2012 cancelled 30/apr/2012regular TC meeting