Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc.Slide 1 Outdoor Stadium Simulation Details Discussion Date:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission Proposed Changes to Simulation Scenario Date: 2015/01/12 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Authors: January.
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1080r0 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc..Slide 1 Markov Modeling of the Channel for HEW System Level.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Doc.: IEEE /0046r0 Submission January 2015 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 11aa GCR-BA Performance in OBSS Date: 2015/01/12 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission Jan 2014 E-Education Analysis HEW SG Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0107 Jan 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) HEW Evaluation Metrics Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /0116r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0787r0 Submission July 2013 Wu TianyuSlide 1 Follow-up Discussions on HEW Functional Requirements Date: Authors:
Doc. No. IEEE hew-r1 Submission July 2013 Klaus Doppler, NokiaSlide 1 Evaluation Criteria and Simulation Scenarios Date: July 16, 2013 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0320r1 Submission March 2015 Yusuke Tanaka, Sony CorporationSlide 1 GCR-BA Performance with Measurement Report in OBSS Date: 2015/03/09.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0627r0 May 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Outdoor Channel Models for System Level Simulations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0486r1 Submission May 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom HEW- Metrics, Targets, Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0612r0 May 2014 Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 1 Calibration Procedures towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Submission Sep doc.: IEEE XXXXr1 Zhigang Wen,et. al (BUPT)Slide 1 Discussion on Massive MIMO for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /342r0 Submission March 2014 Naveen Kakani, CSRSlide 1 Short Packet Optimizations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0648r0 Submission May 2014 Chinghwa Yu et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Performance Observation of a Dense Campus Network Date:
Doc.:IEEE /0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in ac Authors: Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0578r0 May 2014 Frank LaSita, InterDigitalSlide 1 Residential Scenario CCA/TPC Simulation Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0723r1 SubmissionSlide 1 HEW SG Evaluation Methodology Overview Date: Authors: Minyoung Park (Intel Corp.) July 2013.
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1489r0 Submission Nov 2013 Airport Capacity Analysis Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0786r0 Submission July 2013 Wu TianyuSlide 1 Discussions on System Level Simulation Methodology Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0757r0 Submission July 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 Submission Jan 2014 Slide 1 Wireless Office Scenario with Interference Date:
Doc.: IEEE /610r1 Submission Vida Ferdowsi, Newracom May 2015 Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Vida Ferdowsi Daewon Lee Reza Hedayat.
Doc.: IEEE /0680r1 SubmissionJiyong Pang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 Reference Box5 Calibration Assumptions and Parameters Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /0814r0 Submission July 2015 Simulation Results for Box5 Calibration Ke Yao, et, al. (ZTE) Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1172r2 Submission September 2014 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Multicast Performance in OBSS Date: 2014/9/15 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1406r0 Submission Nov 2013 Huai-Rong Shao, et al. (Samsung)Slide 1 Traffic Modeling for HEW Simulation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0307r0 Submission January 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom PHY Calibration Results Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0866r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Traffic modeling and system capacity performance measure Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 1 System Level Assessments for Outdoor HEW Deployments Date: YYYY-MM-DD.
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Discussion on ax functional requirements
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /1263r2 Submission Dec 2009 Z. Chen, C. Zhu et al [Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving] Date: Authors: Slide.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0592r0 May 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 More Power Save Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1373r1 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Updated Box 5 Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion On Basic Technical Aspects for HEW Date:
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Additional Test Cases for MAC calibration Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /117 Submission 11/99 Nada Golmie, NISTSlide 1 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks MAC Performance Evaluation.
Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Feasibility of SU-MIMO under Array Alignment Method Date: Slide.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1366r3 Submission November 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition Date: 2013-xx-11Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1161r0 September 2014 Eric Wong et al (Apple)Slide 1 Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms Date: Authors:
Considerations on HEW Evaluation Methodology
HEW SG Evaluation Methodology Overview
Requirements Discussion
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms
Simulation results for
Simulation Results for Box5
Home Network Simulation Scenario with OBSS
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
Box 5 Calibration Result
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
DSC Calibration Result
Consideration on System Level Simulation
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc.Slide 1 Outdoor Stadium Simulation Details Discussion Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc.Slide 2 Abstract This contribution discusses some aspects of the HEW Stadium use case and proposes a physical description and modelling parameters.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc.Slide 3 A outdoor stadium usage model for HEW was proposed in /0722r1 as well as in 11-13/0657r6. Based on our view of the discussions of the importance of this use case – we chose it as the first use case to model. Therefore in this document we attempt to get HEW agreement to further define this use case so that we can begin to do simulations for this use case. Critical requirements of the 1a Stadium scenario (11-13/0657r6): Open area with few obstacles and single/multiple operators’ deployed multiple APs. Most of the transmissions are LOS and the layout of APs are frequently changed. High density of users and devices (0.5 devices/m²) Inter-AP distance between 12 and 20 meters Introduction

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc.Slide 4 Proposed Use Case Description (1 / 4) Stadium blocks / AP placements: 12m x 12m block (instead of 10m x 10m from 11-13/0722r1) Yields an AP-AP spacing of m (instead of 10-12m) Locates all AP placements on the aisles AP(m, n) x = 12 x (m – 1) y = 12 x (n – 1), for m odd y = 12 x (n – 1) + 6, for m even z = 3 m = 1 to 6 and n = 1 to 6 when m is odd, n = 1 to 5 when m is even

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc.Slide 5 Proposed Use Case Description (2 / 4)

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc.Slide 6 Proposed Use Case Description (3 / 4) Block seating (72 STA per block, 0.5m row, and 1m and 1.5m block spacing's): Block seating / STA placements More realistic row spacing 11 rows of seats, 22 seats per row: 242 seats 0.5 STA/m 2 (72 STA / 144m 2 ) ~ 30% STA to seat ratio STA(m, n) x = 0.5 x (m – 1) y = 1.0 x (n – 1) z = 0.5

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc.Slide 7 Proposed Use Case Description (4 / 4)

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 Summary Slide 8Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc. September 2013 The proposed HEW outdoor stadium model variants offer better alignment to the 1a Stadium scenario in /0657r6, and more closely model current stadium configurations. NOTE: In our view all of the parameters of this model should be agreed so that meaningful system simulations and performance evaluation of HEW techniques can be evaluated.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 Model Details in Format of 11-13/1001r2 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc.Slide 9

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 Model Details in Format of 11-13/1001r2 1 / 5 Slide 10Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc. September 2013 Topology (A) Environment description1 Outdoor stadium  Number of blocks or sections {25}  11 rows of seats, 22 seats per row: 242 seats: {0.5m / 1m / 1.5m seat spacing}  Grid layout of blocks {5x5}  Block size:{12m x 12m x 0.5m} APs location{1 per block, placed alone aisles between blocks at 1 to 3m height} STAs location{72 per AP, randomly located at fixed seating locations} Channel Model{Outdoor, ITU UMi or Winner II B1} Penetration LossesNone

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 Model Details in Format of 11-13/1001r2 2 / 5 Slide 11Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc. September 2013 PHY parameters BW:[up to 80 MHz for ac, 20/40 MHz for n, 20/22 MHz for a/b/g] MCS:[BCC up to MCS X] GI:[long] Data Preamble:[11a/b/g/n/ac] STA TX power[19 dBm/Antenna] AP TX Power[17 dBm/Antenna] AP #of TX antennas{4} AP #of RX antennas{4} STA #of TX antennas{1,2}

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 Model Details in Format of 11-13/1001r2 3 / 5 Slide 12Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc. September 2013 MAC parameters Access protocol parameters:[EDCA with default EDCA Parameters set] Primary channels[Enterprise: Frequency reuse of N – dependent on GHz band and BW used – maximize non- overlapping BSSs] Aggregation:[A-MPDU / max aggregation size / BA window size, No A-MSDU, with immediate BA] Max # of retries[10] RTS/CTS[off] Rate adaptation method[genie, TBD in Evaluation Methodology] Beacon interval[100ms, TBD] Beacon size[TG dependent] Probe request interval[TBD, if active scanning is assumed] Probe request size[TBD, if active scanning is assumed] Probe response size[TBD, if active scanning is assumed] Association[Each STA associated with best AP – no roaming]

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 Model Details in Format of 11-13/1001r2 4 / 5 Slide 13Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc. September 2013 Traffic model (Per STA) #Source/SinkName Transport Protocol Average rate [Mbps] MSDU size [B] Max. Delay [ms]Max. PLR PKT arrival distributionAC Downlink D1 AP  10% STA Office worker: , web browsing, file transfer UDP, TCP D2 AP  40% STA Social media user: file transfer TCP D3 AP  20% STA Video viewer: Video streaming UDP e-4 Uplink U1 AP  30% STA Music sharer: file transfer, web browsing TCP e-4 U2 AP  10% STA Office worker: , web browsing, file transfer UDP, TCP

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 Model Details in Format of 11-13/1001r2 5 / 5 Slide 14Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc. September 2013 P2P P1STA1/AP P2STA2/AP P3STA3/AP …… PNSTAN/AP Idle Management M1AP1 Beacons X Bytes 1/Xms M2STA2 Probe Req. X Bytes 1/Xs M3STA3 …… MNSTAN

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc. Slide 15 References [1] IEEE /0657r6, “Usage models for IEEE High Efficiency WLAN study group (HEW SG) – Liaison with WFA,” Laurent Cariou [2] IEEE /0722r1, “HEW Evaluation Methodology”, Minyong Park [3] IEEE, /1000r2, “Simulation Scenarios”, Simone Merlin, et. al. [4] IEEE /1001r2, “HEW SG Simulation Scenarios”, Simone Merlin, et. al.