ISM Test Development Task Force Report June 21, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
This material is approved for public release. Distribution is limited by the Software Engineering Institute to attendees. Sponsored by the U.S. Department.
Advertisements

Presenter: Cathie Aldis Senior Improvement Adviser - Leadership
MAE 552 Heuristic Optimization
Stephen Milton Undulator System 20 April, 2006 LCLS Undulator System Update S. Milton, ANL FAC, April 20 th, 2006.
Development Processes and Product Planning
The Project AH Computing. Functional Requirements  What the product must do!  Examples attractive welcome screen all options available as clickable.
Cummins ISB Test Development Task Force Cummins Surveillance Panel Mark Sarlo, SwRI January 11, 2005.
Polio Update Pre Tender Meeting 11 th December 2008 UNICEF Supply Division.
08/02/011 Statistical Summary of the Mack T10 Precision/BOI Matrix.
Elementary Assessment Data Update Edmonds School District January 2013.
Lessons learnt and changed understanding: Can Machine Dynamics students survive without my lectures? Ian Howard Mechanical Engineering.
© 2009 Chevron Oronite Companies. All rights reserved. Cummins ISM Reference Data Review for Cummins Surveillance Panel August 26, 2009 Jim Rutherford.
Analysis of the ISM Matrix Draft 3 November 5, 2004.
Access Online Cardholder Transaction Approval Training 1 Client Logo.
SunGuide® Software Development Project Release 4.3 Express Lanes Enhancements Design Review December 15, 2009 December 15, 20091R4.3 Design Review.
Executive Session Director’s CD-3b Review of the MicroBooNE Project January 18, 2012 Dean Hoffer.
Update: Grocery Refrigeration Provisional Standard Protocol for Site Specific Savings RTF Meeting June 28,
Formulae For each severity adjustment entity, X i = i th test result in original units in end-of-test order T i = i th test result in appropriate units.
Fleet Forum Online at fleet.utah.gov Recommendations from the Fiscal Analyst Full Size Van Protocol State Travel Diesel Exhaust Fluid Replacement Process.
Mack T12 Engine Test Update
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
ESF Workshop - Active Protection of Passive Radio Services Cagliari October 2004 Page 1 ESF WORKSHOP “ACTIVE PROTECTION OF PASSIVE SERVICES” Planned.
MORRIS MILL PROPOSED URBAN SERVICES DISTRICT Presentation to County Council September 17, 2013.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
1 Afton ESCIT Report An Analysis of Sequence IIIG Reference Oil Data Phosphorus Retention - and Volatile Phosphorus Throughput December 12, 2006.
1 The Second Addition of LTMS (Theoretical Sneak Peak for the VG) VG SP: May 2010.
Revised ISM IAS Merit Calculation Proposal June 22, 2010 Pat Fetterman Steve Kennedy (discussed with Shawn Whitacre & Philpe Saad 6/21/10)
Rev.04/2015© 2015 PLEASE NOTE: The Application Review Module (ARM) is a system that is designed as a shared service and is maintained by the Grants Centers.
STEP 4 Manage Delivery. Role of Project Manager At this stage, you as a project manager should clearly understand why you are doing this project. Also.
CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research M. Nonis – ACCU Meeting – 3/12/2008 HOSTEL BOOKING SOFTWARE.
Fall 2015 ECEn 490 Lecture #8 1 Effective Presentations How to communicate effectively with your audience.
Regulations and Procedures Please ensure you are familiar with the regulations surrounding examination as laid out in the Research Degree Regulatory Framework.
JACTest Monitoring Center Test Monitoring Center Report to the Mack Test Surveillance Panel June 17, 2002 Montreal.
Reusable Launch Vehicle Working Group Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee Presented to COMSTAC Meeting George Whitesides, RLVWG Chairman.
LTMS Task Force Statistics Subgroup Report to Joint LTMS Open Forum San Antonio, TX May 11, 2010.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
Cummins ISB Test Development Task Force Cummins Surveillance Panel Mark Sarlo, SwRI February 21, 2005.
JACTest Monitoring Center T-10 PB Ad Hoc Task Force Report to the Mack Test Surveillance Panel September 10, 2004 Richmond, VA.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
Welcome Managing concerns and complaints How should schools handle complaints? This session links to guidance from the DfE and local authorities, and looks.
© 2011 Chevron Oronite Companies. All rights reserved. ISB Data Review Presented to Cummins Surveillance Panel Addendum 3 Cam/Tappet Interactions Jim Rutherford.
Cat Aeration Task Force Additional Prove Out Testing Proposal 1 PC-11 Statisticians Task Force July 1, 2014.
© Chevron 2008 ASTM PCEOCP VID Matrix Design and Funding Subgroup April 25, 2008 Teleconference.
Task Group Study of Extended Time PEI Tests on an Oil Matrix ESCIT Meeting 2007 August 9 Midland, Michigan Presented by: Ted Selby Task Group Chair.
Mack T12 Piston Distress October 11, CMIR piston 4 CMIR piston 5 TRWL = 101mg TRWL = 31 mg.
The symbol is a service mark of Afton Chemical Corporation. Support for a Phosphorus Volatility Specification in GF-5 Report to ESCIT June 14, 2007 Greg.
Scrum Overview. Agenda What is scrum…and what it isn’t Scrum’s Characteristics The Scrum Process Scrum Phases Measurements Key Practices Backlogs Sprint.
Draft 08/06/01 jar1 Draft Addendum to the Statistical Summary of the Mack T10 Precision/BOI Matrix Including IR Oxidation.
New EU Regulation on General Safety Implementation of Tyre Aspects Presentation to GRB and GRRF. Informal Document No. GRRF (67th GRRF, 2-5 February.
June 3, 2016 BANNER HR FORUM.  To receive credit on your LMS transcript, please be sure you have indicated your attendance.  As a courtesy to others,
Engine Maintenance Workshop
Proposed C13 MERIT SYSTEM Steve Jetter/Abdul Cassim
Test Monitoring Center Report to the Mack Test Surveillance Panel
Technical Guidance Committee Report
Formulae For each severity adjustment entity,
Presentation to O&H Panel December 3, 2001 David M Stehouwer
Statistical Summary of the Mack T10 Precision/BOI Matrix
API SC 10, Work Group 3 Update:
Test Monitoring Center Report to the Mack Test Surveillance Panel
Report to T-10 Task Force T-10 EGR Hardware Update 24 April 2001
LTMS Task Force Statistics Subgroup Report to Joint LTMS Open Forum
Caterpillar C13 Test Matrix Update
Test Monitoring Center Report to the Mack Test Surveillance Panel
Punch items for LTMS Version 2 Surveillance Panel Consideration
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
LAMAS Working Group June 2017
Item 5.3 – Classification of learning activities (CLA)
New EU Regulation on General Safety Implementation of Tyre Aspects
Presentation transcript:

ISM Test Development Task Force Report June 21, 2004

Overview of status of Test Development Initial phase of matrix testing complete. Initial phase of matrix testing complete. Additional data generated on two tests run to 300 hours. Additional data generated on two tests run to 300 hours. Statistical data review of the initial phase of matrix is complete. Statistical data review of the initial phase of matrix is complete. Test shows discrimination on CHWL, but other parameters unclear. Test shows discrimination on CHWL, but other parameters unclear.

Some of the Data so far… CHWL (mg) has shown discrimination at 200 hrs and 5.5% soot CHWL (mg) has shown discrimination at 200 hrs and 5.5% soot Precision is good, but the spread between oils remains a concern to some. Precision is good, but the spread between oils remains a concern to some.

Some of the Data so far… OFDP (kPa) data is unclear. OFDP (kPa) data is unclear. There is some level of separation, but repeatability is of concern. There is some level of separation, but repeatability is of concern.

Some of the Data so far… Sludge (merit rating) data is also unclear. Sludge (merit rating) data is also unclear. There seems to be a lab influence and it has also been noted that not much separation between 1004 and ISMA is expected. There seems to be a lab influence and it has also been noted that not much separation between 1004 and ISMA is expected.

Some of the Data so far… Injector screw wt. loss (mg) data is also unclear. Injector screw wt. loss (mg) data is also unclear. There was scuffing observed on many of the parts even on some of the low wear parts. There was scuffing observed on many of the parts even on some of the low wear parts.

Some of the Data so far… (300 hr. data) CHWL maintains discrimination at 300 hrs and increases spread, but variability goes up as well. CHWL maintains discrimination at 300 hrs and increases spread, but variability goes up as well.

Next Steps for ISM Development Cummins has expressed a desire to move toward a higher level of soot in the ISM test (6.0 min) Cummins has expressed a desire to move toward a higher level of soot in the ISM test (6.0 min) This will require a modification to the original matrix design. Additional tests that will help develop a soot correlation from 5.5% to 6.5% are now being built into a revised matrix plan. This will require a modification to the original matrix design. Additional tests that will help develop a soot correlation from 5.5% to 6.5% are now being built into a revised matrix plan. Next phase of testing to begin once new matrix if finalized an approved. Next phase of testing to begin once new matrix if finalized an approved.

Cummins ISM UPDATED Testing Plan to Determine Correlation with the M11- EGR

Cummins ISM Test Plan Test in Stages Test in Stages Use Decision Points Use Decision Points Use a Range of Oils – Quality Determined by Test Results/Models Use a Range of Oils – Quality Determined by Test Results/Models Poor (1004) Poor (1004) Borderline (1005) Borderline (1005) Good (830) Good (830) Great (ISMA) Great (ISMA)

Cummins ISM Test Plan STAGE1COMPLETESwRIPELZ 1004√ 5.5% Soot √ √ ISMA√ √

Cummins ISM Test Plan STAGE2PLANSwRIPELZ 1004√ 6.5% Soot ISMA√ 830√ √ 1005√ √

Cummins ISM Test Plan Is the Correlation Similar to the M11 EGR? Is the Correlation Similar to the M11 EGR? No: Stop the Matrix No: Stop the Matrix Somewhat: Complete Matrix by Running the Reference Oil Twice in Each Lab (6 Tests) Somewhat: Complete Matrix by Running the Reference Oil Twice in Each Lab (6 Tests) Yes: Complete Matrix by Running the Reference Oil Once in Each Lab (3 Tests) Yes: Complete Matrix by Running the Reference Oil Once in Each Lab (3 Tests)

Cummins ISM Test Plan Summary Summary Minimum Number of Tests for a Successful Matrix: 14 (Previously 12) Minimum Number of Tests for a Successful Matrix: 14 (Previously 12) Maximum Number of Tests for a Successful Matrix: 17 (Previously 16) Maximum Number of Tests for a Successful Matrix: 17 (Previously 16) Number of Tests in which Cummins Provides Parts and Fuel in Stage 1 and Stage 2: 11 (Previously 8) Number of Tests in which Cummins Provides Parts and Fuel in Stage 1 and Stage 2: 11 (Previously 8)

Cummins ISM Test Plan New Lab Requirements (1 st Stand) New Lab Requirements (1 st Stand) 2 Runs on ISMA at 6.5% Soot Target 2 Runs on ISMA at 6.5% Soot Target 1 Run on 1004 at 6.5% Soot Target 1 Run on 1004 at 6.5% Soot Target

Next Steps for ISM Development Questions remain about the ability of the ISM to be a full replacement test for the M11-EGR and M11 HST. Pending the outcome of phase 2 of the test matrix, there are two paths forward. Questions remain about the ability of the ISM to be a full replacement test for the M11-EGR and M11 HST. Pending the outcome of phase 2 of the test matrix, there are two paths forward. Path 1 – data shows appropriate discrimination and correlation such that the ISM is a suitable replacement for the M11-EGR/HST Path 1 – data shows appropriate discrimination and correlation such that the ISM is a suitable replacement for the M11-EGR/HST Path 2 – Continue to use M11EGR for current category and use ISM for PC10. Path 2 – Continue to use M11EGR for current category and use ISM for PC10.

Items still pending in ISM development Formalized test procedure Formalized test procedure Further operational review and refinements. (activities planned for later this month) Further operational review and refinements. (activities planned for later this month) Review of Test parts and Test Kits Review of Test parts and Test Kits

Current timing for the ISM Development and start of Matrix 6/21/04 Review revised matrix plan. 6/21/04 Review revised matrix plan. 6/28/04 (week of) operational data reviewed from matrix runs 6/28/04 (week of) operational data reviewed from matrix runs 7/5/04 (week of) Begin phase 2 of matrix testing 7/5/04 (week of) Begin phase 2 of matrix testing 8/16/04 (week of) review data phase 2 matrix testing. 8/16/04 (week of) review data phase 2 matrix testing. Make recommendation on path forward for ISM (PC10 or replacement test) Make recommendation on path forward for ISM (PC10 or replacement test)

Final Items of Note The ISM Test Development Task Force plans to make the decision to proceed with the phase 2 matrix testing, once the S.P. has agreed to the plan. The ISM Test Development Task Force plans to make the decision to proceed with the phase 2 matrix testing, once the S.P. has agreed to the plan. The ISM Test Development Task Force will keep the Cummins Surveillance Panel informed of our activities and meetings. The ISM Test Development Task Force will keep the Cummins Surveillance Panel informed of our activities and meetings. Task Force will provide recommendations on data review, but we will need final S.P. direction on discrimination data and correlation data. Task Force will provide recommendations on data review, but we will need final S.P. direction on discrimination data and correlation data.

Questions or Comments from the Surveillance Panel