Survey-mode measurements and analysis T. A. Herring R.W. King M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology GPS Data Processing and Analysis with GAMIT/GLOBK/TRACK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.
Advertisements

Welcome to PHYS 225a Lab Introduction, class rules, error analysis Julia Velkovska.
ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS
Reference Frames Issues to consider Implementation in GLOBK
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
GPS measurements in the field M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University of Bristol,
Seasonal Position Variations and Regional Reference Frame Realization Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Generating velocity solutions with globk
The adjustment of the observations
Survey-mode measurements and analysis M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University.
Effects of azimuthal multipath heterogeneity and hardware changes on GPS coordinate time series Sibylle Goebell, Matt King
SURVEYING II UNIT IV PRESENTATION II.
GAMIT Modeling Aspects Lecture 04 Thomas Herring
GAMIT Modeling Aspects Lecture 04 Thomas Herring
M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk
GEODETIC CONTROL SURVEYS
Generating time series with glred
SOPAC's Instantaneous Global Plate Motion Model: Yehuda Bock, Linette Prawirodirdjo, Peng Fang, Paul Jamason, Shimon Wdowinski (TAU, UMiami) Scripps Orbit.
Issues in GPS Error Analysis What are the sources of the errors ? How much of the error can we remove by better modeling ? Do we have enough information.
Large-scale cGPS processing and prototyping solutions
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
Large continuous network processing and analysis T. A. Herring R. W. King M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology GPS Data Processing and Analysis.
Generating time series with glred
Error analysis T. A. Herring R. W. King M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology GPS Data Processing and Analysis with GAMIT/GLOBK/TRACK UNAVCO.
Regional climate prediction comparisons via statistical upscaling and downscaling Peter Guttorp University of Washington Norwegian Computing Center
Uncertainty in Uncertainty. Within a factor of 2.
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Tools to help complete “Height Mod” Surveys OPUS & OPUS Projects Joe Evjen, Geodesist, NGS Height Modernization Eastern States Regional Tuesday, March.
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
Generating velocity solutions with GLOBK T. A. Herring R. W. King M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology GPS Data Processing and Analysis with.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 1 NAREF & CBN Velocity Solutions for a New Version of SNARF Mike Craymer Joe Henton Mike Piraszewski 8th SNARF Workshop AGU.
Introduction to GPS/GNSS Introduction to Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums Corbin Training Center January 7, 2009 Jeff Little Guest Speaker ,
Dealing with earthquakes and other non-linear motions T. A. Herring R. W. King M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology GPS Data Processing and.
Issues in GPS Error Analysis What are the sources of the errors ? How much of the error can we remove by better modeling ? Do we have enough information.
Error Models Lecture 06 Thomas Herring
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Data weighting, and dealing with earthquakes and other non-linear motions M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University.
Challenges and Opportunities in GPS Vertical Measurements “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal (~3:1) so longer.
Short-session Static and Kinematic Processing Short-session static: GAMIT processing, sessions 1-3 hours long Kinematic: TRACK processing, coordinates.
NATO Workshop Veszprem 2004 Recent Monitoring of Crustal Movements in the Eastern Mediterranean The Usage of GPS Measurements G. Stangl, Federal Office.
1 Module One: Measurements and Uncertainties No measurement can perfectly determine the value of the quantity being measured. The uncertainty of a measurement.
05/12/1005/08/ Lec Lec Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 23 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Error Modeling Thomas Herring Room ;
Water vapour estimates over Antarctica from 12 years of globally reprocessed GPS solutions Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke Newcastle University, UK.
Challenges and Opportunities in GPS Vertical Measurements “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal and makes the vertical.
Modeling Errors in GPS Vertical Estimates Signal propagation effects –Signal scattering ( antenna phase center/multipath ) –Atmospheric delay ( parameterization,
Aug 6, 2002APSG Irkutsk Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan Thomas Herring, Bradford H. Hager, Brendan Meade, Massachusetts.
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps using GNSS and Levelling E. Brockmann, D.
Southern California Earthquake Center The Community Geodetic Model (CGM) Jessica Murray, U.S. Geological Survey (SCEC4) Rowena Lohman, Cornell University.
Report to WCRP Observations and Assimilation Panel David Goodrich Director, GCOS Secretariat Towards a GCOS Reference Upper Air Network.
Issues in GPS Error Analysis What are the sources of the errors ? How much of the error can we remove by better modeling ? Do we have enough information.
AXK/JPL SBAS Training at Stanford University, October 27-30, 2003 Satellite Based Augmentation Systems Brazilian Ionosphere Group Training at Stanford.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Issues in GPS Error Analysis What are the sources of the errors ? How much of the error can we remove by better modeling ? Do we have enough information.
Reference Frames Global Continental Local -- may be self-defined
Elevation angle and phase residuals for single satellite
Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan
Information for virtual participants
GPS measurements in the field
Dealing with earthquakes and other non-linear motions
Introduction, class rules, error analysis Julia Velkovska
Basics of processing workflow for GAMIT/GLOBK
GLOBK Velocity Solutions
Reference Frames Global Continental Local -- may be self-defined
Generating velocity solutions with globk
Elevation angle and phase residuals for single satellite
Investigation of site-dependent GPS errors and monument stability using a short-baseline network of braced monuments Emma Hill, Jim Davis, Pedro Elosegui,
Suggested Guidance for OPUS Projects Processing
Presentation transcript:

Survey-mode measurements and analysis T. A. Herring R.W. King M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology GPS Data Processing and Analysis with GAMIT/GLOBK/TRACK UNAVCO Headquarters, Boulder, Colorado 10–14 August 2015 Material from R. W. King, T. A. Herring, M. A. Floyd (MIT) and S. C. McClusky (now ANU)

Measurement Strategies I: Occupation Time Given time and personnel constraints, what are the trade-offs between between spatial and temporal density? Ideally, you would like for the white-noise position uncertainty for an occupation to contribute to the velocity uncertainty at a level less than the usually dominant long- period correlated noise. Typical white-noise uncertainties (Horizotnal and Vertical) as a function of occupation time: 6-8 hrs: mm H, 5-10 mm V hrs: mm H, 3-5 mm V hrs: mm H, 2-4 mm V Observations over 3 or more days will give you more redundancy Observations of 5 or more days will be necessary for mm-level vertical uncertainties If your region has few continuous stations, you should consider running one or two survey-mode stations for the entire time of the survey to provide continuity

Precision v session length for network processing

Measurement Strategies II: Monuments and Instrumentation Issues in site and antenna selection : Monument stability Accessibility Ease of setup Multipath Vandalism There is no clear prescription for all cases; let’s look at some examples

Three primary mounting options Tripod with optical or physical plummet Spike mount Mast Courtesy UNAVO web page

Low mount in a good enviroment STVP Steven’s Pass, Cascades Range in western Washington 18-cm spike mount No long-term repeatability yet, but 44 hrs of observations in 2012 give formal uncertainties 0.5 mm horizontal, 3 mm vertical. Note minimal long-period signal Scattering.

Low mount in a dirty environment B059 Roadside meadow in western Washington 12.5-cm spike mount Two 24-hr measurements in 2012 agree at 1 mm horizontal, 4 mm vertical though the formal uncertainties are 2 mm, 10mm due to high random noise (diffuse multipath or water vapor?) Note minimal long-period signal scattering. Long-term scatter is 3 mm horizontal, 5 mm vertical (monument instablity?)

High mount in a dirty environment C033 Old survey mark in dirt in central Washington. Tripod mount. (Train blockage was short- lived) hr session and 5-hr session agree at 1.5 mm horizontal, 3 mm vertiical. Long-term repeatability 2 mm horizontal, 12 mm vertical. Surprisingly little short-period multipath (dry dirt?)

Low mount on a slope LYFR Rocky river bank in eastern Oregon 12.5-cm spike mount Single 14-hr session. Long- period multipath due to slope and/or reflective rocks ?

Special Characteristics of Survey-mode Data Editing is critical: every point counts Usually combined with cGPS data to provide continuity and a tie to the ITRF Appropriate relative weighting needed in combining with cGPS data Antenna meta-data may be more complicated Heights may be problematic if different antennas used Seasonal errors behave differently than in cGPS data: best strategy is to observe at the same time of the year (unlike cGPS, which has minimal seasonal sensitivity at 1.5, 2.5, 3.5 ….years total span)

Analysis Strategy Generate time series and aggregated h-files for each survey – Use spans less than ~ 30 days to avoid biasing the position estimate from an in correct velocity – Include cGPS data only on days when sGPS data are available to maintain common-mode cancellation – Strenghens the sGPS positions estimates within each survey and allows better assessment of the long-term statistics – Edit carefully the daily values within each span Generate time series and a velocity using the aggregated h-files from a span of 3 or more years – Edit carefully the long-term time series – Add 0.5 of white noise (sig_neu) to the cGPS estimates from each span to avoid overweighting the cGPS position estimates – Use a separate (ie.g PBO) analysis of the daily cGPS time series to get the appropriate RW (mar_neu) values for each cGPS site; use the median RW for the sGPS sites. See sGPS_recipe.txt for detailed commands

Editing example