TURNING TO CRIME COGNITION: the role of thought in crime.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elements of an Offence Presentation to High School Law Classes.
Advertisements

Mental State at the Time of Offense Assessments and the Insanity Defense --- Hawaii State Hospital July 7, 2010 Marvin W. Acklin, PhD, ABPP Board-certified.
TURNING TO CRIME Cognition.
COMMITMENT 1. CIVIL COMMITMENT – COMMITTMENT BECAUSE OF MENTAL ILLNESS ITSELF 2. CRIMINAL COMMITMENT – COMMITMENT BECAUSE NGRI (NOT GUILTY BY REASON.
CHAPTER 2: CRIME Area of Study 2: Criminal Law. The need for criminal law Read The need for criminal law, Definition of a crime, Elements of a crime,
The Trial in Canadian Criminal Court, Pt. 4: Defences
TWO MAIN ELEMENTS OF CRIME. Most crimes require the following two elements in order for a crime to have been committed and a person to be guilty and liable.
AREA OF STUDY 2 The criminal law PART 2. In this part you will learn about: the principles of criminal liability, crimes and defences the criminal investigation.
Defences 3 In this lecture, we will consider: The nature of automatism The scope and operation of automatism Self-induced sane automatism The distinction.
Forensic Psychology. Summary Forensic Psychology  Eyewitness Testimony  History of Forensic Psychology  Psychological Testing Forensic Psychiatry Serial.
Topic 12 Attempts Topic 12 Attempts. Topic 12 Attempts Introduction If a defendant fully intends to commit a crime but for some reason fails to complete.
Theories of Cognition Yolchelson & Samenow (A study of thinking patterns in criminals) Kohlberg (Moral development in children) Gudjohnsson & Bownes (The.
Criminal Law.
Elements of a Crime. Learning Goal:  By the end of this lessons, I will be able to accurately define and identify the essential elements of a criminal.
1 Components of a Crime: Criminal Acts, Criminal Intent & Legal Causation Criminal Law & Procedure Mike Brigner, J.D.
CRIMINAL AND FORENSIC ISSUES in Autistic Spectrum Disorders Tommy MacKay Psychology Consultancy Services/University of Strathclyde ASD Reference Group,
Bipolar Disorder Bailey Roy. Definition Bipolar disorder causes extreme shifts in mood, energy, thinking, and behavior–from the highs of mania on one.
ELEMENTS OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY In this lecture, we will consider: Burden and standard of proof in a criminal trial The building blocks of criminal liability.
Tanisha Hill-Jarrett Forensic Neuropsychology July 21, 2014 Diminished Capacity Standards.
Elements of a Crime Justice System defines what crimes are Those definitions are called elements…what must be proved (shown) in order to convict someone.
 The term "automatism" describes unconscious, involuntary behaviour.  The legal rules governing the use of automatism evidence vary with the cause of.
Topic E: are criminals born or made? WEEK 1  TO EXAMINE BIOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL CAUSES OF CRIMINALITY.  TO ANSWER THE QUESTION: ‘TO WHAT EXTEND IS NATURE.
Who’s guilty of what and how should we punish them CRIMINAL LAW MOTIONS.
Abnormal PSYCHOLOGY Third Canadian Edition Prepared by: Tracy Vaillancourt, Ph.D. Chapter 18 Legal and Ethical Issues.
Psychology and the Law Civil and Criminal Commitment.
 The list of excuses to absolve oneself of criminal responsibility.  For example: "I was framed," "The devil made me do it," "I didn't know it was a.
 I pulled up near a gas station. I told the service station guy to give me all of his money. I then took him to the bathroom and told him to kneel down.
CJ233: Introduction to Forensic Psychology
Rationality and Choice Psychology of Crime. Cornish and Clarke (1987): Rational Choice theory  1.Offenders seek to benefit themselves by criminal behaviours:
Crime Philip Bollerup-Lindenborg. What is it?  An Act or Omission -> socially inacceptable  State, Judicial and enforcement agencies  Changes over.
Introduction to Forensic Psychiatry World Psychiatric Association Scientific Section Forensic Psychiatry Secretary: Prof. Birgit A. Völlm.
+ Involvement in a Crime. + Division of Blame In a crime, the act is normally not carried out by just one person. How does the law divide blame amount.
Actus Reus and Mens Rea. Actus ReusMens Rea What Do They Mean? -Means a “wrongful deed” -The physical or guilty act, omission, or state of being that.
Psychopathic Behavior and Traits an Inside Look. What Makes us human? Are the things that bring us closer together like love, relationships and working.
Law 12 MUNDY – What are defences used for? Two purposes: 1. to prove that accused is not guilty of offence being tried 2. to prove that accused.
1.3 Psychology. What is Psychology? Study of how and why humans act as they do Instead of studying how humans function in cultures or societies, psychology.
The Act of Crime 7.2 Forensics November 7,
Principles of criminal liability Chapter 2.1
Understanding the Criminal Justice System CJUS 101 Chapter 1: Crime and the Nature of Law.
Topic 8 Insanity. Topic 8 Insanity Introduction In order to establish a defence on the grounds of insanity, it must be clearly proved that at the time.
TWO MAIN ELEMENTS OF CRIME Page Most crimes require the following two elements in order for a crime to have been committed and a person to be.
A2 Law Unit 3 Criminal Law (Offences Against the Person) 9 th September 2010 Our Wiki wiki.hastings.ac.uk/groups/lawa2/ My blog: wiki.hastings.ac.uk/users/hoggs/
Chapter Nine Criminal Practice: Criminal Law and Juvenile Law.
Violence & Dating Information from “But I Love Him” By Jill Murray.
Insanity Recap. Key Points Available for all offences except ones of strict liability Available for all offences except ones of strict liability Key test.
Diminished Responsibility – September Aims and Objectives  Our aim is to develop and of the key rules.
Underlying principles of criminal liability
DEFENCES TO CRIMINAL CHARGES -Complete Defences -Partial Defences to Murder ‘Defences’ are reasons/excuses for committing a crime that mean you don’t get.
Elements of Crime. For an offender to be convicted of a criminal offence, at common law the prosecution usually must prove: –Actus reus –Mens rea –causation.
Kissing in public is not a crime in Australia, however in Middle Eastern Countries such as Saudi Arabia, kissing someone of the opposite sex in public.
 Defendant may present evidence to show that › No criminal act was committed  Example: a person was carrying a gun but had a valid license › No criminal.
Grade Boundaries A* = 22/25 – 86% A = 20/25 – 79% B = 18/25 – 71% C = 16/25 – 64% D = 14/25 – 56% E = 12.5/25 – 50% Difference between each grade is only.
DEFENCES. HISTORY OF THE DEFENCES DR and provocation were put into statutory form in 1957 by the Homicide Act DR has always been considered a good defence.
Attachment: Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation
Mental Health Awareness Fighting the stigma surrounding mental illness.
Group Discussion Questions 1) Come up with your own definition of mental disorders. Discuss then write. 2) List as many mental disorders as you can think.
Forensic Psychology.
Capacity defences of insanity and intoxication
Diminished Responsibility
Bell Ringer 09/25/2013 For a proper claim of Self Defense, what three things need to be established?
Chapter 10.1 Defences.
What makes something criminal? What is a crime?
Insanity.
The Elements of a Crime.
Criminal Justice Process
Evaluation of Diminished Responsibility
Marvin W. Acklin, PhD, ABPP
Psychology.
A2 Unit 3 Options in Applied Psychology Forensic Psychology
Presentation transcript:

TURNING TO CRIME COGNITION: the role of thought in crime.

Determinism vs Free Will Can you help what you do? Do you have your own mind? Is your fate pre-determined? Can criminality be outside your control?

Some good films to watch to see criminal thinking patterns in action Goodfellas The Godfather This is England The Departed

Criminal thinking patterns: Tell me if any of these acts are okay: 1 Mugging an old lady. 2 Stealing a car. 3 Killing your spouse in a jealous rage. 4 Shoplifting an item under £10 in value. 5 Giving a false address in order to get your child into the school of your choice. 6 Killing at least 13 women because the voices in your head told you to do so.

Bad? Or mad? Actus reus – the act of committing a crime (ie you are definitely guilty of the action involved in the crime). Mens rea – the 'free will' element of the crime (ie did you realise what you were doing, were you responsible for your actions?)

Diminished responsibility What's your understanding of this legal term?

Peter Sutcliffe and mens rea &feature=playerembedded

Diminished responsibility: Homicide act (1957) When an individual is suffering from an abnormality of mind* which substantially impairs the responsibility of acts or omissions. * can include extreme anger, emotional imbalance, intoxication as well as mental illness. Defence must prove a defect of reason at time of the offence.

Criminal thinking patterns. Focus of this topic: - do criminals think differently to non-criminals? - can criminal thinking patterns be changed? - by changing thinking patterns can you prevent crime?

KEY STUDY: Yochelson & Samenow, A study of thinking patterns in criminals.

Pp15-16 in textbook. Y & S have been working in this field – cognition and criminality for over 30 years. They are very interested in how criminals rationalise their crimes.

Before we look at our key study, some background... Their work is longitudnal so has many date references for separate findings – 240 male offenders interviewed. Y&S found that: * criminals slightly less intelligent than non-c * in control of lives, crimes result of choice * distorted self-image = denial of own role in crimes; no sense of responsibility – 40 'thinking errors.

Key Study: Participants – 255 male offenders, mixed demographic; roughly half deemed insane (confined to secure hospital) and half 'normal' (prison). All had been found guilty of their crimes. No control group of non-c's.

Aims of study: 1 To understand the criminal personality. 2 To develop ways of treating personality disorders. 3 To encourage c's to understand legal responsibility. 4 To develop ways of preventing criminal behaviour.

Method: Interviews conducted over a period of several years. So – quantitative or qualitiative data collected? Advantages/disadvantages of this method?

Huge catalogue of findings. Here are some: * restlessness, dissatisfaction, irritability of c's * want excitement * lack empathy * are highly self-interested and disregard any rules/laws which compromise this * jump to conclusions and judge poorly BUT...they are already in prison, which suggests what about them?

Yes, that's right... As the interviewees were already in prison they clearly are: a) already in a criminal 'mindset' which may have been exagerrated by being incarcerated. b) they are not very good at eluding capture (ie smarter criminals have higher IQ but not in study cos not captured!) c) they are used to lying/deceit. d) most people in prison are liable to feel 'restless and dissatisfied'. e) we don't know what their thinking patterns were prior to incarceration.

Did the interviews rehabilitate the c's? In a word, no. Only 30 made it through to end of study. 9 had genuinely changed the way they thought. Techniques used included Freudian psychotherapy – why do you think Y&S used this?

Problem: Y&S had originally wanted to find cause of crim beh. In interviews lots of c's lied (big surprise) and gave the answers they thought would help their situation. So...Y&S looked at their thinking patterns instead, as this was easier to analyse.

Thinking errors: Y&S now had 52 thinking errors that defined criminal thinking patterns. Non-c's also make these errors but c's make more of them more often. But...no non-c control group so hard to know extent of this. Research evolved out of clinical practice, not originally intended as a separate study.

HOMEWORK: Write one paragraph on each of the following: * Why might the public/victim's family object to a diminished responsibility verdict in a notorious murder case? * Why is the sample a problem in this study? * Who would make the ideal control group in this study?