High Powered Rocket Team Fall 2015. Project Manager Wesley M. Harpster Team Members James Lawrence Ryan Horton Karna Shah James “Trey” Simmons Irfan Shaukat.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UF Hybrid Rocket Teams Mile High Club Brought to you by Chris Leonard, Ty Morton, Sam Darr, and Josh Childs.
Advertisements

BYU Rocket Team Special thanks to:
Ruby Gomez (Presenter) Gaines Gibson.  Daedalus Astronautics at ASU  Project Purpose  Chemical Properties  Mixing Procedures  Testing Equipment 
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Preliminary Design Review University of Colorado Boulder NASA Student Launch
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
Our Mission Statement  Launch a high-power rocket to an altitude of one mile carrying the Operation: Epic Beep payload package. At lift off, the rocket’s.
Critical Design Review “The Distribution of Ionizing Radiation with Altitude” Left to Right: Izzy S.- Audio Visual Tom L.- Payload James Z.-Construction.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Intercollegiate Rocket Engineering Competition Spring 2015 EML Ethics and Design Project Organization.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Preliminary Design Review “Analysis of Atmospheric Cosmic Radiation Distribution as a Function of Altitude” Steven Schroeder-Program Manager Damon Emerson-Rocket.
Team Members:Tony Guzzo Eric Jacob Bill Liewehr Alex Schlaupitz Design of a Level 2 Rocket for the Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium Advisor: Dr. William.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Stephanie Morris 3/27/08 Propulsion Final Slides.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Safety ► The safety officer for the entire team is Maia Madrid. ► During launch we will follow NAR safety rules and regulations. ► We will follow standard.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Harvard-Westlake Rocketry Club SLI FRR.
Neelam Patel David Wade Brian Reyes TITLE IN PROGRESS.
Flight Readiness Review “Analysis of Atmospheric gamma radiation as a Function of Altitude by means of Scintillator Probe” St. Thomas High School, Houston,
Preliminary Design Review “The Distribution of Ionizing Radiation with Altitude” Left to Right: Tom L.- Payload James Z.-Construction Izzy S.- Audio Visual.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
ODU SAE FORMULA MAE 435. Team Members Advisors Dr. Bawab Prof. Luetke Team Leader Ryan Atkinson Element Analysis Davis Moore Punit Dave Attenuator Shauna.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
Neelam Patel David Wade Brian Reyes TITLE IN PROGRESS.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
Neelam Patel Brian Reyes David Wade ????? Mystery Member ????? STATUS UPDATE TEAM ALPHA.
UPDATE #2.  The predicted altitude was ~9500 feet.  Actual altitude was ~11960 feet.  After investigation the error was found in the simulated weight.
PLANTATION HIGH PDR PRESENTATION Team 1. VEHICLE DIMENSION & MATERIALS.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
College of Engineering
Rocketry.
Critical Design Review Presentation
ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
November 7, 2014.
Design Review 4 Chris Bredberg, Ryan Dwyer, Kjell Gordon
November 7, 2014.
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Final Readiness Review
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
2019 First Nation Launch – FRR Virtual Review
2019 First Nation Launch – PDR Virtual Review
2019 TEKNOFEST ROCKET CONTEST PRELIMINARY DESİGN REPORT (PDR)
Dual-Deploy Launch Checklist
Target Altitude Safety Document
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

High Powered Rocket Team Fall 2015

Project Manager Wesley M. Harpster Team Members James Lawrence Ryan Horton Karna Shah James “Trey” Simmons Irfan Shaukat Project Advisor Dr. Thomas Alberts Multi-Disciplinary Members Cindique Simmonds (EET) Derek Hampton (IT) Alexandre Misenheimer (Junior MAE) Amanda Nolan (Soph. MAE)

Overview  Project Scope  Rocket Breakdown  Avionics Bay  Flight Simulation  Commercial Motor Flights  Fuel Preparation  Research Motor Flight 1  Research Motor Flight 2  Research Motor Results  Gantt Chart  Budget

Project Scope  Objective Statement: To design and build a custom engine to successfully launch a rocket to an altitude of 10,000 feet with a payload of 5 pounds by the end of the fall 2015 semester with a budget of $2,500.  Acceptable Criteria  Attain a 10,000 foot flight using a purchased commercial motor with proper parachute deployment.  Successfully test and gather data for one custom motor prepared by the ODU Rocket Team

Rocket Breakdown  Nose Cone  Forward Body Tube  Avionics Bay  Aft Body Tube  Motor Housing  Main Parachute  Drogue Parachute

Avionics Bay Design Progression  Original Design  Single Altimeter Board mounted on an aluminum sled.  New Design  Two boards implemented for redundancy.  GPS system was added to locate rocket.  Back to Back arrangement to allow arming after rocket assembly.  Rail mounted for weight reduction.

Flight Simulation  Each flight was simulated using RASAero 2 and Open Rocket.  This produced 2 altitude levels from which an average could be taken.  The final research launch  Open Rocket = 8,104 ft.  RASAero = 8,254 ft.  Average = 8,179 ft.  Actual Altitude = 8,111 ft.  Error = %

Commercial Motor Flights Commercial Flight I  Apogee: 4,029 feet  Maximum velocity: 538 m/s  Time to apogee: 15.5 sec  Flight time: sec Commercial Flight II  Apogee: 11,960 feet  Maximum velocity: 352 m/s  Time to apogee: sec  Flight time: 206 sec

Fuel Preparation  Necessary Components of a Research Motor  Propellant Base, Mixing Agent, Plasticizer, Curing Agent, Catalyst  Mixing phases for fuel 1. Liquid components (binding agent, catalyst, plasticizer) 2. Metal oxide catalyst 3. Oxidizer  Allow the mixer to run for 3-4 hours  Apply mold release to all surfaces that are not propellant tubes  Shape and press propellant into tubes and allow to cure

Research Motor I  Propellant Composition  Propellant Base: Ammonium Perchlorate – 76.90%  Mixing Agent: Aluminum – 5.0%  Plasticizer: Dioctyl Adipate – 3.0%  Curing Agent: R45HT-LO – 13.0%  Curing Agent: E744 – 2.0%  Catalyst: Iron Oxide – 0.1%  Comparisons to a commercial motor  This motor would be similar to a white propellant.  Such as Aerotech’s White Thunder

Research Motor II  Propellant Composition  Propellant Base: 74.75% Ammonium Perchlorate  Mixing Agent: 2.54% Aluminum Powder  Plasticizer: 3.5% Dioctyl Adipate  Curing Agent: 11.74% R45HT-LO  Catalyst: 0.75% Black Copper Oxide  Stabilizer: 4.5% Strontium Carbonate  Increase Strength: 0.3% Tepanol

Research Motor Results Research Flight I  Apogee: 3,156 feet  Maximum Velocity: 157 m/s  Time to apogee: 13.6 sec  Flight Time: 84.9 sec Research Flight II  Apogee: 8,111 feet  Maximum Velocity: 803 m/s  Time to apogee: sec  Flight Time: sec

Gantt Chart

Funding SourceMAE Dept. NASA ODU Grant Dr. Bawab LoanTestingMiscellaneousLaunch PrepShippingTotal Received$354.00$1,232.45$500.00$1, $3, Spent $1,500.00$971.56$250.08$696.51$50.00$3, Total -$381.70

Questions?