Jamie Doucett MassDEP. What Problems Are We Solving? Current regulations are inadequate to address technologies other than recycling and composting Are.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMPOSTING TODAY A whole new ball game Chery Sullivan.
Advertisements

Waste Management (Food Waste) Regulations 2009
RIPDES Storm Water Program: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)
Exemption Categories Category 1 – Industrial, farm and residential Category 2 – Storage and processing Category 3 – Permits by Rule Category 4 – Recycling,
June 19, 2014 CONTROL OF TRASH ENTERING WATERWAYS IN CALIFORNIA DRAFT WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD POLICY.
Pesticide Container-Containment Regulations: FIFRA 19(f)(2) Determinations of Adequacy.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System -NPDES Permit Process-
Basic Assumptions Facilities managing MSW must go through Site Assignment Materials that are pre-sorted are not considered MSW Residuals remaining after.
January Goal Increase environmental and public health benefits while clarifying the regulatory process for stakeholders. 2.
CAFO Rule Update and Region 4 CAFO NPDES Program Implementation by Wayne J. Aronson Chief, PGTA Branch Ag Meeting December 06, 2005.
James Doucett, Director Clean Energy Results Program MassDEP.
Title V Site Operating Permits (SOPs)
1 Bringing Curbside Recycling to Delaware A Proposal by: The Recycling Public Advisory Council (RPAC) The Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) The Department.
January Goals: Streamline permitting process for certain solid waste facilities and activities Expand use of 3 rd party inspectors to allow MassDEP.
1 Electronic Waste Recycling Act DTSC Final Regulations Workshop Presented by Charles Corcoran and Valetti Lang Department of Toxic Substances Control.
“Study on Other States’ Regulatory Oversight of Waste and Material Handling Activities Relative to Recycling Centers, Transfer Stations, and Green Material.
New Ag Waiver for the San Diego Region (including Temecula Valley) Water Quality Workshop Rancho California Water District November 6, 2008 Presented by.
Chapter F.A.C. Updates Solid Waste Program.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
OHIO SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT REVIEW UPDATE TO SWAC August 15, Ohio Solid Waste Management Review9/7/2015.
1 PSD - Case #1 Case #1: –A simple cycle natural gas power plant with PTE NOx of 300 tpy and GHGs of 150,000 tpy CO2e receives a PSD permit addressing.
Construction and Demolition Inert Processing Operations Compliance First: Evaluation of Solid Waste Facilities’ State Standards Training Provided By: California.
1 Acquisition, Relocation and Displacement For Local Officials.
Where to find Information About Facilities. Overview of Title V Permits.
Overview of the Final EPA Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO) Regulations April 1, 2003.
1 2 nd Informal Workshops on Draft Revisions to the Disposal Reporting System Regulations June 24, Diamond Bar June 26, Sacramento.
SUMMARY OF INFORMAL COMMENTS Temporary Waiver of Terms Regulations May 2006.
Northwest Indiana Earth Day April 22, 2007 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines January 19, 2010 Daniel Hall, Solid Waste Section Chief.
MS4 Remand Rule Intergovernmental Associations Briefing September 15, 2015.
Chapter 16 Waste Generation and Waste Disposal.  Refuse collected by municipalities from households, small businesses, and institutions such as schools,
Presented to Georgia Airports Association Conference October 21, 2009 EPA Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures – Update Also – What’s Coming with.
Title V Operating Permit Program 1 Section 1: Intro to Title V Laura McKelvey U.S. EPA.
Title V: The Big Picture
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
State of implementation of the decision III/6f regarding Ukraine (MOP 2, June, , 2008, Riga, Latvia)
Best Available Retrofit Technology Rule - Colorado David R. Ouimette Colorado Air Pollution Control Division.
Rigid Plastic Packaging Container (RPPC) Informational Update Permitting and Compliance Committee Meeting February 17, 2009.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Implementing SB 1525: An Update Cheyenne Walsh Squire Sanders (US) LLP Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona Winter Conference Prescott, Arizona.
Lynne Welsh Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
1 Permit Implementation Regulations Defines the phrase “significant change in the design or operation of a solid waste facility that is not authorized.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
Discussion And Request For Direction Relative To Strategic Directive 8.3 Regulation Reviews For Alternative Daily Cover And Food/Green Waste Composting.
1 Revised Suggested Modification 3 CO-12 Prevent the disposal of animal waste, wastewater and other byproducts of human, crop-based-agricultural or equestrian.
1 US EPA Straw Proposals for Modifying the 12/2005 draft Policy Statement Jim Hanlon, Director Office of Wastewater Management, OW Expanded Steering Committee.
Anaerobic Digestion at Wastewater Treatment Plants Regulatory Issues Bureau of Resource Protection April 2011.
Grant County Zoning Ordinance Review Public Comment Forum Todd Kays:Executive Director – 1 st District Association of Local Governments.
Item 21 May 11-12, 2004 CIWMB Meeting Discussion And Request For Rulemaking Direction To Formally Notice Proposed Regulations For RCRA Subtitle D Program.
 To discuss MassDEP’s draft revisions to the following regulations:  Stage II – 310 CMR 7.24(6)  Stage I – 310 CMR 7.24(3)  Definitions – 310 CMR.
California’s Composting Regulations Re-defining “Food Material” Waste Compliance and Mitigation Program Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.
FDA Preventive Control Regulation Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health AFDO 2014.
Gregory Canyon Landfill San Diego County LEA Gary Erbeck, Director California Integrated Waste Management Board Hearing December 14-15, 2004.
Garry Kaufman Air Pollution Control Division.  Background on Oil and Gas Air Regulation in Colorado  Basis for Additional Air Quality Requirements for.
Pollution Prevention & Management DentalBMPs. Overview Amalgam in POTW New EPA Guidelines City of Tulsa Dental BMPs.
Introduction to the Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule
Developing a MRF Public-Private Partnership in the City of Dallas
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Retail Marijuana committee
Solid Waste Handling Standards
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project Doing More with Our Waste
EPA Region IV and ADEM NPDES Permit Coordination
Presentation transcript:

Jamie Doucett MassDEP

What Problems Are We Solving? Current regulations are inadequate to address technologies other than recycling and composting Are these other technologies solid waste facilities? Are they recycling or composting activities? What is appropriate permitting pathway? No certainty for developers, MassDEP or other parties Banging a square peg in a round hole What are the appropriate standards to apply?

Summary - Public Hearing Draft Structure: Exempt activities – current exemptions plus new ones Permits by Rule - small recycling, composting and conversion activities Full permits - larger recycling, composting and conversion activities Raised current thresholds for some activities Expanded public comment process for permits Required compliance certifications for exempt activities

Public Hearings and Comments 5 public hearings held in December and January Received comments from approximately 42 people/organizations Many issues were raised and many detailed suggestions offered Made a number of changes to the regulations in consideration of the comments received

Major Areas of Comment Site Assignment vs. exemptions Controlling potential impacts of managing SSO Appropriate limits and controls on operations Public participation Appeal Process Enforcement Transition of existing operations

Basic Assumptions Facilities managing MSW must go through Site Assignment Materials that are pre-sorted are not considered MSW Residuals remaining after separating recyclables from the waste are MSW POTWs managing SSO in addition to sludge in an AD unit are “adequately regulated” under BRP regulations and exempt from SW regulations Must ensure quality of both incoming pre-sorted materials and outgoing products Maintain standards of public health and environmental protection Provide for adequate public review and comment on permits

Site Assignment Issue Basic premise is that recyclables and source separated organics (SSO) are not solid waste Siting regulations have operated under this premise since 1990 Therefore, operations managing recyclables or SSO do not require a site assignment General Permits and RCC Permits are limited to operations managing only recyclables or SSO

Public Process for RCC Permits Expanded the public comment process for RCC Permits Parallels process used for other solid waste permits Draft RCC permit issued Public notice required, which starts 30 day public comment period Public Hearing Not required, but may be requested by: Applicant Town, through the BOS or mayor Commissioner deems there is sufficient public interest

Public Process for RCC Permits Adjudicatory Hearings on final permit may be requested by: The applicant An aggrieved person Group of 10 persons The municipality in which operation is to be located Must be completed no later than 6 months after request for appeal is filed

Goal Establish levels of MassDEP review and oversight commensurate with environmental and public health issues

Site Assignment Exemptions Conditional exemptions Operations and activities that do not need MassDEP oversight Notification required for some activities General permits Operations that are generally limited in size and/or have limited potential for nuisance conditions Annual compliance certification will be required RCC permits Larger operations requiring more direct MassDEP oversight Permit application and review

Site Assignment Exemptions 2 types of exempt activities: Very small operations handling solid waste Small operations handling recyclables or organic materials These operations manage pre-sorted recyclables and source separated organics Expanded the list of exempt activities to include: Activities at agricultural units – regulated by MDAR Municipal food material collection drop-off <1 tpd

General Permits - Applicability For larger recycling and composting activities Recycling operations <250 tons per day, not including paper Composting operations: Receiving no more than 105 tons per week and 30 tons per day of putrescibles Aerobic or anaerobic digesters receiving no more than 100 tons per day of organics from on or off site

General Permits - Recycling Must submit annual certification that operation meets requirements established in the regulations, including: No unpermitted discharges Recyclable materials not contaminated by toxics Products are marketable Residuals do not average more than 15% (single stream) or 10% (other recycling facilities)

General Permits – Composting and Small AD Operations Must certify that operation meets requirements established in the regulations, including: No unpermitted discharges Maintains proper temperatures (if composting) Implements an odor control plan and a vector control plan Is located at least 250 feet from existing well Ensures quality of organic materials coming in and products produced No more than 5% residuals generated

RCC Permits For recycling, composting and conversion activities above General Permit thresholds Only recyclable or organic materials may be processed or converted under these permits Design and operation must be feasible Public review and comment period on draft permit

RCC Permits Added a number of application details and possible permit conditions to what was proposed in Public Hearing Draft Application and permit review includes: Plans to address control of toxics coming in Site information Design and operation information Vector and odor control plans Contingency plans to address management of materials and products Information on products and residuals

RCC Permits Permitting process: MassDEP issues draft permit with conditions Applicant publishes public notice of 30 day public comment period Public hearing not required but may be requested MassDEP issues final permit after the close of the public comment period or hearing, if one is held Adjudicatory hearing may be requested Must be resolved within 6 months

Transition of existing operations New or newly acquired operation qualifying for either a General Permit or RCC Permit Submit compliance certification 30 days prior to commencing operation or acquisition of operation Existing exempt operations Submit certification by Feb 15, 2014 Existing DON operations Continue operation in compliance with DON until expiration date or 5 years from effective date of regs, whichever is sooner

Alternative Use of Existing Site Modified to: Clarify that a recycling, composting or conversion operation at an assigned facility does not need a new or modified site assignment unless the activity cannot be conducted consistent with the current site assignment

Questions? James Doucett