The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Use of Student Transcript Data to Inform Financial Aid Analysis at the National Level.
Advertisements

Tennessee Education Lottery Scholarship Program Annual Report Tennessee Higher Education Commission January 29, 2009.
Fall 2014 Final Enrollment Report Enrollment Management & Marketing Division of Academic Affairs October 22, 2014.
Northern Arizona University 2004 Enrollment and Cohort Highlights Institutional Data and Analysis Retention and Graduation Cohort Definitions Please see.
NIU – An Historical Snapshot Daniel House Office of Institutional Research Brian Brim Division of Academic and Student Affairs Daniel House Office of Institutional.
1 New York State Trends in Student Financial Aid and Cost of Attendance Presented to the Higher Education Committee of the New York State Board of Regents.
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team November 14, 2007.
MnSCU Audit Committee June 15, Preliminary Report: Higher Education Services to Traditionally Underrepresented Student Populations John Asmussen.
CCSU Graduation and Retention Rates of Full-Time, First-Time Students October 7, 2009 Presented to the Retention and Graduation Council Dr. Braden J. Hosch.
Undergraduate Persistence and Graduation Rates Bernadette Gray-Little Faculty Council September 15, 2006.
Who are our Undergraduates? Prepared for Office of Student Life February 26, 2008 Jennifer Brown, OIRP.
Trends in Student Aid 2014For detailed data, visit: trends.collegeboard.org. Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans in 2013 Dollars (in Millions), to.
Achieving the Dream: Developmental Courses and Student Retention Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment January 2008 Research Report.
Alignment, Action & Achievement Institutional Goals and Performance Measures.
Colorado’s Preschool to Postsecondary Alignment Act, SB (CAP4K) Co-convened Meeting Gunnison, CO – Western State College November 10, 2008 Dept of.
Engaging Data Displays John Muffo Jacki Stirn SSBTN Consultants.
Understanding Colleague Data Using Colleague data to complete the Spring IPEDS surveys Matt Smith: Pitt Community College.
Louisiana Tech University Division of Student Financial Aid University Seminar Instructor’s Workshop August 29, 2006.
Education Pays Update Trends in Higher Education Series 2006, October 24, Source: The College Board, Education Pays,
Ron Harrell Assistant Director for Planning and Accountability Arkansas Department of Higher Education Dr. Linda Beene, Director.
College Completion Reports and Return on Investment March 28, 2014.
Student Success Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges September 2011.
Goal 2025: To increase the proportion of Americans with high-quality degrees and credentials to 60 percent by the year 2025.
Diversity Update 2011 September 2011 Faculty/Staff and Climate Slides.
UMass Boston Retention, Persistence, and Graduation Rates UMass Boston Advising Collaborative March 28, 2013 Office of Institutional Research and Policy.
The Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment Northern Virginia Community College (NOVA) AUGUST 2005.
Board of Trustees Quarterly Data Report Volume 1, Number 2 Graduation and Retention Update January 7, 2014.
Diversity Data Resources from the Office of Academic Planning and Institutional Research apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm.
Total Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans Used to Finance Postsecondary Education Expenses in 2011 Dollars (in Millions), to SOURCE: The.
Higher Education Fact Book The Fact Book compiles tables and graphs reporting enrollment, awards, persistence, tuition, financial trends, and.
Complete College OCCC Fall 2012 AtD Cohort Retention September 18,
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Program Collaboration and Transfer Update
1 System Level Accountability Measures Sept. 17, 2003.
November 12, 2009 Grossmont - Cuyamaca Community College District Grossmont - Cuyamaca Community College District.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. System Level Accountability Measures June 15, 2004.
Low-income Adults in Profile: Low-income Adults in Profile: Improving Lives Through Higher Education Bryan Cook ACE Center for Policy Analysis.
Diversity Update 2011 September 2011 Retention/Graduation and Outcomes Slides.
1 System Level Accountability Measures Dec. 16, 2003.
Trends in Student Aid 2015For detailed data, visit: trends.collegeboard.org. Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans in 2014 Dollars (in Millions), to.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Trends in Student Aid 2013For detailed data, visit: trends.collegeboard.org. Total Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans Used to Finance Postsecondary Education.
Trends in Higher Education Series Trends in Student Aid 2007.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. System Level Accountability Measures June 14, 2005.
Template provided by: “posters4research.com” Academic Performance and Persistence of Undergraduate Students at a Land-Grant Institution: A Statistical.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Data Highlight: Completion CAAP Meeting March 30,
September 2006NYS Education Department1 A Review of Higher Education Data Comparison of the Four Sectors of Higher Education New York State Education Department.
1 The Disparity Story by the Numbers Shaun Williams-Wyche, Ph.D. Minnesota Office of Higher Education April 28, 2016.
Fall Enrollment by Ethnic Group and Year Grant Campus Year ETHNIC GROUP Nonresident alien Hispanic/Latino American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black.
Meaningful Federal Community College Success Rate --A POP QUIZ Utility A.19.8%Federal 150% completion B.38.5%Federal 150% completion + Transfer C.25.1%Federal.
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
Student Demographics and Learning Outcomes
The U.S. Higher Education Landscape: Equity Lens Applied
A Statistical Analysis Utilizing Detailed Institutional Data
Objectives How reliable are the student success measures that are reported to the Board of Trustees? How accurate is the underlying student record data.
Community for Excellence Assessment Results
Using NSC Data to Determine Postsecondary Success
Student Demographics and Learning Outcomes
Perkins IV Postsecondary Accountability
AACRAO Transfer Conference July, 2013 Afet Dundar, PhD
Undergraduate Retention
Trends in Higher Education Series
“Percent of total fall enrollment in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by select age groups: data, 2024 projections” by OCLC Research.
Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans in 2014 Dollars (in Millions), to
IPEDS Outcome Measures and the VFA
UTC Advisory Board Meeting
Board of Regents SUNO/UNO House Education Committee
Unduplicated Annual Enrollment: North Dakota
Noel Levitz Goal Development
Presentation transcript:

The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004

Slide 2 ACCOUNTABILITY INDICATOR: ACCESS TO PROGRAMS & COURSES Measure 1D: Student Retention Rates –Core Measures Measure 1D1 – Percent Graduated Measure 1D2 – Percent Retained Measure 1D3 – Percent Transferred Measure 1D4 – Success Rate –Contextual Measures Graduation and Transfer-Out Rates for similar institutions Retention rates will be available in the future

Slide 3 MEASURE 1D: DATA SOURCES & REPORTING LEVELS Three data sources –ISRS Student Subsystem –National Student Clearinghouse –Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System Reporting Levels –System level –Institution Type –Admission status –Full-Time & Part-Time –Race-Ethnicity –Low Income

Slide 4 MEASURE 1D: DEFINITIONS Cohort: Entering students in a specified term. Graduated: The cumulative percentage of students in the cohort that have graduated by the end of the specified term. Retained: The percentage of students in the cohort that have not graduated and are enrolled during the specified term.

Slide 5 MEASURE 1D: DEFINITIONS Transferred: The cumulative percentage of students in the cohort that have not graduated and are not enrolled but have enrolled at another U.S. institution. Success: The cumulative percentage of students in the cohort that have graduated or transferred plus the percent enrolled during a specific term.

Slide 6 FALL ENTERING STUDENT COHORTS Measure 1D Cohort

Slide 7 COHORTS INCLUDE FOUR SUB-COHORTS Total Entering Students = 69,451 in Fall 2003

Slide 8 SUCCESS RATES DIFFER BY SUBCOHORT Fall 2001 Success Rates in Second Spring

Slide 9 SUCCESS RATE OF FALL 1997 COHORT DURING 6 YEARS FOLLOWING ENTRY: COLLEGES FULL-TIME Fall 1997 UG Regular 41.9%41.4%41.7% 44.2% 53.7% 87.5%

Slide 10 SUCCESS RATE OF FALL 1997 COHORT DURING 6 YEARS FOLLOWING ENTRY: UNIVERSITIES FULL-TIME Fall 1997 UG Regular 62.1% 57.7% 55.5%54.6% 71.6% 95.8%

Slide 11 INCREASING RETENTION & SUCCESS RATES AFTER TWO YEARS: COLLEGES FULL-TIME UG Regular – Five Cohorts Rate at Second Spring 53.7%55.1%54.8%56.3%57.6%

Slide 12 INCREASING RETENTION & SUCCESS RATES AFTER TWO YEARS: UNIVERSITIES FULL-TIME UG Regular – Five Cohorts Rate at Second Spring 71.6%72.1%72.4% 73.2%

Slide 13 SUBSTANTIAL UNKNOWN RACE-ETHNICITY Total FT UG Regular = 28,427 in Fall 2001

Slide 14 STUDENTS OF COLOR Total FT UG Regular Students of Color = 2,104 in Fall 2001

Slide 15 SUCCESS RATES VARY BY RACIAL-ETHNIC GROUP COLLEGE FULL-TIME Fall 2001 Cohort: UG Regular - Second Spring 57.6% 42.8% 60.1% 54.0% 61.3% 48.5% 49.2%

Slide 16 SUCCESS RATES VARY BY RACIAL-ETHNIC GROUP COLLEGE PART-TIME Fall 2001 Cohort: UG Regular - Second Spring 31.4% 25.0% 36.1% 35.5% 36.2% 35.8% 21.1%

Slide 17 SUCCESS RATES VARY BY RACIAL-ETHNIC GROUP UNIVERSITY FULL-TIME Fall 2001 Cohort: UG Regular - Second Spring 73.2% 61.2% 68.8%67.8% 74.5% 63.0% 71.7%

Slide 18 ONE-QUARTER OF FULL-TIME STUDENTS ARE LOW INCOME LOW INCOME = PELL GRANT Total FT Entering Students = 37,816 in Fall 2001

Slide 19 SUCCESS RATES BY INCOME CATEGORY COLLEGE FULL-TIME & PART-TIME Fall 2001 Cohort: UG Regular - Second Spring 57.6%57.1%57.8% 45.1% 29.0% 31.4%

Slide 20 SYSTEM GRADUATION RATES ARE HIGHER THAN THOSE OF SIMILAR INSTITUTIONS IPEDS 2001 Graduation rates

Slide 21 NEXT STEPS Develop contextual data for similar institutions on retention rates Measure 1C3: Cumulative Debt Burden of Graduates Measure 5B: Course Transfer