What Did We Find - Challenges Homogenous population High levels of poverty High number of first generation college students High levels of math dual placement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2012 TRUSTEE CONFERENCE COMPLETE COLLEGE OH November 13, 2012 Rebecca Butler Managing Project Director.
Advertisements

Washington's I-BEST Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges The Comprehensive I-BEST Pathway Models.
GEAR UP Idaho  GEAR UP Idaho is a federal grant program that provides comprehensive, early intervention college access programming to selected Idaho.
Background and Data Student Success Committee. MECC Definition of Student Success Retained Complete 2/3 of credits With 2.0 GPA or higher.
TAIR 2009 – Lubbock Michael Taft and Paul Illich Using Data to Improve Developmental Education.
Achieving the Dream: Baseline Data Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment December 2007 Research Report No
Complete College OCCC OCCC Course Success Overview Office of Institutional Effectiveness September 18, 2013 Presentation By: Matt Eastwood
Student Success at the Beach Update Nov 15, 2012
Achieving the Dream Advisement Initiative Evaluation September 21, 2011.
© 2012 Boise State University1 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Shari Ellertson, Ph.D. Boise State University Analyzing changes in retention and graduation.
University of Cincinnati’s SUCCESS CHALLENGE: Placing Student Success at the Center Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange For Early Intervention.
Creating an On-Ramp from High School to College LEARNING COLLEGE SUMMIT 2012.
Oak Hill High School Home of the “Golden Eagles” 2010 PL 221 and AYP Status and Report.
Freshman Intensive Studies "A Unique Freshman Experience for Motivated Students!" Information Session Information Session
Achieving the Dream: Developmental Courses and Student Retention Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment January 2008 Research Report.
Ivy Tech Community College Indiana’s Education Roundtable May 24, 2011.
Retaining Students at Community Colleges: An Update on the Achieving the Dream Initiative John B. Lee, JBL Associates Inc Lana Muraskin, The Pell Institute.
Implementing Change: A Holistic Approach to Developmental Education Sue Cain, Director Transition and University Services Eastern Kentucky University.
Students Speak: Are We Listening? Teachership Academy – Phase II Orientation Session.
ILASFAA: 2014 MAP ADVISING RECOMMENDATIONS Background MAP Task Force – Illinois General Assembly – 2013 Concluded that students would benefit from.
Background of Performance Measures identified 12 Performance Measures Baseline data collected in Performance Funding in Results.
MSJC Assessment Scores FA’06 as Baseline and includes SP’07/FA’07/SP’08 Updated 7/22/08 Compiled by MSJC R&D Dept.- C. Hawkins / IT MIS WO# XBRO.BSI.
OPENING DAY 2012 THE “ONE MORE” CAMPAIGN. BACKGROUND Goal 1: Increasing student success and academic excellence through student-centered instruction,
Achieving the Dream Status Report Mentor Visit February 5-6, 2009.
BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Students will demonstrate a strong foundation in academic skills by working toward the Kansas Standards of Excellence in reading,
Fast Track to Accelerate Student Success 1.What Fast Track is 2.Strategies for Implementation a) Pre-Production b) Implementation c) Post-Production.
MONITORING STUDENT SUCCESS: HELPFUL PRACTICES College Assistance Migrant Program (CAMP) Oregon State University HEP/CAMP New Director's & Staff Training.
College Success Program Fall 2010 Annual Report College Success Program.
Pulaski Technical College Overview Largest two-year college in Arkansas 4 th largest institution of higher education in state 11,946 students – fall 2011.
DEVELOPMENTAL MATH CHANGES AT BMCC JIM WHITTAKER, DIRECTOR OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH.
ABLE + COLLEGE EQUALS SUCCESS OAACE April
Jumping Past Developmental Mathematics Jim Whittaker and Pete Hernberg AACC San Antonio, Texas 95 th Annual Conference April 20, 2015.
Redesigning for Completion: Policy DREAM 2013 Dr. Randy Parker, President, Guilford Technical Community College Cynthia Liston, Associate Vice President,
The Golden Scholars Bridge Program The Center for Academic Success, Undergraduate Education Vicenta M. Shepard, Reading & Learning Coordinator.
Achieving the Dream: Assessing Implementation CCPRO February 20, 2007.
Fall 2010 Update. Dean of Adult and Developmental Education Director of Academic and Developmental Support Director of Adult and Developmental Instruction.
TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE Julie Woodruff, Associate Professor of English Mary Millikin, Director of Institutional Research representing the AtD Data Team.
Achieving the Dream Baseline Data – What does it tell us? Presented by the ATD Data Team February 24, 2015.
An “At-Risk” Student 2. A Refresher… Risk:Uncertainty.
Collecting data & information Talking with teachers, administrators, service providers Progress Monitoring Consolidated Planning /Use of Data Alternative.
An Equal Opportunity University Transitions from High School to the University of Kentucky Mike Mullen Associate Provost for Undergraduate Education.
MSJC BSI Baseline Measures using FA’06 as Baseline and includes SP’07/FA’07/SP’08 Prepared for Instructional Services Updated 7/22/08 Compiled by MSJC.
Fall 2011NEnd of Fall 2011 GRCC GPA FTIACs with HS GPA 3.00 or higher 2, FTIACs with HS GPA below ,
Identifying At-Risk Students Gary R. Pike Information Management & Institutional Research Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis.
Graduation, Completion, and Transfer ATD Data Team Subcommittee report January 2011.
Mobile County Public Schools is the Largest System in Alabama.
Support Early Success in College Unity College initiatives to improve student retention.
One System…One Mission Florida’s Student Success Dashboard 2011 American Association of Community Colleges John Hughes, Ph. D.
Strategic Planning in Driving Innovative Measures of Success Gregory W. LaPointe University of Maine at Augusta December 9, 2015.
Achieving the Dream: Alexandria Campus Baseline Data Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment January 2008 Research Report No
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004.
Student Success Updates Shelley Tiwari, Achieving the Dream Project Director.
General Demographics. P-12 Public School Students in Colorado Fall 2009 Grades# of Students P-5411, , ,770 Detention Centers247 Total.
High Risk Comparisons SPC High Risk Data AY2010Fall 2009Spring 2010Totals # of High Risk Courses Enrollment in High Risk Courses 10,55211,00321,555.
Achieving the Dream Policy Changes. The National Initiative Achieving the Dream is a national initiative to help community colleges provide the best opportunity.
Freshman Intensive Studies "A Unique Freshman Experience for Motivated Students!" Information Session Information Session Winter
SUPPORTING DATA 1 Pipeline Subcommittee Draft - 5/12/2010.
SUPPORTING DATA 1 Pipeline Subcommittee June 29, 2010 DRAFT.
College Success Program John Cowles, Ph.D. Dean of Student Success and Retention Grand Rapids Community College Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Presented by: Mary Perrine, Coordinator of Institutional Research and Planning.
Success through Advising & Interactive learning
Pennsylvania’s ESSA Submitted Plan Review
First Year Academic Programs Fall Retreat
Toward a New Paradigm for Student Success
Student Equity Planning August 28, rd Meeting
BAS DATA.
Hard-blocked Placement Prerequisites
Summer Success Academy Data
Noel Levitz Goal Development
Achieving the Dream: Loudoun Campus Baseline Data
Presentation transcript:

What Did We Find - Challenges Homogenous population High levels of poverty High number of first generation college students High levels of math dual placement Loss of college-ready & high performing students Significant loss of at-risk students fall-to-fall Significant loss of Dev Ed math students who failed to complete any math during the first year

What Did We Find - Opportunities IPEDS three-year cohort graduation rate that approximates 50% Fall-to-fall retention of approximately 50% Dev Ed completion rates (C or better) that ranged from 70-85% Strong Dev Ed completion rates in the first college- level course Mandatory testing, placement, orientation, and first year experience course

What Did We Do – Our Interventions Math Advising CSI Advising Develop a Comprehensive First-Year Experience Advanced & Linked Courses

Retention Duration Level of Risk based on Noel-Levitz College Student Inventory Moderate-RiskHigh Risk BaselineFall 2006 to Fall %42% 1 st ImplementationFall 2007 to Fall %58% 2 nd ImplementationFall 2008 to Fall %47% 3 rd ImplementationFall 2009 to Fall %52% Percent Change--10% increase Fall-to-Fall Retention Based on CSI Score (CSI Intervention Advising) Based on Achieving the Dream Data

Retention Duration Financial Need as Defined by Pell Grant With PellWithout Pell BaselineFall Fall %58.3% PlanningFall Fall %60.5% 1 st ImplementationFall 2006 to Fall %62.4% 2 nd ImplementationFall 2007 to Fall %69.0% 3 rd ImplementationFall 2008 to Fall %66.7% Percent Change--8.4% increase Fall-to-Fall Retention Based on Pell Status (Math Advising & CSI Advising) Based on Achieving the Dream Data

Baseline 2009 – 4 th Implementation Percent Change English 43.6%67.3%23.7% increase Reading 45.7%59.1%13.4% increase Math 13.7%**34.9%**21.2% Percent of Students Referred to Developmental Education Completing All Requirements During the First Year **Students completing Math 090 with a grade of “A” are permitted to skip Math 091 – these students are considered non-completer An alternative measure for math is those student completing any developmental math during the first year (62.8% - baseline, 71.9% - 4 th implementation, 9.1% increase) Based on Achieving the Dream Data

Percentage of Students 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Percentage of Students 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Course Grades

Percentage of Students 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Percentage of Students 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Course Grades

Percentage of Students 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% English Winter Percentage of Students 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Course Grades

Percentage of Students 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Percentage of Students 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Course Grades

Percentage of Students 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0%

Percentage of Students 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0%