SiPM Readback Noise Tagging & HCAL Calibration Dayton Thorpe July 8, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.
Advertisements

CMS Outer Hadron Calorimeter (HO) Project Naba K Mondal Tata Institute, Mumbai, India.
Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.
A segmented principal component analysis applied to calorimetry information at ATLAS ACAT May 22-27, Zeuthen, Germany H. P. Lima Jr, J. M. de Seixas.
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
Upgrading the CMS simulation and reconstruction David J Lange LLNL April CHEP 2015D. Lange.
Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)
29 June 2004Paul Dauncey1 ECAL Readout Tests Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey, C. Fry, R. Halsall, M.
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCalibration and Analysis group meeting, April, 3, 2006 CAL on-orbit calibration with protons. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.
Forward Detectors and Measurement of Proton-Antiproton Collision Rates by Zachary Einzig, Mentor Michele Gallinaro INTRODUCTION THE DETECTORS EXPERIMENTAL.
We observe two classes of anomalous signals in HCAL 2) Cherenkov light produced by interactions in the window of the Forward Calorimeter PMTs ¼ photoelectrons.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
Recirculation Concept - Cyclotron Radio frequency alternating voltage Hollow metal drift tubes time t =0 time t =½ RF period D-shaped.
1 November 18, 2014 DOE SC-OPA Review of 12 GeV ENC vs. preamp load FSSR2 by FNAL Single chip on a PCB Load from capacitors SVT module testing.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
PSD upgrade: Ar-present and Xe-future 1.- Status of the PSD upgrade 2.- PSD performance after upgrade 3.- Problems during the Ar-run 4.- Future scenarios.
Monitoring system of the LHCb electromagnetic calorimeter NEC’2007, Varna, Bulgaria Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow)
1 A ROOT Tool for 3D Event Visualization in ATLAS Calorimeters Luciano Andrade José de Seixas Federal University of Rio de Janeiro/COPPE.
Proposal for participation in Si-PM testing and Upgrade work HEP Group Department of Physics Panjab University Chandigarh M. India-CMS meeting,
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
Upgrade of the CMS hadron outer calorimeter with SiPM’s
A. Gibson, Toronto; Villa Olmo 2009; ATLAS LAr Commissioning October 5, 2009 Commissioning of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Adam Gibson University.
CMS Calorimeter HB- HB+ HE- HE+ HF- HF+ HO-2 HO-1 HO0 HO+1 HO+2
Operation of the CMS Tracker at the Large Hadron Collider
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
January 21, 2007Suvadeep Bose / IndiaCMS - Santiniketan 1 Response of CMS Hadron Calorimeter to Electron Beams Suvadeep Bose EHEP, TIFR, Mumbai Outline:
08-June-2006 / Mayda M. VelascoCALOR Chicago1 Initial Calibration for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter Barrel Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 7 to July 15 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.4pb -1 u Recorded:
The Compact Muon Solenoid. What does CMS do? The Compact Muon Solenoid is a general purpose particle detector installed at point 5 of the Large Hadron.
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
Bennett Marsh UM CERN REU 2014 Upgrades to the CMS HCAL Run Control System.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.
A Silicon Photomultiplier (SiPM) Based Readout for the sPHENIX Upgrade S. Boose, J. Haggerty, E. Mannel, A. Sukhanov For the PHENIX Collaboration Introduction:
H C A L 11 th International Conference on Advanced Technology and Particle Physics Villa Olmo (Como - Italy), October 5 - 9, 2009 THE PERFORMANCE OF THE.
26/May/2008Calor LHCb Preshower(PS) and Scintillating pad detector (SPD): commissioning, calibration, and monitoring Eduardo Picatoste Universitat.
Geant4 Tutorial, Oct28 th 2003V. Daniel Elvira Geant4 Simulation of the CMS 2002 Hcal Test Beam V. Daniel Elvira Geant4 Tutorial.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
A N DY Status Commissioning with colliding beams (p  +p  at  s=500 GeV) L.C.Bland, for AnDY 22 February 2011 Time Meeting, BNL.
The ATLAS Electromagnetic and Hadronic End-Cap Calorimeter in a Combined Beam Test Tamara Hughes University of Victoria WRNPPC 2004.
Paolo Rumerio, CERN On behalf of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Group CALOR 2006 Chicago, June 5 th – 9 th, 2006 Commissioning of the CMS Electromagnetic.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
SARAH MARIE BRUNO HGCAL OVERVIEW Endcap More sensitive to radiation Crystals degrade quickly and must be replaced – expensive!
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
A New Inner-Layer Silicon Micro- Strip Detector for D0 Alice Bean for the D0 Collaboration University of Kansas CIPANP Puerto Rico.
1 Projectile Spectator Detector: Status and Plans A.Ivashkin (INR, Moscow) PSD performance in Be run. Problems and drawbacks. Future steps.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
Minerva Test Beam 2 Status Geoff Savage for the Test Beam 2 Team March 23, /23/2015AEM - Minerva Test Beam 2 Status1.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
A. Parenti 1 RT 2007, Batavia IL The CMS Muon System and its Performance in the Cosmic Challenge RT2007 conference, Batavia IL, USA May 03, 2007 Andrea.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
The LHCb Calorimeter system
Scintillation Detectors in High Energy Physics
HCAL M&O-B Budget CMS Finance Board
PEDESTAL STABILITY OF HCAL DURING GLOBAL RUNS AND 2009 CASTOR DQM ANALYSIS Emine GÜRPINAR Cukurova University 7/31/2018.
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
Study of Gamma+Jets production
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
   Calorimetry et al.    SUMMARY 12 contributions Tile HCAL
Trigger M&O Progress -- Florida, Rice, UCLA, Wisconsin
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Reports for highly granular hadron calorimeter using software compensation techniques Bing Liu SJTU February 25, 2019.
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Compact Muon Solenoid Detector (CMS) & The Token Bit Manager (TBM)
Presentation transcript:

SiPM Readback Noise Tagging & HCAL Calibration Dayton Thorpe July 8, 2010

CMS Hadron Calorimeter (HCAL) HCAL sits outside of the tracker and electromagnetic calorimeter (ECAL). HCAL uses steel and brass plates to detect muons that do not interact with ECAL. In the central region, ECAL and the Hadron Barrel alone are insufficient to contain hadron showers. An additional layer outside the solenoid, the Outer Calorimeter (HO), is used to stop high energy hadrons.

Silicon Photomultipliers CMS HCAL group plans to replace over 2,000 Hybrid Photodectors with Silicon Photomultipliers (SiPMs) during 2012 shutdown. In April 2009, 144 SiPMs were installed for testing. SiPM gain varies significantly with temperature (8-10 percent per degree C), so frequent temperature and voltage readbacks are needed for Peltier coolers to maintain a constant temperature (de Barbaro & Vishnevskiy, 2009). Recently discovered that temperature readback induces a large signal. This “feature” will be eliminated in SiPM readout electronics to be installed in Need a software solution for 2010/2011. Objective is to develop a simple algorithm for tagging noise events due to temperature readback without tagging collision data.

There are 132 channels which record ADC counts for 10 time slices per event. The above data are from cosmic rays when triggers from several subdetectors are combined to verify that a muon is actually present which should give a low noise/signal ratio due to temperature readback.

The above data are from a run with an HO trigger: whenever HO records a large value the event is recorded. This should capture all of the temperature readback data to give a higher noise/signal ratio. There are two extra patches of data with more than 6 ADC counts below 0 and more than 15 ADC counts above 20.

Time series of this data is also nonphysical. Two patches of data are distinct in the ADC>20 data. Possibly due to succession of temperature and voltage readbacks.

Conclusion Proposed algorithm would tag events with more than 6 ADC counts below 0 and with more than 15 ADC counts above 20. In the process of developing the code. Next project: redo CMS HCAL calibration report. Conditions such as temperature and voltage of SiPM’s and HPD’s have changed since it was last done one year ago.

Acknowledgments Pawel de Barbaro Dmitry Vishnevskiy Paolo Rumerio John Paul Chou