SAFESPOT Project SP2 WP3 1 Title S. Marco, S. Manfredi (CSST) SP1 Meeting PONTEDERA 1st March 2007 INFRASENS Functional Architecture.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Genoa, Italy September 2-4, th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance Combination of Roadside and In-Vehicle.
Advertisements

VTrack: Accurate, Energy-Aware Road Traffic Delay Estimation Using Mobile Phones Arvind Thiagarajan, Lenin Ravindranath, Katrina LaCurts, Sivan Toledo,
Technology Solutions. There are a variety of technologies—old and new—that have been developed to warn drivers and operators when workers on foot are.
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
Knut Evensen Connected Vehicle Summit 29 September 2010
Real-time Estimation of Accident Likelihood for Safety Enhancement Jun Oh, Ph.D., PE, PTOE Western Michigan University March 14, 2007.
HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.
Visual Traffic Simulation Thomas Fotherby. Objective To visualise traffic flow. –Using 2D animated graphics –Using simple models of microscopic traffic.
EX-1 Intersections & Interchanges Improved Traffic Signal Control Ramp metering Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems Automated Enforcement.
Intervenant - date Distributed Simulation Architecture for the Design of Cooperative ADAS D. Gruyer, S. Glaser, S. Pechberti, R. Gallen, N. Hautière 05/09/2011.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Development of a Portable Work Zone Traffic Safety Information System using DSRC Based V2I and V2V Communication.
Hazard and Incident Warning « Majority of events occurring on the road represent a danger for road users » By transmitting road events and road status.
1 Safespot applications for Infrastructure-Based Co-Operative Road-Safety World congress on ITS, Beijin /15SAFESPOT Fabien Bonnefoi, Francesco Bellotti,
Fuzzy Logic in Traffic Control State Trafic Departement Baden Württemberg realized by INFORM Software Corporation Martin Pozybill Martin Pozybill Bernhard.
AUTOMOBILES Dimitris Milakis, Transport Institute, Delft University of Technology Envisioning Automated Vehicles within the Built Environment: 2020, 2035,
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Chapter 9 New Technologies Traffic Signs 101 November 20, 2014.
Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart Roads”
Traffic Enforcement And Management System Malam-Team is Israel's largest systems integration organization, One of the most exciting solutions offered by.
VIKING Workshop – Hamburg, DE, March 2007 Best Practices in Monitoring Deployment, Hamburg, Germany Innovation in Monitoring VIKING Workshop “Best.
SAFEPROBE Project Status of SP1 Christian Zott
SAFESPOT Project SP1 Meeting 3 rd – 4 th April, Berlin 1 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart Roads” Debra.
Technology and Society The DynamIT project Dynamic information services and anonymous travel time registration VIKING Workshop København Per J.
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection Benjamin Schiereck, Sales Manger Traficon Germany Improving road and tunnel safety via incident management: implementing.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
1. This seminar paper is based upon the project work being carried out by the collaboration of Delphi- Delco Electronics (DDE) and General Motors Corporation.It.
1 Development of countermeasures Hossein Naraghi CE 590 Special Topics Safety March 2003 Time Spent: 6 hrs.
Contribution of Infrastructures upon Road Safety: Modeling and Regulation of Operating Vehicle Speeds Nicolas Hautière Marie-Line Gallenne.
1 From user needs to applications: the Safespot approach based on road accident data analysis 6th European congress on ITS, Aalborg /15SAFESPOTSAFESPOT.
SAFESPOT Project SP1/SP4 Harmonization Meeting 9 th June, Lyon 1 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart Roads”
1 SAFEPROBE Plenary Meeting , Torino T1.2.3 Requirements Andreas Ekfjorden Volvo (Sweden) SAFEPROBESAFEPROBE.
F Networked Embedded Applications and Technologies Lab Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering National Cheng Kung University, TAIWAN.
SP1 – Meeting March 1 st - 2nd 2007 – Pontedera (Pisa) Electronic Systems 1 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on.
SAFESPOT – Local Dynamic Maps for Cooperative Systems April, 12th 2007, CRF – SP2 Infrasens meeting 1 Local dynamic maps in cooperative systems IP - “Smart.
Prediction of Traffic Density for Congestion Analysis under Indian Traffic Conditions Proceedings of the 12th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent.
SAFESPOT SP2 Meeting Paris, December 2 nd SP2 Meeting Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart Roads” Mr.
Safe roads, Reliable journeys, Informed travellers Traffic Data To-Be Business and As-Is Technology Map Version 1.0.
SAFESPOT Project Kick off Meeting February 16 th and 17 th 2006 Rome 1 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart.
SP2 Plenary Meeting – Data Fusion March 2008, Munich 1 Infrastructure Side Data Fusion Tobias Schendzielorz (TUM) Paul Mathias (Siemens) SAFESPOTSAFESPOT.
September 25, 2013 Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety Research, Development and Test Overview of V2I Safety Applications.
SAFESPOT Project Kick off Meeting February 16 th and 17 th 2006 Rome 1 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart.
Safe roads, Reliable journeys, Informed travellers Directors Brief with Notes Version 1.0.
SP2 Progress Meeting – Data Fusion September 2007, Paris 1 Infrastructure Side Data Fusion Tobias Schendzielorz Technische Universität München.
IntelliDriveSM Update
Road Inventory Data Collection Re-engineering Collected Data Items (more than 50 items): –Street Names. –Pavement width, number of lanes, etc. –Bike path,
SAFENET The OSU SAFENET Project The Ohio State University Center for Automotive Research & Center for Intelligent Transportation Research.
SF- SP1 – Plenary Meeting June 14 th and 15 th Santorini 1 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart Roads”
SAFESPOT Project SP2 WP3 1 Title S. Marco (CSST) – Budapest, April 26 th 2007 SP2 - INFRASENS WP3 - System Specifications Task 2 - Detection Algorithms.
Intelligent Transport Systems
© 2006 PSEN Unit - #4 Let’s Go Driving Identification Evaluation Control Monitor.
Section 3: New and Experimental Technologies
SP1 – Meeting April 23 rd Schieberdingen Electronic Systems Page 1 of 13 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles.
SF-SP1 Plenary Meeting March 01-02/03/2007 Pontedera - PIAGGIO 1 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart Roads”
SAFESPOT Project Kick off Meeting February 16 th and 17 th 2006 Rome 1 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart.
Auto-Park for Social Robots By Team Daedalus. Requirements for FVE Functional Receive commands from user via smartphone app Share data with other cars.
EUCAR IST Workshop 23 May Active Safety Vehicle Systems and HMI. Topics in need of a Holistic Approach for Integrated Solutions Ulf Palmquist EUCAR.
DSRC and SPaT, SSM, SRM & MAP
Technology Solutions for Tolling and Traffic Management N Video Detection Technology and Marketplace Michael Wieck Business Development Manager, Roadway.
Submitted To: Submitted By: Seminar On ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL.
SAFESPOT Project, SP2 PARTNERS PROGRESS MEETING 12th July 2006, Cofiroute, Paris 1 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles.
CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES Presented by Anju.J.S. CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES.
Auto-Park for Social Robots By Team I. Meet the Team Alessandro Pinto ▫ UTRC, Sponsor Dorothy Kirlew ▫ Scrum Master, Software Mohak Bhardwaj ▫ Vision.
EasyWay - conclusion.
Intelligent Transportation System
SP2 Integration Workshop Short Introduction to the LDM
Design Consistency and Positive Guidance
Connected Vehicle Activities at MnDOT
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
KEYLESS ENTRY PUSH TO START BACK UP CAMERA.
Dangerous Driving Condition Analysis in Driver Assistance Systems
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
Presentation transcript:

SAFESPOT Project SP2 WP3 1 Title S. Marco, S. Manfredi (CSST) SP1 Meeting PONTEDERA 1st March 2007 INFRASENS Functional Architecture

SAFESPOT Project SP2 WP3 2 SP2 Functional Architecture building process Functional Architecture, as opposed to Physical architecture, is the starting point for the system development. The Functional Viewpoint expresses the System in functional terms. It also shows how its functionality links to the outside world and in particular the users of the System and the data that is used within the System [FRAME] The Functional Architecture is essential to identify SP2 interfaces (with the external world and with the othe SPs) and as a basis for the LDM content definition

SAFESPOT Project SP2 WP3 3 SP2 Functional Architecture building process The development of the Safespot Infrastructure Platform starts, as stated by the European ITS Frame Architecture, from the definition of the System Requirements. On the other hand, the system development must consider the Technological Solutions (devices+processes) proposed by each single partner. This twofold approach has led to the following method for the definition of the Functional Architecture:

SAFESPOT Project SP2 WP3 4 SP2 Functional Architecture building process scheme System Requirements preliminary analysis System Requirements preliminary analysis Functional Blocks diagram Extraction of High Level Functions from System Req. Functional Architecture (Frame-Artist like diagrams) Functional Architecture (Frame-Artist like diagrams) UML diagrams of Functional Architecture Technological Capabilities analysis Platform features scheme Context Diagram + Data Flow Diagrams Use Case and Collaboration diagram

SAFESPOT Project SP2 WP3 5 Functional Blocks Diagram

SAFESPOT Project SP2 WP3 6 Extraction of High Level Functions from System Requirements Application of the ordering and grouping method in order to look for more functionalities coming from the System requirements list

SAFESPOT Project SP2 WP3 7 Platform Features scheme SignalsRaw measuresSensorsLow level featuresEventsHigh level features section speed V2I Automatic Incident Detection Level 1 Data Fusion (object assessment)Level 0 Data Fusion (pre-processing)Level 2 Data Fusion (situation assessment) veh RFID (LCPC) Wrong direction thermal camera frames SensorsData FusionSP5 App.s vehicle direction Detection Algorithms magnetic field variation vehicle passage radio waves vehicle passage From vehicle SP1 Legenda: To Applications SP4- SP5 Sensors task process Det.Alg. task process Data Fusion task process Animal on road vehicle passage object position object profile object thermal profile previous veh. speed and time To Applications SP4 sect.speed limit Short headway Curve overshooting vehicle passage magnetic field variation ir,radar,us mechan. vibrations noise vehicle lat. position vehicle controls vehicle posit. sect. traffic density vehicle type vehicle speed safety critical level polarisation direct. images object position object speed vehicle spacing visibility range Ice on road laserscanner raw data section occupancy Safety level congestion/ incident vehicle loop WSN magnetic triple tech. WSN accelerom WSN microph Laserscan. CCTV camera Thermal imaging Road RFID (BME) vehicle presence vehicle passagevehicle direction radio waves vehicle presence section traffic flow Crash/ accident vehicle presence Wrong direction Veh. intended route Cooperative Pre-Data Fusion Object type Dyn. Black Spot recogn. object speed

SAFESPOT Project SP2 WP3 8 Functional Architecture (EITSFA like) CONTEXT diagram Traffic Traffic&Travel info provider Environment Road pavement Probe Vehicle (SP1) To vehicle platform Vehicle Applications (SP4) SP2. Infrastructure platform Driver From traffic From Traffic&Travel info provider From environment From road pavement From vehicle Traffic controls From traffic controls To vehicle platform Infrastructure Applications (SP5)

SAFESPOT Project SP2 WP3 9 Functional Architecture (EITSFA like) Data Flow Diagrams Traffic data Environment data To vehicle applications Vehicle data 2.4 Provide warning 2.1 Acquire measures To Driver incident Object data Environmental events From traffic (traffic sensors) From Traffic&Travel info provider From environment From road pavement From vehicle 2.2 Detect objects and events Trom vehicle applications SP5 outputs 2.3 Detect situation (SP5)

SAFESPOT Project SP2 WP3 10 Functional Architecture (UML diagrams) 2. SP2 Infrastructure Use Case - Collaboration Diagram Traffic Traffic&Travel info provider (TIC) Environment Road pavement Probe Vehicle (SP1) Vehicle Applications (SP4) Driver From traffic (sensors) From Traffic&Travel info provider From environment From road pavement From Probe Vehicle Traffic controls From traffic controls 2. SP2 Infrastructure platform To driver Infrastr. Applications (SP5) SP4 Use Cases SP5 Use Cases 2.1 Acquire measures 2.2 Detect objects and events 2.3 Provide Infrastrucure based warnings To Vehicle Applications Object data Environmental events Incidents Traffic data Vehicle data Environment data SP5 outputs SP4 outputs «include» «realize» Traffic controls status

SAFESPOT Project SP2 WP3 11 Functional Architecture (UML diagrams) 2.1 Acquire Measures From traffic (sensors) From Traffic&Travel info provider From environment From road pavement From Probe Vehicle From traffic controls Acquire vehicle data Acquire traffic data Acquire road pavement data Acquire environment data Acquire traffic controls status Vehicle position Vehicle speed «include» Vehicle data map-matching «include» Acquire noise Acquire thermal images Acquire weather information Acquire vehicle passage/presence on section «include» Map matched vehicle position Map matched vehicle speed Vehicle passage Vehicle presence To 2.2 Detects Events and objects To Infrastructure Applications Traffic controls status Road pavement data Acquire images Acquire laser signal images noise thermal images Iaser signal weather

SAFESPOT Project SP2 WP3 12 Next Steps Define the needed measures (features) and their characteristics (collaboration SP1/2/4/5) Have a clear view of the content of LDM (and other databases!) Detail lower level functions by each SP2 partner APPLICATION AREA: Hazard & Incident Warning CLUSTER: Obstacle on road STAGE 1: SP5 to fill in column for all applications (each ‘cluster’ variation entered separately) STAGE 2: SP5 to associate performance required to meet needs of warning strategy (timing, accuracy, update, reliability, etc coloured in black when definitive) STAGE 3: SP1/2 will fill in marking possible measurements. Later will give detail of ability to meet performance requirements. STAGE 1STAGE 2a2bSTAGE 3 Event/info/parameterMeasurementPerf. DETECTION Presence of obstacleLong position acc.5m10m5m Lane occupationLat position5m NO YES Road statusWet / dry98% conf90% conf80% conf LatencyEvent to warning 1 sec Warning strategy Zone/vehicles Perf. ACTUATION Generic warning to vehicles in e-zone Long distance/ Following vehicle50m Flashing LEDs OBU Speed recom. Speed reduction in a-zone Long distance/ VANET100m VMS Speed recomm OBU Speed recom.