New Directions in Pupil Learning Assessment: Emerging Models from the Teachers for a New Era Initiative California State University, Northridge Beverly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
NCLB, Highly Qualified and IDEA 2004 How it all fits together and What it means for you. RIDE Spring Leadership Conference May 11, 2006 Grossi/Olsen 2006.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
1 Career Pathways for All Students PreK-14 2 Compiled by Sue Updegraff Keystone AEA Information from –Iowa Career Pathways –Iowa School-to-Work –Iowa.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Creating Freshmen Success Task Force Report High School Study Session Board Presentation January 30, 2007.
Assessment, Accountability and NCLB Education 388 Lecture March 15, 2007 Kenji Hakuta, Professor.
Hickory Ridge Elementary School Annual Title One Parent Meeting
CSU-MTEP New Mathematics Standards for K-12 and College Learning Margaret L. Kidd CSU Fullerton October 2014.
English Language Learner Placement WHITTIER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT “To Achieve and Maintain Excellence” Office of Federal & State Categorical Programs.
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
Consistency of Assessment
E DUCATIONAL E XPANSIONS E DUCATIONAL E XPANSIONS (EE ) Research Projects T EACHERS FOR A N EW E RA.
Teachers for a New Era Teacher & Pupil Assessment Phase II: Numeracy and Literacy in Grades 2-8 Scott W. Brown, Ph.D. Teachers for a New Era Project University.
Closing the Gap for Mathematics in Middle School and High School Visionary Leadership for the 21st Century: Closing the Gaps That Matter February 22-24,
Connecting Teacher Education and Pupil Learning: Evidence Emerging from the Teachers for a New Era Initiative CSU Northridge Beverly Cabello Assessment.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
ILAGO Hood River, Oregon May 16, Eastern Promise Goals Increase student access to accelerated learning opportunities Increase the “college/postsecondary”
Progress and Promise: Lessons from the Boston Pilot Schools Center for Collaborative Education January 2006.
Using Data to Identify Student Needs for MME Stan Masters Coordinator of Curriculum, Assessment, and School Improvement Lenawee ISD August 26, 2008.
Shrinking Size, Diminishing Returns? Small is HUGE! Rob Atterbury
Managing Data Collection: Where we were, where we are, and where we want to be! Gwen Brockman California State University, Dominguez Hills.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
California State University, Long Beach Long Beach City College Cerritos College Collaboration Between the University and Community College to recruit.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Title I Rights and Services Annual Parent Meeting Keansburg School District September 16, 2013.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Early Assessment Program California State University Dr. Beverly Young, Assistant Vice Chancellor.
Quality Jeanne M. Burns, Ph.D. Louisiana Board of Regents Bradley O’Hara, Ph.D. University of Louisiana System Lisa Abney, Ph.D. Northwestern State University.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
Archived Information American Board Certification Presentationby Buffy DeBreaux-Watts American Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence.
Excellence for All Children State of the Schools Knox County Schools January 19, 2012.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPROVE SCIENCE EDUCATION PRESENTED BY GIBSON & ASSOCIATES A CALIFORNIA MATH AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP RESEARCH GRANT WISE II Evaluation.
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
Teachers for a New Era: Evidence Study at California State University, Northridge Beverly Cabello Evidence Co-Leader, Teachers for a New Era James David.
Quality Jeanne M. Burns, Ph.D. Louisiana Board of Regents Qualitative State Research Team Kristin Gansle Louisiana State University and A&M College Value-Added.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
CSU Center for Teacher Quality Assessing Teacher Preparation Outcomes for Program Improvement and Institutional Accountability CSU Academic Council Meeting.
A presentation of methods and selected results 1.
Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum ED 222 Spring 2010.
Teacher Education in California SUSAN TOMA-BERGE, ED. D. COORDINATOR, UCI MULTIPLE SUBJECT CREDENTIAL PROGRAM.
Connecting Teacher Education and Pupil Learning: Evidence Emerging from the Teachers for a New Era Initiative: CSU NORTHRIDGE Dr. Beverly Cabello Assessment.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
What is the 90/90/90 Research?  The Original Research  169 schools in high-poverty, high minority system  21 schools broke the mold – 90%
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.
1 Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Wilson Elementary School.
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Partnership for Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Annual WBWF Student Achievement Report 2017
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
1/13/2019 New Directions in Pupil Learning Assessment: Emerging Models from the Teachers for a New Era Initiative California State University, Northridge.
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: PUPIL OUTCOMES
Two District’s Best-Practices in Supporting Secondary LTELs
Split-Block Class Schedule at Yorktown High School
RECLASSIFICATION
Tennessee edTPA Conference
Presentation transcript:

New Directions in Pupil Learning Assessment: Emerging Models from the Teachers for a New Era Initiative California State University, Northridge Beverly Cabello Evidence Co-Leader, Teachers for a New Era James David Ballard Evidence Research Team, TNE AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA April 9, 2006

Teachers for a New Era Carnegie Corporation of New York and other funders undertook an ambitious reform initiative, Teachers for a New Era, to generate evidence-based reforms that promote excellent teacher education programs at selected colleges and universities. Success will require radical change in the allocation of resources, academic organization, criteria for evaluating participating faculty, internal accountability measures, and relationships with practicing schools and districts. At the conclusion of the project, evidence will be analyzed to determine whether the teacher preparation program changes at the university level result in significantly improved K to 12 pupil learning.

Evidence Goals: –To locate the connections between teacher education and pupil learning –To create a permanent viable system of data gathering, data analysis, and data sharing. –To inform our programs and improve teacher education, pupil learning, and program efficacy

Continued What is involved: –Audit availably of data, quality of data, location of data, and access to data: College level, University sources, System wide sources, and District sources. Lessons learned from these data sources: What is there and not there Aggregate possibilities Types of variables, fields, and definitions Identifiers and confidentiality Various data programs, dirty data, and data conflicts Existing and needed data sharing agreements, Union issues, privacy, etc.

CSU- Northridge Emergent Products, Lessons, and Research Processes.

Three of Many Conceptual Modeling and Data Mapping Pilot Study Quantitative Longitudinal Study

CSUN’s Conceptual Framework of TNE Evidence Components Teacher Indicators Other than CSUN : formal education outside of CSUN, personal experiences, personal characteristics, & teaching experiences (if Interns, or former paraprofessionals); knowledge & beliefs about teaching & learning. Teacher Indicators within CSUN Formal University Preparation : Undergraduate preparation (at CSUN or elsewhere), Pathway, credential coursework & fieldwork. Indicators Related to Teaching Quality of CSUN credential recipients: teaching practices & how these are affected by district policies as well as school policies & context. Contextual Factors : (including district policies, school context, peers Individual Pupil Characteristics : previous educational experiences, English language proficiency, disabilities, etc.) Pupil learning & achievement (a subset of which is measured by test scores)

CSUN Pilot Study Research Questions 1.Do significant differences exist between the reading and math achievement of pupils in grades K - 12 and the specific CSUN teacher preparation program (ACT, Multiple Subjects Intern, or Traditional) their teachers experienced? 2.Does a significant relationship exist between candidates' grades in content specific courses (e.g. reading and math methods courses) and the reading and math achievement gains of their pupils in grades K-12?

Quantitative Study Categories of Variables Pupil –Personal demographic –Family demographic (parents) –English Language fluency –All test scores School context – Participation in Title 1 – Participation in Meal Program – Class size

Teachers (district information) –Number of years teaching –Number of years teaching in district –Levels of education –Type of credential –Emergency or intern –Demographics Quantitative Study Categories of Variables

Teachers (CSUN Preparation Data) –Pathway –Credential awarded (Ed. Specialist, other) –Level (elementary, secondary) –Demographics –Grades in professional courses Quantitative Study Categories of Variables

CSUN PATHWAYS Multiple Subjects Credential Programs 1053 Candidates recommended in 2004/5 Integrated Teacher Education Program – (ITEP) Freshman Integrated Teacher Education Program (ITEP) - Junior Multiple Subjects Intern Program Traditional Program Accelerated Collaborative Teacher (ACT) Preparation Program Single Subject Credential Programs 826 Candidates recommended in 2004/5 Single Subject Internship Program Four Year Integrated in English or Mathematics Traditional ACT

Redesignated FEP Limited English Proficient Fluent English Proficient English Only Percent Students' English Language Fluency, CSUN all Years

Declined/ Unknown Grad School Post College Grad Some College HS Grad Not HS Grad Percent Parent Education, CSUN all years

C BA Pathway Mean of Year 2000 scores Means of CST Augmented Math Total Score x Pathway Using API as a Covariate

CBA Pathway Mean of Year 2000 scores Means of SAT 9 Math Scores x Pathway 2000 Using API Scores as Covariate

Dependent Variable: #yrs_in_district (Originally called yrsexpyy in LA data) Type of Credential Program at CSU (Intern or Regular) Intern Program Regular Program Total Intern Program Regular Program Total Intern Program Regular Program Total CSUN- and Other CSU-Trained Teachers CSUN credential Credential from another CSU campus Credential from non-CSU inst. Total MeanStd. DeviationN

Credential from non-CSU inst.Credential from another CSU campus CSUN credential CSUN- and Other CSU-Trained Teachers, Mean SAT9 Reading NCE SAT9 Math NCE All analyses controlled For school API scores And SES indicators.

All analyses controlled For school API scores And SES indicators.

All analyses controlled For school API scores and SES indicators.

All analyses controlled For school API scores And SES indicators.

All analyses controlled For school API scores And SES indicators.

CSUN’s Conceptual Framework of TNE Evidence Components Teacher Indicators Other than CSUN : formal education outside of CSUN, personal experiences, personal characteristics, & teaching experiences (if Interns, or former paraprofessionals); knowledge & beliefs about teaching & learning. Teacher Indicators within CSUN Formal University Preparation : Undergraduate preparation (at CSUN or elsewhere), Pathway, credential coursework & fieldwork. Indicators Related to Teaching Quality of CSUN credential recipients: teaching practices & how these are affected by district policies as well as school policies & context. Contextual Factors : (including district policies, school context, peers Individual Pupil Characteristics : previous educational experiences, English language proficiency, disabilities, etc.) Pupil learning & achievement (a subset of which is measured by test scores)

Additional Resources CSUN’s TNE website: Carnegie Corporation of New York website: Carnegie’s TNE Program website: /teachers.html /teachers.html