GE Update Craig McConnell Liberal Studies, 2011-12 GE Committee Chair David Bowman Geological Sciences, 2011-12 GE Committee Chair.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Retention Reviews Patricia Linton Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences.
Advertisements

As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
The Continuing Journey Towards a Common Assessment Jennifer Coleman, CAI Statewide Project Director Alicia Muñoz, CAI Steering Committee Member, Cuyamaca.
Creating a Unified PLA Policy Recommendation for the State University of New York Ross Garmil Empire State College PLA with a Purpose Symposium April 29,
October Priority 8 Review Team 8: Planning Subcommittee M. DesVignes, D. Kinney, J. Moore, M. Siegel, R. Tillberg Collect and use data systematically.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Development of Student Learning Outcomes for GE: lessons from a collaborative approach A Lawson General Education in California Conference, CSU Fullerton.
WASC Process: An Update August 19, 2008 Greg Crawford, Chair HSU WASC Steering Committee.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Computer Science ABET Visit Update November 8, 2003.
Cumberland County: May 28 Oak Ridge: June 2 Roane County: June 4 Scott: June 4 Campbell: June 9 Knox: June 10 Loudon: June 11.
2012 International Education Conference: IPDC Annual Update June 11, 2012 International Professional Development Committee (IPDC)
Fall Subject Units Online % Online GE Online Units AA Online Units (60) % of AA Units Online (60) Chicano Studies 15 of 23 65% % History9.
Bylaws, Rules, and Periodic Review – Updates from Standards and Practices Julie Adams, ASCCC Executive Director Craig Rutan, ASCCC South Representative.
2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 1. LAHC 2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 All Accreditation Commission recommendations successfully.
Cheryl Aschenbach ASCCC Curriculum Committee Member Michelle Grimes-Hillman ASCCC Curriculum Committee Chair Michelle Pilati C-ID Faculty Coordinator The.
August 23, 2010 Faculty Senate. Core Curriculum Task Force Members *Tina Butcher, Co-chair, Associate Provost for Undergraduate Education Ellen Roberts,
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Core Curriculum Oversight Committee Committee Update University Senate Linda S. Glaze Associate Provost for Undergraduate Studies.
Academic Affairs Committee of the Radford University Board of Visitors Laura Jacobsen Faculty Senate President November 8, 2012.
General Education Learning Outcomes: Campus Discussion on Development & Process Sacramento City College LR 105 – 2:00-3:30 April 4 th, 2006 Facilitators:
BILC UPDATE Rome, Italy, June 8, 2009 BILC Secretary & D/Secretary Bureau de Coordination Linguistique Internationale Bureau for International Language.
Don Dodson, Senior Vice Provost Diane Jonte-Pace, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies Carol Ann Gittens, Director, Office of Assessment Learning Assessment.
Fall Subject Units Online % Online GE Online Units AA Online Units (60) % of AA Units Online (60) Chicano Studies 15 of 23 65% % History9.
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
Visioning 2 Committee 15,800 by 2018 JoyceArmstrongFamily Sciences 13 JessicaGullionSociology GovernorJacksonFinancial AidMarkHamnerInstitutional Research.
The TNI National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Board Update Daniel Hickman, NELAP Board Chair.
FACULTY REPORTS JANUARY 16, 2009 GEOFFREY DYER Taft College’s Progress in SLOs.
Information Competency: Next Steps Presented at California Library Association Conference, Ontario CA November 15, 2003 Erlinda Anne Estrada Mission College.
WASC Interim Report Update on Major Concerns and Initiatives.
Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015 Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015.
Assessment Taskforce Update College Council November 6, 2009.
College of Business California State University, Monterey Bay February 28, 2014 College of Business Committee Structure: Preparing for AACSB.
Responding to Rules that Govern Transfer Linda Young Assistant Director of Admissions Transfer & Articulation University of Wisconsin-Stout.
Presented by Rob Till, Chair UAC Bruce Fox, Chair LSC & member of UAC Craig Bain, Chair UCC Niranjan Venkatraman, member UGC & UAC.
Campus Response to the Visiting Team Report January 2009 WASC Accreditation.
Who We Are When Working in Assessment  Carl Brun works with Gen Ed and other programs  Aligning curriculum with standards  Collecting syllabi and posting.
Undergraduate Programs in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Industrial Advisory Board Meeting January 23, 2014 Adrienne Lavine Vice Chair for Undergraduate.
Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,
Minimum Qualifications for Faculty in the California Community Colleges May 5, 2016 CTE Leadership Academy John Stanskas, ASCCC Secretary.
CAA Review Joint CAA Review Steering Committee Charge Reason for Review Focus Revision of Policy Goals Strategies Milestones.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
JOHN BORMAN LORI BENTON Curriculum Mapping Historical Perspective In Spring 2008, LPSD began exploring curriculum alignment and revision methods.
Presented by Rob Till, Chair UAC Craig Bain, Chair UCC Bruce Fox, Chair LSC & member of UAC Niranjan Venkatraman, member UGC & UAC 1 3/10/14.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Where are my GELOs? Discussion on General Education Learning Outcomes Development & Process Sacramento City College LR 105 – 8:30-10:00 August 18, 2006.
Workforce Task Force Curriculum Recommendations – Implementation Next Steps Julie Bruno, Sierra College John Freitas, Los Angeles City College Pam Walker,
Administrators and System Administrators
Campus Response to the Visiting Team Report
Outcomes Assessment Committee
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
Assessment-driven Core Reform
Curriculum Model Policy (7.18)
Patricia Linton Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences
Expectations for Degree Programs: Curriculum & Assessment
NOT YOUR GRANDMA’S SCHOOL LIBRARIAN
Institutional Program Review 2017 Update
BOARD of GOVERNORS State University System of Florida
Strategic Planning Council December 8, 2006
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
HARNESSING VOICES OF SUPPORT FOR PROGRAM REVIEW
Guided Pathways Hot Topics
UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016
HOW DO WE KNOW OUR STUDENTS ARE LEARNING?
Annual Assessment of Decision-making Processes
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Miller Date of Presentation: 1/18/2017
Senate Meeting Summary
_Accounting_ Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
College Council Report Global Learning Committee
Presentation transcript:

GE Update Craig McConnell Liberal Studies, GE Committee Chair David Bowman Geological Sciences, GE Committee Chair

Recent Accomplishments New GE Learning Objectives adopted in 2009 and revised in June 2011 GE Categories realigned to match system-wide A-E pattern Preliminary GE Assessment Plan drafted GE Assessment was requested in previous WASC accreditation In absence of a more appropriate faculty body, GE Committee was tasked with GE Assessment Committee drafted a multi-year plan to assess Learning Outcomes for all GE Categories

Principles of GE Assessment Assessment is not used to evaluate individual faculty members; data are reported only in aggregate form Assessment is not used to evaluate individual courses, or to recertify courses, or to add or remove courses from GE categories Assessment is not designed to justify our programs to external audiences; it is for internal use and program improvement Assessment is not used to compare different GE learning areas against one another. For GE purposes, it is not appropriate to assess student learning on anything other than the articulated learning goals for the GE sections.

Proposed GE Assessment Plan YearAssessmentRecertification 1A 1-3C 1, 2, 4 2B 1-4D 1-4 3C 1, 2, 4A 1-3 4D 1-4B 1-4 5E, ZB5, C3, D5 6 E, Z

YearAssessmentRecertification 1A 1-3C 1, 2, 4 2B 1-4D 1-4 3C 1, 2, 4A 1-3 4D 1-4B 1-4 5E, ZB5, C3, D5 6 E, Z Proposed GE Assessment Plan Pilot in S11

YearAssessmentRecertification 1A 1-3C 1, 2, 4 2B 1-4D 1-4 3C 1, 2, 4A 1-3 4D 1-4B 1-4 5E, ZB5, C3, D5 6 E, Z Proposed GE Assessment Plan Pilot in S11 Planned S12

Proposed GE Assessment Plan YearAssessmentRecertification 1A 1-3C 1, 2, 4 2B 1-4D 1-4 3C 1, 2, 4A 1-3 4D 1-4B 1-4 5E, ZB5, C3, D5 6 E, Z Major Increase in GE Committee Workload Imposes steep learning curve on new members Committee must still review new course proposals New Courses only reviewed in Fall, with assessment and recertification in the Spring Proposals: Ideally, there should be separate GE Curriculum & Assessment Committees If this is not an option, then 1) GE Committee terms should be lengthened to 3 years 2) GE Committee should receive 1 course release/year 3) GE Chair should receive an additional release (1 course/semester)

Other Recommendations Closer collaboration with FDC to provide New Course Proposal training and curricular design workshops Need to create a centralized GE website for students & faculty Create an online new course proposal process Coordinate with Writing Board and WASC Writing Task Force to review GE Writing Requirement