Proposal Inclusion of absolute atomic radiation energies and emission probabilities in decay data sets Tibor Kibèdi (ANU) and Filip Kondev (ANL) Tibor Kibèdi, Dep. of Nuclear Physics, Australian National UniversityNSDD April 2015, IAEA, Vienna
Tibor Kibèdi, Dep. of Nuclear Physics, Australian National UniversityNSDD April 2015, IAEA, Vienna Atomic Data in ENSDF BrIccEmis (Dec-2014) Transition energies: Auger 300 k of 453 types X-ray: 17.4 k of 55 types Need to Contain energy and intensity for the users Readable by computer codes Use standard notation
Tibor Kibèdi, Dep. of Nuclear Physics, Australian National UniversityNSDD April 2015, IAEA, Vienna Notation CommentX-raysAuger electrons Notation: from IUPAC International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry Based on initial and final atomic levels involved K-L 3 K-L 1 -L 2 Group sub-shells to reduce number of transitions Summed decay rates Use the mean transition energy for the group L (for L 1 -M 2, … L 3 -O 4 ) But not for K K 1 for K-L 3 K 2 for K-L 2 K for K-M 3 &K- M 2 KLL (for K-L 1 -L 1, … K-L 3 -L 3 ) KLX (X=M 1 ….,N 1 ….) KXY (X&Y=M 1 ….,N 1 ….)
Tibor Kibèdi, Dep. of Nuclear Physics, Australian National UniversityNSDD April 2015, IAEA, Vienna 111CDSAD AKtot= [ ]$AKLL= [ ]$AKLX= [ ]$ CDSXD Xtot= [ ]$XKtot= [ ]$XKL2= [ ]$ CD L 0.0 1/2+ STABLE New ENSDF record type “D” (col. 8) and “S” (col. 6) with “A” (Auger) and “X” (X-ray) in column 7; 16 records for 111In Only appears in DECAY data sets just before the ground state level record Each entry: (a) Radiation group (“Aktot=“); (b) Mean energy in keV; (c) Intensity (on the same scale as gammas; “[RI DRI]”) Intensities cut off: /decay Detailed spectra (list and figure) stored on the ENSDF file server Uncertainties: need further study how to deduce Inclusion of atomic relaxation data into ENSDF
Tibor Kibèdi, Dep. of Nuclear Physics, Australian National University Correlation between energy deposition and molecular damage from Auger electrons 8-Dec-2014, IAEA CRP A case study of ultra-low energy (5–18 eV) electron interactions with DNA M. Rezaee, D.J. Hunting, L. Sanche, Univ. de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada Med. Phys. 41 (2014) Nanodosimetric model (V=4.3 nm 3 !) based on the medical internal radiation dose (MIRD) schema (M. Michaud et al. Phys. Rev E 87 (2013) )
Tibor Kibèdi, Dep. of Nuclear Physics, Australian National UniversityNSDD April 2015, IAEA, Vienna Inclusion of atomic relaxation data into ENSDF # Auger electron spectrum calculated with BrIccEmis (23-Sep-2012) # 2012Le09 - B.Q. Lee, T. Kibédi, A.E. Stuchbery, K.A. Robertson, Comput. Math. Meth. Med. (2012) # ENSDF file: 111In_EC.ens # Number of MC events: 1.00E+06 # Energy [eV] Prob/Decay Transition E E-05 N3 O1 O E E-05 M3 M4 N E E-05 N1 N4 N E E-04 M3 M5 N E E-05 M3 M4 N E E-05 N1 O1 O E E-05 M1 M3 N E E-04 N3 N5 O E E-05 M3 M5 N E E-05 M3 M5 N E E-05 N1 N5 N E E-05 M3 M4 N E E-05 M3 M5 N E E-05 M3 M5 N E E-04 N1 N4 N E E-05 N1 N5 N E E-03 N3 N4 O E E-05 M3 M5 N3 Auger electron energy spectrum for plotting & input for MC simulations
Tibor Kibèdi, Dep. of Nuclear Physics, Australian National UniversityNSDD April 2015, IAEA, Vienna 71GES G KC=169.5 $LC=32.7 $MC=5.03$ S_G records 71GES G KC=12.33 [ ]$LC=22.07 [32.7 5]$MC=23.27 [5.03 8]$ Current record created by BrIcc Modified records, ICC ratios not changed Energy ICC DICC