Funders USDA NRCS Conservation Innovation Grant Program Unilever General Mills US EPA Region V Project Team Chuck and Karen Benbrook, BCS-Ecologic Paul.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michael Brewer, Thomas Green, Joy Landis, and Brenna Wanous Michigan State University IPM Program IPM Institute of North America Grower Incentives for.
Advertisements

Reducing the Environmental Risks of Pest Management Joseph K. Bagdon Pest Management Specialist NRCS National Water & Climate Center Amherst, Massachusetts.
Welcome to Online OHS All your OH&S needs in one easy to follow database system.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
Increased Ethanol Production Impacts on Minnesota Wetlands Dr. David Kelley University of St. Thomas 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference.
Summer Copyright (c) 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). All rights reserved. All names and data used in this presentation are fictitious.
IPM in NRCS Programs Joe Bagdon USDA - NRCS National Water & Climate Center Amherst, Massachusetts.
David Lamm ENTSC Soil Conservationist. Pest Management DEFINITION A site-specific combination of pest prevention, pest avoidance, pest monitoring, and.
Pest Management for NRCS Conservation Planning Barbara Stewart, State Agronomist, NRCS.
Market Pull for BMPs & NRCS: Synergies to Explore? T. A. Green, Ph.D., C.C.A., T.S.P. IPM Institute of North America, Inc. * Marketplace.
Overview of Industry Stewardship Initiatives and Issues IPM Institute of North America, Inc. Harnessing Marketplace Power to Improve.
SPONSOR of 4R Nutrient Stewardship Program. The Nature Conservancy Teaming with the Florida agriculture industry to increase farmer profitability and.
MaNIS Interface Project Mayjane Co Denise Green Jane Lee Rebecca Shapley.
MaNIS Interface Project Mayjane Co Denise Green Jane Lee Rebecca Shapley.
Western Regions Pesticide Meeting May 2010 Tools, Calculators And Mapping Tools.
1 Using Scopus for Literature Research. 2 Why Scopus?  A comprehensive abstract and citation database of peer- reviewed literature and quality web sources.
Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska – Lincoln Bob Broz University of Missouri - Columbia.
MaNIS Interface Project Mayjane Co Denise Green Jane Lee Rebecca Shapley.
ADAPTATION BY CANADIAN AGRICULTURE TO CLIMATIC CHANGE: STATUS AND NEEDS Prepared for: Senate of Canada, Standing Committee on Agriculture and Forestry.
A standardized, peer-reviewed national IPM training program for all key IPM roles in schools. Extension, government, private and non-profit organizations.
Harnessing the Power of Environmental Data for Decision-Making IABIN Phase II.
Water Quantity and Conservation #1 Use land according to its capability and treat it according to its needs  Use management to gain the most agricultural.
Cyber-Infrastructure for Agro-Threats Steve Goddard Computer Science & Engineering University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
CSF Citizens’ On Line Information System Co-financed by the European Union under the Operational Programme ‘’Technical Assistance ’’
Application of a Human Health Risk Assessment Software to Support Revitalisation Decisions at Post-industrial Sites E.Wcislo, J.Dlugosz, M.Korcz Institute.
NC STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT of SOIL SCIENCE NC STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT of SOIL SCIENCE NRCS Soil Survey An invaluable resource for landuse planning.
Linda Zellmer Government Information & Data Services Librarian Western Illinois University
An Online Knowledge Base for Sustainable Military Facilities & Infrastructure Dr. Annie R. Pearce, Branch Head Sustainable Facilities & Infrastructure.
Charge Question 5-1 Comment Summary for HHCB Peer Review Panel Meeting January 9, 2014.
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
A generic risk assessment approach for multiple stressors & exposures Geoff Frampton, Guy Poppy, Jamie Sutherland Funded by Ecology & Evolutionary Biology.
Bilateral Working Group 1 SMARTe: Improving Revitalization Decisions Ann Vega Brownfields Research Program Manager May 4, 2005 Clu-In Presentation for.
Bilateral Working Group SMARTe: Improving Revitalization Decisions Name Title Date Meeting Title.
BMP CHALLENGE SM and Water Quality Trading: Opportunities for Farmers, Advisors and Educators Thomas Green, Ph.D., C.C.A., T.S.P.
National Agricultural Decision Support System (NADSS) PI: Steve Goddard An Application of Geo-Spatial Decision Support to Agriculture Risk Management.
DevInfo Monitoring The Regional Environmental Reconstruction Programme – Workshop Belgrade, 8 June 2005.
Bio-remediation for Selenium Making it Work for Agriculture.
Windows Pesticide Screening Tool WIN-PST NRCS National Water and Climate Center Amherst, MA.
Advancing IPM and Sustainable Agriculture Practices on Your Farm Through USDA, NRCS Programs Norm Leppla, Steve Boetger, Peter Werts, Galen Frantz Glades.
Schools Property Planning Competition 2013 “Waitara”
USDA Role in Supporting Decisions on Climate Change William Hohenstein Global Change Program Office January 10, 2005.
Climate Change Scenarios for Agriculture Sam Gameda and Budong Qian Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Ottawa,
Pesticide Spray Drift Conference September 5 and 6, 2001 AgDRIFT® Dave Esterly Environmental Focus, Inc
1 A Very Large Digital Library Technology Demonstration William Y. Arms Cornell University.
Online Emergency Management Tool Richer communication for emergency management APHA Annual Meeting November 11, 2009.
T20-1 Soil Science and Management, 4E Chapter 20 Government Agencies and Programs.
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) ISL 2004 RiskCity Exercise: Spatial Multi Criteria Evaluation for Vulnerability.
PRoMPT David Pendlington Unilever Sustainable Agriculture Project Co-ordinator.
Intaver Institute Inc. Project and Portfolio Risk Management with RiskyProject Enterprise Project and Portfolio Risk Management with RiskyProject Enterprise.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service “Helping people help the land"
Using Pesticide Use Data to Evaluate IPM Programs Larry Wilhoit Department of Pesticide Regulation.
Pesticide Regulation Susan King Extension Specialist University of Delaware.
SEAMLESS: Demo Version 1.4 “Presenting current developments and welcoming your feedback” For contact:
Kg P per county (1000) > < 45 Figure 4 Estimated P production from confined livestock. kg N per county (1000) > 908 Figure.
Irrigation Water Management: Opportunities and Results Presented by: Paul Stoker, Executive Director Columbia Basin Ground Water Management Area.
Agenda Sage Vision New Features in Cashbook 2.New Features in RecXpress 3.New Features in EFTXpress.
LANDSCAPE LOGIC Project 1: Spatial Analysis and Database Landscape Logic Project 1 (Spatial Analysis and Database project) Led by Professor Tony Norton.
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Development of the High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) December 12, 2006 Characterizing Chemicals.
595/Tech Note 5 for IPM Payment Scenarios Joe Bagdon Technical Leader for Environmental Risk Analysis Water Quality and Quantity Team - WNTSC
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Recommendations From the New Jersey Climate Adaptation Alliance Marjorie B. Kaplan, Associate Director Rutgers.
DESIRE – Desertification Mitigation and Remediation of Land DESIRE Work Block 3: Gudrun Schwilch / CDE 1 October 2007 / WB3 Training Workshop Murcia, Spain.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
From Lab to Label: Innovations That Feed The World
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.4 Protecting citizens from environmental hazards European.
Farm Service Agency (FSA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS)
WHAT IS PIVOT? Pivot is one of the most comprehensive funding database that is useful for all subjects and for different levels of researchers. It includes.
CSF Citizens’ On Line Information System
Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Luc Feyen
Addressing Pollinator Health and Extension’s Role
Computers in Agriculture
Presentation transcript:

Funders USDA NRCS Conservation Innovation Grant Program Unilever General Mills US EPA Region V Project Team Chuck and Karen Benbrook, BCS-Ecologic Paul Jepson, Michael Guzy, Kellie Vache, Oregon State University Susan Kegley, Erin Conlisk, Pesticide Research Institute Pierre Mineau, Environment Canada Thomas Green, Wade Pronschinske, Amrita Batra, IPM Institute of North America Marty Williams, Mark Cheplik, Waterborne Environmental Scott Martin, University of Illinois Jonathan Kaplan, Natural Resources Defense Council NRCS Advisor: Joe Bagdon IPM Institute of North America, Inc.

2 2 Specifications Online and user friendly. Online and user friendly. Comprehensive set of indices using best available science. Comprehensive set of indices using best available science. Based on real-life empirical data where possible. Based on real-life empirical data where possible. e.g., probability of kill or of an unacceptable level of impact; proportion of the overall breeding season when reproduction is impaired, etc. e.g., probability of kill or of an unacceptable level of impact; proportion of the overall breeding season when reproduction is impaired, etc. Site-specific, field-level impacts with aggregation potential. Site-specific, field-level impacts with aggregation potential. Use Pattern Adjustment Factors (UPAFs) account for agricultural variability and mitigation. Use Pattern Adjustment Factors (UPAFs) account for agricultural variability and mitigation. Sustainable financial plan to ensure continued functionality and up-to-date databases. Sustainable financial plan to ensure continued functionality and up-to-date databases. IPM Institute of North America, Inc.

3

4 Landscape Features Users create individual “sites” for each orchard. Users save data for individual blocks in the selected orchard. IPM Institute of North America, Inc.

5 Field Mapping Users map their block using Google Earth. PRiME then automatically retrieves site-specific soils data from NRCS. In addition to mapping cropping areas, users map sensitive areas, mitigation zones and/or areas at high risk for runoff. IPM Institute of North America, Inc.

Pesticide Application Users use multiple search options to select a formulated product, for e.g., Lorsban 50W. Users enter pertinent use pattern information for selected product. IPM Institute of North America, Inc. 6

7 Pesticide Management Scenarios Users create and select a pesticide management scenario for evaluation. Users enter amount of product applied, acres treated and restricted entry interval for selected product, Lorsban 50W. Users calculate risk for selected product. IPM Institute of North America, Inc.

8 Risk Summary for Lorsban 50W (Green= Low risk Yellow= Moderate risk Red= High risk) IPM Institute of North America, Inc.

9 Users can select the product, Lorsban 50W and change the application rate to compare the risk of Lorsban 50W at different application rates. Risk Summary for Lorsban 50W applied at 4 lbs. per acre and 2 lbs. per acre. IPM Institute of North America, Inc.

10 Risk summary for Dithane DF, Kocide 2000 and Lorsban 75WG. *: Insufficient data for risk calculation. *FEH: Presumed low exposure and low hazard (Green= Low risk Yellow= Moderate risk Red= High risk) IPM Institute of North America, Inc.

Summary Output and Mitigation 11 PRiME will provide users with a risk summary of the number of indices in the low, moderate and high risk categories for each product. Users may also be alerted to indices demonstrating moderate and high risk ratings and pathways of exposure for each product. IPM Institute of North America, Inc.

When risk is moderate to high, PRiME will suggest mitigation measures including IPM practices and links to technical resources. PRiME can then recalculate risk comparing the effects of hypothetical mitigation. IPM Institute of North America, Inc. 12

Program Evaluation 13 PRiME will display a summary showing the total number of applications falling into each risk category in a given year, allowing program managers to report progress or compare program participants. IPM Institute of North America, Inc.

14 Questions ? IPM Institute of North America, Inc.