Program Review: Philosophy Major Programs engage in planning and review best when they organize these activities themselves. WASC & Program Review Timelines.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capstone Assessment An Introduction Office of Assessment and Accreditation Indiana State University.
Advertisements

Interviewing Techniques and Writing Strategies. Middle School.
Assessment Report School of TAHSS Department: History Chair: Dr. Owen Ireland Assessment Coordinator: Date of Presentation: 10/1/2013.
Weber State University Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction Candidate Assessment Plan.
Advances research methods and proposal writing Ronan Fitzpatrick School of Computing, Dublin Institute of Technology. September 2008.
The Program Review as Research David Baird, Cindy Miller-Perrin, Maire Mullins, & Don Thompson Pepperdine University American Conference of Academic Deans.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
Ethics ©Dr. Emeric Solymossy. Socrates, in Plato’s Symposium.
STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT PLANNING Presentation to CLAS Unit Heads Nov. 16, 2005 Maria Cimitile Julie Guevara Carol Griffin.
Program Planning & Review: Psychology Division - GSEP Programs engage in planning and review best when they organize these activities themselves. WASC.
ETHICS An introduction. “The field of ethics, also called moral philosophy, involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and.
Philosophy 1 Introduction to Philosophy Spring, 2002 Dr. G. J. Mattey.
Program Assessment Workshop Kathleen Harring. What is Assessment? Assessment is the systematic gathering and analysis of information to inform and improve.
Program-level Outcomes Assessment RSC FORENSIC SCIENCE.
LEARNING PROFILE Title of Degree Program PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS (Description, Unique Experiences, Inputs, Outcomes) (EXAMPLES) Year Established. Accreditation.
General Education (GE) Assessment College of Arts and Sciences.
Direct vs Indirect Assessment of Student Learning: An Introduction Dr. Sheila Handy, Chair Business Management and Co-Chair University Assessment Committee.
CCSS Implementation July 2010: State Board of Education adopts Common Core State Standards for English and Mathematics : Implementation of.
Arizona State University College of Education Curriculum and Instruction Science Education Mathematics Education Language and Literacy.
“Knowing Revisited” And that’s how we can move toward really knowing something: Richard Feynman on the Scientific Method.
Torrey Academy Shakespeare. Course Objectives  Familiarity with 3 genres and 13 major plays of William Shakespeare  Exploration of Elizabethan and Aristotelian.
ASSESSMENT SYED A RIZVI INTERIM ASSOCIATE PROVOST FOR INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Student Learning Outcome Assessment: A Program’s Perspective Ling Hwey Jeng, Director School of Library and Information Studies June 27,
CLC reading program Nguyen Thi Thu Trang. In-class activities Assignment Assessment Add your text in here Reading program Objectives Contents.
Usage Guidelines for Jeopardy PowerPoint Game Game Setup Right now, Click File > Save As, and save this template with a different file name. This will.
ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides.
The Middle States Accreditation Process Schreiber High School.
Basic Ethical Theories Soraj Hongladarom Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1 (Intro.) By David Kelsey.
The Nature of Morality General Overview “We are discussing no small matter, but how we ought to live” (Plato in the Republic ca. 390B.C.)
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
BS 3992 Researching Contemporary Management Issues -an alternative to the Final Year Project Dr Adam Palmer Dr Beverley Hill.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
Exploring Evidence.
FACULTY ROLES & STUDENT SUCCESS. Faculty Roles in: Program level learning outcomes Curriculum mapping Assessment of student learning Student success.
A Brief Overview of Western Ethics M. Blake Hargrove University of Texas at Arlington 1.
Branches of Philosophy
Dr. Geri Cochran Director, Institutional Research, Assessment and Planning.
Student Learning Outcomes and SACSCOC 1.  Classroom assessment ◦ Grades ◦ Student evaluation of class/course  Course assessment –????  Academic program.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
AP Capstone: Seminar A Brave New YWCPA. Class Overview The AP Capstone is an inquiry-based course that aims to engage students in cross-curricular.
Academic Assessment Nov Chairs & Program Directors meeting Disclaimer.
PhD in Social Work and Social Policy at FPN UBG Prof dr Nevenka Zegarac Department of Social work and social policy Faculty of political sciences UBG TEMPUS.
We Produce the Future Philosophy: Completing Moral Education Gene Kamena AWC.
Academic Assessment Oct. 24th Chairs Workshop Sophie Kerr Room Disclaimer.
PHL 464 CART Education Expert/phl464cart.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
PRESENTATİON ABOUT ARİSTOTLE
European Studies (Module offerings subject to Changes) DEPARTMENTMODULESTITLES ENG LANG & LITEN2201Backgrounds to Western Literature and Culture (Sem 2)TS3231History.
Categorical Propositions Chapter 5. Deductive Argument A deductive argument is one whose premises are claimed to provide conclusive grounds for the truth.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Humanities with Writing Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
ASH SOC 120 Week 3 Assignment Rough Draft of Final Paper Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
ASH SOC 120 Week 5 Final Paper Check this A+ tutorial guideline at For more classes.
Assessment in a Multi-Discipline Department
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Direct vs Indirect Assessment of Student Learning: An Introduction
University of Haifa MA program in English Literature
Introduction to Virtue Ethical Theory & Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics
SLOs: What Are They? Information in this presentation comes from the Fundamentals of Assessment conference led by Dr. Amy Driscoll and sponsored by.
MBA 641 Business and Labor Law
Simple Tools That Make Alignment Easy
4th November 2013 P2 AS Philosophy Jez Echevarría
Introduction to Meta-Ethics
SOC 120 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
PHL 215 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
SOC 120 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Program Review: Creative Writing
Area of Investigation Point: ______________________________
Comprehensive evaluation of data and assessment plan
A-Level Philosophy Welcome Week. Would you rather never be able to speak again or always have to say everything that is on your mind?
University of Haifa MA program in English Literature
Presentation transcript:

Program Review: Philosophy Major Programs engage in planning and review best when they organize these activities themselves. WASC & Program Review Timelines Review as Research – Faculty as Principal Investigators – –Develop Measurable Program Goals & Objectives » » – –Build Curriculum Matrix – –Identify (Objective,Course) Pairings of Interest – –Collect Data » »Primary - Direct Embedded Evidence: Student Writing, Projects, Pre/Post Exams » »Secondary - Indirect Evidence: Alumni Feedback, Satisfaction Surveys, Interviews – –Philosophy Faculty Analyze Primary Data – –Program Planning and Review ReportProgram Planning and Review Report – –Report To University Planning Committee Outside Consultant, Program Retreat

Philosophy Major Goals (Ends) Write and speak convincingly about a philosophical problem. Write and speak convincingly about a philosophical problem. Analyze a variety of arguments, to locate their premises, evaluate their validity, and examine their soundness. Analyze a variety of arguments, to locate their premises, evaluate their validity, and examine their soundness. Examine a number of the classical philosophical texts, several times in some instances. Examine a number of the classical philosophical texts, several times in some instances. Study a number of secondary philosophical texts, evaluating the positions presented in those texts. Study a number of secondary philosophical texts, evaluating the positions presented in those texts. Examine a variety of ethical positions, both classical and contemporary, both normative and metaethical. Examine a variety of ethical positions, both classical and contemporary, both normative and metaethical. Examine a number of works of at least one major philosopher (e.g., Plato, Aristotle, Kant). Examine a number of works of at least one major philosopher (e.g., Plato, Aristotle, Kant). Complete and present a report on a semester research project in philosophy. Complete and present a report on a semester research project in philosophy. Become acquainted with a field of study other than philosophy. Become acquainted with a field of study other than philosophy.

Philosophy Major Objectives – Student Learning Outcomes (Means) - 1 Submit term papers in upper-level philosophy courses. Submit term papers in upper-level philosophy courses. Take essay examinations in all philosophy courses. Take essay examinations in all philosophy courses. Complete a senior project in philosophy and present it orally. Complete a senior project in philosophy and present it orally. Participate in class and group discussions of philosophical problems. Participate in class and group discussions of philosophical problems. Study the informal language problems affecting arguments. Study the informal language problems affecting arguments. Study Aristotelian procedures for analyzing arguments. Study Aristotelian procedures for analyzing arguments. Study formal methods for propositional and predicate logic. Study formal methods for propositional and predicate logic. Become familiar with the analysis of philosophical texts in Introduction to Philosophy. Become familiar with the analysis of philosophical texts in Introduction to Philosophy. Further explore Ancient Philosophy. Further explore Ancient Philosophy. Further explore Modern Philosophy. Further explore Modern Philosophy. Study secondary literature related to study of primary texts. Study secondary literature related to study of primary texts.

Philosophy Major Objectives – Student Learning Outcomes (Means) - 2 Study secondary literature for senior project. Study secondary literature for senior project. Analyze Aristotle, Kant, Mill. Analyze Aristotle, Kant, Mill. Explore utilitarianism, deontology, emotivism, virtue ethics. Explore utilitarianism, deontology, emotivism, virtue ethics. Study issues in metaethics, the nature of ethical language, etc. Study issues in metaethics, the nature of ethical language, etc. Examine the Socratic method (for Plato, e.g.). Examine the Socratic method (for Plato, e.g.). Study the Socratic dialogues. Study the Socratic dialogues. Study Plato’s theory of forms as a response to Socrates’ problems. Study Plato’s theory of forms as a response to Socrates’ problems. Study Plato’s critique of Platonic theory of Forms. Study Plato’s critique of Platonic theory of Forms. Complete a semester project in regular consultation with a member of the department. Complete a semester project in regular consultation with a member of the department. Present a project in the associated class. Present a project in the associated class. Complete 20 units of study in a field other than philosophy. Complete 20 units of study in a field other than philosophy.

Philosophy Curriculum Matrix (Introduce, Practice, Master)