Ruth L. Pagerey, Ed.D. University at Albany, SUNY TEAC Annual Meeting February 23, 2011 San Diego, California.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Applying Rigorous Analysis to General Education Reform Eric Ruckh, David Sill, and Michael Palmer.
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL Center for Education Committee on Science and Mathematics Teacher Preparation Herbert Brunkhorst California State University.
1. The alignment with national plans. The four missions of higher education institutions. AU uniqueness and identities. AU academic excellence. SWOT analysis.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
CAEP–State Partnerships: New Agreements, New Opportunities 2013 AACTE Annual Meeting Orlando, Florida Mark Lacelle-Peterson, CAEP Senior Vice President.
Dental Hygiene Education “Competency-Based” Dental Accreditation Commission Foothill Dental Hygiene –Program Competencies –Integrated into Curriculum –ePortfolios.
Using Accreditation to Increase the Evidence Base of Teacher Education (i.e., Using evidence to move faculty toward evidence) Sandra B. Cohen Director.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education February 2006 image files formats.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Medical Education Grand Rounds Self-Study Overview Middle States Commission on Higher Education January 13, 2010.
Higher Learning Commission (North Central Association) Comparison/Evaluation of AQIP and PEAQ Michelle Johnston.
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
Report to External Review Board Brigham Young University Civil & Environmental Engineering October 15, 2004.
State of the Department ABET 2000 Update Presentation to External Review Board October 19, 2001.
Regulating the engineering profession 1 EC UK Experience in Accreditation of Engineering Programmes Professor Ian Freeston University of Sheffield, UK.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Accreditation: An Opportunity to Promote Information Technology Fluency NLII Annual Meeting San Diego, CA January 26, 2004 Joan K. Lippincott CNI.
How Are Teacher Education Institutions Using Data to Improve Programs? Lessons Learned from the SUNY Teacher Education Program Assessment FIPSE Project,
MA course on language teaching and testing February 2015.
TEAC Audit. TEAC Accreditation Process at a Glance Review handout.
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
May 1 1 Teacher Education Accreditation Council One Dupont Circle, Suite 320 Washington DC
March 24, :00 pm to 3:00 pm Exhibition Lounge, Corey Union TEC Agenda and Notes.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT AS A TOOL FOR QUALITY CULTURE EMBEDMENT: VILNIUS UNIVERSITY APPROACH Inga Milisiunaite, Roma Adomaitiene, Juozas Galginatis Vilnius.
Graduate School of Education Assessment October 10, 2013.
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SETTING THE STAGE Planning for BC’s Future 2015—2018.
WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT THE QUALITY OF HIGHER LEARNING IN THE UNITED STATES? Marilee J. Bresciani, Ph.D. Professor of Postsecondary Education Leadership.
Oregon State Program Review Process February 10-12, 2010 Commission Meeting.
College of Education Faculty Meeting October 2, 2009.
October 8,  Review TEAC Process  Faculty Presentations on Reflection/ Learning to Learn  Group Work on Evidence for Claim 3  Audit Update 
The Role of the NCATE Coordinator Kate M. Steffens St. Cloud State University NCATE Institutional Orientation September, 2002.
Tachelle Banks, PhD & Debbie Jackson, EdD Project C.R.E.A.T.E The Curriculum Redesign Effort Advancing Teacher Education.
 ASSESSING ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAMS: A CONTINUED DIALOG ON HOW TO PUSH THE ENVELOPE Alex F. DeNoble, Ph.D. and Gangaram Singh, Ph.D. San Diego State.
Intro New Students? Missing Students! Minorities, Low Income and Males American Council on Education San Diego, California February 10, 2008 Tom Mortenson.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
The New CAEP Standards: Implications for Teacher Education Programs Kathryn Chval.
Professional Development is aligned to your district’s initiatives and tailored to your districts current needs. Our modules are designed to  Deepen.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
The TEAC Audit Are the statements in the Brief accurate?  Select a target from the Brief  Describe how the target will be probed (the action taken by.
March 15-16, Inquiry and Evidence An introduction to the TEAC system for accrediting educator preparation programs 3/15/12, 9:00-10:00a.m. CAEP.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Comprehensive Review for Reaffirmation of Accreditation Presentation to Campus Forum October 21, 2015 Christopher Oberg, Vice President/COO.
College of Education and Behavioral Sciences Empowering Individuals to Lead and Serve Our Dynamic World Overview Video Welcome – Dr. Evans New Literacy.
SNU HLC/NCA Accreditation Update SNU Graduate & Professional Studies Fall Meeting October 24, 2008.
Tempus project UM JEP “QUASYS” University of Zagreb Prof. Helena Jasna Mencer, Ph. D. Coordinator “Development of Quality Assurance System in.
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Process Update.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
LCAP UPDATE Diversity of Staff, Quality Teaching, Quality Leadership, and Quality Support Staff Human Resource Services and Leadership and Learning Divisions,
Overview of CAEP Guidelines 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014 Presenters: Mark LaCelle-Peterson, CAEP Hilda R. Tompkins, CAEP, Emerson.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
The College of Education Beth Kubitskey, Associate Dean EMU prepares caring, professional educators for a diverse and democratic society. Assessment for.
Candidate Learning Outcomes. REPORTING AGENCIES STATE BOARD FOR EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION (SBEC) NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCTION.
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Module #4: SLO Annual Report
Ellie A. Fogarty, Ed.D. Vice President
Student Affairs Assessment
Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.
Welcome to CAEP Visitor Training!
April 17, 2018 Gary Railsback, Vice President What’s new at CAEP.
GTC Scotland Professional Update: a positive innovation for teachers
Personal system, professional purpose: supporting self-regulated accreditation Deb Holmes (PebblePad)
Choosing the Right Evidence for your assurance argument
Update to OCTEO – Fall 2015 Rebecca Watts, Ph.D. Matt Exline
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Development of Internal Quality Assurance and its Challenges in Taiwan Higher Education from University and Students’ Perspectives Angela Yung Chi Hou.
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
Presentation transcript:

Ruth L. Pagerey, Ed.D. University at Albany, SUNY TEAC Annual Meeting February 23, 2011 San Diego, California

“…[TEAC’s] primary work is to assure the public about the quality of these professional programs. It provides this assurance through a system of accreditation that examines and verifies the evidence institutions of higher education have for their claim that they prepare competent, caring, and qualified educators.” “Brief Overview and Update of the Teacher Education Accreditation Council” 2/23/02

TEAC’s Process Principles

TEAC Quality Principles Align with CAEP Standards and Processes

How can we maintain the integrity of the TEAC process?

Develop a culture of inquiry

Faculty NMnSDNMnSDNMnSD My students can effectively use technology in the classroom Graduates NMnSDNMnSDNMnSD I developed the ability to effectively use technology in the classroom Alumni NMnSDNMnSDNMnSD As a result of the program, I effectively use technology in my classroom

Develop a culture of inquiry

Maintain your quality control system

Review claims periodically

Communicate