Single Top Production Search at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics III May Vanderbilt University, Tennessee Julien Donini University of Padova and INFN On behalf of the CDF collaboration
2 Search for Single Top Top has been discovered at Tevatron in tt pairs Single top production predicted by theory: Wtb coupling s-channel Tev = 0.88 ± 0.11 pb t-channel Tev = 1.98 ± 0.25 pb Wt-associated Tev < 0.1 pb negligible at Tevatron Z. Sullivan hep-ph/ , T. Tait hep-ph/ Observation of single top: cross section is about 40% of ttbar more difficult to observe due to large background - important W+jets background (for M top = 175 GeV)
3 Single Top Physics Observation of single top allows direct access to V tb CKM matrix element cross section ~ |V tb | 2 study top-polarization and EWK top interaction Probe b-quark PDF (t-channel) Test non-SM phenomena heavy W’ boson anomalous Wtb couplings FCNC couplings like t Z/ c 4 th generation Potentially useful for Higgs searches single top has same final state as Higgs+W (associated) production Why look for single top ?
4 Run I Results Tevatron Run I results at s = 1.8 TeV Theoretical cross-sections were 30% smaller t = 1.40 pb s = 0.76 pb Single top has not been observed: both CDF and DØ set 95% limits t-channel:22 pb (DØ)13 pb (CDF) s-channel:17 pb (DØ)18 pb (CDF) combined:14 pb (CDF) Run II higher beam energy (1.96 TeV) higher rate more luminosity: CDF/DØ have more than 800 pb -1 on tape better detector acceptance
5 Signal Topology General strategy: Separated search of signal of s and t-channels single top production in 1-tag and 2-tag samples Combined search of s+t signal Event selection: we look for W+2 jets channel one high p T isolated lepton (from W): E t > 20 GeV, | | < 1 veto Z, dilepton, convertion events missing E t ( from W): MET > 20 GeV exactly two jets w/ E t > 15 GeV, | | < 2.8 ask for at least 1 b-tag Note: s and t-channel both produce 2 b-jets but bbar from t- channel usually lost into beam pipe Additional cuts cut on m t mass window: 140 < M l b < 210 GeV for 1-tag sample, leading jet E t > 30 GeV
6 Invariant Mass M l b Calculation b choosing in 1-tag events, choose b-tag jet as b from top in 2-tags evt, choose tight jet with larger Q. as the b from top Recipe is 97% successful for t-channel 53% (75%) successful for s-channel 1-tag sample (2-tags) Choosing correct neutrino solution E t ( ) = MET p z ( ) is obtained from the constraint M l = M W : Two solutions: pick the one with lower |p z ( )| i.e most central solution. Successful matching rate: 74% t-channel, 71% s-channel
7 Three methods are currently used and well tested in high p t physics Soft lepton tagging Use semi-leptonic decay of b-quarks: b l c (BR ~ 20%), b c l s (BR ~ 20%). Leptons with softer p t spectrum than W/Z, less isolated. Secondary vertex identification Iterative fit on tracks with significant impact parameter Efficiency is 45-50% for central top b-jets Mistag rates are kept typically at 4-5% Jet-probability Probability P that tracks associated with a jet come from primary vertex Heavy flavors: P tends to 0. b-tagging at CDF
8 Signal and Background Modeling Signal modeling Pythia (or Herwig) do not reproduce correct NLO p t distribution for the b jets in the t-channel Use MadEvent generator generate b+q t+q’ and g+q t+b+q’ separately and merge them to reproduce the b p t spectrum from NLO calculations (ZTOP) Background modeling ttbar and non-top background Top pairs: Pythia, (tt) = 6.7 pb. Non-top: W + heavy flavor (62%): Alpgen mistags (25%) and non-W (10%): estimated from data diboson (WW, WZ, ZZ) production (3%): Pythia
9 Signal and Background Modeling Expected number of signal and background events compared with observation for L = 162 pb -1 Combined and 1-tag signal mostly dominated by t-channel (65-70%) 2-tags signal: only s-channel Total background is dominated by non-top events (89%) Observations are in good agreement with predictions Published CDF results: Phys. Rev. D 71, (2005)
10 Separate Search for Single Top Maximum likelihood technique to extract the signal content from the data Perform search to separate s-channel and t-channel events: use variables that help discriminate the two channels. For t-channel use kinematical boost In proton-antiproton collisions: top production: light quark jet goes in p direction anti-top: light quark jet goes in p-bar direction Correlation between pseudorapidity of untagged jet lepton charge Q Q. distribution asymmetric for t-channel s-channel Count double b-tags g u d b W+W+ t z+ direction
11 Q. Distributions for Separate Search Data and stacked MC templates weighted by the expected number of events in the 1-tag sample.
12 Likelihood Function Joint likelihood function for Q. distribution in the 1-tag sample and number of events in 2-tag samples: Poisson bg gauss. constraintsSyst. Uncert. 4 processes: t-channel (j=1), s-channel (j=2), ttpair and non top (j=3, 4) k : mean number of events in bin k of Q. distribution d : mean number of events in the 2-tags sample n k, n d : observed number in data the background is allowed to float but is constrained to SM predictions 7 sources of systematic uncertainties t or s-channel k: bin index j: process index
13 Systematic Uncertainties Systematic acceptance uncertainties for t-channel, s-channel and combined signal Main systematics: b-tagging (7%) luminosity (6%) top mass (4%) JES (4%)
14 Expected Sensitivity for Separate Search Perform N MC experiments to estimate expected sensitivity: For each exp. we integrate out all nuisance parameters (all variables except sig ) from L sig, and calculate the upper limit at 95% C.L. Calculate the median of N individual upper limits t-channel s-channel
15 Posterior probability densities for data t-channel s-channel The maxima of the probability densities give the most probables values for the cross sections: Since all these results are compatible with zero, we set upper-limits (at 95% CL): t-ch = pb s-ch = 4.6 ± 3.8 pb t-ch < 10.1 pb s-ch < 13.6 pb
16 Combined Search for Single Top Measurement of the combined t-channel plus s-channel signal in the data use kinematic variable that discriminates s+t channels from the background total transverse energy: H T distribution (scalar sum of MET, E t of lepton and jets) same H T distribution for s and t-channels different distributions for ttbar and non-top background Make a likelihood function similar to that in separate search Use smoothed H T distributions
17 H T Distributions for Combined Search Data Distributions versus SM Expectation for combined sample
18 Limits for Combined Search Expected sensitivityProbability density from data s+t (MPV) = pb s+t (95% CL) < 17.8 pb s+t (a-priori) < 13.6 pb at 95% CL
19 Summary No significant evidence for single top quark production set first limits on single top cross section compared with Run I improvement of upper limits of 28% (t-channel) and 20% (s-channel) Technical improvements of the analysis improved MC modeling for single top events full Bayesian treatment of systematic uncertainties 95% CL limits and most probable x-sections values (pb), with 162 ± 10 pb -1
20 Multivariate Analysis New analysis improvements Resolution of M l b : Factors contributing to poor resolution: Jet energy, b-jet choosing, neutrino choosing, lepton energy. use a kinematic fitter to find the neutrino solution most consistent with measured values of the b-jet and MET Multivariate likelihoods use a combination of variables to optimize signal and background separation variables include Q* , dijet invariant mass, cos lepton – other jet, H T, E T likelihood function computed from distributions of each variable compute sensitivities (i.e how much luminosity for discovery ?)
21 Conclusion CDF accumulated more events than in entire Run I Single top search at the Tevatron is more challenging than anticipated CDF prepares advanced analysis techniques multivariate (neural-network) analysis CDF expects 3 signal evidence with 1.5 fb -1 Many improvement are needed to observe single top in the next few years but it is feasible in Run II !
22 Backup slides
23
24