Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 1 Barbara Sciascia K  semileptonic decays Charged Kaon Meeting July, 29 th - LNF Single photon efficiency in KPM events.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 12 October 2006 Status of analysis.
Advertisements

Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 14 December 2006 Status of analysis.
Barbara Sciascia – LNF 1 K  semileptonic BR measurement B. Sciascia 4 may 2006 KpmKSL joint meeting.
Recent Results on Radiative Kaon decays from NA48 and NA48/2. Silvia Goy López (for the NA48 and NA48/2 collaborations) Universitá degli Studi di Torino.
KLOE GM Capri May 2003 K charged status report DE/Dx development vs PiD (next talk by E.De Lucia) →K e3 studies: initial design of efficiency measurement.
Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 12 October 2005 Status of analysis.
Status of the  ee analysis Mauro Raggi, LNF INFN 29 th August 2013 NA48/2 rare decay session NA62 Collaboration meeting Liverpool.
Study of the e + e   η  process at √s = 1 GeV (main systematic error in the e + e   e + e  η analysis)
Charged kaon lifetime F. Ambrosino, P. Massarotti. Paolo Massarotti Kloe meeting 10 march 2005.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February
Measurement of the absolute BR(K  +  -  + ) : an update Patrizia de Simone KLOE Kaon meeting – 21 May 2009.
A. Dabrowski, June Ratio(ke3/pipi0) 1 Final Results Γ(Ke3)/ Γ(pipi0) Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Collaboration Meeting 08 June.
Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.
Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.
Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.
Takeo Higuchi Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, KEK Jan 21, 2004 Hawaii, USA Super B Factory Workshop Charged Higgs Search with B  D   
Study of the semileptonic decays at 4170 MeV Koloina Randrianarivony Marina Artuso (Syracuse University)
Analysis work by: Rachid Ayad Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang CBX note available: /homes/cleo/sls/ds4pi.ps Status of B  D  (4  )   analysis Jianchun.
B.Sciascia Kpm Meeting - LNF - February, 3 rd Charged kaon meeting LNF - February, 3 rd 2004 B.Sciascia TagBias  Bug on error calculation  Sensitivity.
M. Primavera 2 nd KLOE Physics Workshop, 10 th -12 th june 2002 Otranto (LE) 1 Perspectives on charged K physics in KLOE 2 nd KLOE Physics Workshop, 10.
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
NA48-2 new results on Charged Semileptonic decays Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Kaon 2005 Workshop 14 June 2005.
Progress on BR(K L  p + p - ) using a double-tag method A. Antonelli, M. Antonelli, M. Dreucci, M. Moulson CP working group meeting, 25 Feb 2003.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
E. De LuciaNeutral and Charged Kaon Meeting – 7 May 2007 Updates on BR(K +  π + π 0 ) E. De Lucia.
K charged meeting 10/11/03 K tracking efficiency & geometrical acceptance :  K (p K,  K )  We use the tag in the handle emisphere to have in the signal.
July 19th, 2003EPS HEP Aachen R. Fantechi Tests of Chiral Perturbation Theory in K S rare decays at NA48 Riccardo Fantechi INFN - Sezione di Pisa.
K  group activities K + K - retracking features New vs Old : resolution future planning. Conclusion and outlook K + K - retracking features New vs Old.
V.Patera – KLOE GM – Otranto – 10 June 2002 K  reconstruction status K + K - retracking features New vs Old : resolution New vs Old : efficiencies Conclusion.
Barbara Sciascia – LNF 1 Barbara Sciascia Measurement of the absolute branching ratio of K  l3 decays and of the R  e ratio Blessing meeting of the final.
Status of K S   e analysis C. GattiT. Spadaro Selection on data Selection on MC Efficiencies from data, K L   e, K S    ,      , bhabha.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
 0  5  Outline Event selection & analysis Background rejection Efficiencies Mass spectrum Comparison data-MC Branching ratio evaluation Systematics.
2004 Fall JPS meeting (English version) K.Okada1 Measurement of prompt photon in sqrt(s)=200GeV pp collisions Kensuke Okada (RIKEN-BNL research center)
Preliminary results for the BR(K S  M. Martini and S. Miscetti.
Sabino Meola Kloe meeting 10 March 2005 Status of analysis.
Progress on F  with the KLOE experiment (untagged) Federico Nguyen Università Roma TRE February 27 th 2006.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
Status of the hadronic cross section (small angle) Federico Nguyen February 22 nd 2005  the 2002 data sample and available MC sets  trigger efficiency.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
Preliminary Measurement of the Ke3 Form Factor f + (t) M. Antonelli, M. Dreucci, C. Gatti Introduction: Form Factor Parametrization Fitting Function and.
Current estimation of the background level Ken Sakashita ( Osaka University ) for the E391a collaboration 1.Overview/Motivation 2.4  data analysis 3.2.
Measurement of the branching ratio of the K +     decay Update E. De Lucia, R. Versaci.
Status of vertex efficiency evaluation Fabio Ambrosino, Patrizia de Simone, Paolo Massarotti, Vincenzo Patera the idea is to look for events where the.
4 May 2006 First look to the Ke2 decay ● Interesting for the Ke2/k m 2 ratio ● BR(K ±  e n ) = (1.55 ±0.07)10 -5 ● Large radiative decay BR(K ±  e n.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
Measurement of the branching ratio of the K +     decay Update E. De Lucia, R. Versaci on behalf of the charged kaon group.
D. LeoneNovosibirsk, , 2006Pion Form KLOE Debora Leone (IEKP – Universität Karlsruhe) for the KLOE collaboration International Workshop.
Tuning of trigger simulation parameters (Bossi, Moulson, Palutan, Sciascia) Calorimeter trigger thresholds calibration using prompt photons from K S 
Data vs MC … issues of the K +- group 1.Accidentals … contribution from Erika & Roberto 2.DC background.
LAV efficiency studies with photons T. Spadaro* *Frascati National Laboratory of INFN.
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
Guglielmo De Nardo for the BABAR collaboration Napoli University and INFN ICHEP 2010, Paris, 23 July 2010.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
KLOE general meeting December 2002 Tor Vergata K charged status report DST production status New analysis items:  K + K - cross section/  line.
M. Martemianov, ITEP, October 2003 Analysis of ratio BR(K     0 )/BR(K    ) M. Martemianov V. Kulikov Motivation Selection and cuts Trigger efficiency.
Paolo Massarotti Charged Kaon Meeting 4 may 2006 Charged kaon lifetime P. Massarotti.
LNF 12/12/06 1 F.Ambrosino-T. Capussela-F.Perfetto Update on        Dalitz plot slope Where we started from A big surprise Systematic checks.
Status of the measurement of K L lifetime - Data sample (old): ~ 440 pb -1 ( ) - MC sample: ~125 pb -1 ( mk0 stream ) Selection: standard tag (|
Roberto Versaci e + e - collisions from  to  – Novosibirsk /26 1 Charged kaons at KLOE Roberto Versaci on behalf of the KLOE collaboration.
Status of K± p±p0 E. De Lucia.
analisys: Systematics checks
the charged kaon lifetime
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
KLOE General Meeting - LNF March,
Progress on Pion Form Factor at KLOE (large photon polar angle)
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 1 Barbara Sciascia K  semileptonic decays Charged Kaon Meeting July, 29 th - LNF Single photon efficiency in KPM events (towards  0 efficiency) Status of the art

Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 2 On the way towards  0 efficiency-4 E  min (MeV) p  0 kine (MeV) Kl3 (MC) K  0 (MC) The low component of the  0 momentum spectrum for Kl3 events span a region of E  min which is fully contained in the E  min range of K  decays. Plenty of statistics to minimize contribution to efficiency error. Single-photon efficiency measured with K  2 events.

Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 3 Single photon efficiency-1 Select events with K  2 or K  2 tag. Unbias for the trigger: require Emc-trigger to  - or  0 -clusters, following the tag. Ask for a K  2 selection (p* cut) in the signal side. Get   0 from the missing momentum at vertex. Look for a  0 -photon from the vertex, excluding clusters already used by the tag or connected to a track.

Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 4 Single photon efficiency-2 Starting with K  2+  selection, estimate the energy and the position of the “other photon”. Look for a cluster close to the other photon. “Close to” criteria: 1- distance between cluster and estimated position. 2- opening angle between estimated and cluster direction from the vertex.

Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 5 Single photon efficiency-3 Measurement o the single photon efficiency as a function of estimated energy ot the photon, separately for different tags (K  2 or K  2) and charges. The efficiency behaviour at high energy (similar to the K L      0 measurement) indicate a not correct acceptance definition.

Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 6 Single photon efficiency-4 40 pb -1 of 2002 Data and 2002 MC all_phys have been used. Data and MC have different resolutions in p* and in cluster selection variables.

Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 7 Measuring BR(K  l3) BR(Kl3) = N(Kl3)  (  TAG (i) BR(i) ) 1 N TAG  TAG (Kl3)  SELE Fit results Tag bias correction [  (KAON+VTX+TRK)   TCA)   0 ) ] DATA 3 samples [  (KAON+VTX+TRK)   TCA)   0 ) ] MC  SELE =  SELE_MC CC Cosmic veto/T3 correction

Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 8 Measuring BR(K  l3) - cont’d 3 Tag samples: K  2 +  0 -trigger K  2 +  -trigger K  2 + Global_Emc-trigger Tag bias: trigger and kine stability checked Cosmic veto correction Selection efficiencies: Tracking: global, from P.M.; syst. at 0.3% level Track-to-Cluster: from neutral kaons  0 : from single photon efficiency (work is in progress) Counting Kl3 from fit The errors on Kl3 BR measurements are at now 2% level (dominated by MC; new MC prod. just started)

Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 9 Conclusions A method to measure the single photon efficiency in KPM events has been implemented. Preliminary results for the efficiency have been presented. Working is in progress to study the acceptance and the resolutions implied in the method. Status of the art for the measurement of BR(Kl3) has been presented.

Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 10 Spare slides

Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 11 On the way towards  0 efficiency-3 Agreement within the errors between the Ke3, K  3 and K  2 samples. Large errors for Ke3 and K  3 samples. The secondary track momentum is “anti- correlated” to the  0 momentum. Next step: single-photon efficiency ratio plugged in the MC. P(MeV) Ke3 K3K3 K2K2  DATA /  MC

Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 12 Single photon efficiency-5

Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 13 The errors on Kl3 BR measurements are at 2% level. They are dominated by the Kpm MC statistics As an example: BR(K + e3) = (4.8xx  0.110)% with: %  (0.033   0.025)% A note on Kpm MC statistics The just started Kpm-MC campaign with 1/1 MC statistics wrt to Data will lower the MC sample contribution to the error from  2% to  0.5% [  (KAON+VTX+TRK)   TCA)   0 ) ] DATA [  (KAON+VTX+TRK)   TCA)   0 ) ] MC  SELE =  SELE_MC From the fit

Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 14 A first glance at the fit