Environmental Dependence of Brightest Cluster Galaxy Evolution Sarah Brough, Liverpool John Moores University Chris Collins, Liverpool John Moores University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
To measure the brightness distribution of galaxies, we must determine the surface brightness of the resolved galaxy. Surface brightness = magnitude within.
Advertisements

18 July Monte Carlo Markov Chain Parameter Estimation in Semi-Analytic Models Bruno Henriques Peter Thomas Sussex Survey Science Centre.
Dark energy workshop Copenhagen Aug Why the SNLS ? Questions to be addressed: -Can the intrinsic scatter in the Hubble diagram be further reduced?
Clusters and groups of galaxies Claudia Mendes de Oliveira Instituto Astronômico e Geofísico Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ben Maughan (CfA)Chandra Fellows Symposium 2006 The cluster scaling relations observed by Chandra C. Jones, W. Forman, L. Van Speybroeck.
Studying the mass assembly and luminosity gap in fossil groups of galaxies from the Millennium Simulation Ali Dariush, University of Birmingham Studying.
Dark Halos of Fossil Groups and Clusters Observations and Simulations Ali Dariush, Trevor Ponman Graham Smith University of Birmingham, UK Frazer Pearce.
Constraining Astronomical Populations with Truncated Data Sets Brandon C. Kelly (CfA, Hubble Fellow, 6/11/2015Brandon C. Kelly,
Star-Formation in Close Pairs Selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Overview The effect of galaxy interactions on star formation has been investigated.
Massive galaxies in massive datasets M. Bernardi, J. Hyde and E. Tundo M. Bernardi, J. Hyde and E. Tundo University of Pennsylvania.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation Section 4: Semi-Analytic Models of Galaxy Formation Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael.
1 The Population and Luminosity Function of AGNs from SDSS Lei Hao Collaborators: Michael Strauss SDSS collaboration Princeton University Carnegie Symposium.
AGN and Quasar Clustering at z= : Results from the DEEP2 + AEGIS Surveys Alison Coil Hubble Fellow University of Arizona Chandra Science Workshop.
Bell, E. F et al “Nearly 5000 distant Early-type galaxies in COMBO-17: A Red Sequence and its evolution since z~1” Presented by: Robert Lindner (Bob)‏
First Results from an HST/ACS Snapshot Survey of Intermediate Redshift, Intermediate X-ray Luminosity Clusters of Galaxies: Early Type Galaxies and Weak.
Carlos Guillermo Bornancini IATE Group, Observatorio Astronómico Córdoba The Spatial Clustering of Ultra Steep Spectrum radio sources and galaxies. Carlos.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation (Section 3: Galaxy Data vs. Simulations) Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael Solway.
“ Testing the predictive power of semi-analytic models using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey” Juan Esteban González Birmingham, 24/06/08 Collaborators: Cedric.
PRESIDENCY UNIVERSITY
Attempts to fit/understand models: Number counts of Galaxies – Hubble,Yoshii/Peterson Angular Size Distances - distant radio cores Kellerman.
Advanced Methods for Studying Astronomical Populations: Inferring Distributions and Evolution of Derived (not Measured!) Quantities Brandon C. Kelly (CfA,
The Evolution of X-ray Luminous Groups Tesla Jeltema Carnegie Observatories J. Mulchaey, L. Lubin, C. Fassnacht, P. Rosati, and H. Böhringer.
Black holes: do they exist?
Overview of Astronomy AST 200. Astronomy Nature designs the Experiment Nature designs the Experiment Tools Tools 1) Imaging 2) Spectroscopy 3) Computational.
A Step towards Precise Cosmology from Type Ia Supernovae Wang Xiaofeng Tsinghua University IHEP, Beijing, 23/04, 2006.
Environmental Properties of a Sample of Starburst Galaxies Selected from the 2dFGRS Matt Owers (UNSW) Warrick Couch (UNSW) Chris Blake (UBC) Michael Pracy.
What can we learn from the luminosity function and color studies? THE SDSS GALAXIES AT REDSHIFT 0.1.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Unravelling the formation and evolutionary histories of the most massive galaxies Ilani Loubser (Univ. of the Western Cape)
Structural Properties of Galaxies in the Local Universe Paul Allen Mount Stromlo Observatory The Australian National University Simon Driver, Alister Graham,
Culling K-band Luminous, Massive Star Forming Galaxies at z>2 X.Kong, M.Onodera, C.Ikuta (NAOJ),K.Ohta (Kyoto), N.Tamura (Durham),A.Renzini, E.Daddi (ESO),
Large-scale structure at high z: the SHADES survey Eelco van Kampen, University of Edinburgh with Jim Dunlop, John Peacock, Will Percival, Chris Rimes,
ASIAANTUPHYS CosPA Seminar May 28, Supernovae and Acceleration of the Universe A journal club K. Y. Lo.
How Standard are Cosmological Standard Candles? Mathew Smith and Collaborators (UCT, ICG, Munich, LCOGT and SDSS-II) SKA Bursary Conference 02/12/2010.
A Supergroup in 6dFGS Sarah Brough, Swinburne University Virginia Kilborn, Duncan Forbes, Swinburne University Warrick Couch, UNSW Heath Jones, Mount Stromlo.
The Environmental Effect on the UV Color-Magnitude Relation of Early-type Galaxies Hwihyun Kim Journal Club 10/24/2008 Schawinski et al. 2007, ApJS 173,
TEMPERATURE AND DARK MATTER PROFILES OF AN X-RAY GROUP SAMPLE FABIO GASTALDELLO UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE D. BUOTE P. HUMPHREY L. ZAPPACOSTA J. BULLOCK.
TEMPERATURE AND DARK MATTER PROFILES OF AN X-RAY GROUP SAMPLE FABIO GASTALDELLO UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE D. BUOTE P. HUMPHREY L. ZAPPACOSTA J. BULLOCK.
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.
Luminosity Functions from the 6dFGS Heath Jones ANU/AAO.
Galaxy and Quasar Clustering at z=1 Alison Coil University of Arizona April 2007.
On the evolution of Cool Core Clusters Joana Santos (INAF-Trieste) Piero Rosati (ESO), Paolo Tozzi (INAF-Trieste), Hans Boehringer (MPE), Stefano Ettori.
Observational Test of Halo Model: an empirical approach Mehri Torki Bob Nichol.
Major dry-merger rate and extremely massive major dry-mergers of BCGs Deng Zugan June 31st Taiwan.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 2: More about Λ Distances at z ~1 Type Ia supernovae SNe Ia and cosmology Results from the Supernova Cosmology Project, the High.
Subaru Wide-Field Survey of M87 Globular Cluster Populations N.Arimoto (NAOJ) N.Tamura, R.Sharples (Durham) M.Onodera (Tokyo, NAOJ), K.Ohta(Kyoto) J.-C.Cuillandre.
The epoch of star formation for th e most massive galaxies Sarah Brough (AAO)
THE BUILD-UP OF THE COLOUR- MAGNITUDE RELATION IN LOW-Z GALAXY CLUSTERS Bertinoro School 23 th -29 th May 2009 Diego Capozzi 1,2, Chris A. Collins 1, John.
Group Evolution Multi-wavelength Survey (GEMS) Duncan A. Forbes Centre for Astrophysics & Supercomputing, Swinburne University.
Models & Observations galaxy clusters Gabriella De Lucia Max-Planck Institut für Astrophysik Ringberg - October 28, 2005.
Galaxies and X-ray Populations G. Fabbiano Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Evolution of galaxies and dark matter halos Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Main Collaborators: Chunyan Jiang ( 姜春艳), Cheng Li (李成), Donghai.
Assembly of Massive Elliptical Galaxies
Simulating the Production of ICL in Galaxy Groups and Clusters Craig Rudick Case Western Reserve University 7 December, 2005.
Evolution of clusters M. Arnaud CEA - service d’astrophysique Saclay Assuming favored cosmology  =0.3  =0.7.
The XMM Cluster Survey: Project summary and Cosmology Forecasts Kathy Romer University of Sussex.
The dependence on redshift of quasar black hole masses from the SLOAN survey R. Decarli Università dell’Insubria, Como, Italy A. Treves Università dell’Insubria,
The First Galaxies in the Hubble Frontier Fields Rachana Bhatawdekar, Christopher Conselice The University of Nottingham.
The First Galaxies in the Hubble Frontier Fields Rachana Bhatawdekar, Christopher Conselice The University of Nottingham.
Present-Day Descendants of z=3.1 Ly  Emitting (LAE) Galaxies in the Millennium-II Halo Merger Trees Jean P. Walker Soler – Rutgers University Eric Gawiser.
The History of Active Galaxies A.Barger, P. Capak, L. Cowie, RFM, A. Steffen, and Y. Yang Active Galaxies (AKA quasars, Seyfert galaxies etc) are radiating.
TWO SAMPLES OF X-RAY GROUPS FABIO GASTALDELLO UC IRVINE & BOLOGNA D. BUOTE P. HUMPHREY L. ZAPPACOSTA J. BULLOCK W. MATHEWS UCSC F. BRIGHENTI BOLOGNA.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
Star Forming Proto-Elliptical z>2 ? N.Arimoto (NAOJ) Subaru/Sup-Cam C.Ikuta (NAOJ) X.Kong (NAOJ) M.Onodera (Tokyo) K.Ohta (Kyoto) N.Tamura (Durham)
ZCOSMOS galaxy clustering: status and perspectives Sylvain de la Torre Marseille - June, 11th Clustering working group: Ummi Abbas, Sylvain de la Torre,
Lightcones for Munich Galaxies Bruno Henriques. Outline 1. Model to data - stellar populations and photometry 2. Model to data - from snapshots to lightcones.
The formation and dynamical state of the brightest cluster galaxies
Galaxy populations within clusters in the 2PIGG catalogue
Galaxy Populations in the Most Distant Clusters
The Evolving Luminosity Function of Red Galaxies
Presentation transcript:

Environmental Dependence of Brightest Cluster Galaxy Evolution Sarah Brough, Liverpool John Moores University Chris Collins, Liverpool John Moores University Doug Burke, Centre for Astrophysics, Harvard Bob Mann, Institute for Astrophysics, Edinburgh Paul Lynam, ESO

Introduction Why study BCGs? K-band photometry of BCGs K-band structural properties of BCGs Conclusions

Brightest Cluster Galaxies Most luminous galaxies emitting purely photospheric light in the Universe. Found at the centre of clusters and groups of galaxies. Originally studied to determine cosmological parameters (e.g. Sandage et al 1972) and measure large-scale streaming (e.g. Lauer & Postman 1994)

Monolithic collapse models predict that these galaxies formed first at very high redshift and have passively evolved since. Hierarchical models predict that these most massive galaxies should have assembled their stellar mass most recently. Therefore, the differences in the predictions of these models should be most apparent in these, most massive galaxies.

Aim to examine the evolution of BCGs in host clusters with known X-ray luminosities by studying their physical properties over a wide span of cosmological time. Cluster X-ray luminosity allows an objective, quantitative measure of galaxy environmental density. X-ray selected cluster catalogues: EMSS (Gioia & Luppino 1994); SHARC (Burke et al. 2003); NORAS (Bohringer et al. 2000). Present Study

Flux limits of X-ray cluster catalogues Ebeling et al. 2001

X-ray luminosity distribution of cluster sample

Absolute Magnitudes

K-Band Hubble Diagram Brough et al. 2002

Inferred Mass of BCGs

Difference with environment also observed by Nelson et al. (2002) with Las Campanas Distant Cluster Survey and Ellis & Jones (2004) with 3 X-ray selected clusters. The colour evolution observed by Nelson et al. (2002) is consistent with accretion consisting of old stellar populations.

Structural Properties The accretion rates inferred assume that increases in luminosity mean increases in mass. Numerical simulations of dissipationless mergers predict that radii increase, and the surface brightnesses fade (e.g. Navarro 1990, Capelato et al. 1995) Therefore, expect a difference in structural properties with host cluster environment.

Petrosian Structural Parameters Measure K-band Petrosian structural parameters. Petrosian Eta(r) = SB(r) - Petrosian parameters are not model dependent, are less affected by zero-point or extinction errors and are more robust than model fits.

Correlation with Environment > 99% Significance 95-98% Significance

Petrosian Eta Profile Kjaergaard et al. 1993

Petrosian Eta Profile Abell 644

Conclusions BCGs in high X-ray luminosity clusters assembled their stellar mass at z>1 and have been passively evolving since. BCGs in low X-ray luminosity clusters have assembled more recently and have been undergoing significant mass evolution since z~1. BCG profiles not consistent with those of normal cluster elliptical galaxies.