A Process Improvement Plan for a High Maturity (and Diverse) Organization Alan Pflugrad Northrop Grumman Information Technology Defense Enterprise Solutions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
More CMM Part Two : Details.
Advertisements

Leaders in Asset Management Establishing a Property Training Program How do we get Property Officials trained AND….motivated?
Technical Communication Anupama Gummaraju - as a service in the IT consulting industry.
2003 Indigo Technology, Inc. All Rights Reserved Alliance Portfolio Computing Infrastructure Services Customer Relationship Management Engineering Services.
Project Change Management
Stepan Potiyenko ISS Sr.SW Developer.
Requirements Analysis INCOSE Systems Engineering Boot Camp
The Israel Telecommunication Corp. Limited IT Division 2003 November Production Readiness Reviews of IT Systems in Bezeq 1 Production Readiness Reviews.
Components of software quality assurance system overview
CMM Overview - 1 © Paul Sorenson CMPUT Software Engineering refs. IEEE Software, March 1988, 73-79, and IEEE Software, July 1993, (Capability.
CMMI Overview Quality Frameworks.
Organizational Project Management Maturity: Roadmap to Success
Capability Maturity Model
Enterprise Architecture
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Using Six Sigma to Achieve CMMI Levels 4 and 5
CMMI Course Summary CMMI course Module 9..
S T A M © 2000, KPA Ltd. Software Trouble Assessment Matrix Software Trouble Assessment Matrix *This presentation is extracted from SOFTWARE PROCESS QUALITY:
Integrated Capability Maturity Model (CMMI)
SQA Architecture Software Quality By: MSMZ.
High Impact Global Product Engineering Solutions ® ©2007 Symphony Service Corp. All Rights Reserved. Symphony Services is a registered trademark of Symphony.
Continual Service Improvement Process
N By: Md Rezaul Huda Reza n
Software Quality Assurance Activities
OHT 25.1 Galin, SQA from theory to implementation © Pearson Education Limited 2004 The quality assurance organizational framework Top management’s quality.
People First … Mission Always Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI ® ) Millee Sapp 2 Dec 08 Warner Robins Air Logistics Center.
S Q A.
Lecture 1 Introduction to Software Engineering
CMS 00_ Copyright 2002 Raytheon Company All Rights Reserved CMMI – What a Difference a Sponsor Makes! Ann Turner Raytheon Company
CSI - Introduction General Understanding. What is ITSM and what is its Value? ITSM is a set of specialized organizational capabilities for providing value.
NDIA Systems Engineering Supportability & Interoperability Conference October 2003 Using Six Sigma to Improve Systems Engineering Rick Hefner, Ph.D.
Copyright 2003 Northrop Grumman Corporation 0 To PIID or Not to PIID: Lessons Learned in SCAMPI Evidence Preparation To PIID or Not to PIID: Lessons Learned.
How To Build a Testing Project 1 Onyx Gabriel Rodriguez.
MD Digital Government Summit, June 26, Maryland Project Management Oversight & System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Robert Krauss MD Digital Government.
BPK Strategic Planning: Briefing for Denpasar Regional Office Leadership Team Craig Anderson Ahmed Fajarprana August 11-12, 2005.
IT Requirements Management Balancing Needs and Expectations.
Strong9 Consulting Services, LLC 1 PMI - SVC I-80 Breakfast Roundtable Monthly Meeting Thursday, October 12, :00 am – 9:00 am.
3rd Annual CMMI Technology Conference and User Group
Quality Concepts within CMM and PMI G.C.Reddy
Application of the CMMI SM to Plan and Control Life Cycle Costs Dr. Mary Anne Herndon Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) November, 2003.
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
3 rd Annual CMMI ® Technology Conference and User Group Dave Castellano US Army Representative to CMMI Steering Group 4 August 2003 US Army Armaments Research.
Quantitatively Measured Process Improvements at Northrop Grumman IT Craig Hollenbach Northrop Grumman IT.
The Value Driven Approach
Ch-1 Introduction The processes used for executing a software project have major effect on quality of s/w produced and productivity achieved in project…
Purpose: The purpose of CMM Integration is to provide guidance for improving your organization’s processes and your ability to manage the development,
CMMI Benefits at Northrop Grumman Mission Systems Rick Hefner, Northrop Grumman Dean Caccavo, Northrop Grumman
An Introduction. Objective - Understand the difference between CMM & CMMI - Understand the Structure of CMMI.
Software Engineering Modern Approaches Eric Braude and Michael Bernstein 1.
SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT
MSA Orientation – v203a 1 What’s RIGHT with the CMMI?!? Pat O’Toole
Project Management Strategies Hidden in the CMMI Rick Hefner, Northrop Grumman CMMI Technology Conference & User Group November.
UNIT 5.
SEN 460 Software Quality Assurance. Bahria University Karachi Campus Waseem Akhtar Mufti B.E(C.S.E) UIT, M.S(S.E) AAU Denmark Assistant Professor Department.
Multitude of source of errors - various style of source of errors will affect the SQA components * The environment in which software development & maintenance.
CMMI Overview Quality Frameworks. Slide 2 of 146 Outline Introduction High level overview of CMMI Questions and comments.
Capability Maturity Model. CS460 - Senior Design Project I (AY2004)2 Immature Organisations Software processes are often rigorously followed. Organisation.
B U D I L U H U R U N I V E R S I T Y POST GRADUATE PROGRAM MAGISTER ILMU KOMPUTER IT PROJECT MANAGEMENT.
CMMI Certification - By Global Certification Consultancy.
Michael J. Novak ASQ Section 0511 Meeting, February 8, 2017
Components of software quality assurance system overview
Components of software quality assurance system overview
Chapter 10 Software Quality Assurance& Test Plan Software Testing
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
CMMI – Staged Representation
Quality management standards
Paul Sesto, Software Engineering Manager
Capability Maturity Model
Capability Maturity Model
Presentation transcript:

A Process Improvement Plan for a High Maturity (and Diverse) Organization Alan Pflugrad Northrop Grumman Information Technology Defense Enterprise Solutions

Slide 2 Purpose and Agenda Purpose – To describe the strategic and tactical process improvement plans of a diverse organization that has achieved a CMMI SE/SW Level 5 Rating Agenda – Organizational Scope & Process Improvement Approach – 2002 Situation – Strategic (2010) and Tactical (2003) Goals & Plans – Applicability – Performance – Infrastructure – Compliance – Effectiveness of Plan

Slide 3 Organizational Information Northrop Grumman – $26 B in revenue; 120,000 employees; 50 states; 25 countries Information Technology (IT) Sector – $4 B in sales; 22,000 employees; 48 states; 15 countries Defense Enterprise Solutions (DES) Business Unit – $548 M in sales; 3,045 employees, 23 states, 3 countries DES provides enterprise-wide technology solutions to the Defense marketplace Major Application Areas: – Logistics – Mission Support – Science & Technology – Simulation, Analysis, and Training – Communications & Infrastructure

Slide 4 Repeatable and Defined Organizational SW/SE Processes Products & Services SE/SW Methods & Tools Customer Maturity Customers & Markets ManagementEngineeringOrganizational Project Size & Location Introduction: Diversity of Engineering Environments Diverse & Dynamic Contract Vehicles COTS Integration? System Development? System Migration? Maintenance? Operations Support? IT Managed Services? Etc. Speed of Technology Change

Slide 5 LIS Litton TASC LTS L5 Litton PRC (to other units) Defense Enterprise Solutions LAT L3 L5 (to other units) L3 CMMI (to other units) LISS L3 ENABLER LIEB SPII 2002 Situation: DES Process Legacy Integration

Slide 6 Strategic Optimizing Process Before Defect Categories Root Cause Analysis Pareto Analysis Organization Defined Process Project Tailored Process Process Change Remove Root Causes From Process to Prevent Defects Test PR or Peer Review PR PR Defect Analysis Defect Data Common & Special Causes Technology Innovations

Slide 7 Process Maturity CMMI SE/SW Level 5 for Staged and Continuous Representations Software CMM Level 5 also Organizational Process Strengths Integrated SE and SW Eng Sharing & reusing process assets Data driven corrective action Technology Change Management Global Best Practices Requirements Elicitation Quantitative Data Management Process Maturity CMMI SE/SW Level 5 for Staged and Continuous Representations Software CMM Level 5 also Organizational Process Strengths Integrated SE and SW Eng Sharing & reusing process assets Data driven corrective action Technology Change Management Global Best Practices Requirements Elicitation Quantitative Data Management 2002 Situation: DEC CMMI SW/SE Appraisal F1=Fully Implemented Out of Scope Cost, Schedule and Quality Performance  JEDMICS exceeds software quality goals (.0156 vs.06 defects/KSLOC)  PERMS exceeds revenue goals by 11%  AIT has 100% on-time delivery  Only 2% of total defects found in delivered SIGS product  ITS is on cost and schedule (CPIm =.965 & SPIm =.985, target = 1.0 +/-.1)  SIGS averages a customer satisfaction of 98.5% over last four years Cost, Schedule and Quality Performance  JEDMICS exceeds software quality goals (.0156 vs.06 defects/KSLOC)  PERMS exceeds revenue goals by 11%  AIT has 100% on-time delivery  Only 2% of total defects found in delivered SIGS product  ITS is on cost and schedule (CPIm =.965 & SPIm =.985, target = 1.0 +/-.1)  SIGS averages a customer satisfaction of 98.5% over last four years

Slide Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction – Purpose – Motivation for Improvement – Vision and Mission Approach – NGIT Quality Management System – Quality System and Policy – EPG Operations and Planning – EPI Implementation – Current Situation Long-Range Strategic Plan (EPIC) – EPI Applicability Goals – Performance Goals – Infrastructure Goals – Compliance Goals 2003 Tactical Plans – Master Schedule – Applicability – Audit/Appraisal Entity Catalog – Additional High Maturity Projects (Full LC) – Partial Life Cycle Project Process Improvement – Service Project Process Improvement – Analysis of Quality Programs – IPPD Survey & Pilot – Performance – EVMS for Small Projects – Peer Review Process Upgrades – SWEEP Pilot – TSP/PSP Pilot – Customer Satisfaction Survey Analysis – Infrastructure – Process Infrastructure – OU Support – PAL Upgrades – EPI Project/Proposal Startup – Compliance – Quality Management System – QA Class C Appraisals – Master Budget – Risks (TBD)

Slide 9 EPI Long Range Strategic Goals 1. EPI Applicability Goals Goals related to the application of EPI policies and procedures to DES projects 2. Performance Goals Goals related to process performance and product quality at the DES business unit and project levels 3. Infrastructure Goals Goals related to the cost, schedule, and quality of EPI Infrastructure 4. Compliance Goals Goals related to ratings against industry standards and models Each Category described in terms of the Current Situation, the Goals, and the 2003 Tactical Plans

Slide Strategic Goals Eng, PM, & Support PAs Services Pilot PM & Support PAs All programs participate in metrics program Pilot EVMS for small projects Baseline project startup cost & time Update processes and artifacts for Service pilots Upgrade PAL Capability >= L2 in PM & Support PAs

Slide Tactical Plans PAL Upgrades Process Infrastructure (DES EPG, PALT, PA Owners, Training, WGs) QA Class C Appraisals (Phoenix Team?) Services Audit/Appraisal Entity Catalog Service Pilots EPI Proposal Support Expanded Metrics Support EVMS for Small Projects OU Support EPI Project Startup PAL Upgrades Process Infrastructure (DES EPG, PALT, PA Owners, Training, WGs) QA Class C Appraisals (Phoenix Team)

Slide 12 Tactical Plans – Master Schedule

Slide 13 EPI Applicability Start Responsible for Product or Process? Is SE or SW Involved? Responsible for full SE/SW Life Cycle? Universe of DES Projects All Applicable Y Y Y Responsible for Product or Process Involved in a SE or SW LC Phase Responsible for full SE/SW LC

Slide Goals for Performance Cost and schedule performance, product quality, service quality, and customer satisfaction are statistically significantly better than competitors

Slide 15 Approach: Process ImplementationOutputWorkProducts Roles & Roles &Responsibilities ProcessIntegration Check-lists Metrics RolloutPlans Tools Training Support Requirements Tailoring Guidance Policy & Verifications Processes Templates Templates Samples Samples Policy Statements Policy Statements Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Audits Audits Proposals Proposals Pilot Projects Pilot Projects Startups Startups Ongoing Projects Ongoing Projects Corporate Corporate Customer Customer Internal Internal COTS & “Glue” COTS & “Glue” Support Support Compatible Formats Compatible Formats Corporate Corporate OJT OJT CMMI CMMI ISO ISO Customer Stds Customer Stds Per Process, Asset Per Process, Asset One Per DomainOne Per Domain Shows Variations in each Process/ AssetShows Variations in each Process/ Asset Expert KnowledgeExpert Knowledge Process Process Product Product Process Champion Process Champion Internal Consultant Internal Consultant Subject Matter Experts Subject Matter Experts Links to other KPAs/PAs Links to other KPAs/PAs Links to SIM Links to SIM Links to other processes Links to other processes

Slide Plan Effectiveness 1. EPI Applicability Goals Expanded into Enterprise IT Managed Services and Advanced Weapon Research and Testing 2. Performance Goals Improved Error Estimating – positive impact on schedule performance Improved Earned Value plans and tools – positive impact on cost performance Improved Peer Reviews with detailed checklists – positive impact on defect removal 3. Infrastructure Goals Process built-in to project planning and startup – positive impact on “time to high maturity” 4. Compliance Goals Improved accuracy of quicklooks/QA policy audits – positive impact on maturity and ISO readiness On track to exceed ALL 2003 organizational business objectives!