TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-probability decision rules Dr. Yan Liu Department of Biomedical, Industrial & Human Factors Engineering Wright State University.
Advertisements

Decision Theory.
To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, 9e by Render/Stair/Hanna 3-1 © 2006 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Prepared by.
Module 16 – Decision Theory
1 Decision Analysis What is it? What is the objective? More example Tutorial: 8 th ed:: 5, 18, 26, 37 9 th ed: 3, 12, 17, 24 (to p2) (to p5) (to p50)
Lesson 9.1 Decision Theory with Unknown State Probabilities.
Chapter 14 Decision Analysis. Decision Making Many decision making occur under condition of uncertainty Decision situations –Probability cannot be assigned.
Instructor: Vincent Duffy, Ph.D. Associate Professor of IE Lab 2 Tutorial – Uncertainty in Decision Making Fri. Feb. 2, 2006 IE 486 Work Analysis & Design.
Introduction to Management Science
Decision Theory.
Decision Process Identify the Problem
Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Beni Asllani University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Operations Management - 6 th Edition Chapter 1 Supplement Roberta.
1 DSCI 3223 Decision Analysis Decision Making Under Uncertainty –Techniques play an important role in business, government, everyday life, college football.
Chapter 3 Decision Analysis.
1 Decision Analysis Decision-Making Under Uncertainty updated Systems Analysis Methods Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow NTU SY-521-N SMU EMIS.
Managerial Decision Modeling with Spreadsheets
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc1 Supplement 2 – Decision Analysis A set of quantitative decision-making techniques for decision situations where uncertainty.
DSC 3120 Generalized Modeling Techniques with Applications
BA 555 Practical Business Analysis
Project Management Risk Management. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Definition of Risk 3.Tolerance of Risk 4.Definition of Risk Management 5.Certainty, Risk,
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Beni Asllani University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Operations Management - 5 th Edition Chapter 2 Supplement Roberta.
ISMT 161: Introduction to Operations Management
Decision Making Under Uncertainty and Under Risk
Decision Tree Analysis. Decision Analysis Managers often must make decisions in environments that are fraught with uncertainty. Some Examples –A manufacturer.
Decision Analysis Introduction Chapter 6. What kinds of problems ? Decision Alternatives (“what ifs”) are known States of Nature and their probabilities.
Operations Management Decision-Making Tools Module A
Chapter 8 Decision Analysis n Problem Formulation n Decision Making without Probabilities n Decision Making with Probabilities n Risk Analysis and Sensitivity.
8-1 CHAPTER 8 Decision Analysis. 8-2 LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1.List the steps of the decision-making process and describe the different types of decision-making.
Module 5 Part 2: Decision Theory
“ The one word that makes a good manager – decisiveness.”
3-1 Quantitative Analysis for Management Chapter 3 Fundamentals of Decision Theory Models.
1 1 Slide Decision Theory Professor Ahmadi. 2 2 Slide Learning Objectives n Structuring the decision problem and decision trees n Types of decision making.
To Accompany Russell and Taylor, Operations Management, 4th Edition,  2003 Prentice-Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Supplement S2 Decision Analysis To.
Chapter 9 - Decision Analysis - Part I
Decision Analysis Steps in Decision making
12-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Decision Analysis Chapter 12.
Decision Analysis Mary Whiteside. Decision Analysis Definitions Actions – alternative choices for a course of action Actions – alternative choices for.
Welcome Unit 4 Seminar MM305 Wednesday 8:00 PM ET Quantitative Analysis for Management Delfina Isaac.
Models for Strategic Marketing Decision Making. Market Entry Decisions To enter first or to wait Sources of First-Mover Advantages –Technological leadership.
Decision Analysis. Basic Terms Decision Alternatives (eg. Production quantities) States of Nature (eg. Condition of economy) Payoffs ($ outcome of a choice.
Fundamentals of Decision Theory Chapter 16 Mausam (Based on slides of someone from NPS, Maria Fasli)
Decision Theory McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
12-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Decision Analysis Chapter 12.
Decision Analysis.
ENGM 661 Engr. Economics for Managers Decisions Under Uncertainty.
Decision Analysis Pertemuan Matakuliah: A Strategi Investasi IT Tahun: 2009.
Chapter 16 Notes: Decision Making under Uncertainty Introduction Laplace Rule Maximin Rule Maximax Rule Hurwicz Rule Minimax Regret Rule Examples Homework:
Chapter 12 Decision Analysis. Components of Decision Making (D.M.) F Decision alternatives - for managers to choose from. F States of nature - that may.
DECISION MODELS. Decision models The types of decision models: – Decision making under certainty The future state of nature is assumed known. – Decision.
Chap 18-1 Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach 6 th Edition Chapter 18 Introduction to Decision Analysis.
Chapter 8 Decision Analysis n Problem Formulation n Decision Making without Probabilities n Decision Making with Probabilities n Risk Analysis and Sensitivity.
QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES
DECISION THEORY & DECISION TREE
Decision Analysis Chapter 12.
Chapter 5 Supplement Decision Theory.
Decisions under uncertainty and risk
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT: Creating Value Along the Supply Chain,
Welcome to MM305 Unit 4 Seminar Larry Musolino
Slides 8a: Introduction
Decision Analysis Chapter 12.
Supplement: Decision Making
MNG221- Management Science –
نظام التعليم المطور للانتساب
نظام التعليم المطور للانتساب
Decision Theory Analysis
Decision Analysis Support Tools and Processes
Modeling T.Reema T.Rawan.
Decision Analysis.
Making Decisions Under Uncertainty
Presentation transcript:

TM 732 Engr. Economics for Managers Decision Analysis

GoferBroke

Prototype Ex. 2 Digger Construction is interested in purchasing 1 of 3 cranes. The cranes differ in capacity, age, and mechanical condition, but each is fully capable of performing the jobs expected. The firm anticipates a growing market and that there will be sufficient demand to justify each of the cranes. However, low, medium, and high growth estimates result in different cash flow profiles for each crane. Based on ATCF at 15%, the analyst estimates the following NPWs for each of the cranes for each of the growth market conditions.

Digger Construction

Decision Matrix EUAW

Matrix Decision Model A j = alternative strategy j under decision makers control S k = a state or possible future that can occur given A j p k = the probability state S k will occur

Matrix Decision Model V(  jk ) = the value of outcome  jk (terms of $, time, distance,.. )  jk = the outcome of choosing A j and having state S k occur

Decisions Under Certainty

Investor wishes to invest $10,000 in one of five govt. securities. Effective yields are: A 1 = 8.0% A 2 = 7.3% A 3 = 8.7% A 4 = 6.0% A 5 = 6.5% choose A 3.

Maximin Select A j : max j min k V(  jk ) e.g., Find the min payoff for each alternative.

Maximin Select A j : max j min k V(  jk ) e.g., Find the min payoff for each alternative. Find the maximum of minimums Select Crane 1 Choose best alternative when comparing worst possible outcomes for each alternative.

Maximin Select A j : max j min k V(  jk ) e.g., Find the min payoff for each alternative. Find the maximum of minimums Sell Land Choose best alternative when comparing worst possible outcomes for each alternative.

MiniMax Select A j : max j min k V(  jk ) e.g., Find the max payoff for each alternative.

MiniMax Select A j : max j min k V(  jk ) e.g., Find the max payoff for each alternative. Find the minimum of maximums Select Crane 1 Choose worst alternative when comparing best possible outcomes for each alternative.

MiniMax Select A j : max j min k V(  jk ) e.g., Find the max payoff for each alternative. Find the minimum of maximums Sell Land Choose worst alternative when comparing best possible outcomes for each alternative.

Class Problem Choose best alternative using a.Maximax criteria b.Minimin criteria

Class Problem Choose best alternative using a.Maximax criteria (best of the best) max j {15163, 16536, 18397} = 18,397 choose A 3

Class Problem Choose best alternative using a.Minimin criteria (worst of the worst) min j {11,962 10,934 10,840} = 10,840 choose A 3

Maximum Likelihood Assume S 2 a certainty

Maximum Likelihood Assume S 2 a certainty max{P A1, P A2, P A3 | p 2 =1.0} choose A 1

Most Probable Assume S 2 a certainty max{P A1, P A2, P A3 | p 2 =1.0} choose A 1

Most Probable Assume S 2 a certainty max{P A1, P A2, P A3 | p 2 =1.0} choose A 1

Most Probable Assume S 2 a certainty max{P A1, P A2, P A3 | p 2 =1.0} choose A 1

Most Probable Assume S 2 a certainty max{P A1, P A2, P A3 | p 2 =1.0} choose A 1

Most Probable Assume S 2 a certainty max{P A1, P A2, P A3 | p 2 =1.0} choose A 1

Most Probable Assume S 2 a certainty max{P A1, P A2, P A3 | p 2 =1.0} choose A 1

Most Probable Assume S 2 a certainty max{P A1, P A2, P A3 | p 2 =1.0} choose A 1

Most Probable Assume S 2 a certainty max{P A1, P A2, P A3 | p 2 =1.0} choose A 1

Assume S 2 a certainty max{P A1, P A2 | p 2 =1.0} choose A 2 Maximun Likelihood Most Probable

Bayes’ Decision Rule E[A 1 ] > E[A 2 ] > E[A 3 ] choose A 1

Bayes’ Decision Rule E[A 1 ] > E[A 2 ] choose A 1

Expectation E[A 1 ] > E[A 2 ] > E[A 3 ] choose A 1

Expectation E[A 1 ] > E[A 2 ] > E[A 3 ] choose A 1

Expectation E[A 1 ] > E[A 2 ] > E[A 3 ] choose A 1

Expectation E[A 1 ] > E[A 2 ] > E[A 3 ] choose A 1

Expectation E[A 1 ] > E[A 2 ] > E[A 3 ] choose A 1

Expectation E[A 1 ] > E[A 2 ] > E[A 3 ] choose A 1

Laplace Principle If one can not assign probabilities, assume each state equally probable. Max E[P Ai ] choose A 1

Expectation-Variance If E[A 1 ] = E[A 2 ] = E[A 3 ] choose A j with min. variance

Sensitivity Suppose probability of finding oil (p) is somewhere between 15 and 35 percent.

Sensitivity Suppose probability of finding oil (p) is somewhere between 15 and 35 percent.

Sensitivity Suppose probability of finding oil (p) is somewhere between 15 and 35 percent.

Sensitivity

Sensitivity Plot Prob. of Oil Expected Value Drill Sell

Sensitivity We know E[payoff] = 700(p) -100(1-p) = 800p - 100

Sensitivity Sensitivity Plot Prob. of Oil Expected Value Drill Sell

Aspiration-Level Aspiration: max probability that payoff > 60,000 P{P A1 > 60,000} = 0.8 P{P A2 > 60,000} = 0.3 P{P A3 > 60,000} = 0.3 Choose A 2 or A 3

Aspiration-Level Aspiration: max probability that payoff > 60,000 P{P A1 > 60,000} = 0.8 P{P A2 > 60,000} = 0.3 P{P A3 > 60,000} = 0.3 Choose A 2 or A 3

Class Problem Determine alternative A j if aspiration level is NPW > $14,000.

Class Problem Determine alternative A j if aspiration level is Payoff > $14,000.

Class Problem Determine alternative A j if aspiration level is Payoff > $14,000. P{P A1 > 14,000} = 0.1 P{P A2 > 14,000} = 0.1 P{P A3 > 14,000} = 0.4Choose A 3

Hurwicz Principle  = 0.3 Select j: max j {H j =  max k [V(  jk )]+(1-  )min k (V(  jk ) max{12,922 12,615 13,107} = 13,107 choose A 3

Hurwicz Principle  = 0.3 Select j: max j {H j =  max k [V(  jk )]+(1-  )min k (V(  jk ) max{12,922 12,615 13,107} = 13,107 choose A 3

Hurwicz Principle  = 0.3 Select j: max j {H j =  max k [V(  jk )]+(1-  )min k (V(  jk ) max{12,922 12,615 13,107} = 13,107 choose A 3

Hurwicz Principle  = 0.3 Select j: max j {H j =  max k [V(  jk )]+(1-  )min k (V(  jk ) max{12,922 12,615 13,107} = 13,107 choose A 3

Hurwicz Principle  = 0.3 Select j: max j {H j =  max k [V(  jk )]+(1-  )min k (V(  jk ) max{12,922 12,615 13,107} = 13,107 choose A 3

Hurwicz Principle  = 0.3 Select j: max j {H j =  max k [V(  jk )]+(1-  )min k (V(  jk ) max{12,922 12,615 13,107} = 13,107 choose A 3

Hurwicz Principle  = 0.3 Select j: max j {H j =  max k [V(  jk )]+(1-  )min k (V(  jk ) max{12,922 12,615 13,107} = 13,107 choose A 3

Hurwicz Principle  = 0.3 Select j: max j {H j =  max k [V(  jk )]+(1-  )min k (V(  jk ) Note:   = 1.0 MaxiMax  = 0.0 MaxiMin

Hurwicz Principle  = 1.0 MaxiMax = best of the best = max{max k V(  jk )} max{15,163 16,536 18,397} = 18,397 choose A 3

Hurwicz Principle  = 0.0 MaxiMin = best of the worst = max{min k V(  jk )} max{11,962 10,934 10,840} = 11,962 choose A 1

Class Problem You personally assess your boss’s risk level  to be approximately.3. Use Hurwicz’s principle to analyze the value matrix and determine the appropriate alternative.

Hurwicz Principle Select j: max j {H j =  max k [V(  jk )]+(1-  )min k (V(  jk )

Hurwicz Principle Select j: max j {H j =  max k [V(  jk )]+(1-  )min k (V(  jk ) max{50500, 48400, 45000} = 50,500

Hurwicz Principle Select j: max j {H j =  max k [V(  jk )]+(1-  )min k (V(  jk ) max{50500, 48400, 45000} = 50,500 choose A 1

Savage Principle (Minimax Regret) Build table of regrets: R jk = max j [V(  jk )] - V(  jk ) (max in each column less cell value)

Savage Principle (Minimax Regret)

Minimize the maximum regret Min {3,234 1,861 1,122} = 1,122 choose A 3

Class Problem Being somewhat of a pessimist, you constantly worry about lost opportunities. Compute a regret matrix and determine an alternative which minimizes the maximum regret.