Introduction Efficient use of nitrogen is becoming important due to increasing N fertilizer prices and the growing concerns about NO 3 - contamination.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effects of Plant Density on Developmental Phenotypes in Maize Michael J. Stein 1 and Jode W. Edwards 2 1 Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University,
Advertisements

Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Manure is a Resource Ron Wiederholt Nutrient Management Specialist NDSU Extension Livestock Manure Nutrient Management Series March, 2006.
Multiple Comparisons in Factorial Experiments
Use of sensor based nitrogen rates to improve maize nitrogen use efficiency in the Northern Argentinean Pampas. Ricardo Melchiori 1, Octavio Caviglia 1,
Late Season Nitrogen Enhanced Wheat Protein as Affected by Late Season Moisture. B. D. Brown. University of Idaho Introduction High protein premiums and.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.
Effect of Long-term Cattle Manure Application on Soil Test Phosphorus, Organic Carbon and Winter Wheat Grain Yield Natasha Macnack, Peter Omara, Lawrence.
LECTURE IV PRODUCTION PRINCIPLES. Production Principles  The Production Principles to be discussed include:  Production Function  Law of Diminishing.
Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) for cereal production worldwide is approximately 33% with the remaining 67% representing a $15.9 billion annual loss of Nitrogen.
Yield, Protein, and Quality Response to Planting Date, Variety, and Late N. B.D. Brown. University of Idaho. Introduction Higher market prices for the.
Maize Light Interception and Grain Yield as Affected by Precision Planting.
May 6, Drought tolerant Miller ComparisonsEfawLCB Grain Yield (bu/ac) Drought tolerant vs. Non-drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer
INFLUENCES OF IRRIGATION AND N FERTILIZATION ON MAIZE (Zea mays L.) PROPERTIES - Hrvoje PLAVSIC1 - Marko JOSIPOVIC1 - Luka ANDRIC1 - Antun JAMBROVIC1 -
DESIGN - Strip-split-split plot with 3 replications at each of two Bangladesh Agricultural research station sites (Dinajpur - sandy loam soil; Rajshahi.
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
PRODUCTION ECONOMICS TOOLS FOR FARM MANAGEMENT AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
ISU Agronomy Extension Fertilizer Price Effect on Optimum Corn N Rate Recommendations John Sawyer Department of Agronomy Iowa State University.
Nitrogen Use Efficiency Workshop Canopy Reflectance Signatures: Developing a Crop Need-Based Indicator for Sidedress Application of N Fertilizer to Canola.
Methods and Materials Soils – 25 Kansas soils were dried for 48 h at 60 o C, ground, sieved to 2 mm. After preparation, soils were analyzed for Walkley-Black.
In The Name of God. Subject: The Effect of Application of Biological Phosphate Fertilizer (Fertile 2) and Triple Super Phosphate Chemical Fertilizers.
Baking Quality Response to Late Season N with Variable Moisture During Grain Fill. K. O’Brien, B. Brown, and R. Gibson. University of Idaho Introduction.
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Mandana Tayefe, Ebrahim Amiri, and Azin Nasrollah Zade
Regional Nitrogen Rate Guidelines John Sawyer Department of Agronomy Iowa State University.
Root biomass and grain yield of Pavon 76 wheat and its Near isogenic Lines in Organic and Synthetic Fertilizer Systems Ruth Kaggwa-Asiimwe 1, Mario Gutierrez-Rodriguez.
Remote sensing of canopy reflectance on a field scale has been proposed as a useful tool for diagnosing nitrogen (N) deficiency of corn plants. Differences.
Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing Ray Asebedo, David Mengel, and Randall Nelson Kansas State.
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
Evaluation of NUE and WUE on Corn Hybrids With and Without Drought Tolerance in Irrigated and Dryland Production Systems Eric C. Miller Jeremiah L. Mullock,
NITROGEN FERTIGATION OF SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATED BERMUDAGRASS M.A. Maurer* 1, J.A. Moken 2 and J.L. Young 1 1 Department of Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin.
Development of Vegetation Indices as Economic Thresholds for Control of Defoliating Insects of Soybean James BoardVijay MakaRandy PriceDina KnightMatthew.
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Refinement of the Missouri Corn Nitrogen Algorithm Using Canopy Reflectance Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, and Scott Drummond USDA-Agricultural Research.
Introduction Soybeans are an important crop on many cotton farms in the Midsouth. Rapidly rising input prices have increased the cost of soybean production.
Global Climate Change in the Great Lakes: How will Agriculture in the Great Lakes Region be Affected? By: Mary Brunner.
LATE SEASON N APPLICATIONS FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED WHEAT PROTEIN ENHANCEMENT. S.E. Petrie*, Oregon State Univ, B.D. Brown, Univ. of Idaho. Introduction.
Locations Efaw Lake Carl Blackwell Haskell Years2005, 2006 Objectives: 1)To determine the minimum preplant N fertilizer needed to achieve maximum yield.
Effect of Preplant/Early Irrigation, Nitrogen and Population Rate on Winter Wheat Grain Yield Plant and Soil Sciences Department, Oklahoma State University,
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
Influence of Late-Season Foliar Nitrogen Applications on Grain Protein in Winter Wheat C.W. Woolfolk, W.R. Raun, G.V. Johnson E.G. Krenzer, and W.E. Thomason.
IRRIGATED CORN RESPONSE TO NITROGEN FERTILIZATION IN THE COLORADO ARKANSAS VALLEY Ardell Halvorson 1, Frank Schweissing 2, Michael Bartolo 2, and Curtis.
Enhancing Continuous Corn Production Under High-Residue Conditions with Starter Fluid Fertilizer Combinations and Placements Gyles Randall Univ. of Minnesota,
Managing Tillage and FYM for Enhancing Maize Production and Soil Properties in Mid-hills of Nepal Pudasaini, R. and Pande, K. R. Presenter: Roshan Pudasaini.
Where do Enhanced Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers and Split N Applications Fit? Cynthia Grant and Alan Moulin AAFC - Brandon Research Centre Nicolas Tremblay.
Wood ash, the residue remaining from the combustion of bark, sawdust and yard waste for energy generation for forestry product operations, is an effective.
Economics of Crop Production
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
1Dept. of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, AL
Fig 1: Nitrogen fertilizer application at V7.
Dhurba Neupane1, Juan Solomon2 and Jay Davison3
How High Should NUE Be, and Can Knowing Soil N Help Us Get There
and No-Tillage under Various Crop Rotations.
2017 NUE Conference Baton Rouge, LA – August 7 - 9, 2017
Strategies for Split N Applications for Corn
Evaluation of Midseason UAN Application Depth in Winter Wheat
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Maize Light Interception and Grain Yield as Affected by Precision Planting.
Figure 1. Long term annual precipitation received at Bird City, Kansas
Concepts and Rationale for Regional Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Corn
Lodging immediately after July 4, 2007 storm.
Eric Miller August 3rd, 2010 Dr. Camberato & Dr. Nielsen
Tastes Great. Less Filling
Evaluating “Ultra-Early” Corn Hybrids
Jeff Vetsch and Gyles Randall University of Minnesota
Presentation transcript:

Introduction Efficient use of nitrogen is becoming important due to increasing N fertilizer prices and the growing concerns about NO 3 - contamination of ground and surface waters. Researchers are interested in whether N rates can be tailored to better fit certain hybrids. Previous studies have shown mixed results. Tsai et al. (1984) found that yields of hybrids differed in their response to N, and classified hybrids as two types: high fertility or low fertility. However, Bundy and Carter (1988) found that hybrids required similar rates of N to achieve maximum yield. Commercial seed corn companies are also trying to develop hybrids with higher N use efficiency, and thus, less need for N fertilizer. Objective Determine how nine commercial corn hybrids differed in their response to N rate, measured as differences in economically optimum N rate (EONR), yield at EONR, fertilizer N use efficiency (FNUE), and the economic return to N at the optimum N rate Materials and Methods This study was conducted for 3 years in Urbana, IL. In 2003 and 2004, the soil type was Dana silt loam, and in 2005, it was Flanagan silt loam. Corn followed corn. The plots were arranged in a split plot design in an RCBD with 4 replications. The main plots consisted of 5 N rates (0, 67, 135, 202, 270 kg N/ha) and the subplots were 9 Burrus hybrids (440, 442, 576, 583Bt, 625, 645, 710, 727 & 795B). Nitrogen was sidedressed as 28% UAN at the V5-V6 growth stage. A cost:price ratio of 8.52 ($0.09/kg corn & $0.77/kg N) was used to calculate EONR. Data were analyzed using the Proc Mixed procedure in SAS, with years and reps (nested in years) as random factors, and hybrids and N rates as fixed factors. Yield data were fit to the quadratic+plateau model in Proc NLIN. FNUE parameters were calculated at a given N rate using the following equations: -Yield efficiency = Yield EONR – Yield zero N EONR -N uptake efficiency = Plant N content EONR – Plant N content zero N EONR -N utilization efficiency = Yield EONR – Yield zero N Plant N content EONR – Plant N content zero N Net return to N was calculated for each hybrid as: (Optimum yield – yield zero N ) × price of corn – (EONR × N price). Table 1. Test of fixed effects for yield. Fig. 1. Yield response to N by hybrid across years. Table 2. Economically optimum N rates (EONR) and optimum yields (OY) by hybrid. Table 4. FNUE measured as yield efficiency, N uptake efficiency and N utilization efficiency by hybrid. Results The N rate × hybrid interaction for yield was significant in 2004, 2005 and across years (Table 1) Across years, maximum yields were reached at N rates ranging from 140 to 228 kg N/ha (Fig. 1) Optimum yields were significantly different among hybrids in each year and across years, with 583Bt and 795B having consistently higher optimum yields in each year (Table 2) EONR values were significantly different among hybrids in 2004 and across years, with hybrid 583Bt having the highest EONR values in both instances (Table 2) Net return to N (NRTN) was significantly different among hybrids in 2004 and 2005, and 583Bt had the highest NRTN in both years (Table 3) NRTN values were correlated with optimum yields in 2004 and 2005, but were only correlated with EONR values in 2004 Yield efficiency and N uptake efficiency were significantly different among hybrids in 2005, while N utilization efficiency was significantly different among hybrids across 2004 and 2005 (Table 4) Some hybrids that had higher optimum yields and EONR values tended to have lower yield efficiency, and thus lower FNUE (Tables 2 & 4) NRTN values were not correlated with yield efficiency in 2005 Fixed effectGrain yield Across years Pr>F Nitrogen rate0.0005<.0001 Hybrid <.0001 Nitrogen rate * Hybrid Table 3. Net return to N by hybrid. Values are calculated at the economically optimum N rate for each hybrid each year, using an N price of $0.77/kg N and a corn price of $0.09/kg corn. Conclusions The two Bt hybrids seemed to have a higher response to N Further research to compare Bt hybrids against non-Bt counterparts Hybrid maturity did not consistently affect hybrids’ response to N in either yield or FNUE Net return to N was closely associated with optimum yield FNUE by itself may have limited economic value as a hybrid trait Yield efficiency N uptake efficiency N utilization efficiency Hybrid yr avg yr. avg yr. avg. ---kg grain/kg N % kg grain/kg N Bt B LSD NS 12.1NS 14.4 Hybrid yr avg $/ha Bt B LSD.10 NS NS Hybrid yr avg. EONROY EONROY EONROY EONROY kg N/haMg/ha kg N/haMg/ha kg N/haMg/ha kg N/haMg/ha Bt B LSD.10 NS NS Literature Cited Bundy, L.G. and P.R. Carter Corn hybrid response to nitrogen fertilization in the Northern Corn Belt. J. Prod. Agric. 1: Tsai, C.Y., D.M. Huber, D.V. Glover, and H.L Warren Relationship of N deposition to grain yield and N response of three maize hybrids. Crop Sci. 24: