TRIAL PROCEDURE Dr. KAROLINA KREMENS, LL.M. (Ottawa) International Criminal Procedure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Courts and the Quest for Justice. In Theory: Courtroom Ideals  Courts have extensive powers in our criminal justice system.  The courts legitimacy is.
Advertisements

Administration of the Judicial Environment Prepared and Presented By Gladstone K. Hlalakuhle.
+ Courtroom Participants. + 2 Fundamental Principles An accused person is innocent until proven guilty. Guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Participants in a Criminal Trial. Principles Canada’s criminal justice system has two fundamental principles: an accused person is innocent until proven.
Chapter 13: Chapter 13 Packet #1.
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
The Judicial Branch. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
Outline Procedure to Trial To be able to describe the procedure from charging the accused to the start of his trial To be able to describe the procedure.
Irish Centre for Human Rights Summer Course on the International Criminal Court 2010 Victim Participation.
Last Topic - The Ombudsman Federal Ombudsman Provincial Ombudsman Banking Ombudsman Federal Insurance Ombudsman and Federal Tax Ombudsman Federal Ombudsperson.
Objective 1.02 Understand Court Systems and Trial Procedures
Cje Karolina Kremens, LL.M., Ph.D. Wojciech Jasiński, Ph.D. Department of Criminal Procedure Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics University of.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 29 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE III FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 26, 2002.
Whose Justice? Whose Justice? Victim Participation in Procedures before the International Criminal Court Dr Regina Rauxloh Southampton 13 th September.
CJ227 Criminal Procedure Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 4 (Chapter 9 – Pretrial Motions, Hearings and Pleas) (Chapter.
The Criminal Courts: Procedure and Sentencing
Pre-Trial Management of Criminal Cases
1 “For Better or For Worse” State Bar of Arizona American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers January 28, 2010 Rules Update Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure,
Pre-Trial Procedures. Release before trial  Few people charged with a crime are held in jail until their trial  There must be good reason to keep someone.
The Criminal Justice System
Trial Procedures & Courtroom Personnel
 The 5 th Amendment limits the national government, but the 14 th guarantees that states cannot deprive rights without “Due Process.”  Due process is.
Legal and Court Terminology. Indictment A formal criminal charge against a person who then becomes the defendant.
The criminal courts: Procedure and Sentencing Outline Procedure to Trial.
DISCOVERY AND DIRECTIONS HEARINGS. Discovery Is a stage of the civil pre-trial process where each party has the opportunity to request documents and additional.
Our Court System Terms, procedures, and ideas you need to know.
Trial on Indictment in the Crown Court
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Business Law in Canada, 7/e, Chapter 2 Business Law in Canada, 7/e Chapter 2 The Resolution of Disputes.
EVIDENCE Some Basics Spring Overview The cases you read involve facts and law Most often appellate courts decide legal issues based on the facts.
Chapter 7 – The adversary system Key Knowledge
Criminal Law – Bringing the Accused to Trial. Comic.
Supreme Court civil pre-trial procedures: an overview
Trial Procedures Law 120 MHS Mr. Binet.
IN-CAMERA TRIALS PRESENTED BY CLLR. FELICIA V. COLEMAN CHIEF PROSECUTOR/SGBVCU MINISTRY OF JUSTICE.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 3 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
THE CRIMINAL COURT SYSTEM The Participants. BURDEN OF PROOF  2 Fundamental Principles: Accused is innocent until proven guilty. Guilt must be proved.
Trends and Successes in Improving Access to Justice Dr. Pim Albers Special advisor.
INVESTIGATION KAROLINA KREMENS, LL.M. (Ottawa), Ph.D. International Criminal Procedure.
Seminar on the Swiss Rules of International Arbitration Evidence & Hearings under the Swiss Rules Belgrade, 9 December 2015 University.
CASE MANAGEMENT HOW TO TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR CASES 1 Lady Justice Hallett DBE and Dame Linda Dobbs DBE.
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch. “The Federal Court System & How Federal Courts Are Organized”
PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE KAROLINA KREMENS, LL.M. (Ottawa), Ph.D. International Criminal Procedure.
Ontario Court of Justice Judges appointed by the provincial government Judges appointed by the provincial government Court of “inferior” jurisdiction –
THE ADULT JUSTICE SYSTEM. ADULT JUSTICE SYSTEM  Characterized as Civil or Criminal  Criminal laws are characterized as felonies or misdemeanors  For.
SELF-REPRESENTATION The right of self-representation is defined as the right of anyone charged with a criminal offence to defend himself in person or through.
Comparing the Inquisitorial and Adversarial Systems.
Cje Karolina Kremens, LL.M., Ph.D. Wojciech Jasiński, Ph.D. Department of Criminal Procedure Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics University of.
Tracing Our Rights
Pretrial and Courtroom Procedures Principles of LPSCS.
CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES. WHAT EXACTLY ARE CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES?  Processes and procedures that occur before a trial or hearing commences.
Oregon Victims’ Rights Presented by Terry Campos National Crime Victim Law Institute & Janine Robben Oregon Crime Victims Law Center.
Article III: The Judicial Branch Chapters: 11,12
Law LA1: The Criminal Process The Criminal Process Unit 1 -AS.
WELCOME TO EVIDENCE 2016 Miiko Kumar. What is evidence law about? Where is evidence law from? Where is evidence law now? What are the aims of the laws.
What is it like to serve on a Jury?
The Criminal Process Criminal Courts
Jury System.
Rules and Theory of Criminal Law Criminal Process
Criminal Court Process
Courtroom Participants
Bill of Rights Vocabulary
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards
The Participants.
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Trial before court of session
Arrest—Police arrest and “book” suspect by photographing and
Trial Procedures & Courtroom Personnel
Rights of the Accused.
Legal provisions governing the taking of witness statements
Presentation transcript:

TRIAL PROCEDURE Dr. KAROLINA KREMENS, LL.M. (Ottawa) International Criminal Procedure

CONTENTS 1. General remarks 2. Commencement of the trial 3. Technical issues 4. Powers of the Trial Chamber 5. Admission of guilt 6. Closing arguments 7. Judgment and sentence

1. GENERAL REMARKS  art of the Rome Statute  Rule RPE  role fo the Court during the trial  basic rights of the accused as well as victims and witnesses  general principles applicable throughout the course of the trial  balance between prosecution of indicted persons, the rights of the victims and the rights of the accused to a fair trial

2. COMMENCEMENT OF THE TRIAL AFTER THE CONFIRMATION OF THE CHARGES  the Presidency constitutes a Trial Chamber, to which it refers the case (art. 61 (11)) (Rule 130))  the Trial Chamber receives the decision of the Pre-Trial Chamber and the record of the proceedings before the Pre-Trial Chamber (Rule 130) – common and civil law approach  the record of the proceedings is kept by the Registrar  records of the Pre-trial proceedings may be consulted by the Prosecutor, the defence, representatives of States and victims with their representatives (Rule 131 (2)) – restrictions (national security and confidentiality)

2. COMMENCEMENT OF THE TRIAL STATUS CONFERENCES  the ICTY and ICTR practice  held promptly after the Trial Chamber has been constituted (Rule 132)  date of the trial  other status conferences – in order to facilitate the fair and expeditious conduct of the proceedings (Rule 132 (2))  rulings on any issue concerning the conduct of the proceedings (Rule 134 (1)) – in writing!  objections concerning the conduct of the proceedings (Rule 134 (2))

3. TECHNICAL ISSUES COMPOSITION OF THE COURT  three judges of the Trial Division (no jury!)  all the judges shall be present at each stage of the proceedings and throughout the deliberations (art. 74 (1)) – alternate judges  Presiding Judge – power to give directions for the conduct of proceedings including to ensure that they are conducted in a fair and impartial manner; parties may submit evidence subject to his directions – art. 64 (8) (b)  all other decisions must be made by the Trial Chamber – the powers of the Chamber and the Presiding Judge are not clearly defined

3. TECHNICAL ISSUES PLACE OF THE TRIAL  the seat of the ICC – the Hague (Netherlands) (art. 3)  the Court may seat elsewhere  the place of the trial should be the seat of the Court, unless otherwise decided (art. 62)  in a particular case when the Court considers that it would be in the interest of justice, it may decide to sit in a state other than the host state (Rule 100)  issue of the interest of justice – expeditious and fair conduct of the proceedings, rights of the defendant safety measures  on-site visits for the evidence of specific witnesses

3. TECHNICAL ISSUES LANGUAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS  the TC shall determine the language or languages to be used at the trial (art. 64 (3) (b))  the right of the defendant – to receive a competent translation and the right to address the court in language that the accused is comfortable with (art. 67)  official languages of the Court: English, French, Arabic, Chinese, Russian, Spanish  working languages: English and French  Rule 41 – use of another language during proceedings (spoken by the majority involved in a case)

3. TECHNICAL ISSUES PUBLIC TRIAL  the principle: trials at the ICC should be held in public (art. 64 (7))  right of the accused to have a public trial  educational tool; right of the public, right of the victims  exceptions – protection of the victims and witnesses (art. 68) or to protect sensitive or confidential information (art. 64 (7))  allowance for the press to attend – no limitations to the presence, there might be limitations according to take photographs or record the content of the proceedings (Rule 137 (3))

4. POWERS OF THE TRIAL CHAMBER GENERAL POWERS OF THE TRIAL CHAMBER  exercise any functions of the Pre-Trial Chamber  require the attendance and testimony of witnesses and production of documents and other evidence (assistance of States)  provide for the protection of confidential information  order the production of evidence in addition to that already collected prior to the trial or presented during the trial by the parties  provide for the protection of the accused, witnesses and victims (art. 64 (6))  rule on the admissibility or relevance of evidence and take all necessary steps to maintain order in the course of hearing (art. 64 (10))

4. POWERS OF THE TRIAL CHAMBER OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE  the TC has jurisdiction over such offences (art. 70): o giving false testimony o presenting false or forged evidence o corruptly influencing a witness o obstructing or interfering with the witness’ attendance or testimony o retaliating against witness o destroying or tampering with evidence o intimidating Court official to persuade him not to perform his duties properly o soliciting or accepting bribe by a Court official  penalty: maximum 5 years in prison or fine or both

4. POWERS OF THE TRIAL CHAMBER ENSURING FAIR AND EXPEDITIOUS TRIAL  ensuring that ‘the trial is fair and expeditious and is conducted with full respect for the rights of the accused and due regard for the protection of victims and witnesses’ (art. 64 (2))  one of the ways to ensure that is holding ‘status conferences’ according to art. 64 (3) (a) and Rule 132 – decrease disputes over procedures later on in the trial, so that it may focus and deal with substantive matter: the crimes and the role of the accused  provide for disclosure of documents or information not previously disclosed, sufficiently in advance of the commencement of the trial to enable adequate preparation for trial (art. 64 (3) (c))  joinder or severance of the cases (art. 64 (5))

4. POWERS OF THE TRIAL CHAMBER ENSURING FAIR AND EXPEDITIOUS TRIAL  problems with art. 64 (3) (a) – ‘adopt such procedure as are necessary to facilitate the fair and expeditious conduct of the proceedings’  also problematic Rule 140 (1) – if the Presiding Judge does not give a directions under article 64 (8) (power to give directions for the conduct of proceedings including to ensure that they are conducted in a fair and impartial manner; parties may submit evidence subject to his directions) the Prosecutor and defence shall agree on the order and manner in which the evidence shall be submitted to the Trial Chamber  If no agreement can be reached, the Presiding judge shall issue directions  Rule 85 (A) ICTY/ICTR RPE

5. ADMISSION OF GUILT PROCEEDINGS ON AN ADMISSION OF GUILT  at the commencement of the trial the TC shall have read to the accused the charges previously confirmed by the PTC and shall satisfy itself that the accused understands the nature of the charges – opportunity for the accused to admit guilt or plead not guilty (art. 64 (8) (a))  when the accused pleads guilty the TC determines (art. 65): o the accused understands the nature and consequences of the admission of guilt o admission is voluntarily and made after the consultations with the defence lawyer o supported by the facts of the case

5. ADMISSION OF GUILT TRIAL CHAMBER DECISIONS ON ADMISSION  upon determination the Trial Chamber makes the decision (art. 64 (8) (a)):  when the accused pleads guilty the TC determines (art. 65): o the TC is satisfied – shall consider the admission of guilt and may convict the accused (art. 65 (2)) o the TC is not satisfied – considers admission of guilt as not being made and the trial may be continued (art. 65 (3)) o the TC is not sure – request additional evidence, continue the trial (art. 65 (4))  any Prosecution-Defence agreements are not binding the TC (art. 65 (5))

6. CLOSING ARGUMENTS  after the Presiding Judge declares that the submission of evidence is closed (Rule 141 (1))  the Prosecutor and the defence are invited to make their closing statements (Rule 141 (2))  no specific order, the Court will rule on that or parties will decide; but the defence is always speaking last (Rule 141 (2))  a further hearing may be held for the submission of any additional evidence or related to the sentence or reparations before the completion on the trial (Rule 143)

7. JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DECISION  the TC decision shall be base on its evaluation of the evidence and the entire proceedings (art. 74 (2))  the decision shall not exceed the facts and circumstances described in the charges and any amendments to the charges; the Court may base its decision only on evidence submitted and discussed before it at the trial (art. 74 (2))  deliberations are secret (art. 74 (4)) (Rule 142)  the decision should be unanimous or made by the majority of votes (art. 74 (3)  elements of the decision (art. 74 (5))  the decision or the summary shall be delivered in the open court (art. 74 (5)) (Rule 144 (1))  copies of the decision (Rule 144 (2))

7. JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE SENTENCING PROCEDURE  judgment and sentence - two stages or one? (common and civil law approach)  ICC – not obligatory two stages  in case of convictions the TC will consider the appropriate sentence to be imposed on the accused and take into account the evidence presented and submission made by the parties during the trial (art. 76 (1))  additional hearing (art. 76 (2)) (Rule 143)  sentence made in public and in presence of the accused (art. 76 (4))

Thank You!