2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 Cul de Sac? PROGRAM REDUCTION AND DISCONTINUANCE Julie Bruno, Sierra College Sidney.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Advertisements

Strategies for developing and using Assessment Planning Templates.
Is budget driving curriculum? Faculty roles in program discontinuance and suspension Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Craig Rutan, Santiago Canyon College.
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges Vocational Education Leadership Institute – March 2007 Program Development, Reduction, and Review: Faculty.
Curriculum Concerns in Program Viability and Discontinuance Processes Julie Bruno, Sierra College, Facilitator Chris Hill, Grossmont College Summer 2011.
2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES: SLOs IN CORs? Kevin Bontenbal, Cuesta College Lesley Kawaguchi,
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 Program Review: Curriculum & Institutional Culture Julie Bruno, Sierra College David.
Structured Career Pathways Kris Costa Articulation Liaison Academic Senate for California Community Colleges Dr. Grant Goold American River College.
Adapted from a presentation by Mark Lieu Academic Senate for California Community Colleges - Leadership Institute 2006 Academic Senate for California Community.
Where is it Written? Ed. Code, Title 5, and Local Senates Dolores Davison, ASCCC Area B Representative Ginni May, ASCCC North Representative Faculty Leadership.
The Faculty Leadership Role on Accreditation Julie Bruno, Sierra College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College Chris Hill, Grossmont College Richard Mahon, Riverside.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
A Presentation to Early Childhood Educators Spring 2010 The Academic Senate + You.
2010 Faculty Leadership Institute Hot Topics Beth Smith, Treasurer Richard Mahon, Area D.
REPEATABILITY UPDATE CCC-PE SOUTH & NORTH MEETINGS &
Natural Lifecycle of a Program: Program Development Currency Updates and Discontinuance Nabil Abu-Ghazaleh, Pierce College Lesley Kawaguchi, Santa Monica.
1 Effective Senates: The Key Ingredients of Collegial Consultation Angelica Bangle, Chris Hill, Wheeler North, Beverly Reilly, Cheryl Stewart.
Hiring and Evaluation Processes: Building Future Successes Paul Starer and Lesley Kawaguchi Leadership Institute Hayes Mansion, San Jose, CA June 16, 2007.
Institutional Effectiveness &. Institutional Effectiveness & Strategic Planning IE & SP Committees have developed a new system that integrates these two.
 SACSCOC REAFFIRMATION FALL  OBJECTIVES: 1.List key facts related to the SACSCOC reaffirmation process. 2.Verbalize understanding of SACSCOC Principles.
A Proposed Accountability Framework for California Higher Education Recommendations from the Advisory Group November 4, 2003.
Jane Patton, President, ASCCC Lisa Legohn, LA Trade Tech.
+ Grow! Grow! Grow! … Shrink? Julie Bruno, Sierra College Lesley Kawaguchi, Santa Monica College Craig Rutan, Santiago Canyon College 2012 ASCCC Fall Plenary.
Accreditation Hot Topics Marcy Alancraig - Cabrillo College Janet Fulks - Bakersfield College.
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges ­– Leadership Institute 2008 Basics for Effective Senates Shaaron Vogel Wheeler North Academic Senate.
10/28/2015 The Latest Updates on Title 5 Issues and Compliant Degrees Janet Fulks, Curriculum Chair Randy Lawson, SACC co-chair CIO, Santa Monica College.
April 8, Agenda Charge of the Group SACS/QEP Update/Overview 5 th Year Interim Report Assigned Areas Next Steps.
What’s New with Curriculum? Julie Bruno, Sierra College Lesley Kawaguchi, Santa Monica College.
(Assessment). Mission, Vision, Goals PlanDoCheckAct Drill Down.. 2.
ACCREDITATION, SELF-STUDIES, AND FACULTY ROLES
Accreditation Kevin Bontenbol Julie Bruno Michelle Grimes-Hillman 1.
Program Vitality and Discontinuance Kevin Bontenbal, Cuesta College Don Gauthier, Los Angeles Valley College Paul Setziol, De Anza College Spring 2011.
The Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP). SACS Principles of Accreditation Integrity Quality Enhancement.
New Program Development Presented by: Lyla A Eddington, Ed.D. April 17, 2008.
Leadership 2007 HOT TOPICS Mark Wade Lieu Jane Patton ASCCC Leadership Institute 2007.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Berta Cuaron, CIO, Palomar College Kathy O’Connor, Faculty, Santa Barbara City College Beth Smith, Faculty, Grossmont College Phil Smith, Faculty, Sacramento.
GIVE YOUR CURRICULUM PROCESS A TUNE-UP: MAKING CURRICULUM PROCESSES EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT John Freitas, Los Angeles City College Michael Heumann, Imperial.
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
Budgets 101 – The Basics What is a budget? What is the faculty role in budgeting? What mandates a budget and the budget form? State and Local Budgets.
Closing the Loop: SLOs, GE SLOs, Assessment, Curriculum, Program Review, Planning, and Budgeting Marcy Alancraig, Cabrillo College Janet Fulks, Bakersfield.
2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 Curriculum, Budgets, and Enrollment Management Kevin Bontenbal, Cuesta College Ian.
CTE Strong Workforce Task Force Recommendation Implementation Grant Goold Julie Bruno John Stanskas Van Ton-Quinlivan Lynell Wiggins.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Writing and Revising SLOs with Best Practices in Mind
ASCCC 101 Julie Adams, Executive Director John Freitas, Treasurer
Local Senates and Boards
Creating and Revising Curriculum: The Role of Program Review
Curriculum & Accreditation: You Can Get There from Here
Curriculum and Accreditation
Curriculum and Accreditation
Regional Coordination
Wait. Where Does That Go Again
Critical Conversations for Educational Program Development
Accreditation and curriculum
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
Program Review Driving Curricular Revisions
Assigning Courses to Disciplines: Finding the Right Map
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Dolores Davison, ASCCC Secretary
Faculty Leadership and the Role of the ASCCC
Program Darwinism: The Evolution of Programs
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
Program Development, Reduction, and Review: Faculty Take the Lead
Program Discontinuance
Navigating the College Culture
Start with PROGRAM REVIEW
Inquiry into Effective Practices of SLO Assessment AScCC Educational policies committee Anna Bruzzese ASCCC South Representative; ASCCC Educational Policies.
Integrating Noncredit Faculty Into Collegial Governance
Presentation transcript:

2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 Cul de Sac? PROGRAM REDUCTION AND DISCONTINUANCE Julie Bruno, Sierra College Sidney Burks, Chaffey College Lesley Kawaguchi, Santa Monica College

Participant Learning Outcomes After attending this session, participants should be able to: – Distinguish between Program Review and Program Discontinance – Explain the principles and key components of a Program Discontinance Policy – Develop a principled Program Discontinance Policy

A PRINCIPLED VIEW AND THE ROLE OF THE CURRICULUM COMMITTEE

DEFINING PROGRAMS Title 5 §55000(g): An educational program is “an organized sequence of courses leading to a defined objective, a degree, a certificate, a diploma, a license, or transfer to another institution of higher learning.”

TITLE 5 §51022 Requires California community colleges to have policies for the establishment, modification, or discontinuance of courses or programs

TITLE 5 §78016 Requires that districts form advisory committees for vocational education [career technical education] programs.

Education Code Section Requires that occupational programs undergo a review every two years

EXAMINING PROGRAMS: PROCESSES 1. PROGRAM REVIEW: – Self Study: What the program is doing well The resources needed to improve, including the use of Student Learning Outcome assessment results to highlight needs – Opportunity to show program quality and success – Opportunity to build a plan of correction – The emphasis is on improvement

PROCESSES, continued 2. PROGRAM VIABILITY PROCESS: – EXAMPLE: Los Angeles Pierce College – See Curric2009.htm Curric2009.htm Two handouts under “Natural Lifecycle of a Program”

PROCESSES, continued 3. Program Vitality/Discontinuance Policy

PRINCIPLES TO CONSIDER ASCCC POSITION: – Discontinuance policy is “distinct” from program review – Include collective bargaining representative(s). – Focus on saving or improving a program – Local senate should take lead and process should be collegial – Curriculum should reflect the missions of the community colleges

GETTING A POLICY Curriculum Committee role

ELEMENTS TO CONSIDER

KEY COMPONENTS OF A PROGRAM DISCONTINUANCE POLICY WARNING: Do not write a policy during the current budget climate!

POLICY PURPOSE: Needs to be clearly stated

INDICATORS What conditions or events “trigger” a vitality or discontinuance review are identified, such as – Significant decline in enrollment – Significant facility and/or equipment issues – Availability of qualified faculty – Failure to meet state mandates or accreditation standards – Significant changes in the labor market – Program no longer supports existing fulltime faculty

CONSIDERATIONS Accreditation Standard II.A.6.b: – “When programs are eliminated or program requirements are significantly changed, the institution makes appropriate arrangements so that enrolled students may complete their education in a timely manner with a minimum of disruption.”

CONSIDERATIONS: Impact on students Impact on faculty Impact on community Impact on local/regional employers Keep in mind: Curriculum and the multiple CCC missions

DEFINE THE PROCESS Who initiates the process? What are the steps? Who has the input? Is there a timeline? What data do you need? How is the final decision made? How is shared governance addressed?

QUESTIONS?

Thank you! Please fill out the evaluation form!