Review of stochastic sources of gravitational radiation Carlo Ungarelli Physics Department University of Pisa GWADW06.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

Inspiraling Compact Objects: Detection Expectations
Jonathan Gair Graduate Seminar, St.Catharine’s College, 28 th November 2005 The Black Hole Symphony – listening to the Universe with gravitational waves.
LIGO Status and Advanced LIGO Plans Barry C Barish OSTP 1-Dec-04.
1 What can gravitational waves do to probe early cosmology? Barry C. Barish Caltech “Kavli-CERCA Conference on the Future of Cosmology” Case Western Reserve.
Primordial BHs. 2 Main reviews and articles astro-ph/ Primordial Black Holes - Recent Developments astro-ph/ Gamma Rays from Primordial.
The Strongly Relativistic Double Pulsar and LISA Vicky Kalogera Physics & Astronomy Dept with Chunglee Kim (NU) Duncan Lorimer (Manchester)
R. Frey Student Visit 1 Gravitational Waves, LIGO, and UO GW Physics LIGO
The Search for a Stochastic Background of Gravitational Radiation Part I Rosa M. Luna, D. Auzmus, M. Casquette, C.W. Torres, M.C. Diaz, J.D. Romano, and.
Teória relativity začiatok alebo koniec fyziky.
The Astrophysics of Gravitational Wave Sources Conference Summary: Ground-Based Detectors ( Hz) Kimberly New, LANL.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
Why search for GWs? New tests of general relativity Study known sources – potential new discoveries that are inaccessible using EM View the universe prior.
1 Circular Polarization of Gravitational Waves in String Cosmology MIAMI, 200 7 Jiro Soda Kyoto University work with Masaki Satoh & Sugumi Kanno.
Double NS: Detection Rate and Stochastic Background Tania Regimbau VIRGO/NICE.
Le Fond Gravitationnel Stochastique Tania Regimbau ARTEMIS - OCA.
Mock Data Production, Characteristics, and Confusion Background WG4 f2f – Nice 09/01/10 Tania Regimbau.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
TAMA binary inspiral event search Hideyuki Tagoshi (Osaka Univ., Japan) 3rd TAMA symposium, ICRR, 2/6/2003.
Astrophysical Sources of Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background Tania Regimbau CNRS/ARTEMIS GWDAW 12, Boston, Dec LIGO-G
1 Observable (?) cosmological signatures of superstrings in pre-big bang models of inflation Università degli Studi di Bari Facoltà di Scienze Matematiche,
High-Frequency GW Sources Bernard F Schutz Albert Einstein Institute – Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics, Golm, Germany and Cardiff University,
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
Double Compact Objects: Detection Expectations Vicky Kalogera Northwestern University with Chunglee Kim (NU) Duncan Lorimer (Manchester) Philippe Grandclement.
Binary Pulsar Coalescence Rates and Detection Rates for Gravitational Wave Detectors Chunglee Kim, Vassiliki Kalogera (Northwestern U.), and Duncan R.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
Double Compact Objects: Detection Expectations Vicky Kalogera Physics & Astronomy Dept Northwestern University with Chunglee Kim (NU) Duncan Lorimer (Manchester)
童明雷 中国科学院国家授时中心 Pulsar timing residuals induced by non-evolving single GW sources.
Gravitational Wave and Pulsar Timing Xiaopeng You, Jinlin Han, Dick Manchester National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
LIGO-G D Searching for Stochastic Background with LIGO: Results and Implications on Pre-Big-Bang Models Vuk Mandic Caltech LIGO Seminar, 12/06/05.
Expected Coalescence Rate of NS/NS Binaries for Ground Based Interferometers Tania Regimbau OCA/ARTEMIS on the behalf of J.A. de Freitas Pacheco, T. Regimbau,
Testing the slow roll inflation paradigm with the Big Bang Observer
1/26 Science case for AdV 1 st project review November 1 st, 2008 A.Viceré for the AdV Team‏
Stochastic Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves L P Grishchuk Cardiff University, UK Fujihara Seminar, Japan, May 28, 2009.
10/23/2006 Stefan Ballmer, Caltech G Stochastic Background of Gravitational Waves For the stochastic analysis group Stefan Ballmer California.
Astrophysics to be learned from observations of intermediate mass black hole in-spiral events Alberto Vecchio Making Waves with Intermediate Mass Black.
LIGO-G D Upper Limits on the Stochastic Background of Gravitational Waves from LIGO Vuk Mandic Einstein2005 Conference Paris, July
Science with DECIGO Naoki Seto (Kyoto U) The 1st International LISA-DECIGO.
A New Relativistic Binary Pulsar: Gravitational Wave Detection and Neutron Star Formation Vicky Kalogera Physics & Astronomy Dept with Chunglee Kim (NU)
Search for Stochastic Gravitational Waves with LIGO
Oct. 30, 2002Source Simulation & Data Analysis1 Gravitational-Wave Observations of Galactic Populations of Compact Binaries M. Benacquista Montana State.
Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.
LIGO G M Intro to LIGO Seismic Isolation Pre-bid meeting Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech Stanford, April 29, 2003.
Binary Compact Object Inspiral: Rate Expectations Vicky Kalogera with Chunglee Kim Richard O’Shaughnessy Tassos Fragkos Physics & Astronomy Dept.
October 17, 2003Globular Clusters and Gravitational Waves1 Gravitational Wave Observations of Globular Clusters M. Benacquista Montana State University-Billings.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
+ Quintessence and Gravitational Waves Peng Zhou, Daniel Chung UW-Madison Physics Dept.
What will it mean to be a gravitational wave astronomer? Alberto Vecchio Imaging the future: Gravitational wave astronomy Penn State 27 th – 30 th October,
APS Meeting April 2003 LIGO-G Z 1 Sources and Science with LIGO Data Jolien Creighton University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee On Behalf of the LIGO.
I was right! (again). Why study gravitational waves? Study known sources New tests of general relativity New sources? Potential new discoveries inaccessible.
Gravitational Wave Astronomy --The Dawn has Arrived!-- 1 Misao Sasaki Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics Kyoto University APCTP 25 March, 2016.
Mike Cruise University of Birmingham Searches for very high frequency gravitational waves.
LISA Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: The Mission Mike Cruise For the LISA Team.
Gravitational Waves What are they? How can they be detected?
The Quest for Gravitational Waves: a global strategy
The search for those elusive gravitational waves
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
Asantha Cooray (Caltech) Based on Seto & Cooray, PRL, astro-ph/
Cosmological Sources of Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background
GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves
Stochastic Background
Gravitational Wave Astronomy with a Radio Telescope
Gravitational wave detection and the quantum limit
Primordial BHs.
Albert Lazzarini California Institute of Technology
Stochastic gravitational wave and its spectral property
M. Benacquista Montana State University-Billings
Center for Gravitational Wave Physics Penn State University
Aerospace Research and Technology Centre, Barcellona - SPAIN
Primordial BHs.
Presentation transcript:

Review of stochastic sources of gravitational radiation Carlo Ungarelli Physics Department University of Pisa GWADW06

Outline  Introduction: general features  Cosmological (primordial) sources  Astrophysical sources (galactic and extragalactic)

Possible target of GW experiments Stochastic background of GW Random process, described only in terms of its statistical properties (isotropic, unpolarised, stationary, gaussian)  Primordial: Parametric amplification of vacuum fluctuations during inflation, phase transitions (QCD,EW), non-equilibrium processes (reheating..), topological defects phase transitions (QCD,EW), non-equilibrium processes (reheating..), topological defects  Astrophysical: Large populations of binary systems of compact objects (wd,ns,bh), hot, young rapidly spinning NS (r-modes)…

Characteristic frequencies of GW stochastic backgrounds (primordial) For relic gravitational waves, two features determine the tipical frequency: the dynamics of production mechanism (model dependent) and the kinematics (redshift from the production time) For a graviton produced at time t * with frequency f * during RD or MD epoch (Kamionkowski et al ‘94, Maggiore ‘00)

Phenomenological bounds BBN bound (Copi Schramm, Turner 97) COBE bound (Koranda, Turner 94) Msec pulsar bound (Thorsett, Dewey 96)

Production mechanisms and characteristic amplitudes of GW stochastic backgrounds (primordial) Amplification of vacuum fluctuations (Grishchuk ‘75; Starobinski ‘78…) Slow-roll inflation: almost flat spectrum (see e.g. Turner ’97) Pre-big-bang inflation (see e.g. Buonanno, Maggiore, U 97) EW first order phase transition (T * ~100GeV) In SM there is no first-order phase transition for m H > M W In MSSM there are possibilities (depending on m H ) but (Kosowsky,Turner 94; Kosowsky, Turner, Kamionkowski 94) In NMSSM (Apreda, Maggiore, Nicolis, Riotto, 01, Apreda 03) GW from cosmic turbolence Kosowsky et al, Apreda et al 01, dolgov et al ‘02 Gw from bubble collision in false vacuum inflation If phase transition occurs before the end of inflation (Baccigalupi et al, 97)

Detection of primordial backgrounds (I) Earth-based interferometers Design sensitivity of current Interferometers Second generation detectors [Advanced LIGO] 3 rd generation European Gravitational Observatory  String-inspired inflationary models (e.g. pre-big-bang) could be tested by second generation detectors (Allen, Brustein 97; U, Vecchio 99; Vuk, Buonanno ‘05) Warnings: the models do not provide reliable description of transition to post-big-bang era; the observability of GW spectrum depends on the detail of the transition ~f 3 (See e.g Allen, Romano ‘99)

Detection of primordial backgrounds(II) Space-based interferometers Astrophysical backgrounds Incoherent superposition of GW emitted by short-period, solar mass binary systems (WD,NS..) Galactic and extra-galactic contribution (Bender et al, 90,97; Postnov et al, Schneider et al 00)  The signal produced by the galactic background dominates the instrumental LISA noise ~ mHz

Stochastic backgrounds from Astrophysical Sources Cumulative GW signal due to the uncorrelated emission of populations of sources wd-wd Nelemans et al 2001 Bender et al 1991 rotating ns Postnov 1997 Giampieri 1997 only GW spin-down with E.M. losses Galactic backgrounds Amplitude modulation of the signal due to the anisotropic distribution of the emitting sources Can be used to identify sucb signals Giampieri, Polnarev’ 97; Giazzotto et al ‘97; U and Vecchio, ‘01 The signal produced is stochastic when (Ex. Galactic wd-wd) (Courtesy of R.Schneider)

Extragalactic backgrounds generated by all GW sources formed in the universe since the onset of star formation fundamental backgrounds limiting the sensitivity of GW instruments astrophysical foregrounds for primordial GW from the early universe astrophysical foregrounds for primordial GW from the early universe provides combined constraints on the star formation history provides combined constraints on the star formation history and GW source emission properties and GW source emission properties Realistic estimates require knowledge of the source formation rate individual emission properties “Recovered” Star formation history out to z~6 (~1 Gyr) (Nagamine et al ‘04) Additional information required: -stellar Initial Mass Function (black holes, neutron stars) -binary population synthesis code (initial masses, orbital separations, eccentricities)

Extragalactic backgrounds: present status Schneider, Matarrese, Ferrari ‘99, ‘01; Farmer, Phinney ‘03; Buonanno et al. ‘05 solid lines: Ferrari, Matarrese, Schneider 1999a Ferrari, Matarrese, Schneider 1999b Schneider, Ferrari, Matarrese, Portegies Zwart 2001 Farmer & Phinney 2002 Buonanno et al 2005 Signals from core-collapse SNe are uncertain by orders of magnitudes Background limits instrumental sensitivity delayed Sn1a explosions detectable with cross-correlation do not limit the sensitivity of ground-based interferometers WD-WD NS-NS (Courtesy of R. Schneider)