Model Comparison and Evaluation Studies Tal Ezer (with H. Arango & A. Shchepetkin) TOMS Inaugural Meeting, NCAR, Aug. 23, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Computation of High-Resolution Global Ocean Model using Earth Simulator By Norikazu Nakashiki (CRIEPI) Yoshikatsu Yoshida (CRIEPI) Takaki Tsubono (CRIEPI)
Advertisements

Numerical simulation of internal tides in the Sicily and Messina Straits Jihene Abdennadher and Moncef Boukthir Institut Preparatoire aux Etudes d’Ingenieur.
ROMS effective resolution
Assimilation of Sea Surface Temperature into a Northwest Pacific Ocean Model using an Ensemble Kalman Filter B.-J. Choi Kunsan National University, Korea.
HYCOM and the need for overflow/entrainment parameterizations.
Patrick Marchesiello Brest, 13 Janvier 2005 Le modèle ROMS et son utilisation sur NYMPHEA Centre IRD de Bretagne.
Ocean-atmosphere simulations of the Eastern Mediterranean using COAMPS TM /NCOM Objectives  Simulate Mediterranean and subregional (e.g., Adriatic and.
ROMS/TOMS Tangent Linear and Adjoint Models Andrew Moore, CU Hernan Arango, Rutgers U Arthur Miller, Bruce Cornuelle, Emanuele Di Lorenzo, Doug Neilson.
Hydrostatic Correction for Terrain-Following Ocean Models Peter C Chu and Chenwu Fan Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California 2003 Terrain-Following.
2005 ROMS Users Meeting Monday, October 24, 2005 Coupled sea-ice/ocean numerical simulations of the Bering Sea for the period 1996-present Enrique Curchitser.
HOW AESOP GOT A SUNTAN A fractured fairy tale (with apologies to the producers of the Rocky and Bullwinkle show) The cast of this episode: Oliver Fringer.
Vertical Mixing Parameterizations and their effects on the skill of Baroclinic Tidal Modeling Robin Robertson Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia.
On mixing and advection in the BBL and how they are affected by the model grid: Sensitivity studies with a generalized coordinate ocean model Tal Ezer.
Overview of ROMS features (numerics and boundary layer parameterizations) ROMS developments: boundary layers, data assimilation, nesting, Prototype model.
Community Terrain-Following Ocean Modeling System (TOMS) An overview of the collaboration between the modeling communities of Princeton (Ezer) and Rutgers.
Institute of Oceanogphy Gdańsk University Jan Jędrasik The Hydrodynamic Model of the Southern Baltic Sea.
Non-hydrostatic algorithm and dynamics in ROMS Yuliya Kanarska, Alexander Shchepetkin, Alexander Shchepetkin, James C. McWilliams, IGPP, UCLA.
A Finite Volume Coastal Ocean Model Peter C Chu and Chenwu Fan Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California, USA.
SELFE: Semi-implicit Eularian- Lagrangian finite element model for cross scale ocean circulation Paper by Yinglong Zhang and Antonio Baptista Presentation.
Japan/East Sea Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) Patrick J. Hogan and Harley E. Hurlburt Naval Research Laboratory, Code 7323, Stennis Space Center,
University of Veszprém Department of Image Processing and Neurocomputing Emulated Digital CNN-UM Implementation of a 3-dimensional Ocean Model on FPGAs.
About the advantages of vertically adaptive coordinates in numerical models of stratified shelf seas Hans Burchard 1, Ulf Gräwe 1, Richard Hofmeister 2,
Most physically significant large-scale atmospheric circulations have time scales on the order of Rossby waves but much larger than the time scales.
– Equations / variables – Vertical coordinate – Terrain representation – Grid staggering – Time integration scheme – Advection scheme – Boundary conditions.
1.Introduction 2.Description of model 3.Experimental design 4.Ocean ciruculation on an aquaplanet represented in the model depth latitude depth latitude.
Implementation of an Advection Scheme based on Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) in the MesoNH The main goal of this study was to estimate if the RGSW model.
Initial Progress on HYCOM Nested West Florida Shelf Simulations George Halliwell MPO/RSMAS, University of Miami.
Hernan G. Arango, Rutgers University Tal Ezer, Pricenton University FTP File: TOMS.tar A Community.
Hans Burchard Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde How to make a three-dimensional numerical model that.
Applied NWP [1.2] “Once the initialization problem was resolved in the 1960s, models based on the primitive equations gradually supplanted those based.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Atmosphere at rest experiments with the latest COSMO version.
Sensitivity Studies Using Nested HYCOM Models 2004 Layered Ocean Model Users’ Workshop February 9-11, 2004 RSMAS, Miami, FL Patrick Hogan Luis Zamudio.
High-resolution 3D modelling of oceanic fine structures using vertically adaptive coordinates Hans Burchard 1, Ulf Gräwe 1, Richard Hofmeister 2, Peter.
Numerical simulations of inertia-gravity waves and hydrostatic mountain waves using EULAG model Bogdan Rosa, Marcin Kurowski, Zbigniew Piotrowski and Michał.
Application of ROMS for the Spencer Gulf and on the adjacent shelf of South Australia Carlos Teixeira & SARDI Oceanography Group Aquatic Sciences 2009.
Implementation of Grid Adaptation in CAM: Comparison of Dynamic Cores Babatunde J. Abiodun 1,2 William J. Gutowski 1, and Joseph M. Prusa 1,3 1 Iowa State.
Model Formulation, Numerics and Approximations. Vertical coordinates for climate? What are the remaining liabilities or challenges with z, z*, p, p*,
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Status of the COSMO-1 configuration at MeteoSwiss Guy.
Comparisons of Numerical Aspects in POM and ROMS Tal Ezer Princeton University (in collaboration with H. Arango (Rutgers) & A. Shchepetkin (UCLA); Supported.
Sea ice modeling at met.no Keguang Wang Norwegian Meteorological Institute.
Permanent Meanders in the California Current System and Comparison of Near- Surface Observations with OGCM Solutions Luca Centurioni (SIO-PORD) Collaborators:
CHANGSHENG CHEN, HEDONG LIU, And ROBERT C. BEARDSLEY
Hernan G. Arango, Rutgers University Tal Ezer, Pricenton University FTP File: TOMS.tar A Community.
NUMERICAL STUDY OF THE MEDITERRANEAN OUTFLOW WITH A SIMPLIFIED TOPOGRAPHY Sergio Ramírez-Garrido, Jordi Solé, Antonio García-Olivares, Josep L. Pelegrí.
By S.-K. Lee (CIMAS/UM), D. Enfield (AOML/NOAA), C. Wang (AOML/NOAA), and G. Halliwell Jr. (RSMAS/UM) Objectives: (1)To assess the appropriateness of commonly.
Module 6 MM5: Overview William J. Gutowski, Jr. Iowa State University.
Numerical Algorithm Development and Testing in HYCOM.
Assessment of a wetting and drying scheme in the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) Sébastien DENNEULIN Eric Chassignet, Flavien Gouillon, Alexandra.
Assessment of a wetting and drying scheme in the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) Sébastien DENNEULIN Summer 2007 Internship at COAPS Eric Chassignet,
Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center Modifications of the MICOM version used in the Bergen Climate Model Mats Bentsen and Helge Drange Nansen.
Evaluation of Upper Ocean Mixing Parameterizations S. Daniel Jacob 1, Lynn K. Shay 2 and George R. Halliwell 2 1 GEST, UMBC/ NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Status of the COSMO-1 configuration at MeteoSwiss Guy.
Some preliminary FIM results DCMIP workshop July/August 2012 Boulder, CO.
15 Annual AOMIP Meeting. WHOI, 1- 4 November 2011 Numerical modeling of the Atlantic Water distribution in the upper Arctic Ocean: Sensitivity studies.
An oceanographic assessment of the GOCE geoid models accuracy S. Mulet 1, M-H. Rio 1, P. Knudsen 2, F. Siegesmund 3, R. Bingham 4, O. Andersen 2, D. Stammer.
Impacts of Vertical Momentum Mixing in an Arctic Ocean Model Youyu Lu 1, Greg Holloway 2, Ji Lei 1 1 Bedford Institute of Oceanography 2 Institute of Ocean.
Coupling ROMS and CSIM in the Okhotsk Sea Rebecca Zanzig University of Washington November 7, 2006.
Operational COSMO of MeteoSwiss
Development of nonhydrostatic models at the JMA
ROMS Framework: Kernel
Review of conservation equations State, Mass and Momentum
Harvard Ocean Prediction System (HOPS)
Unit 6 – Part I: Geostrophy
Accurate calculation of pressure forces using steeply sloping coordinates Mike Bell, Dave Storkey (Met Office), Darren Engwirda (NASA) Figure 2: The net.
Terrain-following coordinates over steep and high orography
Bogdan Rosa1, Marcin Kurowski1, Damian Wójcik1,
Topographic Effects on Typhoon Toraji (2001)
Parameterizing Vertical Mixing in the Coastal Ocean
System A Community Terrain-Following Ocean Modeling
  Robin Robertson Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Presentation transcript:

Model Comparison and Evaluation Studies Tal Ezer (with H. Arango & A. Shchepetkin) TOMS Inaugural Meeting, NCAR, Aug. 23, 2001

Goal: to evaluate and test new numerical elements in terrain-following ocean models. Goal: to evaluate and test new numerical elements in terrain-following ocean models. Why: to help developers in improving codes and users in selecting options and parameterizations. Why: to help developers in improving codes and users in selecting options and parameterizations. How: by comparing different schemes and parameterizations in POM and ROMS/TOMS. How: by comparing different schemes and parameterizations in POM and ROMS/TOMS. Criteria: numerical errors, accuracy, stability, compatibility between schemes, computational cost. Criteria: numerical errors, accuracy, stability, compatibility between schemes, computational cost.

Tested Elements Advection schemes Advection schemes Time stepping algorithms Time stepping algorithms Pressure gradient schemes Pressure gradient schemes Others Others

Seamount configuration test Very steep case h=4050m, w=50km s=0.36, r=14.2 moderately steep h=2700m, w=100km s=0.07, r=2.7 S=max(  H/2H) r=max(  grid=(64x64x20),  x=8km

Zonal flow Topography Sea surface height Topography Sea surface height -50cm 0 +50cm

Effect of advection scheme on model: Surface elevation anomaly ADV4- 4 th ord. cnt. ADV2- 2 nd ord. cnt. ADV3- 3rd ord. upst. POMROMS

Time-stepping schemes (split mode: baroclinic/internal and barotropic/external) POMROMS schemeLeap-FrogPredictor-Corrector Time-splitting filter Weights: (n-1, n, n+1) Asselin (  Adams-Moulton (-1/12, 2/3, 5/12) Internal-externalCoupling Once every internal time step Weighted, every external time step

Coupling of barotropic (external) and baroclinic (internal) modes in ROMS DTI  U n+1 =   a m  U m  U n+½ =  b m’  U m’ DTE weights 1<m<N, N=DTI/DTE

Sensitivity to internal (DTI) & external (DTE) time steps DTI DTIDTE180s360s540s720s900s1080s 8s s s s s s s DTE180s360s540s720s900s1080s8s s s s ROMS POM UNSTABLE STABLE TDI/DTE CFL=13s

Computational cost for different models & parameterizations model modelfeatures CPU (ms)/ (Im*Jm*Km*n) CPU (s)/ 1 day 2 nd order cent. advection nd order upstream adv. Lin et al. (1994) 13.2 POM 3 rd order upstream adv. Smolarkiewicz (1984) th order PG (CPP) Chu & Fan (1998) Z-lev. Interp. PG scheme Kliem & Pietrzak (1999) nd order cent. Adv ROMS 4 th order cent. Adv rd order upstream adv. 20.0

The adjustment process in POM and ROMS: forced case (zonal flow)

Roms- sensitivity of adjustment proces to time step choices DTE=12s DTE=24s DTI=360s DTI=720s

Pressure Gradient Schemes SchemeTypeReference POM-DJ Standard Density Jacobian scheme Mellor et al. (1998) POM-CCD Combined Compact Difference scheme (6 th ) Chu & Fan (1997) ROMS-FPJ Finite-Volume Pressure Jacobian scheme Lin (1997) ROMS-DJ Weighted Density Jacobian scheme (  0) Song (1998) ROMS-WDJ Weighted Density Jacobian scheme (  0.125) Song (1998) ROMS-PJQ Pressure Jacobian scheme with Quadratic Polynomial fit Shchepetkin & McWilliams (2001) ROMS-DJC Density Jacobian scheme with Cubic Polynomial fit Shchepetkin & McWilliams (2001)

Structure of  V (cm/s) in ROMS for different PG schemes (medium seamount case) R-DJ (Vmax=3.7) R-WDJ (Vmax=0.3) R-FPJ (Vmax=30) R-PJQ (Vmax=0.03) R-DJC (Vmax=0.06)

PG errors- moderately steep seamount

More model elements and schemes need to be tested Boundary conditions Boundary conditions Data assimilation Data assimilation Nesting and air-sea coupling Nesting and air-sea coupling Horizontal and vertical mixing schemes Horizontal and vertical mixing schemes Generalized coordinate system: comparisons between sigma, z-level & isopycnal grids. Generalized coordinate system: comparisons between sigma, z-level & isopycnal grids.