Dispute Resolution Mechanism International Seminar – TDSAT Hotel Imperial – 29 Oct 2004 New Delhi EVOLVING SCENARIO IN THE TELECOM SECTOR ITS IMPACT &

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Forum for Europe Broadband: A Pillar of Social and Economic Development 6-7 September 2012 Sheraton Hotel, Tirana Sofie Maddens Toscano ITU Expert.
Advertisements

SADC Forum on Analogue to Digital Migration Workshop Present Emerging and Future Broadband Technologies and potential uses 27 – 31 August, Mozambique 2012.
POLICIES GOVERNING TELECOM SECTOR THE FIRST ATTEMPT TO FORMALIZE A POLICY STATEMENT WAS MADE IN 1994 WHEN THE NATIONAL TELECOM POLICY 1994 (NTP 94)
TWO DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA GOVERN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SECTOR AND THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECTOR THESE TWO DEPARTMENTS.
Consumer Disputes Settlement under Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 Presentation by: Madhav Joshi Chief Legal Officer Tata Teleservices.
Amrit Lal Saha, Advocate Gauhati High Court President, Consumers’ Protection Association, Agartala (Member CAG registered with TRAI) Vice Chairperson,
Regulation and Investment Case Study of the Indian Telecommunications Industry Payal Malik.
THE RIGHT TO CHOICE NATIONAL CONCLAVE ON CONSUMER ISSUES, NEW DELHI, OCT. 12, 2012.
“Status of Dispute Settlement Mechanism in the Telecom Sectors in India” 20 th October, 2007 Srinagar Presentation by Kuldeep Goyal CMD BSNL.
Historical Perspective of Regulations under TRAI Act 1997 and Future Trends K.Sridhara Member (T), TC.
OVERVIEW OF TELECOM SCENARIO IN INDIA including rapidly changing technology in the telecom K. Sridhara Member (Technology) Department of Telecom TDSAT.
Folie 1 Telecommunications Regulatory Policy Dr. Iris Henseler-Unger, Vice-President Regulierungsbehörde für Telekommunikation und Post ITS Conference.
1 New European Directives : n Impact on regulation : New legal approach n Impact on market Stimulation of network and service- investment ?
Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Telecom Sector BSNL Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Telecom Sector A Management Perspective K.Sridhara,CGM,TN Telecom Circle.
International Perspectives New Zealand’s Radiocommunications Act Review.
Click to edit Master title style The only time a Tata phone won’t be accessible. Please switch off your mobile phones during presentations. Be safe and.
Cable TV Industry – INDIA
“Status of Dispute Settlement Mechanism in the Telecom Sector in India” 24 th March, 2007 Ahmedabad Presentation by A.K. Sinha CMD BSNL.
TDSAT Seminar- Guwahati, Dec of 15 Status of Disputes Settlement Mechanism in Telecom & Broadcasting Sectors in India Association of Unified Telecom.
Dispute Resolution Mechanism in Telecom Sector in India MTNL Mumbai.
7/6/20041 The Jamaican Bar Association Continuing Legal Education Seminar Internet Access – Legal and Regulatory Issues The Jamaican Bar Association Continuing.
MANJUL BAJPAI AHMEDABAD STATUS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS IN INDIA.
MANJUL BAJPAI GOA EVOLUTION OF JUDICIAL MECHANISM IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS IN INDIA.
Telecom Reforms: Achieving Higher Growth ASSOCHAM Interaction with TRAI on New Policy Initiatives 18 Oct 2004: New Delhi S C Khanna Secretary General Association.
Association of Basic Telecom Operators welcomes H.E. Ambassador David Gross, US Coordinator for International Communications & Information Policy; Mr Michael.
Implementation of EU Electronic Communication Directives.
CONSUMER RIGHTS UNDER TRAI ACT, 1997 TDSAT SEMINAR, BOMBAY 25 TH SEPTEMBER, 2004 RAMJI SRINIVASAN.
Universality of Infrastructure Services-Legal, Policy and Regulatory Framework (Telecom) Mohit Saraf Partner Luthra and Luthra Law Offices TERI REGIONAL.
The New EU Directives Oftel Forum 25/04/02 Heather Clayton.
CANTO 24th Annual Seminar Enhancing competitiveness in the Caribbean through the harmonization of ICT policies, legislation and regulation Bahamas, July.
Wednesday, 8 September 2004 The health and wealth of the internet industry ivo vegter ict journalist.
Creating Business Advantage with IT Chapter 1. Technological Changes The Internet and broadband networks The World Wide Web and high-performance Servers.
TDSAT SEMINAR Chennai 30 th August 2008 “Dispute Resolution Scenario in Telecom and Broadcasting Sector” Venue : Hotel Park Sheraton.
Slide 1.2 Introduction to Department of Telecommunications: Telecommunication services started in India in the year 1851 with the First Electric telegraph.
Jump to first page MANJUL BAJPAI M U M B A I – DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM SECTOR IN INDIA.
Internet Policy Day 3 - Workshop Session No. 5 The impact of telecomms regulation Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
Regulatory Framework & Dispute Resolution in the Telecom Sector By Mr. S C Khanna Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India 14 th May,
TDSAT Seminar 20 January 2008 Kolkata, India Settlement of Disputes & Protection of Consumer Rights by RAMJI SRINIVASAN Advocate.
TDSAT INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON DISPUTE RESOLUTION October 2004 New Delhi, India Susan Schorr, Regulatory Officer Telecommunication Development Bureau.
Presentation By R K Arnold I.T.S. Secretary, TRAI TDSAT Seminar, Chennai on Dispute Resolution in Telecom.
1 MTN PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS Hearings on Telecoms Policy Directions 3 April 2001 Irene Charnley – Chairperson, M-Cell.
Economic benefits and implications in investing and deploying new technologies - Bridging Digital Divide with Mobility Dr. Walid Moneimne SVP, Nokia Networks.
Status of Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Telecom and Broadcasting Sectors in India 25 th November 2006 Asim Abbas, Vice President (legal), Bharti Airtel.
1 Pre-Independence Laws: PRIVATE CAPITAL Constitution (1950); IDR Act (1951); IPR (1956); MRTP Act, 1969; State Ownership Reserved Lists & Licensing Post.
Consumer Rights under Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 & Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – a Background Analysis.
Issues in Regulation Presentation by: Gajendra Haldea New Delhi, December 5, 2006.
Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 3: Competition Copyright © 2007.
MANJUL BAJPAI AHMEDABAD – “REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN TELECOM, BROADCASTING AND CABLE SERVICE SECTORS”
Panel Discussion on “Status of Dispute Settlement Mechanism in the Telecom, Broadcasting and Cable Sectors in India” 18 th December 2005 Presentation by.
Telecom scenario in India D.Ismail,SDE/RTTC.. 20 years Back In India DOT was the Only One Service Provider-On service-Land lines(Roll 1) Based on.
_______________ R ORY M ACMILLAN Legal Mediation Rory Macmillan Telecom Sector Dispute Resolution: Alternative.
1 Convergence Bill Department of Communications Director- General: Lyndall Shope- Mafole 2005.
MANJUL BAJPAI Mumbai – “DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS”
Canadian Economy & the National Policy. Define Economy: Brainstorm some ideas…
State Regulation in the Natural Monopoly Sphere Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Regulation of Natural Monopolies ALMATY – 2006.
Dispute Settlement Scenario in Telecom Sector By S C Khanna Secretary General Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India 15 th May 2010.
Liberalisation and regulation in the telecommunication sector: Theory and empirical evidence Week 3 The European Regulatory Framework for the Telecommunication.
NEXT-GENERATION REGULATION OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS
MANJUL BAJPAI Lucknow –
MANJUL BAJPAI CHANDIGARH –
Regulatory Adjudication in Resolution of Disputes
DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCENARIO IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS
International Distribution Institute
Adjudication, Regulation, Telecommunication
SACF Comments on the ECA Amendment Bill B
Presentation on Legislative Framework & Licensing
PC ON TELECOMMUNICATION & POSTAL SERVICES
EMPOWERING THE ICT SECTOR FOR CHANGE
MTN SUBMISSION ON THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMENDMENT BILL
Presentation transcript:

Dispute Resolution Mechanism International Seminar – TDSAT Hotel Imperial – 29 Oct 2004 New Delhi EVOLVING SCENARIO IN THE TELECOM SECTOR ITS IMPACT & EFFICACY OF THE RESPONSE SYSTEM BY RAMJI SRINIVASAN

-Evolving Scenario in the Sector -Its Impact on Nature of Disputes -Efficacy of the Response System

Evolving Scenario in the Sector CRYSTAL BALL GAZING A Look at the Past & A Peep into the Future*

TODAY’s Economy is heading towards what is called 21 CN economy (Converged Networks)

SEVEN FORCES that are changing the World 1. Moore’s Law 1. Moore’s Law 2. The Digital World 2. The Digital World 3. Miniaturisation 3. Miniaturisation 4. Decreasing Costs 4. Decreasing Costs 5. Wireless Evolution 5. Wireless Evolution 6. Internet 6. Internet 7. Convergence 7. Convergence wayfinding.net wayfinding.net

All SEVEN forces add upto ONE TECHNOLOGY The Biggest Catalyst

II. Impact on Nature of Disputes Impact on POLICY Impact on POLICY Impact on REGULATION Impact on REGULATION Impact on DISPUTE RESOLUTION Impact on DISPUTE RESOLUTION *

POLICY Pre NTP Pre NTP NTP 94 NTP 94 NTP 99 NTP 99 NTP Amendment 2003 NTP Amendment 2003

REGULATION Licences u/s 4 - Indian Telegraph Act 1885 Licences u/s 4 - Indian Telegraph Act Ordinances 1996 Ordinances 1997 TRAI Act 1997 TRAI Act 2000 TRAI Amendment 2000 TRAI Amendment 2002 Attempted Convergence Bill 2002 Attempted Convergence Bill

DISPUTE RESOLUTION High Court High Court TRAI – Old section 14 TRAI – Old section 14 TDSAT – 2000 Amendment ( ) TDSAT – 2000 Amendment ( )  Limited exceptions: MRTPMRTP CPA –IndividualCPA –Individual 7-B, ITA – Statutory Arbitration7-B, ITA – Statutory Arbitration

Nature of Disputes Ever changing Ever changing Cycle of disputes Cycle of disputes Policy-Incumbent-Competition-Policy Policy-Incumbent-Competition-Policy

Nature of Disputes Policy & Licence: Policy & Licence:  WLL  Level Playing Field  Refund of Fees & Interest  AGR Definition  Migration Package  Taxes etc.

Nature of Disputes Incumbent: Incumbent:  INTERCONNECTION  IN Services  UNBUNDLING  Accounting Separation  PREDATORY PRICING

Nature of Disputes Competition: Competition:  Allocation of Spectrum  Unfair Trade Practices  Entry Barriers  Signals Interference etc.

EFFICACY of RESPONSE * Flexible & Responsive instead of Rigid & Technical Function is to Regulate and Not only Adjudicate

EFFICACY & EXPECTATIONS Not looking for a mere substitute to the High Court Not looking for a mere substitute to the High Court But an Adjudicator and Regulator rolled in one But an Adjudicator and Regulator rolled in one Where even Policy & Licence & Regulations keep changing with times Where even Policy & Licence & Regulations keep changing with times TDSAT should be able to mould relief TDSAT should be able to mould relief

Hope this helps ! Thanks Ramji Srinivasan