Open Meetings Act Basic Training Jennie Hoelscher Division Chief Opinion Committee Charlotte Harper Deputy Division Chief Opinion Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nevada Open Meeting Law
Advertisements

South Dakota Office of the Attorney General Bethanna Feist Assistant Attorney General Consumer Protection Division.
Through 2008 Season Barry Bonds 762 Home Runs Roger Clemens 354 Wins Alex Rodriguez 553 Home Runs.
Lisa Endres General Counsel Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Fundamentals of the Brown Act Student Governing Bodies Presented by the Office of General Counsel April 2010.
A Baker’s Dozen: 13 Issues Regarding the Open Meetings Law 2004 IARC Staff Retreat May 14, 2004 Ames, IA David Vestal General Counsel Iowa State Association.
School Councils Conducting Public School Business in Public Public School Business in Public Presented by Samuel E. Brown, TUSD Staff Attorney.
Meeting in Vermont Vermont Department of Libraries.
Open Meetings Briefing for Public Body Chairpersons Presented by the Office of the University Attorney Fall 2001.
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association December 9, 2005 (revised January 4, 2006)
North Dakota Open Records & Meetings Law Government in the Sunshine.
The Texas Open Meetings Act Texas Municipal League.
Common Sense Approach to Wisconsin Open Meetings Law.
Sunshine Laws Sunshine laws Open Meetings law Public Records Law.
Arkansas Conservation Districts Training Program Power Point 7 Freedom of Information Act Open Meetings/Open Records.
Michigan Department of Attorney General Open Meetings & Freedom of Information Acts Seminar.
NRS Chapter 241 OPEN MEETING LAW. Legislative Intent  All public bodies exist to aid in the conduct of the people’s business.  Deliberations must be.
OPEN MEETING LAW GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER 39, SECTIONS 23A-D.
By Bob Bass Allison, Bass & Associates, LLP
CHANGES TO THE OPEN MEETING LAW Prepared and presented by: Brian W. Riley, Esq. Kopelman and Paige, P.C.
The Open Meetings Act The Open Meetings Act W.S et. seq.
1 THE KENTUCKY OPEN MEETINGS ACT KRS – [T]he basic policy of KRS to is that the formation of public policy is public business.
The Indiana Open Door Law (ODL) “…It is the intent of this chapter that the official action of public agencies be conducted and taken openly, unless otherwise.
Open and Public Meetings Act Training Revised 1/12.
OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT Eva Rooks, MA Health Services Administrator/Trainer Health Systems Quality Assurance Division Washington State Department of Health.
PUBLIC MEETING LAW Clackamas County Counsel Steven Lounsbury.
Public Review Committee Linda Sullivan-Colglazier Assistant Attorney General July 28, 2011.
Consolidation Commission Training Session Board of County Commissioners Chambers April 6, 2005.
1 THE BROWN ACT CA Gov’t. Code Section et. seq. Office of the County Counsel.
Indiana’s Open Door Law Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Presented to Fort Wayne Housing Authority Fort Wayne Housing Authority Board.
The Basics of Open Meetings Office of the Attorney General Mary Kae Kelsch.
Knowing When and How the Public Gets a Seat at the Table.
OPEN MEETINGS ACT General Provisions Article, Sections through 3-501, Annotated Code of Maryland 1.
Government Code Sections – Purpose Sunshine provision The Legislature envisioned that an additional seat on the board is reserved for the.
When Can You Redact Information Without Requesting an Attorney General Decision? Karen Hattaway Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division Views.
Government Data Practices and the Open Meeting Law August 2014.
Westlake Charter School Annual Brown Act Training Presented by: Lisa A. Corr, Esq. Website:
Texas Open Meetings Act Documents at Meetings What are the Rules? Becky P. Casares Assistant Attorney General Opinion Committee.
THE RALPH M. BROWN ACT Cal. Gov’t Code § et seq. Presented to the First 5 Commission San Mateo County Monali S. Sheth, Deputy Office of the County.
Indiana’s Public Access Laws Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Indiana Association of Cities and Towns Red Flag and Sunshine Workshop.
Utah’s Open Meetings Act. Declaration of Public Policy The Legislature finds and declares that the state, its agencies and political subdivisions exist.
Open Meetings Law Office of Charter Schools Cande Honeycutt Education Consultant January 2016.
Ann MacNeille Assistant Attorney General Maryland Attorney General’s Office Counsel, Open Meetings Compliance Board John S.
Results. Relationships. Reputation. Legal and Policy Elements to Community Planning and Zoning – Open Meeting Law Christopher A. Schmaltz Gust Rosenfeld,
Citizens’ Aide/Ombudsman Office Overview Open Meetings Law Presented by: Angela McBride Assistant Ombudsman for Public Records, Open Meetings, and Privacy.
Lawrence J. Bohlen Manager Member Services & Education Local Government Insurance Trust __________________________________ MACO Winter Conference January.
COUNTY COUNSEL Brown Act Public Records Act Presenter: Janice D. Killion Public Records Act – Ethics – Conflicts of Interest.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
1 Brown Act Workshop  Seal Beach City Council Craig Steele, City Attorney May 9, 2016.
ILLINOIS OPEN MEETINGS ACT TRAINING Prepared by: Michelle L. Masoncup, Deputy City Attorney Presentation Date: November 12, 2014.
Open Government 101: The Texas Open Meetings Act
Ian Marquand Montana Board of Medical Examiners
Utah’s Open Meetings Act
MEETING SCENARIOS April 18, 2017
Monique Coady, Assistant City Attorney
Complying with Maryland’s Open Meetings Act
The Open Meetings Act W.S et. seq
Citizens of the World Los Angeles
OPEN GOVERNMENTAL PROCEEDINGS ACT April 18, 2017
The Open Meetings Act W.S et. seq
MEETINGS Seth Grigg – IAC Executive Director
West Virginia Economic Development Council Open Meetings Act Training 2018 Derek Knopp Staff Attorney West Virginia Ethics Commission.
Paula Steffen Moeller, Ed.D.
LCAP Committee – September 28, 2017
OPEN GOVERNMENTAL PROCEEDINGS ACT April 18, 2017
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
III. Government Transparency Laws
Texas Open Meetings Act – What CAN I Do?
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
Florida’s Sunshine Law and the Council & Boards
Presentation transcript:

Open Meetings Act Basic Training Jennie Hoelscher Division Chief Opinion Committee Charlotte Harper Deputy Division Chief Opinion Committee

 Training is required for each elected or appointed public official who is a member of a governmental body.  A governmental body must maintain and make available for public inspection the record of its members’ completion of the training. Required Training

Today’s Goal

 Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code  Office of the Attorney General’s Open Meetings Act Handbook, available on-line at: openmeeting_hb.pdf Open Meetings Act Resources

 Every regular, special, or called meeting of a governmental body shall be open to the public, except as provided by the Act. Tex. Gov’t Code § Basic Rule of the Open Meetings Act

 The purpose of the Act is to safeguard the public’s interest in knowing the workings of its governmental bodies.  The public interest is “not only to know what government decides but to observe how and why every decision is reached.” Purpose of the Open Meetings Act

 To whom and when the Act applies  Notice requirements  How to conduct open meetings  When closed sessions are permissible and how they must be conducted  Penalties and remedies under the Act Today’s Agenda

 The Act generally applies whenever there is: A governmental body, and That body is meeting. Applicability of the Open Meetings Act

 State agencies, boards, commissions, committees, or departments  County commissioners courts, city councils, school boards, special district boards, and deliberative bodies with rulemaking or quasi-judicial authority  Local workforce development boards  Certain nonprofit corporations and property owners’ associations Applicability: The Act’s Definition of “Governmental Body”

 Committees, subcommittees, or separate entities that have been delegated decision-making authority  Other governmental bodies made subject to the Act by a law outside of the Act, a rule, or a local ordinance Applicability: Governmental Bodies Subject to the Act

 Generally, the Act applies whenever a quorum of a governmental body meets.  A quorum is a majority of the governing body, unless otherwise defined by law. Applicability: Quorum

 If our board has 9 positions, but only 7 are filled, and 5 of the 7 members attend a meeting, do we have a quorum?  A city council has 7 positions, but 5 officials are removed at a recall election. Can the city council act with the two remaining officials? Hypo: Do we have a quorum?

 Even if a quorum is not present, the Act also applies when: There is a meeting of a committee or subcommittee with authority to supervise public business; or Members of the governmental body conspire to circumvent the Act. Applicability: No Quorum

 “A member or group of members of a governmental body commits an offense if the member or group of members knowingly conspires to circumvent [the Act] by meeting in numbers less than a quorum for the purpose of secret deliberations in violation of [the Act].” Tex. Gov’t Code§ Applicability: Walking Quorums

 An eleven-member city council works on city budget amendments together in discussions over the telephone and in the Mayor’s office. To avoid implicating the OMA, the city manager ensures that at no time are there more than five members engaged in the discussion. At the end of the evening, all members of the city council sign a memo outlining the agreed-upon budget changes. Hypo: Have we conspired to circumvent the Act?

 The definition of “meeting” requires: A gathering of a quorum of the governmental body; and  Deliberation about the governmental body’s public business or formal action taken by the governmental body, or  An opportunity for members to ask, speak or listen to matters relating to public business. Applicability: Definition of a “Meeting”

 A gathering of a quorum at a: Social function Convention or workshop Ceremonial event, or Press conference  Is not a meeting, provided: No formal action is taken, and Any discussion of public business is incidental to the authorized event Applicability: Exceptions

 Written notice must include the: Date Hour Place Subjects to be considered Notice: Content

City Council Meeting December 17, :00 p.m. Mayor’s Report Old Business Personnel Matters Public Comment Hypo: What is wrong with this notice?

 Political subdivisions must generally post notice 72 hours before a meeting.  Governmental bodies with statewide jurisdiction must generally post notice 7 days prior to a meeting.  In emergencies, notice must be posted 2 hours before the meeting. Notice: Deadlines for Posting

 Sections – provide detailed posting requirements for state entities, counties, cities, school districts and other districts and political subdivisions, which vary depending on the governmental body.  Many entities are now required to post notice on their websites. Some are also required to post meeting materials. Notice: Place of Posting

 The Act creates an exception to the 72-hour or 7-day posting requirements in the event of an emergency, which is defined as a situation when immediate action is required because of: An imminent threat to public health and safety; or A reasonably unforeseeable situation Notice: Emergency Meeting Exception

 Scenario A: City’s meeting notice is posted 2 ½ hours prior to an emergency meeting. The notice indicates that the city council’s “lack of confidence” in the city’s sole police officer “makes it an emergency or urgent public necessity.”  Scenario B: At a properly noticed city council meeting, the city council eliminates the position of a city employee. By the end of the meeting, the employee hands the council members the pleadings in the suit against the city. The city is formally served with the suit four days later and posts notice for a subsequent meeting with only two hours notice to discuss issues related to the lawsuit. Hypo: Does this constitute an emergency?

 When calling an emergency meeting: Post the notice two hours before the meeting Notify the media Clearly identify the emergency or urgent public necessity in the notice Notice: Emergency Meetings

 To convene a meeting, a quorum is required.  If members leave, resulting in the loss of a quorum, the meeting should be adjourned until a quorum is again present. Conducting Open Meetings

 The following governmental bodies are required to broadcast on the Internet or archive some meetings: General academic teaching institutions University systems Junior college districts with enrollment of more than 20,000 Certain transit authorities School district boards with student enrollment of 10,000 or more Home-rule municipalities with a population of 50,000 or more Counties with a population of 125,000 or more Conducting Open Meetings: Internet Broadcasting and Archiving

 Meetings must be: In a location within or reasonably close to the geographic boundaries of the governmental body Accessible to the public Accessible to individuals with disabilities Conducting Open Meetings: Location and Accessibility

 The following entities are allowed to hold certain meetings by teleconference, with restrictions: Governing board of an institution of higher education Governing board of junior college district Specific state agencies Any governmental body holding an emergency meeting if convening at one location of a quorum is difficult  Videoconferencing is permitted by all governmental bodies as long as the requirements of section are met. Conducting Open Meetings: Teleconferencing or Videoconferencing

 The public must be able to Attend Record by video, audio, or other means Conducting Open Meetings: Rights of the Public

 If allowing the public to speak, the governmental body may impose reasonable limits but cannot unfairly discriminate among speakers based on their views for or against a specific matter. Conducting Open Meetings: Public Comments or Speech

To the extent that closed meetings are permitted, they are only for purposes of deliberation. Any final action, decision, or vote on a matter deliberated in closed meeting must be conducted in an open meeting. Conducting Open Meetings: Final Actions

 A governmental body may meet in a closed meeting or executive session: When expressly authorized to do so by the Open Meetings Act When expressly authorized to do so by a statute outside the Act  The authority to meet in executive session may not be implied from a statute. Closed Meetings

 A governmental body may meet in a closed meeting to seek advice from its attorney: When discussing pending or contemplated litigation or a settlement offer, or When discussing a matter that requires the attorney to meet in a closed meeting in order to comply with the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Closed Meetings: The Attorney Consultation Exception

 Scenario A: An executive session is held under the attorney- consultation exception to discuss consequences and legal ramifications of termination of a contract with the city’s garbage services provider. Deliberations include merits of awarding a new contract to a different provider.  Scenario B: An executive session is held under the real estate exception by a city’s sports development committee to negotiate with owners of professional sporting teams regarding improvements to a city-owned arena. Deliberations include discussions about legislative initiatives to create special tax districts for additional tax revenue. Hypo: Is a closed session permitted?

 Post notice  Do not begin until a quorum is present  First convene in an open meeting  Identify in the open meeting the legal provision authorizing the governmental body to meet in closed session  Keep a certified agenda or make a tape recording as required by law Closed Meetings: Procedure

 Only members of the governmental body have a right to attend.  An employee may attend if the employee’s presence is: Necessary to the closed meeting, and Would not defeat its legal basis.  No one whose presence would undermine the legal basis for the closed meeting may attend. Closed Meetings: Who May Attend

 The Act requires a governmental body to make and keep a certified agenda or recording of most closed meetings  Certified agendas are required to indicate: The presiding officer announced the date and time at both the beginning and end of the meeting A statement of the subject matter of each deliberation A record of any further action taken The presiding officer has certified that the agenda is a true and correct record of the closed meeting  Recordings are required to include the presiding officer’s announcements of the date and time at both the beginning and end of the meeting Closed Meetings Certified Agenda or Recording

 A certified agenda or recording of a closed meeting is confidential and is not available to the public except by court order  A person who knowingly and without lawful authority makes a certified agenda or recording public commits a Class B misdemeanor  A certified agenda or recording shall be preserved for at least 2 years Closed Meeting: Certified Agenda or Recording

 Express authorization is required. Authority for a closed meeting may not be implied by statute.  Notice is required by the governmental body, even if it anticipates the entire meeting to be closed.  Closed meetings are limited to deliberations; no final actions.  A certified agenda or recording is required for most closed meetings. Closed Meetings: Review

 Criminal penalties exist for knowingly violating the Act: Failing to keep a certified agenda or recording Unlawfully disclosing a certified agenda or recording Holding or participating in an illegally closed meeting Circumventing the Act by meeting with numbers less than a quorum Criminal Penalties

 The Act permits a court to void any action taken in violation of the Act.  Individuals may sue to prevent threatened actions in violation of the Act. Remedies

 Scenario A: Judicial invalidation  Scenario B: Mandamus, injunction, or declaratory judgment  Scenario C: Criminal penalties Hypo: What happens if we fail to comply with the Act?

Toll Free (877) OPEN TEX (877) Views expressed are those of the presenters, do not constitute legal advice, and are not official opinions of the Office of the Texas Attorney General. Open Government Hotline