Peering BOF III William B. Norton Co-Founder, Chief Technical Liaison Equinix Inc. NANOG 19 Washington, DC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 How to Overcome Staff Objections Develop incentive program 1.$3-$7 for each ad you assumptivlly sell into the program for the first 30-days 2.Special.
Advertisements

What is your name? What is your job? What are your hobbies?
© Annie Patton Credit Cards One of the most popular forms of credit Next Slide.
Optimizing IP Transit for Online Video and “Donut Peering” Explained Grant Kirkwood – CTO, Mzima Networks Streaming Media East – May 13, 2009.
Selecting an IXP Where to peer?. THE TOP 10 IXP SELECTION CRITERIA How do network operators choose an Internet Exchange Point? 2.
Evolution 0.9: The Evolution of the U.S. Peering Ecosystem Gigabit Peering Forum VII Herndon, VA September 9, 2003 William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief.
The IX Playbook Observations from an IX Operative.
1 Auctions, I V.S. Subrahmanian. Fall 2002, © V.S. Subrahmanian 2 Auction Types Ascending auctions (English) Descending auctions (Dutch) Vickrey Auctions.
How to Write an Executive Summary (one that gets read) How to Write an Executive Summary (one that gets read) June 15, 2011.
Equinix Confidential - © 2012 Equinix Inc. Interconnection Markets RIPE 64, Ljubljana April 2012 Remco van Mook What Works & What Doesn’t.
Analysis of peering strategy adoption by transit providers in the Internet Aemen Lodhi (Georgia Tech) Amogh Dhamdhere (CAIDA) Constantine Dovrolis (Georgia.
The Folly of Peering Ratios? William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. From Debate…
Interconnection Strategies for ISPs William B. Norton Co-Founder, Chief Technical Liaison Workshop: A Practical Guide to Interconnect, Transit & Peering.
Peering vs Transit Economics : The Peering Simulation Game August :00-13:00 Nairobi, Kenya Sarova Panafric Hotel Nairobi
Welcome to Money Matters
A Business Case for Peering in 2010 William B. Norton Executive Director, DrPeering.net August 2010 Frankfurt, Germany 15 YEAR.
Internet Video: The Next Wave of Massive Disruption to the U.S. Peering Ecosystem William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc.
Scaling the Internet Core William B. Norton Co-founder and Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. William B. Norton Co-founder.
Mathematics Probability: Odds Science and Mathematics Education Research Group Supported by UBC Teaching and Learning Enhancement Fund Department.
JA Dollars With Sense. Overview IntroductionsExpectations Lesson 1: Let’s Talk Money Lesson 2: Be A SMART Shopper Lesson 3: Look After Your Money Lesson.
Honors Precalculus: Do Now 1.) You are betting with your friend. Every time you flip heads, your friend pays you a dollar. Every time you flip tails, you.
The Next Wave of Massive Disruptions to the Peering Ecosystem Tokyo Peering Forum II June 22, 2006 William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison.
Networking Essentials for Entrepreneurs MBC, January, 2009.
Financial Literacy 101 for Teens
Ergonomic Fix Ergonomics team changed design of part to completely eliminate this hazard No change in cost of part & cost savings of labor alone is $25,000.
March 16, 2014 Welcome to Strategies for Differentiating Instruction when Tutoring Presented by: Bev Strayer.
Do ATM-based Internet Exchanges Make Sense Anymore? William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc.
© XchangePoint 2001 Economic Differences Between Transit and Peering Exchanges Keith Mitchell Chief Technical Officer NANOG 25 10th June 2002.
Internet Policy Day 1 - Workshop Session No. 2 Market structure Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
Interconnection Strategies for ISPs William B. Norton Co-Founder, Director of Business Development NANOG 16 - Eugene, Oregon24-May-99 © Equinix, Inc
Internet Video: The Next Wave of Massive Disruption to the U.S. Peering Ecosystem William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc.
David Graham Finance.  David Graham  I am married with 4 children ranging from 5 to 15. I have been involved with Adventurers for 6 years. Starting.
The Max Legacy System Core Skills Needed Review & Practice for each Core Skill Resources for Support Your Commitment & SUCCESS Today’s Session.
The Evolution of the U.S. Internet Peering Ecosystem William B. Norton Co-Founder and Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc.
The Peering Simulation Game William B. Norton August 2010 Nairobi, Kenya Sarova Panafric Hotel Nairobi African Peering and Interconnection Forum:
Peering vs Transit Economics : The Peering Simulation Game August :00-13:00 Nairobi, Kenya Sarova Panafric Hotel Nairobi
Welcome! Help yourself to a snack. Discuss the following question until we begin at 1:30: What behaviors do you expect from your students as you teach.
Peering Policies - When to Peer, When not to Peer Quilt Peering Workshop October 2006 St Louis, Missouri.
Resilience of the Internet Interconnection Ecosystem Chris Hall Ross Anderson Richard Clayton Evangelos Ouzounis Panagiotis Trimintzios WEIS 14 th June.
An Overview of Peering; Benefits of Peering Andrew Ogilvie Managing Director, Xtraordinary Networks Ltd
Policies for Peering and Internet Exchanges AFIX Technical Workshop Session 8.
CS551: ISP Peering Norton01 Christos Papadopoulos (
Money Unit 5 What is Money? Money is something we use to buy things with. Money can be made of paper or metal.
25/07/2003BGP Table Manners 1 Interdomain Routing Politics for the Masses Dave Aaldering.
Note: The following presentation gives a brief overview of the NanoVenture rules. However, this presentation is not comprehensive. Players are encouraged.
Dolch Sight Word Assessment Adapted from Shanker, J. L., & Ekwall, E. E. (2003). Locating and correcting reading difficulties (8 th ed.). Upper Saddle.
The Use of $Money$ in the Virginia Colony SOL VS. 4d.
Sight Word List.
MORE FACTS ABOUT INVESTING PERSONAL FINANCE. EMERGENCY FUNDS  An ___________account needs to have a high degree of _______ and __________.  High safety.
The Great (Public vs. Private) Peering Debate Peering at 10G William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. RIPE 50 – Stockholm EIX-WG.
WOULD YOU PLAY THIS GAME? Roll a dice, and win $1000 dollars if you roll a 6.
Why SingTel Won’t Peer William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. Asia Pacific Peering Forum Singapore, Oct. 5, 2006 Slide Set.
A Business Case for Peering in 2004 (v0.7) William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. (V0.7), XChangePoint Europe October 28,
Analysis of peering strategy adoption by transit providers in the Internet Aemen Lodhi (Georgia Tech) Amogh Dhamdhere (CAIDA) Constantine Dovrolis (Georgia.
Growing global interconnection. TIWS All Telefonica’s subsidiaries are single homed with TIWS as IP transit provider All of them are eyeball networks.
HCI Prototype Presentation July 12, Agenda Concept Assumptions Prototype / Storyboard.
Billion Dollar Baby Game Created By: Timmy Drzewinski Edwin McCracken.
Employing Agent-based Models to study Interdomain Network Formation, Dynamics & Economics Aemen Lodhi (Georgia Tech) 1 Workshop on Internet Topology &
November 9, NANOG 14 - Atlanta, GA Commercial Grade Internet Facilities (CGIF) Project William B. Norton Co-Founder.
Case study #1 You and a friend have just watched a movie. You are leaving the cinema and notice a group of popular kids from your school who are all smoking.
ERPsim on Paper Léger, P.M. (2011) Introduction to the business processes, ERPsim on paper ERPsim Lab.
Welcome to Introduction to Psychology! Let’s share a bit about where we are all from…
Remote Peering William B. Norton Executive Director, DrPeering International Chief Strategy Officer, International Internet Exchange (IIX)
A Business Case for Peering
Peering Information: Some Data Points
The Evolution of the U.S. Internet Peering Ecosystem
Peering Information: Some Data Points
A Business Case for Peering in 2004 (v0.7)
Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison
Presentation transcript:

Peering BOF III William B. Norton Co-Founder, Chief Technical Liaison Equinix Inc. NANOG 19 Washington, DC

Rough Agenda for Peering BOF III 7:45 Introduction to the Peering Simulation Game: pick ISPs, Transit Providers, IXP Operator, rules 8:00 Play Simulation 8:50 Wrap up, post mortem 9:00 Adjourn to bar, meet Peering Coordinators To facilitate: 1.Green dots to ID as Company Peering Coordinator 2.White Paper: Peering Decision Tree 3.White Paper : Interconnection Strategies 4.Peering Contact Database exchange 5.Beer

The Peering Simulation Game William B. Norton

3 minute Intro to Peering Transit $$ ISP A ISP B Peering provides routes only to each others customers 1)Transit costs big bucks. (But it is a convenient plug in the wall that says “Internet  this way”) 2) Peering costs very little and reduces transit costs. 3) Q: Who to peer with and how to justify costs of peering? Upstream Transit Provider

A C B D Transit Provider X Transit Provider Y IXWIXE IXN IXS Y Y XX The Peering Game

3 Peering Simulation Game Rules 1.Goal: Maximize bank holdings. Make money by acquiring customers and reduce transit costs by peering 2.Play: Roll the dice and expand your network by selecting that many adjacent “squares” of customers Gain transit revenue of $2000 for each customer square you own Pay transit fees of $1000 for each square of traffic that other ISPs own 3. If at Exchange Point, two ISPs can negotiate peering: –$2000 recurring cost and loss of 2 turns, ISPs negotiates who covers the costs of peering –Peering ISPs do not have to pay transit for each others squares starting the next turn Quick round…

A C B D Transit Provider X Transit Provider Y IXWIXE IXN IXS Y Y XX AAAA A A rolls 5, Wants to peer w/B – moves to IXN Pays Transit on others squares (3*$1000) Receives revenue on 6 squares (6*$2000) $12,000 - $3,000 = $9,000

A C B D Transit Provider X Transit Provider Y IXWIXE IXN IXS Y Y XX AAAA A A rolls 5, Pays Transit on others squares (3*$1000) Receives revenue on 6 squares (6*$2000) $12,000 - $3,000 = $9,000 B rolls 3, Going to IXE Pays Transit on others squares (8*$1000) Receives revenue on 4 squares (4*$2000) $8,000 - $8,000 = $0 B B B

A C B D Transit Provider X Transit Provider Y IXWIXE IXN IXS Y Y XX AAAA A A rolls 5, Pays Transit on others squares (3*$1000) Receives revenue on 6 squares (6*$2000) $12,000 - $3,000 = $9,000 B rolls 3, Can get to IXE Pays Transit on others squares (8*$1000) Receives revenue on 4 squares (4*$2000) $8,000 - $8,000 = $0 B B B C rolls 6, Can get to IXW, likes IXS Pays Transit on others squares (11*$1000) Receives revenue on 7 squares (7*$2000) $14,000 - $11,000 = $3,000 C C C CC C

A C B D Transit Provider X Transit Provider Y IXWIXE IXN IXS Y Y XX AAAA A A rolls 5, Pays Transit on others squares (3*$1000) Receives revenue on 6 squares (6*$2000) $12,000 - $3,000 = $9,000 B rolls 3, Can get to IXE Pays Transit on others squares (8*$1000) Receives revenue on 4 squares (4*$2000) $8,000 - $8,000 = $0 B B B C rolls 6, Can get to IXW, IXS Pays Transit on others squares (11*$1000) Receives revenue on 4 squares (7*$2000) $14,000 - $11,000 = $3,000 C C C CC C D rolls 1, Late entrant heading to IXE Pays Transit on others squares (17*$1000) Receives revenue on 2 squares (2*$2000) $4,000 - $17,000 = -$13,000 D

Scoreboard after Round 1 ISP A: $9,000 ISP B: $0 ISPC: $3,000 ISPD: -$13,000 On to Round 2 

A C B D Transit Provider X Transit Provider Y IXWIXE IXN IXS Y Y XX AAAA A A rolls 5, Pays Transit on others squares (3*$1000) Receives revenue on 6 squares (6*$2000) $12,000 - $3,000 = $9,000 B rolls 3, Can get to IXE Pays Transit on others squares (8*$1000) Receives revenue on 4 squares (4*$2000) $8,000 - $8,000 = $0 B B B C rolls 6, Can get to IXW, IXS Pays Transit on others squares (11*$1000) Receives revenue on 4 squares (7*$2000) $14,000 - $11,000 = $3,000 C C C CCC D rolls 1, Late entrant heading to IXE Pays Transit on others squares (17*$1000) Receives revenue on 4 squares (2*$2000) $2,000 - $17,000 = -$15,000 D A rolls 3, Attaches to IXW Pays Transit on others squares (13*$1000) Receives revenue on 9 squares (9*$2000) $18,000 - $13,000 = $5,000 Wants to peer with C – split costs? YES: -$1,000 + both lose a turn Neither has to pay transit to each other! A A A C

A C B D Transit Provider X Transit Provider Y IXWIXE IXN IXS YC Y XBXA AAAA A A rolls 5, Pays Transit on others squares (3*$1000) Receives revenue on 6 squares (6*$2000) $12,000 - $3,000 = $9,000 B rolls 3, Can get to IXE Pays Transit on others squares (8*$1000) Receives revenue on 4 squares (4*$2000) $8,000 - $8,000 = $0 B B B C rolls 6, Can get to IXW, IXS Pays Transit on others squares (11*$1000) Receives revenue on 4 squares (7*$2000) $14,000 - $11,000 = $3,000 C C C CCC D rolls 1, Late entrant heading to IXE Pays Transit on others squares (17*$1000) Receives revenue on 4 squares (2*$2000) $2,000 - $17,000 = -$15,000 D A rolls 2, Attaches to IXW Pays Transit on others squares (13*$1000) Receives revenue on 8 squares (8*$2000) $16,000 - $13,000 = $3,000 Wants to peer with C – split costs? YES: -$1,000 both lose a turn Neither has to pay transit to each other A A B rolls 6, Attaches to IXE*IXN Pays Transit on others squares (21*$1000) Receives revenue on 10 squares (10*$2000) $20,000 - $21,000 = -$1,000 Wants to peer with A – split costs? NO: You pissed me off, Yes: if $0 & B lose both turns Both walk away B B B B B A Position 9 Revenue squares 1 lost turn Peering w/C reduced cost $8000/turn

Let’s play WELCOME TO BILLAND 4 ISPs that have never played before 2 transit providers that have played before 1 Exchange Point Operator that has played before Open Board $35,000 VC Funding We want to hear your thought process and peering negotiations Winner - prize

Play Game

Content Peering Transit $$ ISP A Tier 1 Content Peering provides routes only to each others customers ( asymmetric traffic, true,… But, both companies benefit ) 1)Transit costs big bucks. (But it is a convenient plug in the wall that says “Internet  this way”) 2) Peering costs very little and reduces transit costs. 3) Q: Who to peer with and how to justify costs of peering? Upstream Transit Provider

Content Peering Financial Model At Max: 100  $10/Mbps/mo 1000  $ 2/Mbps/mo Source: Qwest/L3 quotes for OC-3 Equinix GigE Peering Package (LINX/AMS-IX similar)

Beering BOF III Summary Cost of peering insignificant relative to long term savings of transit costs Peering Simulator vs. Peering Reality? Peering Coordinators –Green Dot – Willing to talk peering –Double Green Dot – Willing to buy beer! –Peering Contact Database – your card w/AS# White Papers Available –“Interconnection Strategies for ISPs” –“Peering Decision Tree” –Soon: “Content Peering” NANOG Survey Form – if you want Peering BOFs Let’s talk over BEER(s)!