Ch. 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Sec.2-3 Deductive Reasoning

Advertisements

EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment

2.5 If-Then Statements and Deductive Reasoning

Geometry 2.3 Big Idea: Use Deductive Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning. Objectives I can identify an example of inductive reasoning. I can give an example of inductive reasoning. I can identify an example.

Chapter 2 Geometric Reasoning

4.3 Warm Up Find the distance between the points. Then find the midpoint between the points. (5, 2), (3, 8) (7, -1), (-5, 3) (-9, -5), (7, -14)

2.3: Deductive Reasoning p Deductive Reasoning Use facts, definitions and accepted properties in logical order to write a logical argument.

Geometry Unit 2 Power Points Montero to 2.3 Notes and Examples Patterns, Conditional Statements, and BiConditional Statements Essential Vocabulary.

Section 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.

Introduction to Geometric Proof Logical Reasoning and Conditional Statements.

2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning. Objectives Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Syllogism Use the Law of Syllogism.

Holt McDougal Geometry 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures Holt Geometry Warm Up Warm Up.

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning Goal: You will use deductive reasoning to form a logical argument.

The Law of Detachment This applies when one statement is conditional and a second statement confirms the hypothesis of the conditional. The conclusion.

2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning Use deductive reasoning to form a logical argument.

Deductive Reasoning What can you D…D….D…. DEDUCE ?

Applying Deductive Reasoning Section 2.3. Essential Question How do you construct a logical argument?

Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.

Deductive Reasoning.  Conditional Statements can be written using symbolic notation  p represents hypothesis  q represents conclusion  is read as.

2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. What We Will Learn Use inductive reasoning Use deductive reasoning.

EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Detachment to make a valid conclusion in the true situation. If two segments have the same length, then.

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Notecard 30 Definition: Conjecture: an unproven statement that is based on observations or given information.

WARM UP. DEDUCTIVE REASONING LEARNING OUTCOMES I will be able to use the law of detachment and syllogism to make conjectures from other statements I.

C HAPTER Using deductive reasoning. O BJECTIVES Students will be able to: Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.

Holt Geometry 2-4 Biconditional Statements and Definitions Write and analyze biconditional statements. Objective.

Deductive Reasoning Geometry Chapter 2-3 Mr. Dorn.

Section 2.3: Deductive Reasoning

2.3 Deductive Reasoning p. 87 Reminders Statement Conditional statement Converse Inverse Contrapositive Biconditional Symbols p → q q → p ~p → ~q ~q.

Section 2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Definition: Conjecture an unproven statement that is based on observations or given information.

3/15/ : Deductive Reasoning1 Expectations: L3.1.1: Distinguish between inductive and deductive reasoning, identifying and providing examples of each.

Chapter 2 Section 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning. Deductive Reasoning Uses facts, definitions, accepted properties, and the laws of logic to form a logical.

Name vertical angles and linear pairs. Name a pair of complementary angles and a pair of supplementary angles.

Chapter 2, Section 1 Conditional Statements. Conditional Statement Also know as an “If-then” statement. If it’s Monday, then I will go to school. Hypothesis:

2.3 Warm Up Warm Up Lesson Quiz Lesson Quiz Lesson Presentation Lesson Presentation Apply Deductive Reasoning.

LG 1: Logic A Closer Look at Reasoning

Holt Geometry 2-3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures Chapter 2.3 – Deductive Reasoning.

Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.

Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3

1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of. “If

Section 2.3 – Deductive Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning, Postulates, and Proofs

2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

2-3 Deductive Reasoning Warm Up Lesson Presentation Lesson Quiz

Warm Up For this conditional statement: If a polygon has 3 sides, then it is a triangle. Write the converse, the inverse, the contrapositive, and the.

Reasoning Proof and Chapter 2 If ….., then what?

Deductive Reasoning.

2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.

} { Using facts, definitions, accepted properties and the

Applying Deductive Reasoning

Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3

Sec. 2.3: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Warmup Definition: Perpendicular Lines—

1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of. “If

1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the conditional below and determine the truth value for each. “If the measure of an angle is less.

EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment

Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.

2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Reasoning and Proofs Deductive Reasoning Conditional Statement

Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3

Learning Target Students will be able to: Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.

2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

2-4 Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning: Using facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions. Law of Detachment: A form.

Law of Detachment Law of Syllogism

EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Presentation transcript:

Ch. 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning GEOMETRY: CHAPTER 2 Ch. 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning uses facts, definitions, accepted properties, and the laws of logic to form a logical argument. This differs from inductive reasoning, which uses specific examples and patterns to form a conjecture.

KEY CONCEPT: LAWS OF LOGIC Law of Detachment—If the hypothesis of a true conditional statement is true, then the conclusion is also true.

Law of Syllogism: If hypothesis p, then conclusion q. If hypothesis q, then conclusion r. If hypothesis p, then conclusion r.

If two segments have the same length, then they are congruent. Ex. 1: Use the Law of Detachment to make a valid conclusion in the true situation. If two segments have the same length, then they are congruent. You know that BC=XY.

Ex. 1: Use the Law of Detachment to make a valid conclusion in the true situation. If two segments have the same length, then they are congruent. You know that BC=XY. Solution: Because BC=XY satisfies the hypothesis of a true conditional statement, the conclusion is also true. So,

Ex. 2. Use the Law of Detachment to make a valid conclusion in the true situation. Tim has a hockey game every Thursday evening. Today is Thursday. Step 1—Identify the hypothesis and the conclusion.

Ex. 2. (cont.) The hypothesis is “If it is a Thursday evening” and the conclusion is “then Tim has a hockey game.” “Today is Thursday” satisfies the hypothesis of the conditional statement. Therefore, you can conclude that Tim has a hockey game this evening.

So, Jane will get an A in chemistry. Ex. 3: If possible, use the Law of Syllogism to write a new conditional statement that follows from the pair of true statements. a. If Jane takes chemistry this year, Ana will be Jane’s lab partner. If Ana is Jane’s lab partner, then Jane will get an A in chemistry. So, Jane will get an A in chemistry.

Ex. 3. b. If x2 > 25, then x2 > 20. If x > 5, then x2 > 25. Solution: If x > 5, then x2 > 20.

If a polygon is regular, then all of its sides are congruent. Ex. 3 c. If a polygon is regular, then all angles in the interior of the polygon are congruent. If a polygon is regular, then all of its sides are congruent. Solution: Neither statement’s conclusion is the same as the other statement’s hypothesis. You cannot use the Law of Syllogism in this case. For more examples, go to: http://www.classzone.com/cz/books/geometry_2007_na/resources/applications/animations/2_3.html

Ex. 4 If you get an B+ or better on your math test, then you can go to the movies. If you go to the movies, then you can watch your favorite actor. If you get an B+ or better on your math test, then you can watch your favorite actor.

Ex. 4: State the law of logic that is illustrated. b. The value of x is 21. Therefore, x - 4 > 13. Law of Detachment.

Ex. 5: Use Inductive and Deductive Reasoning What conclusion can you make about the product of an even integer with any other integer? Step 1: Look for a pattern in several examples. Use Inductive Reasoning. (-4)(2)=-8, (-2)(2)=-4, (1)(2)=2, (3)(2)=6 Conjecture: Even integer times any integer is equal to an even integer.

Ex. 5 (cont.) Step 2—Let n and m be any integer. Use deductive reasoning to show the conjecture is true. 2n is an even integer because any integer multiplied by two is even. 2nm represents the product of an even integer and any integer m. 2nm is the product of 2 and an integer nm. So, 2nm is an even integer. The product of an even integer and any integer is an even integer.