Quantitative Synthesis II Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Systematic Review Module 10: Quantitative Synthesis II Thomas Trikalinos, MD, PhD Joseph Lau, MD Tufts EPC.
Advertisements

Quantitative Synthesis II: Interactive Quiz Thomas Trikalinos, MD, PhD Joseph Lau, MD Tufts EPC.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence on Diagnostic Tests Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for.
Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews.
Quantitative Synthesis II Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide
Exploring uncertainty in cost effectiveness analysis NICE International and HITAP copyright © 2013 Francis Ruiz NICE International (acknowledgements to:
When To Select Observational Studies as Evidence for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
1 ADDRESSING BETWEEN-STUDY HETEROGENEITY AND INCONSISTENCY IN MIXED TREATMENT COMPARISONS Application to stroke prevention treatments for Atrial Fibrillation.
ODAC May 3, Subgroup Analyses in Clinical Trials Stephen L George, PhD Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Duke University Medical Center.
Subgroup Analysis in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ISPOR Issues Panel May 17, 2004 Joseph Heyse John Cook Merck Research Laboratories.
Estimation and Reporting of Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare.
The Importance of Decision Analytic Modelling in Evaluating Health Care Interventions Mark Sculpher Professor of Health Economics Centre for Health Economics.
Decision Analysis as a Basis for Estimating Cost- Effectiveness: The Experience of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in the UK.
Validity Lecture Overview Overview of the concept Different types of validity Threats to validity and strategies for handling them Examples of validity.
Meta-Analysis and Meta- Regression Airport Noise and Home Values J.P. Nelson (2004). “Meta-Analysis of Airport Noise and Hedonic Property Values: Problems.
Assessing Quality of Individual Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic.
Topic Refinement Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide.
Analytic Frameworks Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide
Making all research results publically available: the cry of systematic reviewers.
Are the results valid? Was the validity of the included studies appraised?
Published in Circulation 2005 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Conservative Therapy in Nonacute Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis Demosthenes.
The Campbell Collaborationwww.campbellcollaboration.org Introduction to Robust Standard Errors Emily E. Tanner-Smith Associate Editor, Methods Coordinating.
Addressing missing participant data in systematic reviews: Part I – Dichotomous outcomes Elie Akl, Shanil Ebrahim, Bradley Johnston, Pablo Alonso, Matthias.
Study Designs Afshin Ostovar Bushehr University of Medical Sciences Bushehr, /4/20151.
Grading Strength of Evidence Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Tips and tricks for performing standard meta-regression analysis with SPSS Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine,
Finding Relevant Evidence
Appraising Randomized Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews October 12, 2012 Mary H. Palmer, PhD, RN, C, FAAN, AGSF University of North Carolina at Chapel.
Reporting the Review Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Presentation of Findings Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Quantitative Synthesis I Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Composite Scores of Asthma Control Michael Schatz, MD Michelle M. Cloutier, MD Co-Chairs.
Review of Research Methods. Overview of the Research Process I. Develop a research question II. Develop a hypothesis III. Choose a research design IV.
1 Subgroup Reporting in the General Medical Literature: Do Investigators Misinterpret Their Own Findings? Erik Fernandez y Garcia, MD MPH University of.
N-3fatty acids in cardiovascular disease DR.AMINI.
When To Select Observational Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic.
Analytic Frameworks Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
CAT 5: How to Read an Article about a Systematic Review Maribeth Chitkara, MD Rachel Boykan, MD.
Presentation of Findings: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Jeff Seroogy, BS Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center Joseph Lau,
Module 3 Finding the Evidence: Pre-appraised Literature.
Grading Strength of Evidence Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :呂宥達 Date : 2005/10/27.
Systematic Synthesis of the Literature: Introduction to Meta-analysis Linda N. Meurer, MD, MPH Department of Family and Community Medicine.
Finding, Evaluating, and Presenting Evidence Sharon E. Lock, PhD, ARNP NUR 603 Spring, 2001.
C-1 Efficacy of the Combination: Meta-Analyses Donald A. Berry, Ph.D. Frank T. McGraw Memorial Chair of Cancer Research University of Texas M.D. Anderson.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 18 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Research Design Evidence Based Medicine Concepts and Glossary.
AHRQ annual meeting September 10, 2008 Stephanie Chang MD, MPH Center for Outcomes and Evidence Conducting a methodologically sound systematic review with.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when and how to do them Andrew Smith Royal Lancaster Infirmary 18 May 2015.
A Synthesis of Annual Estimates of TIR and D for Wild Populations Presenter: Paul Wilson CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Assessing Applicability Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 27 Systematic Reviews of Research Evidence: Meta-Analysis, Metasynthesis,
PATHOLOGICAL AGING IN ELDERLY PEOPLE WITH ID. Aim of the Module 1.Learn about the most common diseases of old age; 2.Know how to avoid complications;
Acupuncture in Pain Management Zekeriya AKTÜRK Şifa University Medical Faculty, Department of Family Medicine 17 March 2016
Meta-analysis of observational studies Nicole Vogelzangs Department of Psychiatry & EMGO + institute.
Get with the Program! Software tools to modernize systematic reviews and meta-analyses Joseph Lau, MD Byron Wallace, PhD Nira Hadar, MS Tufts EPC / Brown.
Building an Evidence-Based Nursing Practice
Meta-Analysis of a Possible Signal of Increased Mortality Associated with Cefepime Use Peter W. Kim, Yu-te Wu, Charles Cooper, George Rochester, Thamban.
Data Extraction Interactive Quiz
Donald E. Cutlip, MD Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist
Research Rotation Part II
Boolean Logic Damian Gordon.
11/20/2018 Study Types.
Jun M, et al. Lancet 2010 Epub May 10
Study Eligibility Criteria Interactive Quiz
Publication Bias in Systematic Reviews
Module 4 Part 2 Selecting Measures
Presentation transcript:

Quantitative Synthesis II Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide

Assume that you are performing a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on vitamin D supplementation and mortality in elderly people who are institutionalized. You want to explore whether or not the treatment effect differs across trials according to their maximum followup. The maximum length of followup is: A.A patient-level covariate B.A study-level covariate Covariates

You should perform only the subgroup analyses that are specified a priori and not perform post- hoc subgroup analyses. A.False B.True Subgroup Analysis

Because of the risk of ecological fallacy, meta- regressions on patient-level covariates should never be performed. A.True B.False Meta-Regressions and the Risk of Ecological Fallacy

Mean 25-hydroxy-D Concentration Assessing Study Conclusions Based on this example, which of the following statements is more likely to be true? A. These conclusions are based on a well constructed meta-regression (see on the right) and are definitely valid. B. The analyses and conclusions are suspect.

 Meta-analyses require understanding of covariates and how to analyze them.  Patient-level covariates differ across patients in the same study or in the same study arm.  Study-level covariates pertain to the whole study and do not vary across patients in the same study.  Results of subgroup analyses should be viewed with skepticism, especially when adjustments for multiple testing have not been performed.  If an association from a meta-regression on the mean of a patient-level covariate is biologically plausible, it merits further study. Summary

 This quiz was prepared by Joseph Lau, M.D., and Thomas Trikalinos, M.D., Ph.D., members of the Tufts Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center.  The information in this module is based on Chapter 9 in Version 1.0 of the Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews (available at: es/2007_10DraftMethodsGuide.pdf). Authors