January 7, 2011 Review Nodal Exposure / Collateral as of end of December, 2010 Cheryl Yager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nodal Credit Limit Overview Credit Work Group May 28, 2008 Cheryl Yager.
Advertisements

1 Revisions to M2 and RT Final Component of UFTA CWG/MCWG ERCOT Public January 22, 2014.
NPRR 206 DAM Credit Requirements Reduction: E Values and Percentiles Luminant Proposal.
Credit Updates Vanessa Spells Credit Work Group ERCOT Public
MCWG Update to WMS 12/07/ Exposure / Collateral Update Nodal Total Potential Exposure reported by ERCOT as of 11/30/11 now exceeds the Zonal Estimated.
Automation and Improvements to Default Uplift Methodology (summary/white paper of a draft NPRR)
NPRR Proposed Changes TPTF Meeting 26 Aug 2008.
Potential Future Exposure (PFE) Q Presentation Randy Baker Director, Credit Risk 19 January 2010 ERCOT Board of Directors Meeting.
1 February 17, 2009 Review of Key ISO Credit Policies and Proposed Changes Review ERCOT Unsecured Credit Process.
Seasonal Adjustment Factor Mark Ruane Credit Work Group ERCOT Public July 23, 2014.
1 COMS/Settlements/Credit Weekly Update August 27, 2010.
December 2, 2011 QMWG Summary of Potential Issues with NPRR385 Price Floor ERCOT.
Market Trials - Friday call Credit and Treasury Weekly Update September 3, 2010.
Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation
September 2012 Proposed CRR Auction Credit Changes: Summary of Draft NPRR.
1 COMS/Settlements/Credit Weekly Update June 11, 2010.
WMS Subgroup – CRR Credit 3.Review of CRR margining methodology for PTP Obligations in Nodal Protocols 4.Potential credit margin alternatives Cheryl Yager.
1 NPRR 484/554 – Revisions to Congestion Revenue Rights Credit Calculations and Payments Market Call ERCOT Public July 31, 2013.
Board of Directors Credit Aspects of Mass Transition.
ERCOT Credit Loss Model Mark Ruane Credit Work Group / Market Credit Work Group ERCOT Public April 22, 2015.
1 COMS/Settlements/Credit Weekly Update May 21, 2010.
Bill Hellinghausen EDF Trading North America
MCWG Update to WMS 5/11/ Exposure / Collateral Update Nodal Total Potential Exposure reported by ERCOT as of 4/30/11 remains less than Zonal Estimated.
1 Weekly Market Call Weekly Update November 19, 2010.
Nodal Settlement Delta Calculations and Statements – 7/11/06 Workshop  Objective: Describe design concepts of nodal settlement delta calculations and.
Nodal Program Update and SEWG Update COPS 1/11/2011 Jim Galvin.
MCWG Update to WMS 6/15/ Exposure / Collateral Update Nodal Total Potential Exposure reported by ERCOT as of 4/30/11 remains less than Zonal Estimated.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department October 11, 2006.
1 COMS/Settlements/Credit Weekly Update July 2, 2010.
1 NPRR638 Back-casting Updated Results CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, ERP, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public April 22, 2015.
1 Draft NPRR – Revisions to Certain Price Components of EAL CWG/MCWG ERCOT Public January 22, 2014.
MCWG Update to WMS 08/14/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update -July 31 st Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review NPRRs All operational except – NPRR 552 – Additional.
October 20, 2010 WMS Credit Update. 2 Topics Nodal exposure – how much collateral CRR/TCR auctions – December 2010 Preliminary Credit Cutover Timeline.
1 Cutover Market Call November 29, :00 AM.
Resource Adequacy Task Force (RATF) Update to WMS June 12, 2013.
2% Shift Factor rule and associated price discrepancies Kris Dixit 1.
Highlights from TAC Credit Workshop Cheryl Yager March 6, 2008.
9/17/2012 CSWG CSWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT. 2 Settlements Project & Operational Updates February 27, 2012 NPRR 347: Combined Daily Invoice –Still on track.
MCWG Update to WMS 11/13/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update - October 30 th Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review September 25 Meeting Minutes - Approved.
1 Tab X ERCOT Confidential Credit Impact of Increased Caps The credit exposure impact of higher system-wide offer caps was estimated using an internal.
The credit exposure impact of higher system-wide offer caps was estimated using an internal ERCOT model under four scenarios: 1.(Base Case) “Normal” summer.
Market Credit Working Group update to the Wholesale Market Subcommittee 09/02/
Credit Updates Vanessa Spells Credit Work Group ERCOT Public December 16, 2015.
Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Oct 20, 2010.
1 Nodal Credit Update at WMS June 16, 2010.
ERCOT CWG/MCWG April 24, 2013 DAM Credit Parameters.
Total Potential Exposure (TPE) Overview Credit Work Group May 28, 2008 Cheryl Yager.
July 28, 2010 Market Readiness Seminar Credit Transition to Nodal (Preliminary)
1 Exposure Stress Testing CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public June 12, 2014.
MCWG Update to WMS 2/9/2010. Agenda Items Exposure / Collateral Status Update 1/26 MCWG/CWG Joint Meeting – Potential NPRR to enable expiring CRRs to.
October, 2011 MCWG/CWG Review of Abacus Loss Allocation ERCOT Mandy Bauld.
DAM and Nodal Collateral Requirements Concerns and Solutions December 7, 2009.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department September 28, 2006.
WMS – Nodal Credit Integration Start Up May 19,
Credit Exposure and Loss Given Default Mark Ruane Credit Work Group ERCOT Public November 18, 2015.
1 NPRR638 Back-casting Updated and Supplementary Results CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, ERP, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public May 20, 2015.
Credit Working Group Background Information Credit Aspects of Mass Transition Update – February 3, 2006.
Credit Exposure and Expected Loss update Suresh Pabbisetty, FRM, ERP, CQF, CSQA. Lead Technical Analyst, Credit February 17, 2016.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 02, :30 PM.
1 COMS/Settlements/Credit Weekly Update September 3, 2010.
Credit Updates Vanessa Spells Credit Work Group ERCOT Public May 18, 2016.
Day Ahead Market QSE’s Credit Requirements Concerns and Solutions August 14, 2008.
MCWG Update to WMS 3/9/2010. Exposure / Collateral Update Nodal Total Potential Exposure reported by ERCOT as of 1/31/11 remains less than Zonal Estimated.
Credit Reports Vanessa Spells COPS Meeting ERCOT Public
2017 Seasonal Adjustment Factors
DALE MCWG / CWG 3/10/2010.
Credit Updates Vanessa Spells Credit Work Group ERCOT Public
COMS/Settlements/Credit
NPRR829 Incorporate Real-Time Telemetered Net Generation for Non-Modeled Generation into the Real-Time Liability Estimate ERCOT PRS Meeting May 11, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

January 7, 2011 Review Nodal Exposure / Collateral as of end of December, 2010 Cheryl Yager

2 ERCOT Market Credit Status January 7, 2011

3 Benchmark Report as of December 31, 2010 January 7, 2011

4 Appendix January 7, 2011

5 Background Section 16 - total potential exposure (TPE) covers both historical risk and forward risk –Historical exposure may be invoiced or estimated (if invoices have not been generated) –Forward risk is, in large part, estimated based on historical activity in the “Core” credit calculation Underlying assumption - history is a reasonable predictor of the future (e.g. if an entity has been in the ERCOT market at 20% of its load, it is appropriate to assume they will be in the ERCOT market at 20% of load in the future) Key drivers of forward risk include volume and price Situations may arise when historical trends may not be the best predictor of future risk –Very low volume (or very low prices) in ERCOT market may result in a collateral requirement that is less than forward risk –Very high volume (or very high prices) in ERCOT market may result in a collateral requirement that is greater than forward risk January 7, 2011

6 Reasonableness Test - Benchmark To help evaluate the reasonableness of the calculated TPE in the new market, ERCOT has developed a “benchmark” tool –Data used in the report is from the CMM system –A CP’s TPE will be reviewed relative to a low end and a high end exposure calculation Generally expect most TPEs to be between the low and high end estimates The high end exposure relates to some level of default risk This tool is still a work in process and will be adapted over time ERCOT plans to use this tool to –Identify trends in the overall market –Identify individual CP’s TPE to review »The fact that a TPE is outside the range does not mean that an adjustment will be made, just that ERCOT will review the activity »May also identify calibrations to be made to the tool –In unusual or stress scenarios (as were experienced in Feb/Mar 2003, May, 2008), provide points of reference for level of adjustment »Benchmark report may be adapted as situations develop (e.g. If prices are expected to remain high, price factor in benchmark may be adjusted) January 7, 2011

7 Benchmark tool assumptions January 7, 2011 Low end TPE benchmark 1.Estimate of net historical activity (e.g. both positive and negative) PLUS 2.Low end estimate of forward liability Differs based on activity (load and generation or entities without load or generation) CP’s calculated FCE is included “as is” to address CRR risk High end TPE benchmark 1.Estimate of net historical activity (e.g. both positive and negative) PLUS 2.High end estimate of forward activity Differs based on activity (load and generation or entities without load or generation) CP’s calculated FCE is included “as is” to address CRR risk Note: The high end estimate is not intended to capture the maximum liability that can be incurred but a reasonable estimate of high end risk

8 Benchmark tool – historical estimates Historical activity includes –OIA – Outstanding Invoices –UDAA – Unbilled Day Ahead Activity –RTLCS – Real Time Completed and Settled activity (but not invoiced) from AIL –RTLCNS – Real Time Completed Not Settled activity from AIL –UFTA – Unbilled Final and True-Up Activity –PUL – Potential Uplift Historical data used in estimating forward risk (from CMM) –Average load volume over last 30 days –High load volume over last 30 days –Average generation volume over last 30 days –High generation volume over last 30 days –Average RT imbalance volume over last 30 days –High RT imbalance over last 30 days –Average RT price over last 30 days (CP specific – derived as total RT liability / RT volume in AIL report) Note: Volume data is settled data where available, RTL estimates from AIL report for days not yet settled January 7, 2011

9 Benchmark tool – forward risk CPs with LoadCPs with GenerationCPs w/o Load or Generation or with more imbalance than load/gen Low end Avg Load x 2 days x [(|Avg RT Price| x 1.0 – with a floor of $25 and a cap of $100] Avg Gen x.2 x 2 days x [(|Avg RT Price| x 1.0 – with a floor of $25 and a cap of $100] Avg Imbal x 2 days x [(|Avg RT Price| x 1.0 – with a floor of $25 and a cap of $100] High end High Load x 9 days x [(|Avg RT Price| x 1.5 – with a floor of $25 and a cap of $100] High Gen x.2 x 9 days x [(|Avg RT Price| x 1.5 – with a floor of $25 and a cap of $100] [(High Imbal) x 6 * days + [highest DAM sales for past 30 days x 2] x [(|Avg RT Price| x 1.5 – with a floor of $25 and a cap of $100] January 7, CPs with both load and generation will use the greater of columns 1 or 2 above. 2 CPs with no load and no generation will use the calculation described in column 3 3 CPs with some load or generation but with more imbalance volume than the absolute value of the sum of their load and generation, will use the higher of column1, 2 or 3 (and the high end estimate is based on 9 days in both calculations) Note: The above assumptions are as of December 31, All factors are subject to change as the tool evolves.